Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink » MIC1770890241

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MIC1770890241)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-23
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident729 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMIC1770890241
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORMalicious Office Add-in (Supply Chain Attack)
DATA EXPOSED4,000+ login credentials, credit card...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2021
STATUSOngoing (researchers accessed exfiltration channel)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink breach identified under incident ID MIC1770890241.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-outlook-365, the number of followers: 64, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 729 with a difference of -23 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Email Signature Management for Microsoft 365 / Outlook / Entra ID | by Xink and their customers.

Microsoft recently reported "Microsoft Outlook Add-In Hijacked to Steal Thousands of Credentials and Payment Data", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Security researchers at Koi Security uncovered a novel attack leveraging a dormant Microsoft Outlook add-in to harvest over 4,000 login credentials, credit card numbers, and banking security answers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Microsoft Outlook with AgreeTo add-in installed, and exposing 4,000+ login credentials, credit card numbers, banking security answers, IP addresses, with nearly 4,000+ records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Microsoft removed the add-in from its store.

The case underscores how Ongoing (researchers accessed exfiltration channel), teams are taking away lessons such as Office add-ins function as remote dynamic dependencies, allowing content to change without oversight. Microsoft’s security review process only validates manifests upon initial submission, leaving room for post-deployment tampering, and recommending next steps like Implement ongoing security validation for third-party add-ins, Monitor for expired domains associated with add-ins and Restrict add-in permissions to least privilege.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including attack leveraging a dormant Microsoft Outlook add-in, and expired domain takeover (outlook-one.vercel.app) and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fake Microsoft sign-in page loaded inside Outlook via iframe. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating phishing page captured credentials and transmitted them to attacker and Adversary-in-the-Middle: LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay (T1557.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential access to read/modify users’ emails (ReadWriteItem permissions). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating harvested over 4,000 login credentials, credit card numbers, banking security answers and Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating readWriteItem permissions granted potential access to emails. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating transmitted stolen data to attacker via Telegram bot. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing Policy Modification (T1553.006) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malicious content change went undetected due to lack of ongoing validation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but ReadWriteItem permissions existed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Credential Access
Input Capture: Keylogging (90%)
Adversary-in-the-Middle: LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay (30%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Defense Evasion
Subvert Trust Controls: Code Signing Policy Modification (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (20%)

Sources & References