ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Efficient solutions that fit your business. ☁️ Follow along for the latest news and updates from the trusted #MSCloud team.

Microsoft Cloud A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Microsoft Cloud

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

microsoft-cloud-platform

Employees number:

2

Number of followers:

665,119

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

microsoft.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

MIC_1234855

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMicrosoft Cloud Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-cloud-platform.jpeg
Microsoft Cloud Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreMicrosoft Cloud Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-cloud-platform.jpeg
Microsoft Cloud Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Microsoft Cloud Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
63
Attack Types
5
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
GitHubBreach6023/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.

GitHubBreach8542/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.

GitHubBreach100604/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.

GitHubBreach10057/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub’s response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.

GitHubCyber Attack6024/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The **Banana Squad** threat group, active since April 2023, compromised over **60 GitHub repositories** by trojanizing them with **malicious Python-based hacking kits**. These repositories masqueraded as legitimate hacking tools but contained **hidden backdoor payloads**, designed to deceive developers and security researchers into downloading and executing them. The attack leveraged **supply-chain compromise tactics**, exploiting GitHub’s open-source ecosystem to distribute malware under the guise of trusted repositories. The campaign, uncovered by **ReversingLabs**, revealed that the fake repositories mimicked well-known tools, embedding **stealthy backdoor logic** that could grant attackers unauthorized access to systems, exfiltrate data, or deploy further payloads. While the **direct financial or operational damage to GitHub itself remains undisclosed**, the incident poses **severe reputational risks** to the platform, eroding trust among developers who rely on GitHub for secure code sharing. Additionally, **downstream victims**—developers or organizations that unknowingly integrated the trojanized tools—face potential **data breaches, system compromises, or lateral attacks** stemming from the malicious payloads. The attack underscores vulnerabilities in **open-source supply chains**, where threat actors exploit **typosquatting and repository spoofing** to distribute malware. Though no **large-scale data leaks or ransomware demands** were reported, the **deception-based nature of the attack** and its potential to enable **follow-on cyber intrusions** classify it as a **high-severity reputational and operational threat** to GitHub’s ecosystem.

GitHubCyber Attack8549/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The **GhostAction attack** compromised **327 GitHub accounts**, leading to the theft of **3,325 secrets**, including **PyPI, npm, DockerHub, GitHub tokens, Cloudflare, and AWS keys**. The attack began with the hijacking of the **FastUUID project**, where the maintainer’s account was breached to inject a malicious **GitHub Actions workflow** named *‘Add Github Actions Security workflow’*—designed to exfiltrate sensitive credentials. GitGuardian detected the campaign, reported it to GitHub, and disrupted the operation by rendering the exfiltration server unresponsive. While **100 of 817 affected repositories** reverted malicious changes, **573 repositories** were alerted via issue notifications (others were deleted or had issues disabled). The attack exposed **API keys, access tokens, and deployment secrets**, risking downstream supply-chain compromises. A separate but unrelated **NPM-based *s1ngularity* attack** hit **2,000 accounts** concurrently, though no overlap was found between victims.

GitHubCyber Attack10058/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The North Korean-linked Famous Chollima APT group exploited GitHub's infrastructure to distribute malicious NPM packages, targeting job seekers and organizations. By posing as legitimate recruiters, they tricked victims into downloading malware disguised as technical evaluation tools. The attack involved the InvisibleFerret backdoor, which established encrypted command-and-control communication, enabling data exfiltration and remote access. The campaign compromised software developers and IT professionals, leveraging their access to sensitive organizational resources. This breach highlights vulnerabilities in supply chain security and social engineering defenses within development communities.

GitHubCyber Attack10057/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies.

GitHubCyber Attack100508/2015
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.

GitHubCyber Attack100511/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A sophisticated **typosquatting attack** targeted GitHub via a malicious npm package **‘@acitons/artifact’** (mimicking the legitimate **‘@actions/artifact’**), accumulating **206,000+ downloads** before removal. The attack exploited developers mistyping dependency names, deploying a **post-install hook** that executed obfuscated malware undetected by antivirus tools (0/60 on VirusTotal at discovery). The malware, compiled via **Shell Script Compiler (shc)**, checked for **GitHub-specific environment variables** (e.g., build tokens) and exfiltrated **authentication tokens** from GitHub Actions workflows. These tokens could enable attackers to **publish malicious artifacts under GitHub’s identity**, risking a **cascading supply chain compromise**. The campaign used **hardcoded expiry dates** (Nov 6–7, 2023) and **AES-encrypted exfiltration** via a GitHub App endpoint, evading detection. The attack directly threatened **GitHub’s CI/CD infrastructure**, with potential downstream risks to **repositories, developers, and enterprise customers** relying on GitHub Actions. While GitHub removed the malicious packages and users, the incident highlights critical vulnerabilities in **dependency trust models** and the escalating threat of **supply chain attacks** (OWASP Top 10 2025).

GitHubData Leak25101/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.

GitHubData Leak50105/2018
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files.

GitHubRansomware100405/2019
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.

GitHubVulnerability5027/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, allowing attackers to achieve remote code execution through maliciously crafted repositories when users execute git clone –recursive commands. This vulnerability, assigned a CVSS severity score of 8.1/10, exploits a flaw in Git's handling of configuration values and carriage return characters. Public proof-of-concept exploits are available, and urgent remediation is required across development environments.

GitHub (Microsoft)Vulnerability8548/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: GitHub’s **Copilot Chat**, an AI-powered coding assistant, was found vulnerable to a critical flaw named **CamoLeak** (CVSS 9.6), allowing attackers to exfiltrate secrets, private source code, and unpublished vulnerability details from repositories. The exploit leveraged GitHub’s invisible markdown comments in pull requests or issues—content hidden from human reviewers but parsed by Copilot Chat. By embedding malicious prompts, attackers tricked the AI into searching for sensitive data (e.g., API keys, tokens, zero-day descriptions) and encoding it as sequences of 1x1 pixel images via GitHub’s **Camo image-proxy service**. The attack bypassed GitHub’s **Content Security Policy (CSP)** by mapping characters to pre-generated Camo URLs, enabling covert data reconstruction through observed image fetch patterns. Proof-of-concept demonstrations extracted **AWS keys, security tokens, and private zero-day exploit notes**—material that could be weaponized for further attacks. GitHub mitigated the issue by disabling image rendering in Copilot Chat (August 14) and blocking Camo-based exfiltration, but the incident highlights risks of AI-assisted workflows expanding attack surfaces. Unauthorized access to proprietary code and vulnerability research poses severe threats to intellectual property and supply-chain security.

GitHubVulnerability10054/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.

MicrosoftBreach50212/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users.

MicrosoftBreach100503/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.

MicrosoftBreach10046/2017
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022.

MicrosoftBreach1008/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A significant security breach has compromised Microsoft’s PlayReady Digital Rights Management (DRM) system, exposing critical certificates that protect premium streaming content across major platforms including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+. The leak involved the unauthorized disclosure of both SL2000 and SL3000 certificates, with SL3000 representing a particularly severe security concern. These certificates utilize advanced hardware-based security measures designed to protect the highest quality content, including 4K and Ultra High Definition releases. The compromise undermines the fundamental trust model upon which DRM systems operate, posing a critical threat to the entire digital entertainment ecosystem. TorrentFreak researchers noted that the leaked SL3000 certificates could facilitate large-scale content redistribution networks, significantly escalating piracy capabilities.

MicrosoftBreach10058/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations.

MicrosoftCyber Attack257/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised

Description: A hack targeting Microsoft's SharePoint software was likely carried out by a single bad actor, according to researchers. This incident highlights the vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software and the potential for significant disruption to businesses relying on such platforms. The attack did not compromise data, but it underscores the need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect against similar threats in the future.

Microsoft (Azure)Cyber Attack2510/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised

Description: Microsoft mitigated a record-breaking **15.72 Tbps** distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in late October 2023, the largest ever recorded against its Azure cloud platform. The multivector assault, peaking at **3.64 billion packets per second**, originated from the **Aisuru botnet**, exploiting compromised home routers and IoT cameras across **500,000+ source IPs** globally. While the attack targeted a single Australian endpoint, Azure’s DDoS Protection infrastructure successfully filtered and redirected traffic, preventing service disruption or data compromise. No customer workloads were affected, and operations continued uninterrupted.The attack was part of a broader surge in DDoS activity linked to Aisuru and related **TurboMirai botnets**, which had previously executed **20+ Tbps 'demonstration attacks'** primarily against internet gaming organizations. Microsoft attributed the escalation to rising residential internet speeds and the proliferation of connected devices, enabling attackers to scale attacks proportionally with global infrastructure growth. Though no data was breached or systems compromised, the incident underscored the evolving threat landscape of hyper-scale DDoS attacks leveraging vulnerable IoT ecosystems.

