Comparison Overview

MITRE

VS

The University of Edinburgh

MITRE

7515 Colshire Dr, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The MITRE Corporation is working to solve some of the nation’s biggest challenges in defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, homeland security, the judiciary and transportation. MITRE is a not-for-profit corporation committed to the public interest, operating federally funded R&D centers on behalf of U.S. government sponsors. To learn more, visit www.mitre.org.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 9,312
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

The University of Edinburgh

Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh, GB, EH8 9YL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Imagine what you could do at a world-leading university that is globally recognised for its teaching, research and innovation. The University of Edinburgh has been providing students with world-class teaching for more than 425 years, unlocking the potential of some of the world's leading thinkers since 1583. Choose to study with us and you will be investing in an education that will help you build a successful future.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 15,886
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitre.jpeg
MITRE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-edinburgh.jpeg
The University of Edinburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MITRE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The University of Edinburgh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MITRE in 2026.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Edinburgh in 2026.

Incident History — MITRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MITRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The University of Edinburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Edinburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitre.jpeg
MITRE
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured GitHub Actions workflows (pull_request_target)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-edinburgh.jpeg
The University of Edinburgh
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Edinburgh company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MITRE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MITRE company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of Edinburgh company has not reported any.

In the current year, The University of Edinburgh company and MITRE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The University of Edinburgh company nor MITRE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The University of Edinburgh company nor MITRE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The University of Edinburgh company nor MITRE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

MITRE company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while The University of Edinburgh company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of Edinburgh company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MITRE company.

The University of Edinburgh company employs more people globally than MITRE company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MITRE nor The University of Edinburgh holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H