ESMMOEIX A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
ESMMOEIX
Company Information
Website:https://www.xink.io/microsoft365/
Employees number:None
Number of followers:66
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:xink.io
ESMMOEIX Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
ESMMOEIXIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
08/08/2026
08/08/2026
745/1000
Moderate
Ba
ESMMOEIX Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
ESMMOEIXIT Services and IT Consulting
Score locked

ESMMOEIXModerate
Current Score
745Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
750
Vulnerability
06 Aug 2026 • ESMMOEIX
Yahoo, AOL, Fastmail, Google and Microsoft: New CSS Attacks Can Break Webmail Defenses to Steal Passwords and Tokens
New Webmail Exploits Bypass Security Boundaries, Risking Data Theft and Account Takeovers
745
CRITICAL-5
AOLMICYAHFASGOO1786188226
New Webmail Exploits Bypass Security Boundaries, Risking Data Theft and Account Takeovers
Research presented at Black Hat USA 2026 by PortSwigger’s Gareth Heyes reveals critical vulnerabilities in major webmail platforms including Outlook, Gmail, Fastmail, Proton Mail, Yahoo Mail, and AOL Mail that allow malicious content within emails to escape message boundaries and manipulate trusted interfaces. The findings, published on August 6, demonstrate how attackers could steal passwords, hijack third-party accounts, leak tokens, and exploit AI tools processing emails.
### Key Attack Vectors
1. Outlook (Firefox Chain)
- A proof-of-concept (PoC) spoofs a Microsoft sign-in screen, capturing passwords as users type. The attack leverages label elements, custom attributes, and media-query parsing tricks to bypass sanitization, disguising a select element as a password field. Firefox’s option-selection timer reset enables real-time credential theft.
2. Yahoo/AOL (Paste Race Condition)
- In Firefox, pasted HTML retains active CSS briefly before sanitization, allowing attackers to extract Medium email-login tokens. The victim copies attacker-supplied CSS into a draft, triggering requests that reveal enough of the 12-character token for reconstruction and account takeover.
3. Gmail (AI-Powered Exfiltration)
- A prompt-injection attack via Anthropic’s Claude Cowork (connected to Gmail) tricks the AI into retrieving a Slack token from a confirmation email. The token is placed in an HTML draft, and viewing it leaks the data. The exploit abuses Gmail’s `image-set()` fallback to bypass sanitization.
4. Fastmail (CSS Hotwiring & AI Manipulation)
- CSS pseudo-elements and opacity tricks deceive OpenAI’s Atlas AI (deprecated as of August 9, 2026) into executing hidden instructions. When a user asks Atlas to translate visible text, the AI instead opens tabs and encodes the victim’s name in URLs.
- "CSS hotwiring" redirects clicks to unintended UI actions, while an image-proxy bypass (via the `user.fm` domain) reveals email-viewing activity.
5. Proton Mail (IP Leak)
- A separate exploit exposes the recipient’s IP address, contradicting Proton’s claim of hiding personal IPs and exact open times.
### Defensive Gaps & Mitigations
While Fastmail patched two CSS mutation bugs and a Proton Mail proxy bypass was neutralized, several vulnerabilities remain unaddressed:
- Outlook’s label-jacking and Gmail’s `image-set()` bypass still function.
- The full Outlook password-capture chain’s fix status is unclear.
The research highlights two primary attack paths:
- Abusing allowed HTML/CSS in webmail interfaces.
- Exploiting discrepancies between sanitizer approvals and browser rendering.
### Recommended Defenses
The paper advises webmail providers to:
- Isolate HTML emails in sandboxed iframes.
- Restrict CSS, custom attributes, select menus, and image requests.
- Use character allow lists for CSS validation and block dangerous selectors.
- Prevent attacker-controlled image requests via allow-listed domains.
Public PoCs for the disclosed techniques remain available as of August 8, though no active malicious exploitation has been reported. The findings underscore the need for strict boundary enforcement between untrusted email content and trusted interfaces.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2026
750
JUNE 2026
750
MAY 2026
750
APRIL 2026
750
MARCH 2026
750
FEBRUARY 2026
749
JANUARY 2026
749
DECEMBER 2025
749
NOVEMBER 2025
749
OCTOBER 2025
749
SEPTEMBER 2025
749
JANUARY 2022
752
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2022 • ESMMOEIX
Microsoft: Microsoft Outlook Add-In Stolen 4000 Accounts and Credit Card Numbers
Microsoft Outlook Add-In Hijacked to Steal Thousands of Credentials and Payment Data
730
CRITICAL-22
MIC1770890241
Microsoft Outlook Add-In Hijacked to Steal Thousands of Credentials and Payment Data
Security researchers at Koi Security uncovered a novel attack leveraging a dormant Microsoft Outlook add-in to harvest over 4,000 login credentials, credit card numbers, and banking security answers. The incident marks the first known malicious Office add-in discovered in the wild, exposing a critical flaw in Microsoft’s third-party tool distribution.
The attack centered on AgreeTo, a legitimate meeting-scheduling add-in published to the Microsoft Office Add-in Store in 2022. After the developer abandoned the project and its hosting domain expired, the subdomain (`outlook-one.vercel.app`) became available for registration. An attacker claimed the domain and replaced the original tool with a fake Microsoft sign-in page, which loaded inside Outlook via an iframe for all existing users.
Microsoft’s security review process only validates an add-in’s manifest file upon initial submission, meaning the malicious content change went undetected. The phishing page captured credentials and transmitted them to the attacker via a Telegram bot. Researchers accessed the exfiltration channel, recovering stolen data including Microsoft account logins, payment details, and IP addresses while the attackers were actively testing the credentials.
Though Microsoft removed the add-in from its store, the phishing infrastructure remained operational outside it. The AgreeTo manifest had ReadWriteItem permissions, granting potential access to read or modify users’ emails, though the attackers only deployed a basic phishing scheme. The incident underscores a broader vulnerability in software supply chains: Office add-ins function as remote dynamic dependencies, allowing content to change without Microsoft’s oversight.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for ESMMOEIX ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on ESMMOEIX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with ESMMOEIX ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view ESMMOEIX's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?