MITRE Company CyberSecurity Posture

mitre.org
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

The MITRE Corporation is working to solve some of the nation’s biggest challenges in defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, homeland security, the judiciary and transportation. MITRE is a not-for-profit corporation committed to the public interest, operating federally funded R&D centers on behalf of U.S. government sponsors. To learn more, visit www.mitre.org.

MITRE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MITRE

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

mitre

Website:

http://www.mitre.org/

Employees number:

9,312

Number of followers:

234,635

NAICS:

5417

Industry Type:

Research Services

Homepage:

mitre.org

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MIT_5275633

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMITRE Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitre.jpeg
MITRE Research Services
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreMITRE Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitre.jpeg
MITRE Research Services
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

MITRE

Fair
Current Score
772
Baa (Fair)
01000
2 incidents
-3.0 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

JANUARY 2026
772
DECEMBER 2025
772
NOVEMBER 2025
772
OCTOBER 2025
772
SEPTEMBER 2025
771
AUGUST 2025
771
JULY 2025
771
JUNE 2025
775
Vulnerability
18 Jun 2025 • Spotify, Mitre and Splunk: Misconfigured GitHub Actions could leave repos and secrets exposed, Sysdig finds • DEVCLASS
GitHub Repositories Vulnerable to Hijacking via Insecure pull_request_target Workflows

**GitHub Repositories at Risk: Sysdig Uncovers Critical Workflow Vulnerabilities** Sysdig researchers have identified a significant security risk in GitHub repositories, where improperly configured workflows could allow attackers to hijack projects by exploiting the `pull_request_target` event in GitHub Actions. Unlike the standard `pull_request` trigger—which runs in the context of a merge commit—`pull_request_target` executes in the base branch (typically the default branch) and has access to repository secrets and write permissions via the `GITHUB_TOKEN`. The vulnerability arises when maintainers use `pull_request_target` to test untrusted code from public contributors, inadvertently exposing sensitive credentials. If misconfigured, attackers could inject malicious code, exfiltrate secrets, and gain elevated privileges within the repository. Sysdig’s investigation revealed multiple affected projects, including: - **Spotipy**, an open-source Python library for the Spotify Web API, where researchers demonstrated the ability to execute malicious Python packages and steal the `GITHUB_TOKEN`. The flaw has since been patched. - **Mitre’s cyber analytics repository**, where attackers could exfiltrate the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and other secrets, potentially gaining full control. Mitre addressed the issue promptly. - **Splunk’s security_content repository**, where two secrets were exposed, though the extracted `GITHUB_TOKEN` had limited read-only access. Stefan Chierici, Sysdig’s threat research lead, warned that the impact depends on the privileges of the extracted token. In severe cases, attackers could modify workflows, exfiltrate additional secrets, or alter files in the main branch—effectively taking over the repository. While `pull_request_target` can be used safely, its nuances require careful handling to avoid exploitation. Sysdig has reported additional vulnerable repositories and is awaiting remediation before disclosing further details. The findings underscore the need for maintainers to audit their GitHub Actions workflows for potential misconfigurations.

770
high -5
SPOMITSPL1767777752
Incident Details -
Type
Supply Chain Attack
Attack Vector
Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target)
Vulnerability Exploited
Insecure use of pull_request_target in GitHub Actions workflows
Impact
Data Compromised: Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN), potentially other sensitive data Systems Affected: GitHub repositories with misconfigured workflows Operational Impact: Potential repository takeover, unauthorized code modifications, and secret exfiltration Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for affected projects and maintainers
Response
Third Party Assistance: Sysdig researchers assisted in identifying and reporting vulnerabilities Containment Measures: Flaws were fixed by the respective maintainers (Spotify, Mitre, Splunk) Remediation Measures: Correcting misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows to prevent secret exfiltration
Data Breach
Type Of Data Compromised: Repository secrets (e.g., GITHUB_TOKEN), potentially other sensitive data Sensitivity Of Data: High (secrets could lead to repository takeover) Data Exfiltration: Yes (secrets were exfiltrated in proof-of-concept attacks)
Lessons Learned
Maintainers must fully understand the security implications of GitHub Actions workflows, particularly pull_request_target, and use them with caution. Misconfigurations can lead to severe security risks, including repository takeover.
Recommendations
Audit GitHub Actions workflows for insecure use of pull_request_target Limit GITHUB_TOKEN permissions to the minimum required Use pull_request_target only when absolutely necessary and with proper safeguards Monitor for unauthorized access or modifications to workflows
Investigation Status
['Ongoing (additional findings to be disclosed after remediation)']
Initial Access Broker
Entry Point: Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target)
Post Incident Analysis
Root Causes: Misunderstanding of pull_request_target security implications, overprivileged GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and lack of workflow audits Corrective Actions: Fixing misconfigured workflows, reducing GITHUB_TOKEN permissions, and educating maintainers on secure workflow practices
References
Blog URL Source URL
MAY 2025
775
Vulnerability
13 May 2025 • MITRE Corporation
Launch of European Union's Vulnerability Database and Concerns Over CVE Program Funding