Microsoft (Azure)Cyber Attack6029/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft’s Azure network was targeted by the **Aisuru botnet**, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet exploiting vulnerabilities in routers, IP cameras, and Realtek chips. The attack peaked at **15.72 Tbps** (terabits per second) with **3.64 billion packets per second**, originating from over **500,000 compromised IP addresses**—primarily residential devices in the U.S. and other regions. The DDoS assault leveraged **UDP floods** with minimal spoofing, targeting a public IP in Australia. While Azure mitigated the attack, the botnet’s scale and persistence posed significant risks to service availability, network integrity, and customer trust. The same botnet was linked to prior record-breaking attacks (e.g., **22.2 Tbps** against Cloudflare in September 2025), demonstrating its evolving threat capability. The incident also revealed Aisuru’s manipulation of Cloudflare’s DNS rankings by flooding its **1.1.1.1 service** with malicious queries, distorting domain popularity metrics. Though no data breach or financial loss was confirmed, the attack’s sheer volume threatened **operational disruption**, potential **reputation damage**, and **infrastructure strain**, underscoring the escalating sophistication of IoT-based cyber threats.

MicrosoftCyber Attack60207/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data.

MicrosoftCyber Attack85411/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.

MicrosoftCyber Attack100512/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity.

Microsoft (Teams)Cyber Attack100510/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft Teams, a globally adopted collaboration platform, has become a prime target for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors exploiting its messaging, calls, meetings, and screen-sharing features. Threat actors leverage open-source tools (e.g., **TeamFiltration, TeamsEnum, MSFT-Recon-RS**) to enumerate users, tenants, and misconfigurations, enabling reconnaissance and initial access. Social engineering tactics—such as **tech support scams (Storm-1811, Midnight Blizzard), deepfake impersonations, and malvertising (fake Teams installers)**—trick users into granting remote access, deploying ransomware (e.g., **3AM/BlackSuit, DarkGate**), or stealing credentials via **device code phishing (Storm-2372)** and **MFA bypass (Octo Tempest)**. Post-compromise, attackers escalate privileges by abusing **Teams admin roles**, exfiltrate data via **Graph API (GraphRunner) or OneDrive/SharePoint links**, and maintain persistence through **guest user additions, token theft, and malicious Teams apps**. State-sponsored groups like **Peach Sandstorm** and financially motivated actors (**Sangria Tempest, Storm-1674**) exploit cross-tenant trust relationships for lateral movement, while tools like **ConvoC2** and **BRc4** enable C2 over Teams channels. Extortion tactics include **taunting messages to victims (Octo Tempest)** and disrupting operations by targeting high-value data (e.g., **employee/customer PII, patents, or financial records**). The attacks undermine organizational trust, risk **regulatory penalties**, and enable **supply-chain compromises** via federated identities. Microsoft’s mitigations (e.g., **Entra ID Protection, Defender XDR alerts**) highlight the platform’s systemic vulnerabilities, with ransomware and data leaks posing existential threats to targeted entities.

MicrosoftCyber Attack10058/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.

Microsoft (via RaccoonO365 phishing service targeting its customers)Cyber Attack10057/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft disrupted **RaccoonO365**, a phishing-as-a-service operation led by Joshua Ogundipe, which stole **at least 5,000 Microsoft 365 credentials** across **94 countries** since July 2024. The service, sold via Telegram (850+ members), offered subscriptions ($335–$999) to bypass MFA, harvest credentials, and maintain persistent access—enabling **financial fraud, ransomware, and larger cyberattacks**. The stolen data was resold to criminals, while Ogundipe profited **$100,000+ in crypto**. Targets included **2,300+ US organizations** (tax-themed phishing) and **20+ healthcare providers**, prompting Health-ISAC to join Microsoft’s lawsuit. Though 338 domains were seized and Cloudflare dismantled the infrastructure, Ogundipe (Nigeria-based) remains at large. The operation’s **AI-powered scaling (RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck)** and capacity to process **9,000 email targets/day** amplified risks of **data breaches, extortion, and supply-chain attacks** leveraging compromised Microsoft accounts.

MicrosoftCyber Attack100510/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft has warned that hackers are exploiting **Microsoft Teams** as a high-value attack vector, targeting everyday users beyond corporate networks. Cybercriminals and state-backed actors use Teams to conduct **reconnaissance** (probing for weak settings, public profiles, or external meeting links), **impersonation** (posing as IT admins, coworkers, or Microsoft reps via fake profiles), and **malware delivery** (sending phishing links or files disguised as security updates or account verifications). Once access is gained, attackers maintain **persistence** by altering permissions, adding guest accounts, or abusing admin tools to move laterally across Teams, OneDrive, and cloud-stored personal files. Advanced groups like **Octo Tempest** have weaponized Teams for **ransomware attacks**, sending demands directly via chat while taunting victims. The attacks compromise **personal and corporate data**, including passwords, financial details, and sensitive communications. The breach leverages Teams’ trusted interface to bypass traditional defenses, exploiting **zero-day vulnerabilities** and social engineering. Users—whether on work laptops or personal devices—face risks of **data theft, account lockouts, and systemic infiltration**, with potential cascading effects on organizational security. Microsoft’s alert underscores the platform’s shift from a collaboration tool to a **critical attack surface** for large-scale cyber operations.

MicrosoftCyber Attack100611/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of geographical region

Description: In 2026, a low-level breach in Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure—part of the global computing backbone—was exploited by threat actors, cascading into a large-scale disruption. The attack targeted a widely deployed firewall vulnerability, compromising SaaS platforms that power critical enterprise ecosystems. This led to a domino effect, exposing sensitive data across one-eighth of the world’s networks, including financial records, proprietary business intelligence, and government-linked communications. The breach triggered outages in cloud services relied upon by Fortune 500 companies, halting operations for banks, healthcare providers, and logistics firms. While no direct ransomware was deployed, the incident eroded public trust, prompted regulatory investigations, and forced Microsoft to implement emergency patches. The economic fallout included contractual penalties, lost revenue from service downtime, and a surge in cyber insurance premiums for affected partners. Analysts warned that the attack highlighted the risks of concentrated infrastructure dependency, with nation-state actors suspected of probing for future escalations.

MicrosoftData Leak25102/2016
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue.

MicrosoftData Leak50201/2020
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details.

MicrosoftData Leak8536/2016
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.

Microsoft (VS Code Extension Marketplace)Ransomware75211/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Cybersecurity researchers identified a malicious **Visual Studio Code (VS Code) extension** named *susvsex*, uploaded by a suspicious user (*suspublisher18*) on **November 5, 2025**. The extension, described as a 'test,' automatically executed ransomware-like functionality upon installation or VS Code launch. It **zipped, exfiltrated, and encrypted files** from predefined test directories (`C:\Users\Public\testing` or `/tmp/testing`), though the target path was non-critical. However, the attacker could easily update the directory via a **GitHub-based C2 channel**, where commands were fetched from a private repository (*aykhanmv*) and results logged in *requirements.txt*. The extension **accidentally exposed decryption tools, C2 server code, and GitHub access tokens**, risking C2 takeover by third parties. While Microsoft **removed the extension within 24 hours**, the incident highlights supply-chain risks in open-source ecosystems. The attacker’s use of **AI-generated ('vibe-coded') malware**—with sloppy comments and placeholder variables—suggests a low-effort but potentially scalable threat. Though the immediate impact was minimal due to the test directory, the **exfiltration + encryption capability** and **C2 infrastructure** pose severe risks if repurposed for critical systems.

MicrosoftRansomware7523/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.

Microsoft (via malicious impersonation of Microsoft Teams)Ransomware10056/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The **Rhysida ransomware gang** exploited **malvertising** to impersonate **Microsoft Teams** in search engine ads (Bing), tricking users into downloading a fake installer laced with **OysterLoader malware** (also known as Broomstick/CleanUpLoader). The campaign, active since **June 2024**, used **typosquatting** and **code-signing certificates** (over 40 in the latest wave) to bypass antivirus detection, with some malware samples evading **VirusTotal** for days. Once executed, the loader deployed **Rhysida ransomware**, encrypting systems and exfiltrating data for extortion. Rhysida operates as a **RaaS (Ransomware-as-a-Service)**, with affiliates conducting attacks under the core group’s infrastructure. Since **2023**, they’ve leaked data from **~200 organizations** (27 in 2024 alone), targeting those refusing ransom payments. Microsoft revoked **200+ malicious certificates** tied to this campaign, but the gang’s **obfuscation techniques** (packing tools, delayed AV detection) ensured persistent infections. The attack chain—from **fake ads to ransomware deployment**—demonstrates a **highly coordinated, evolving threat** leveraging **trust in Microsoft’s brand** to compromise enterprises globally.

MicrosoftVulnerability2515/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: A vulnerability known as BadSuccessor in Windows Server 2025’s delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature has been weaponized by a proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor. This tool allows attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions to escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious security concerns for enterprise environments worldwide. The vulnerability leverages the dMSA migration mechanism and requires only CreateChild permissions over any Organizational Unit (OU) to function. Exploiting this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and potential data breaches within organizations.

MicrosoftVulnerability6036/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: In June 2025, Microsoft addressed **CVE-2025-33073**, a critical **SMB (Server Message Block) vulnerability** affecting older versions of **Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server**. The flaw, stemming from **improper access controls**, allows attackers to execute a **malicious script** that coerces a victim’s machine to authenticate with an attacker-controlled system via SMB, potentially granting **system-level privileges**.The vulnerability was added to **CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) list** in October 2025, confirming active exploitation. While Microsoft released a patch in June, unpatched systems remain at risk. The bug’s **CVSS score of 8.8** underscores its severity, as successful exploitation could lead to **unauthorized access, lateral movement within networks, or full system compromise**.Mitigations include **applying the June 2025 Patch Tuesday update**, monitoring for **unusual outbound SMB traffic**, and **restricting SMB exposure to trusted networks**. Researchers from **Google’s Project Zero, CrowdStrike, and Vicarius** contributed to its discovery, with Vicarius providing a **detection script** to assess vulnerability status and SMB signing configuration.Failure to patch exposes organizations to **privilege escalation, data breaches, or network infiltration**, though no confirmed large-scale breaches have been reported yet. The risk is heightened for enterprises relying on **legacy Windows systems** or those with **unrestricted SMB protocols**.

MicrosoftVulnerability606/2020
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks:

Description: A critical race condition vulnerability (CVE-2025-55680) in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys) allowed attackers to exploit a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness during placeholder file creation in cloud synchronization services like OneDrive. By manipulating filenames in memory between validation and file creation, attackers could bypass security checks and write arbitrary files—including malicious DLLs—to restricted system directories (e.g., *C:\Windows\System32*). This enabled privilege escalation to **SYSTEM-level access**, permitting arbitrary code execution.The flaw stemmed from inadequate filename validation in the *HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders()* function, a regression linked to a prior patch (CVE-2020-17136). Exploitation required only basic user privileges, posing severe risks to multi-user environments. Microsoft addressed the issue in the **October 2025 security updates**, but unpatched systems remained vulnerable to attacks leveraging DLL side-loading techniques. Organizations using cloud sync services with configured sync root directories were at heightened risk, as these were prerequisites for successful exploitation. The vulnerability carried a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (High)** and threatened system integrity, confidentiality, and availability through unauthorized privilege escalation.

MicrosoftVulnerability6034/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.

MicrosoftVulnerability6038/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity researchers at **Check Point** uncovered four critical vulnerabilities in **Microsoft Teams** (tracked as **CVE-2024-38197**, CVSS 6.5) that enabled attackers to manipulate conversations, impersonate high-profile executives (e.g., C-suite), and forge sender identities in messages, calls, and notifications. The flaws allowed malicious actors—both external guests and insiders—to alter message content without the 'Edited' label, modify display names in chats/calls, and exploit notifications to deceive victims into clicking malicious links or disclosing sensitive data. While Microsoft patched some issues between **August 2024 and October 2025**, the vulnerabilities eroded trust in Teams as a collaboration tool, turning it into a vector for **social engineering, data leaks, and unauthorized access**. The attack chain leveraged Teams’ messaging, calls, and screen-sharing features, enabling threat actors (including cybercriminals and state-sponsored groups) to bypass traditional defenses by exploiting **human trust** rather than technical breaches. Though no confirmed data breaches were reported, the risks included **credential theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**—particularly if employees or customers fell victim to impersonation scams. Microsoft acknowledged Teams’ high-value target status due to its global adoption, warning that such spoofing attacks could escalate into broader **phishing campaigns or lateral movement** within corporate networks.

MicrosoftVulnerability8546/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) identified **CVE-2025-59230**, a critical **privilege escalation vulnerability** in **Windows Remote Access Connection Manager**, being actively exploited in real-world attacks. This flaw allows threat actors with limited system access to **elevate privileges**, execute malicious code with administrative rights, **exfiltrate sensitive data**, and move laterally across networks. While no direct data breach or ransomware linkage has been confirmed, the vulnerability poses severe risks if chained with other exploits—potentially enabling **full system compromise**, unauthorized data access, or disruption of operations. CISA mandated federal agencies to patch within **three weeks**, emphasizing the urgency due to active exploitation. Organizations failing to remediate risk **unauthorized access to confidential information**, **operational disruptions**, or **follow-on attacks** like data theft or ransomware deployment. The flaw’s exploitation could lead to **financial fraud, reputational damage, or regulatory penalties** if sensitive data is exposed or systems are hijacked for malicious purposes.

MicrosoftVulnerability8545/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft disclosed **CVE-2025-59499**, a critical **SQL injection vulnerability** in **SQL Server** that enables authenticated attackers to escalate privileges remotely over a network. The flaw (CWE-89) arises from improper neutralization of SQL commands, risking unauthorized administrative access to enterprise databases. With a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.7–8.8**, it poses a high-risk threat due to its **network-based attack vector**, low exploitation complexity, and lack of user interaction requirements. Successful exploitation could lead to **data manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion**, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although Microsoft assesses exploitation as *‘Less Likely’* currently, the vulnerability’s **high-impact potential**—coupled with its appeal to insider threats or credential-compromised actors—demands urgent patching. Organizations handling **sensitive or critical data** in SQL Server environments are particularly exposed. The absence of public PoC exploits or confirmed wild attacks does not mitigate the risk, as sophisticated adversaries may weaponize it once technical details emerge. Microsoft advises **immediate patching**, access control reviews, and monitoring for suspicious privilege escalation attempts to prevent database takeovers.

Microsoft (Windows API)Vulnerability8545/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A newly developed offensive security tool, **Indirect-Shellcode-Executor**, exploits a previously overlooked vulnerability in the **Windows API**—specifically within the `ReadProcessMemory` function—to bypass modern **Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)** and **Antivirus (AV)** systems. The tool manipulates the `[out]` pointer parameter (`*lpNumberOfBytesRead`), originally intended to report read data size, to instead **write malicious shellcode into process memory** without triggering traditional detection mechanisms that monitor functions like `WriteProcessMemory` or `memcpy`.The **Rust-based Proof of Concept (PoC)**, created by researcher **Mimorep**, enables **remote payload execution** (fetching shellcode from a C2 server disguised in files like PNGs), **terminal injection** (direct shellcode input via CLI), and **file-based execution** (extracting payloads from local documents). This technique creates a **blind spot** for security vendors, as it evades heuristic analysis by constructing payloads byte-by-byte under the guise of a legitimate API call.The vulnerability, initially discovered by **Jean-Pierre LESUEUR (DarkCoderSc)**, underscores a systemic risk: **legitimate Windows API functions can be weaponized** for stealthy attacks. Security teams are urged to **reassess API monitoring rules**, particularly for `ReadProcessMemory` calls targeting executable memory sections. The open-source release of the tool amplifies the threat, as adversaries may adopt it for **real-world exploits**, compromising defensive postures across enterprises relying on Windows systems.

MicrosoftVulnerability8546/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.

MicrosoftVulnerability8547/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft has released a critical security update for Edge Stable Channel on July 1, 2025, addressing a severe vulnerability (CVE-2025-6554) that cybercriminals have actively exploited. The vulnerability affects the underlying Chromium engine that powers Microsoft Edge, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code or gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data. This highlights the urgency of applying the security update immediately to protect against sophisticated attacks that could compromise personal information, corporate data, or system integrity.

MicrosoftVulnerability85412/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.

Microsoft Corp.Vulnerability8537/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The number of companies and organizations compromised by a security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.’s SharePoint servers is increasing rapidly, with the tally of victims soaring more than six-fold in a few days, according to one research firm. Hackers have breached about 400 government agencies, corporations, and other groups, with most victims in the US, followed by Mauritius, Jordan, South Africa, and the Netherlands. The hacks are among the latest major breaches that Microsoft has blamed, at least in part, on China.

MicrosoftVulnerability10056/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Zscaler ThwartLabz uncovered **CVE-2025-50165**, a critical **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** vulnerability in the **Windows Graphics Component** (CVSS 9.8), affecting **windowscodecs.dll**—a core library used by applications like **Microsoft Office**. The flaw allows attackers to embed malicious JPEG images in documents, triggering arbitrary code execution when opened, requiring **minimal user interaction**. Exploitation leverages **uninitialized memory pointer dereference** and **heap spraying with ROP**, bypassing **Control Flow Guard (CFG)** in 32-bit systems by default. While the 64-bit version demands additional bypass techniques, both architectures remain vulnerable.The vulnerability impacts **Windows 11 24H2 (x64/ARM64), Windows Server 2025, and Server Core installations**, exposing **millions of systems** to potential **full system compromise**, including **data theft, lateral movement, or ransomware deployment**. Microsoft released an emergency patch (build **10.0.26100.4946**), but unpatched systems face **immediate risk** of mass exploitation due to the **low attack complexity** and **widespread use of Office/Windows**. Organizations failing to patch within **48 hours** risk **large-scale breaches**, operational disruption, or **supply-chain attacks** via weaponized documents.