The MITRE Corporation faced a critical funding crisis for its **CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) Program**, a cornerstone of global cybersecurity infrastructure used by vendors, governments, and critical infrastructure entities to track and prioritize vulnerabilities. The U.S. federal government initially appeared unwilling to renew MITRE’s contract, risking the shutdown of the CVE program—halting new vulnerability entries and eventually taking the platform offline. While historical CVE records would remain accessible via GitHub, the disruption would sever a vital resource for real-time threat intelligence, leaving organizations worldwide exposed to unpatched vulnerabilities without centralized tracking.The temporary 11-month contract extension by CISA averted immediate collapse, but the uncertainty underscored systemic risks: reliance on a single entity for a foundational cybersecurity service, potential exploitation gaps during transitions, and the broader fragility of public-private partnerships in critical infrastructure. ENISA’s parallel launch of the **European Vulnerability Database** further highlighted the urgency of decentralizing such dependencies, as MITRE’s near-lapse revealed how a funding lapse could cascade into global cybersecurity blind spots, delaying patch management and increasing attack surfaces for threat actors.

774
critical -1
MIT3490134112625
Incident Details -
Type
Vulnerability Management Operational Risk
Impact
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to global vulnerability tracking and response prioritization if CVE program funding lapses; historical records would remain available on GitHub but no new CVEs would be added. Brand Reputation Impact: Concerns raised within the cybersecurity community about the reliability and continuity of critical vulnerability databases (CVE program).
Response
Third Party Assistance: ENISA in contact with MITRE to assess impact and next steps. Remediation Measures: Temporary 11-month contract extension for MITRE to continue operating the CVE program; historical CVE records to remain available on GitHub if funding lapses. Communication Strategy: Public statements by ENISA and MITRE; media coverage by Recorded Future News.
Lessons Learned
The incident highlights the critical dependency of the global cybersecurity ecosystem on centralized vulnerability databases like the CVE program. It underscores the need for sustainable funding models and contingency planning to ensure continuity of essential cybersecurity infrastructure. Collaboration between regional entities (e.g., ENISA) and global programs (e.g., MITRE) is vital for resilience.
Recommendations
Establish long-term funding mechanisms for critical cybersecurity utilities like the CVE program to prevent operational disruptions. Develop redundant or distributed vulnerability databases to mitigate single points of failure. Enhance transparency in contract renewals and funding allocations for foundational cybersecurity programs. Foster international cooperation to share vulnerability data and reduce reliance on any single entity. Encourage private-sector contributions to support public-good cybersecurity initiatives.
Investigation Status
['Ongoing coordination between ENISA and MITRE; CVE program operations secured for 11 months via temporary contract extension.']
Stakeholder Advisories
Cybersecurity vendors, governments, and critical infrastructure entities advised to monitor updates from ENISA and MITRE regarding the CVE program's future.
Post Incident Analysis
Uncertainty in federal funding for the CVE program, leading to potential operational gaps. Lack of a backup or distributed system to ensure continuity of vulnerability tracking. Dependency on a single non-profit organization (MITRE) for a critical global cybersecurity utility. Temporary contract extension by CISA to maintain CVE program operations. ENISA's launch of the European Vulnerability Database as a complementary notification platform. Ongoing discussions between ENISA and MITRE to address long-term sustainability.
References
Blog URL Source URL
APRIL 2025
775
MARCH 2025
775
FEBRUARY 2025
775

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for MITRE is 772, which corresponds to a Fair rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for December 2025 was 772.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 772.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 772.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 771.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 771.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 771.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 775.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 775.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 775.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 775.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 775.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on MITRE’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -3.0 points.

You can access MITRE’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mitre.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view MITRE’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mitre.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.