MicrosoftVulnerability10056/2012
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft disclosed a critical **remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability (CVE-2025-59287, CVSS 9.8)** in its **Windows Server Update Service (WSUS)**, actively exploited in the wild since at least **October 24, 2025**. The flaw stems from **unsafe deserialization of untrusted data** in WSUS’s `GetCookie()` endpoint, where malicious `AuthorizationCookie` objects—decrypted via **AES-128-CBC** and deserialized using the deprecated **BinaryFormatter**—enable attackers to execute arbitrary code with **SYSTEM privileges** on vulnerable servers. Exploitation involves sending a crafted event to trigger deserialization, bypassing authentication.A **proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit** was publicly released, accelerating attacks. Observed payloads include a **.NET executable** that fetches commands from an HTTP header (`aaaa`) and executes them via `cmd.exe`, evading logs. The **Dutch NCSC** and **Eye Security** confirmed in-the-wild abuse, with attackers dropping Base64-encoded malware on an unnamed victim. Microsoft issued an **out-of-band patch** for affected Windows Server versions (2012–2025) and recommended **disabling WSUS** or **blocking ports 8530/8531** as mitigations. **CISA added the flaw to its KEV catalog**, mandating federal agencies to patch by **November 14, 2025**.The vulnerability poses severe risks: **unauthenticated remote takeover of WSUS servers**, potential **lateral movement within enterprise networks**, and **supply-chain attacks** via compromised update mechanisms. Organizations failing to patch risk **full system compromise**, **data breaches**, or **operational disruption** if WSUS is used for internal updates.

MicrosoftVulnerability10051/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A critical **token validation failure (CVE-2025-55241, CVSS 10.0)** in **Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD)** was discovered by researcher **Dirk-jan Mollema**, enabling attackers to **impersonate any user—including Global Administrators—across any tenant** without exploitation evidence. The flaw stemmed from **improper tenant validation in the deprecated Azure AD Graph API** and misuse of **S2S actor tokens**, allowing **cross-tenant access** while bypassing **MFA, Conditional Access, and logging**.An attacker exploiting this could **create admin accounts, exfiltrate sensitive data (user info, BitLocker keys, tenant settings, Azure subscriptions), and fully compromise services** like **SharePoint Online, Exchange Online, and Azure-hosted resources**. The **legacy API’s lack of logging** meant **no traces** of intrusion would remain. Microsoft patched it on **July 17, 2025**, but the **deprecated API’s retirement (August 31, 2025)** left lingering risks for un migrated apps.Security firms like **Mitiga** warned of **full tenant takeover risks**, emphasizing how **misconfigurations in cloud identity systems** (e.g., OAuth, Intune, APIM) could lead to **lateral movement, privilege escalation, and persistent access**—exposing **enterprise data, financial records, and operational control** to silent, high-impact breaches.

MicrosoftVulnerability10056/2012
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The **CVE-2025-59287** vulnerability in **Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)** is under active exploitation by threat actors, including a newly identified group (**UNC6512**). The flaw, stemming from **insecure deserialization of untrusted data**, allows **unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE)** on vulnerable systems running WSUS (Windows Server 2012–2025). Despite Microsoft’s emergency patch, attackers continue exploiting it, with **~100,000 exploitation attempts detected in a week** and **~500,000 internet-facing WSUS servers at risk**. Attackers leverage exposed WSUS instances (ports **8530/HTTP, 8531/HTTPS**) to execute **PowerShell reconnaissance commands** (e.g., `whoami`, `net user /domain`, `ipconfig /all`) and **exfiltrate system data** via Webhook.site. While current attacks focus on **initial access and internal network mapping**, experts warn of **downstream risks**, including **malicious software distribution via WSUS updates** to enterprise systems. The flaw’s **low attack complexity** and **publicly available PoC** make it a prime target for opportunistic threat actors. Microsoft’s **failed initial patch** (October Patch Tuesday) and delayed acknowledgment of active exploitation exacerbate risks, leaving organizations vulnerable to **large-scale compromises**. The potential for **supply-chain attacks** via WSUS—used to push updates to thousands of endpoints—poses **catastrophic downstream effects**, though full-scale damage remains unquantified.

MicrosoftVulnerability100606/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants “wizards” in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised user’s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence.

MicrosoftVulnerability1006/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A critical zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint servers, dubbed 'ToolShell', has exposed over 17,000 servers to internet-based attacks. At least 840 servers are vulnerable to CVE-2025-53770, with 20 confirmed to have active webshells. Attributed to Chinese threat actors, the attacks have compromised over 400 organizations, including government agencies, healthcare, finance, and education sectors. The breach allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, with Storm-2603 deploying Warlock ransomware on compromised systems. The attack's stealthy nature suggests a higher actual number of victims.

MicrosoftVulnerability10051/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Security researchers uncovered a **max-severity vulnerability** in **Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory)** that enables attackers to **impersonate any user—including Global Administrators—across any tenant without triggering Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Conditional Access, or leaving audit logs**. The flaw, discovered by red-teamer **Dirk-jan Mollema**, exploits **‘Actor tokens’**, an internal Microsoft delegation mechanism, by abusing a **legacy API that fails to validate the originating tenant**. An attacker in a low-privilege environment could **request an Actor token** and use it to **assume the identity of a high-privileged user in a completely separate organization**. Once impersonating a **Global Admin**, the attacker could **create rogue accounts, escalate permissions, or exfiltrate sensitive corporate and customer data** without detection. The vulnerability poses a **critical risk of large-scale account takeover, unauthorized access to enterprise systems, and potential data breaches** across organizations relying on **Entra ID/Azure AD for identity management**. While no active exploitation has been confirmed, the flaw’s **stealthy nature**—bypassing logging and security controls—makes it a prime target for **advanced persistent threats (APTs), ransomware operators, or state-sponsored actors** seeking to compromise cloud environments. Microsoft has since addressed the issue, but organizations are urged to **review suspicious admin activities and enforce stricter token validation policies** to mitigate residual risks.

MicrosoftVulnerability10053/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attack—exploiting software vulnerabilities—the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.

MicrosoftVulnerability1007/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's Windows Explorer is affected by RenderShock, a zero-click attack that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute malicious payloads without user interaction, potentially leading to credential theft, remote access, and data leaks. The attack methodology leverages built-in system automation features, making it difficult to detect and mitigate. Security teams are advised to disable preview panes and block SMB traffic to prevent such attacks.

MicrosoftVulnerability100511/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

microsoft-aiData Leak60309/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk.

Microsoft CloudVulnerability100612/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.

Microsoft CloudVulnerability100505/2022
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.

GitHub
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 3/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.

GitHub
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 2/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.

GitHub
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 04/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.

GitHub
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 7/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub’s response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 4/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The **Banana Squad** threat group, active since April 2023, compromised over **60 GitHub repositories** by trojanizing them with **malicious Python-based hacking kits**. These repositories masqueraded as legitimate hacking tools but contained **hidden backdoor payloads**, designed to deceive developers and security researchers into downloading and executing them. The attack leveraged **supply-chain compromise tactics**, exploiting GitHub’s open-source ecosystem to distribute malware under the guise of trusted repositories. The campaign, uncovered by **ReversingLabs**, revealed that the fake repositories mimicked well-known tools, embedding **stealthy backdoor logic** that could grant attackers unauthorized access to systems, exfiltrate data, or deploy further payloads. While the **direct financial or operational damage to GitHub itself remains undisclosed**, the incident poses **severe reputational risks** to the platform, eroding trust among developers who rely on GitHub for secure code sharing. Additionally, **downstream victims**—developers or organizations that unknowingly integrated the trojanized tools—face potential **data breaches, system compromises, or lateral attacks** stemming from the malicious payloads. The attack underscores vulnerabilities in **open-source supply chains**, where threat actors exploit **typosquatting and repository spoofing** to distribute malware. Though no **large-scale data leaks or ransomware demands** were reported, the **deception-based nature of the attack** and its potential to enable **follow-on cyber intrusions** classify it as a **high-severity reputational and operational threat** to GitHub’s ecosystem.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 9/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The **GhostAction attack** compromised **327 GitHub accounts**, leading to the theft of **3,325 secrets**, including **PyPI, npm, DockerHub, GitHub tokens, Cloudflare, and AWS keys**. The attack began with the hijacking of the **FastUUID project**, where the maintainer’s account was breached to inject a malicious **GitHub Actions workflow** named *‘Add Github Actions Security workflow’*—designed to exfiltrate sensitive credentials. GitGuardian detected the campaign, reported it to GitHub, and disrupted the operation by rendering the exfiltration server unresponsive. While **100 of 817 affected repositories** reverted malicious changes, **573 repositories** were alerted via issue notifications (others were deleted or had issues disabled). The attack exposed **API keys, access tokens, and deployment secrets**, risking downstream supply-chain compromises. A separate but unrelated **NPM-based *s1ngularity* attack** hit **2,000 accounts** concurrently, though no overlap was found between victims.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 8/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: The North Korean-linked Famous Chollima APT group exploited GitHub's infrastructure to distribute malicious NPM packages, targeting job seekers and organizations. By posing as legitimate recruiters, they tricked victims into downloading malware disguised as technical evaluation tools. The attack involved the InvisibleFerret backdoor, which established encrypted command-and-control communication, enabling data exfiltration and remote access. The campaign compromised software developers and IT professionals, leveraging their access to sensitive organizational resources. This breach highlights vulnerabilities in supply chain security and social engineering defenses within development communities.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 7/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 08/2015
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.

GitHub
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A sophisticated **typosquatting attack** targeted GitHub via a malicious npm package **‘@acitons/artifact’** (mimicking the legitimate **‘@actions/artifact’**), accumulating **206,000+ downloads** before removal. The attack exploited developers mistyping dependency names, deploying a **post-install hook** that executed obfuscated malware undetected by antivirus tools (0/60 on VirusTotal at discovery). The malware, compiled via **Shell Script Compiler (shc)**, checked for **GitHub-specific environment variables** (e.g., build tokens) and exfiltrated **authentication tokens** from GitHub Actions workflows. These tokens could enable attackers to **publish malicious artifacts under GitHub’s identity**, risking a **cascading supply chain compromise**. The campaign used **hardcoded expiry dates** (Nov 6–7, 2023) and **AES-encrypted exfiltration** via a GitHub App endpoint, evading detection. The attack directly threatened **GitHub’s CI/CD infrastructure**, with potential downstream risks to **repositories, developers, and enterprise customers** relying on GitHub Actions. While GitHub removed the malicious packages and users, the incident highlights critical vulnerabilities in **dependency trust models** and the escalating threat of **supply chain attacks** (OWASP Top 10 2025).

GitHub
Data Leak
Severity: 25
Impact: 1
Seen: 01/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences

Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.

GitHub
Data Leak
Severity: 50
Impact: 1
Seen: 05/2018
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences

Description: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files.

GitHub
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 4
Seen: 05/2019
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.

GitHub
Vulnerability
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, allowing attackers to achieve remote code execution through maliciously crafted repositories when users execute git clone –recursive commands. This vulnerability, assigned a CVSS severity score of 8.1/10, exploits a flaw in Git's handling of configuration values and carriage return characters. Public proof-of-concept exploits are available, and urgent remediation is required across development environments.

GitHub (Microsoft)
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 8/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: GitHub’s **Copilot Chat**, an AI-powered coding assistant, was found vulnerable to a critical flaw named **CamoLeak** (CVSS 9.6), allowing attackers to exfiltrate secrets, private source code, and unpublished vulnerability details from repositories. The exploit leveraged GitHub’s invisible markdown comments in pull requests or issues—content hidden from human reviewers but parsed by Copilot Chat. By embedding malicious prompts, attackers tricked the AI into searching for sensitive data (e.g., API keys, tokens, zero-day descriptions) and encoding it as sequences of 1x1 pixel images via GitHub’s **Camo image-proxy service**. The attack bypassed GitHub’s **Content Security Policy (CSP)** by mapping characters to pre-generated Camo URLs, enabling covert data reconstruction through observed image fetch patterns. Proof-of-concept demonstrations extracted **AWS keys, security tokens, and private zero-day exploit notes**—material that could be weaponized for further attacks. GitHub mitigated the issue by disabling image rendering in Copilot Chat (August 14) and blocking Camo-based exfiltration, but the incident highlights risks of AI-assisted workflows expanding attack surfaces. Unauthorized access to proprietary code and vulnerability research poses severe threats to intellectual property and supply-chain security.

GitHub
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 4/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.

Microsoft
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 12/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users.

Microsoft
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 03/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.

Microsoft
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 4
Seen: 6/2017
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022.

Microsoft
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact:
Seen: 8/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A significant security breach has compromised Microsoft’s PlayReady Digital Rights Management (DRM) system, exposing critical certificates that protect premium streaming content across major platforms including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+. The leak involved the unauthorized disclosure of both SL2000 and SL3000 certificates, with SL3000 representing a particularly severe security concern. These certificates utilize advanced hardware-based security measures designed to protect the highest quality content, including 4K and Ultra High Definition releases. The compromise undermines the fundamental trust model upon which DRM systems operate, posing a critical threat to the entire digital entertainment ecosystem. TorrentFreak researchers noted that the leaked SL3000 certificates could facilitate large-scale content redistribution networks, significantly escalating piracy capabilities.

Microsoft
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 8/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 25
Impact:
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised

Description: A hack targeting Microsoft's SharePoint software was likely carried out by a single bad actor, according to researchers. This incident highlights the vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software and the potential for significant disruption to businesses relying on such platforms. The attack did not compromise data, but it underscores the need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect against similar threats in the future.

Microsoft (Azure)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 25
Impact:
Seen: 10/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised

Description: Microsoft mitigated a record-breaking **15.72 Tbps** distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in late October 2023, the largest ever recorded against its Azure cloud platform. The multivector assault, peaking at **3.64 billion packets per second**, originated from the **Aisuru botnet**, exploiting compromised home routers and IoT cameras across **500,000+ source IPs** globally. While the attack targeted a single Australian endpoint, Azure’s DDoS Protection infrastructure successfully filtered and redirected traffic, preventing service disruption or data compromise. No customer workloads were affected, and operations continued uninterrupted.The attack was part of a broader surge in DDoS activity linked to Aisuru and related **TurboMirai botnets**, which had previously executed **20+ Tbps 'demonstration attacks'** primarily against internet gaming organizations. Microsoft attributed the escalation to rising residential internet speeds and the proliferation of connected devices, enabling attackers to scale attacks proportionally with global infrastructure growth. Though no data was breached or systems compromised, the incident underscored the evolving threat landscape of hyper-scale DDoS attacks leveraging vulnerable IoT ecosystems.

Microsoft (Azure)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 9/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft’s Azure network was targeted by the **Aisuru botnet**, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet exploiting vulnerabilities in routers, IP cameras, and Realtek chips. The attack peaked at **15.72 Tbps** (terabits per second) with **3.64 billion packets per second**, originating from over **500,000 compromised IP addresses**—primarily residential devices in the U.S. and other regions. The DDoS assault leveraged **UDP floods** with minimal spoofing, targeting a public IP in Australia. While Azure mitigated the attack, the botnet’s scale and persistence posed significant risks to service availability, network integrity, and customer trust. The same botnet was linked to prior record-breaking attacks (e.g., **22.2 Tbps** against Cloudflare in September 2025), demonstrating its evolving threat capability. The incident also revealed Aisuru’s manipulation of Cloudflare’s DNS rankings by flooding its **1.1.1.1 service** with malicious queries, distorting domain popularity metrics. Though no data breach or financial loss was confirmed, the attack’s sheer volume threatened **operational disruption**, potential **reputation damage**, and **infrastructure strain**, underscoring the escalating sophistication of IoT-based cyber threats.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 07/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 11/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 12/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity.

Microsoft (Teams)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 10/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft Teams, a globally adopted collaboration platform, has become a prime target for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors exploiting its messaging, calls, meetings, and screen-sharing features. Threat actors leverage open-source tools (e.g., **TeamFiltration, TeamsEnum, MSFT-Recon-RS**) to enumerate users, tenants, and misconfigurations, enabling reconnaissance and initial access. Social engineering tactics—such as **tech support scams (Storm-1811, Midnight Blizzard), deepfake impersonations, and malvertising (fake Teams installers)**—trick users into granting remote access, deploying ransomware (e.g., **3AM/BlackSuit, DarkGate**), or stealing credentials via **device code phishing (Storm-2372)** and **MFA bypass (Octo Tempest)**. Post-compromise, attackers escalate privileges by abusing **Teams admin roles**, exfiltrate data via **Graph API (GraphRunner) or OneDrive/SharePoint links**, and maintain persistence through **guest user additions, token theft, and malicious Teams apps**. State-sponsored groups like **Peach Sandstorm** and financially motivated actors (**Sangria Tempest, Storm-1674**) exploit cross-tenant trust relationships for lateral movement, while tools like **ConvoC2** and **BRc4** enable C2 over Teams channels. Extortion tactics include **taunting messages to victims (Octo Tempest)** and disrupting operations by targeting high-value data (e.g., **employee/customer PII, patents, or financial records**). The attacks undermine organizational trust, risk **regulatory penalties**, and enable **supply-chain compromises** via federated identities. Microsoft’s mitigations (e.g., **Entra ID Protection, Defender XDR alerts**) highlight the platform’s systemic vulnerabilities, with ransomware and data leaks posing existential threats to targeted entities.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 8/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.

Microsoft (via RaccoonO365 phishing service targeting its customers)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 7/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft disrupted **RaccoonO365**, a phishing-as-a-service operation led by Joshua Ogundipe, which stole **at least 5,000 Microsoft 365 credentials** across **94 countries** since July 2024. The service, sold via Telegram (850+ members), offered subscriptions ($335–$999) to bypass MFA, harvest credentials, and maintain persistent access—enabling **financial fraud, ransomware, and larger cyberattacks**. The stolen data was resold to criminals, while Ogundipe profited **$100,000+ in crypto**. Targets included **2,300+ US organizations** (tax-themed phishing) and **20+ healthcare providers**, prompting Health-ISAC to join Microsoft’s lawsuit. Though 338 domains were seized and Cloudflare dismantled the infrastructure, Ogundipe (Nigeria-based) remains at large. The operation’s **AI-powered scaling (RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck)** and capacity to process **9,000 email targets/day** amplified risks of **data breaches, extortion, and supply-chain attacks** leveraging compromised Microsoft accounts.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 10/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft has warned that hackers are exploiting **Microsoft Teams** as a high-value attack vector, targeting everyday users beyond corporate networks. Cybercriminals and state-backed actors use Teams to conduct **reconnaissance** (probing for weak settings, public profiles, or external meeting links), **impersonation** (posing as IT admins, coworkers, or Microsoft reps via fake profiles), and **malware delivery** (sending phishing links or files disguised as security updates or account verifications). Once access is gained, attackers maintain **persistence** by altering permissions, adding guest accounts, or abusing admin tools to move laterally across Teams, OneDrive, and cloud-stored personal files. Advanced groups like **Octo Tempest** have weaponized Teams for **ransomware attacks**, sending demands directly via chat while taunting victims. The attacks compromise **personal and corporate data**, including passwords, financial details, and sensitive communications. The breach leverages Teams’ trusted interface to bypass traditional defenses, exploiting **zero-day vulnerabilities** and social engineering. Users—whether on work laptops or personal devices—face risks of **data theft, account lockouts, and systemic infiltration**, with potential cascading effects on organizational security. Microsoft’s alert underscores the platform’s shift from a collaboration tool to a **critical attack surface** for large-scale cyber operations.

Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of geographical region

Description: In 2026, a low-level breach in Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure—part of the global computing backbone—was exploited by threat actors, cascading into a large-scale disruption. The attack targeted a widely deployed firewall vulnerability, compromising SaaS platforms that power critical enterprise ecosystems. This led to a domino effect, exposing sensitive data across one-eighth of the world’s networks, including financial records, proprietary business intelligence, and government-linked communications. The breach triggered outages in cloud services relied upon by Fortune 500 companies, halting operations for banks, healthcare providers, and logistics firms. While no direct ransomware was deployed, the incident eroded public trust, prompted regulatory investigations, and forced Microsoft to implement emergency patches. The economic fallout included contractual penalties, lost revenue from service downtime, and a surge in cyber insurance premiums for affected partners. Analysts warned that the attack highlighted the risks of concentrated infrastructure dependency, with nation-state actors suspected of probing for future escalations.

Microsoft
Data Leak
Severity: 25
Impact: 1
Seen: 02/2016
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences

Description: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue.

Microsoft
Data Leak
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 01/2020
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details.

Microsoft
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 6/2016
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.

Microsoft (VS Code Extension Marketplace)
Ransomware
Severity: 75
Impact: 2
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Cybersecurity researchers identified a malicious **Visual Studio Code (VS Code) extension** named *susvsex*, uploaded by a suspicious user (*suspublisher18*) on **November 5, 2025**. The extension, described as a 'test,' automatically executed ransomware-like functionality upon installation or VS Code launch. It **zipped, exfiltrated, and encrypted files** from predefined test directories (`C:\Users\Public\testing` or `/tmp/testing`), though the target path was non-critical. However, the attacker could easily update the directory via a **GitHub-based C2 channel**, where commands were fetched from a private repository (*aykhanmv*) and results logged in *requirements.txt*. The extension **accidentally exposed decryption tools, C2 server code, and GitHub access tokens**, risking C2 takeover by third parties. While Microsoft **removed the extension within 24 hours**, the incident highlights supply-chain risks in open-source ecosystems. The attacker’s use of **AI-generated ('vibe-coded') malware**—with sloppy comments and placeholder variables—suggests a low-effort but potentially scalable threat. Though the immediate impact was minimal due to the test directory, the **exfiltration + encryption capability** and **C2 infrastructure** pose severe risks if repurposed for critical systems.

Microsoft
Ransomware
Severity: 75
Impact: 2
Seen: 3/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.

Microsoft (via malicious impersonation of Microsoft Teams)
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The **Rhysida ransomware gang** exploited **malvertising** to impersonate **Microsoft Teams** in search engine ads (Bing), tricking users into downloading a fake installer laced with **OysterLoader malware** (also known as Broomstick/CleanUpLoader). The campaign, active since **June 2024**, used **typosquatting** and **code-signing certificates** (over 40 in the latest wave) to bypass antivirus detection, with some malware samples evading **VirusTotal** for days. Once executed, the loader deployed **Rhysida ransomware**, encrypting systems and exfiltrating data for extortion. Rhysida operates as a **RaaS (Ransomware-as-a-Service)**, with affiliates conducting attacks under the core group’s infrastructure. Since **2023**, they’ve leaked data from **~200 organizations** (27 in 2024 alone), targeting those refusing ransom payments. Microsoft revoked **200+ malicious certificates** tied to this campaign, but the gang’s **obfuscation techniques** (packing tools, delayed AV detection) ensured persistent infections. The attack chain—from **fake ads to ransomware deployment**—demonstrates a **highly coordinated, evolving threat** leveraging **trust in Microsoft’s brand** to compromise enterprises globally.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 25
Impact: 1
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences

Description: A vulnerability known as BadSuccessor in Windows Server 2025’s delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature has been weaponized by a proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor. This tool allows attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions to escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious security concerns for enterprise environments worldwide. The vulnerability leverages the dMSA migration mechanism and requires only CreateChild permissions over any Organizational Unit (OU) to function. Exploiting this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and potential data breaches within organizations.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: In June 2025, Microsoft addressed **CVE-2025-33073**, a critical **SMB (Server Message Block) vulnerability** affecting older versions of **Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server**. The flaw, stemming from **improper access controls**, allows attackers to execute a **malicious script** that coerces a victim’s machine to authenticate with an attacker-controlled system via SMB, potentially granting **system-level privileges**.The vulnerability was added to **CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) list** in October 2025, confirming active exploitation. While Microsoft released a patch in June, unpatched systems remain at risk. The bug’s **CVSS score of 8.8** underscores its severity, as successful exploitation could lead to **unauthorized access, lateral movement within networks, or full system compromise**.Mitigations include **applying the June 2025 Patch Tuesday update**, monitoring for **unusual outbound SMB traffic**, and **restricting SMB exposure to trusted networks**. Researchers from **Google’s Project Zero, CrowdStrike, and Vicarius** contributed to its discovery, with Vicarius providing a **detection script** to assess vulnerability status and SMB signing configuration.Failure to patch exposes organizations to **privilege escalation, data breaches, or network infiltration**, though no confirmed large-scale breaches have been reported yet. The risk is heightened for enterprises relying on **legacy Windows systems** or those with **unrestricted SMB protocols**.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact:
Seen: 6/2020
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks:

Description: A critical race condition vulnerability (CVE-2025-55680) in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys) allowed attackers to exploit a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness during placeholder file creation in cloud synchronization services like OneDrive. By manipulating filenames in memory between validation and file creation, attackers could bypass security checks and write arbitrary files—including malicious DLLs—to restricted system directories (e.g., *C:\Windows\System32*). This enabled privilege escalation to **SYSTEM-level access**, permitting arbitrary code execution.The flaw stemmed from inadequate filename validation in the *HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders()* function, a regression linked to a prior patch (CVE-2020-17136). Exploitation required only basic user privileges, posing severe risks to multi-user environments. Microsoft addressed the issue in the **October 2025 security updates**, but unpatched systems remained vulnerable to attacks leveraging DLL side-loading techniques. Organizations using cloud sync services with configured sync root directories were at heightened risk, as these were prerequisites for successful exploitation. The vulnerability carried a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (High)** and threatened system integrity, confidentiality, and availability through unauthorized privilege escalation.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 4/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 8/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity researchers at **Check Point** uncovered four critical vulnerabilities in **Microsoft Teams** (tracked as **CVE-2024-38197**, CVSS 6.5) that enabled attackers to manipulate conversations, impersonate high-profile executives (e.g., C-suite), and forge sender identities in messages, calls, and notifications. The flaws allowed malicious actors—both external guests and insiders—to alter message content without the 'Edited' label, modify display names in chats/calls, and exploit notifications to deceive victims into clicking malicious links or disclosing sensitive data. While Microsoft patched some issues between **August 2024 and October 2025**, the vulnerabilities eroded trust in Teams as a collaboration tool, turning it into a vector for **social engineering, data leaks, and unauthorized access**. The attack chain leveraged Teams’ messaging, calls, and screen-sharing features, enabling threat actors (including cybercriminals and state-sponsored groups) to bypass traditional defenses by exploiting **human trust** rather than technical breaches. Though no confirmed data breaches were reported, the risks included **credential theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**—particularly if employees or customers fell victim to impersonation scams. Microsoft acknowledged Teams’ high-value target status due to its global adoption, warning that such spoofing attacks could escalate into broader **phishing campaigns or lateral movement** within corporate networks.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) identified **CVE-2025-59230**, a critical **privilege escalation vulnerability** in **Windows Remote Access Connection Manager**, being actively exploited in real-world attacks. This flaw allows threat actors with limited system access to **elevate privileges**, execute malicious code with administrative rights, **exfiltrate sensitive data**, and move laterally across networks. While no direct data breach or ransomware linkage has been confirmed, the vulnerability poses severe risks if chained with other exploits—potentially enabling **full system compromise**, unauthorized data access, or disruption of operations. CISA mandated federal agencies to patch within **three weeks**, emphasizing the urgency due to active exploitation. Organizations failing to remediate risk **unauthorized access to confidential information**, **operational disruptions**, or **follow-on attacks** like data theft or ransomware deployment. The flaw’s exploitation could lead to **financial fraud, reputational damage, or regulatory penalties** if sensitive data is exposed or systems are hijacked for malicious purposes.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft disclosed **CVE-2025-59499**, a critical **SQL injection vulnerability** in **SQL Server** that enables authenticated attackers to escalate privileges remotely over a network. The flaw (CWE-89) arises from improper neutralization of SQL commands, risking unauthorized administrative access to enterprise databases. With a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.7–8.8**, it poses a high-risk threat due to its **network-based attack vector**, low exploitation complexity, and lack of user interaction requirements. Successful exploitation could lead to **data manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion**, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although Microsoft assesses exploitation as *‘Less Likely’* currently, the vulnerability’s **high-impact potential**—coupled with its appeal to insider threats or credential-compromised actors—demands urgent patching. Organizations handling **sensitive or critical data** in SQL Server environments are particularly exposed. The absence of public PoC exploits or confirmed wild attacks does not mitigate the risk, as sophisticated adversaries may weaponize it once technical details emerge. Microsoft advises **immediate patching**, access control reviews, and monitoring for suspicious privilege escalation attempts to prevent database takeovers.

Microsoft (Windows API)
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A newly developed offensive security tool, **Indirect-Shellcode-Executor**, exploits a previously overlooked vulnerability in the **Windows API**—specifically within the `ReadProcessMemory` function—to bypass modern **Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)** and **Antivirus (AV)** systems. The tool manipulates the `[out]` pointer parameter (`*lpNumberOfBytesRead`), originally intended to report read data size, to instead **write malicious shellcode into process memory** without triggering traditional detection mechanisms that monitor functions like `WriteProcessMemory` or `memcpy`.The **Rust-based Proof of Concept (PoC)**, created by researcher **Mimorep**, enables **remote payload execution** (fetching shellcode from a C2 server disguised in files like PNGs), **terminal injection** (direct shellcode input via CLI), and **file-based execution** (extracting payloads from local documents). This technique creates a **blind spot** for security vendors, as it evades heuristic analysis by constructing payloads byte-by-byte under the guise of a legitimate API call.The vulnerability, initially discovered by **Jean-Pierre LESUEUR (DarkCoderSc)**, underscores a systemic risk: **legitimate Windows API functions can be weaponized** for stealthy attacks. Security teams are urged to **reassess API monitoring rules**, particularly for `ReadProcessMemory` calls targeting executable memory sections. The open-source release of the tool amplifies the threat, as adversaries may adopt it for **real-world exploits**, compromising defensive postures across enterprises relying on Windows systems.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 6/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft has released a critical security update for Edge Stable Channel on July 1, 2025, addressing a severe vulnerability (CVE-2025-6554) that cybercriminals have actively exploited. The vulnerability affects the underlying Chromium engine that powers Microsoft Edge, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code or gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data. This highlights the urgency of applying the security update immediately to protect against sophisticated attacks that could compromise personal information, corporate data, or system integrity.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 12/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.

Microsoft Corp.
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The number of companies and organizations compromised by a security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.’s SharePoint servers is increasing rapidly, with the tally of victims soaring more than six-fold in a few days, according to one research firm. Hackers have breached about 400 government agencies, corporations, and other groups, with most victims in the US, followed by Mauritius, Jordan, South Africa, and the Netherlands. The hacks are among the latest major breaches that Microsoft has blamed, at least in part, on China.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Zscaler ThwartLabz uncovered **CVE-2025-50165**, a critical **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** vulnerability in the **Windows Graphics Component** (CVSS 9.8), affecting **windowscodecs.dll**—a core library used by applications like **Microsoft Office**. The flaw allows attackers to embed malicious JPEG images in documents, triggering arbitrary code execution when opened, requiring **minimal user interaction**. Exploitation leverages **uninitialized memory pointer dereference** and **heap spraying with ROP**, bypassing **Control Flow Guard (CFG)** in 32-bit systems by default. While the 64-bit version demands additional bypass techniques, both architectures remain vulnerable.The vulnerability impacts **Windows 11 24H2 (x64/ARM64), Windows Server 2025, and Server Core installations**, exposing **millions of systems** to potential **full system compromise**, including **data theft, lateral movement, or ransomware deployment**. Microsoft released an emergency patch (build **10.0.26100.4946**), but unpatched systems face **immediate risk** of mass exploitation due to the **low attack complexity** and **widespread use of Office/Windows**. Organizations failing to patch within **48 hours** risk **large-scale breaches**, operational disruption, or **supply-chain attacks** via weaponized documents.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2012
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft disclosed a critical **remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability (CVE-2025-59287, CVSS 9.8)** in its **Windows Server Update Service (WSUS)**, actively exploited in the wild since at least **October 24, 2025**. The flaw stems from **unsafe deserialization of untrusted data** in WSUS’s `GetCookie()` endpoint, where malicious `AuthorizationCookie` objects—decrypted via **AES-128-CBC** and deserialized using the deprecated **BinaryFormatter**—enable attackers to execute arbitrary code with **SYSTEM privileges** on vulnerable servers. Exploitation involves sending a crafted event to trigger deserialization, bypassing authentication.A **proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit** was publicly released, accelerating attacks. Observed payloads include a **.NET executable** that fetches commands from an HTTP header (`aaaa`) and executes them via `cmd.exe`, evading logs. The **Dutch NCSC** and **Eye Security** confirmed in-the-wild abuse, with attackers dropping Base64-encoded malware on an unnamed victim. Microsoft issued an **out-of-band patch** for affected Windows Server versions (2012–2025) and recommended **disabling WSUS** or **blocking ports 8530/8531** as mitigations. **CISA added the flaw to its KEV catalog**, mandating federal agencies to patch by **November 14, 2025**.The vulnerability poses severe risks: **unauthenticated remote takeover of WSUS servers**, potential **lateral movement within enterprise networks**, and **supply-chain attacks** via compromised update mechanisms. Organizations failing to patch risk **full system compromise**, **data breaches**, or **operational disruption** if WSUS is used for internal updates.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 1/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A critical **token validation failure (CVE-2025-55241, CVSS 10.0)** in **Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD)** was discovered by researcher **Dirk-jan Mollema**, enabling attackers to **impersonate any user—including Global Administrators—across any tenant** without exploitation evidence. The flaw stemmed from **improper tenant validation in the deprecated Azure AD Graph API** and misuse of **S2S actor tokens**, allowing **cross-tenant access** while bypassing **MFA, Conditional Access, and logging**.An attacker exploiting this could **create admin accounts, exfiltrate sensitive data (user info, BitLocker keys, tenant settings, Azure subscriptions), and fully compromise services** like **SharePoint Online, Exchange Online, and Azure-hosted resources**. The **legacy API’s lack of logging** meant **no traces** of intrusion would remain. Microsoft patched it on **July 17, 2025**, but the **deprecated API’s retirement (August 31, 2025)** left lingering risks for un migrated apps.Security firms like **Mitiga** warned of **full tenant takeover risks**, emphasizing how **misconfigurations in cloud identity systems** (e.g., OAuth, Intune, APIM) could lead to **lateral movement, privilege escalation, and persistent access**—exposing **enterprise data, financial records, and operational control** to silent, high-impact breaches.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 6/2012
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The **CVE-2025-59287** vulnerability in **Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)** is under active exploitation by threat actors, including a newly identified group (**UNC6512**). The flaw, stemming from **insecure deserialization of untrusted data**, allows **unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE)** on vulnerable systems running WSUS (Windows Server 2012–2025). Despite Microsoft’s emergency patch, attackers continue exploiting it, with **~100,000 exploitation attempts detected in a week** and **~500,000 internet-facing WSUS servers at risk**. Attackers leverage exposed WSUS instances (ports **8530/HTTP, 8531/HTTPS**) to execute **PowerShell reconnaissance commands** (e.g., `whoami`, `net user /domain`, `ipconfig /all`) and **exfiltrate system data** via Webhook.site. While current attacks focus on **initial access and internal network mapping**, experts warn of **downstream risks**, including **malicious software distribution via WSUS updates** to enterprise systems. The flaw’s **low attack complexity** and **publicly available PoC** make it a prime target for opportunistic threat actors. Microsoft’s **failed initial patch** (October Patch Tuesday) and delayed acknowledgment of active exploitation exacerbate risks, leaving organizations vulnerable to **large-scale compromises**. The potential for **supply-chain attacks** via WSUS—used to push updates to thousands of endpoints—poses **catastrophic downstream effects**, though full-scale damage remains unquantified.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 06/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants “wizards” in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised user’s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact:
Seen: 6/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: A critical zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint servers, dubbed 'ToolShell', has exposed over 17,000 servers to internet-based attacks. At least 840 servers are vulnerable to CVE-2025-53770, with 20 confirmed to have active webshells. Attributed to Chinese threat actors, the attacks have compromised over 400 organizations, including government agencies, healthcare, finance, and education sectors. The breach allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, with Storm-2603 deploying Warlock ransomware on compromised systems. The attack's stealthy nature suggests a higher actual number of victims.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 1/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Security researchers uncovered a **max-severity vulnerability** in **Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory)** that enables attackers to **impersonate any user—including Global Administrators—across any tenant without triggering Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Conditional Access, or leaving audit logs**. The flaw, discovered by red-teamer **Dirk-jan Mollema**, exploits **‘Actor tokens’**, an internal Microsoft delegation mechanism, by abusing a **legacy API that fails to validate the originating tenant**. An attacker in a low-privilege environment could **request an Actor token** and use it to **assume the identity of a high-privileged user in a completely separate organization**. Once impersonating a **Global Admin**, the attacker could **create rogue accounts, escalate permissions, or exfiltrate sensitive corporate and customer data** without detection. The vulnerability poses a **critical risk of large-scale account takeover, unauthorized access to enterprise systems, and potential data breaches** across organizations relying on **Entra ID/Azure AD for identity management**. While no active exploitation has been confirmed, the flaw’s **stealthy nature**—bypassing logging and security controls—makes it a prime target for **advanced persistent threats (APTs), ransomware operators, or state-sponsored actors** seeking to compromise cloud environments. Microsoft has since addressed the issue, but organizations are urged to **review suspicious admin activities and enforce stricter token validation policies** to mitigate residual risks.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 3/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attack—exploiting software vulnerabilities—the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact:
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's Windows Explorer is affected by RenderShock, a zero-click attack that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute malicious payloads without user interaction, potentially leading to credential theft, remote access, and data leaks. The attack methodology leverages built-in system automation features, making it difficult to detect and mitigate. Security teams are advised to disable preview panes and block SMB traffic to prevent such attacks.

Microsoft
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

microsoft-ai
Data Leak
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 09/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk.

Microsoft Cloud
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 12/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.

Microsoft Cloud
Vulnerability
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 05/2022
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.

Ailogo

Microsoft Cloud Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Microsoft Cloud

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Cloud in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Cloud in 2025.

Incident Types Microsoft Cloud vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Cloud in 2025.

Incident History — Microsoft Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Microsoft Cloud Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Efficient solutions that fit your business. ☁️ Follow along for the latest news and updates from the trusted #MSCloud team.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Microsoft Cloud Similar Companies

Bosch

The Bosch Group is a leading global supplier of technology and services. It employs roughly 417,900 associates worldwide (as of December 31, 2024). According to preliminary figures, the company generated sales of 90.5 billion euros in 2024. Its operations are divided into four business sectors: Mobi

Cisco

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its customers, partners and communities

Alibaba.com

The first business of Alibaba Group, Alibaba.com (www.alibaba.com) is the leading platform for global wholesale trade serving millions of buyers and suppliers around the world. Through Alibaba.com, small businesses can sell their products to companies in other countries. Sellers on Alibaba.com are t

Facebook

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving

Daraz

Daraz is the leading e-commerce marketplace across South Asia (excluding India). Our business covers four key areas – e-commerce, logistics, payment infrastructure and financial services – providing our sellers and customers with an end-to-end commerce solution. With access to over 500 million custo

Rakuten

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion m

Workday

Workday is a leading provider of enterprise cloud applications for finance and human resources, helping customers adapt and thrive in a changing world. Workday applications for financial management, human resources, planning, spend management, and analytics are built with artificial intelligence and

Bolt

At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike. We're helping over 200 mill

Meituan

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we

newsone

Microsoft Cloud CyberSecurity News

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Record-breaking DDoS attack against Microsoft Azure mitigated

Record-breaking DDoS attack against Microsoft Azure mitigated · Microsoft said Monday it was able to neutralize a record breaking distributed...

October 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Microsoft Azure Outage Hits Globally

Microsoft Azure Outage Hits Globally ... In the early hours of Wednesday, 30 October 2025 (AEDT), Microsoft Azure suffered a significant outage...

October 29, 2025 07:00 AM
Microsoft Outage Hits Azure, 365, Xbox, Minecraft and More

On October 29, 2025, Microsoft suffered a widespread infrastructure disruption that knocked out multiple services globally and left...

October 27, 2025 04:22 PM
Microsoft admits that hackers are exploiting its Azure Blog Storage

According to the company, certain account misconfigurations and flaws within its automated systems gave hackers a significant advantage, enabling them to...

October 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Dubai Municipality collaborates with Microsoft to drive digital growth

Dubai Municipality enhances citizen services and cybersecurity with Microsoft cloud and AI solutions. Collaboration with Microsoft to...

October 14, 2025 07:00 AM
Microsoft raises the bar: A smarter way to measure AI for cybersecurity

ExCyTIn-Bench is Microsoft's newest open-source benchmarking tool designed to evaluate how well AI systems perform real-world cybersecurity...

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: Microsoft Azure outage, law firm cyberattack, Russian hacktivists pwned

Azure outage blocks Microsoft 365 services and portals, U.S. law firm suffers cyberattack, critical infrastructure hacktivists get pwned.

October 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Microsoft Azure Faces Global Outage Affecting Services Worldwide

Microsoft Azure Faces Global Outage Affecting Services Worldwide ... Microsoft Azure, one of the world's leading cloud computing platforms,...

October 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity Awareness Month: Security starts with you

Get the Be Cybersmart Kit and explore some of Microsoft's resources for Cybersecurity Awareness Month to stay safe online.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Microsoft Cloud CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Microsoft Cloud

The official website of Microsoft Cloud is https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/.

Microsoft Cloud’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 751, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Microsoft Cloud’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Microsoft Cloud have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Microsoft Cloud have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Microsoft Cloud comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Microsoft Cloud have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Microsoft Cloud comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Microsoft Cloud is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Microsoft Cloud have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Microsoft Cloud is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Microsoft Cloud

Microsoft Cloud operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at Microsoft Cloud

Microsoft Cloud employs approximately 2 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Microsoft Cloud

Microsoft Cloud presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Microsoft Cloud’s LinkedIn Followers

Microsoft Cloud’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 665,119 followers.

NAICS Classification of Microsoft Cloud

Microsoft Cloud is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Microsoft Cloud’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Microsoft Cloud does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Microsoft Cloud’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Microsoft Cloud maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-cloud-platform.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Microsoft Cloud

As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Microsoft Cloud has experienced 63 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Microsoft Cloud has an estimated 26,609 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Microsoft Cloud ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack, Vulnerability, Ransomware, Data Leak and Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Microsoft Cloud ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $2.12 million.

How does Microsoft Cloud detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with notifying impacted users and organizations, and communication strategy with notifying impacted users and organizations, and containment measures with removed several repositories, and remediation measures with patch released in december 2021, and remediation measures with mitigated the security flaw, and containment measures with disabling the msdt url protocol, and third party assistance with chris vickery, and containment measures with secured the database, and third party assistance with wiz, and containment measures with password reset, and communication strategy with public statement, and remediation measures with addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, and containment measures with disable fake accounts, and remediation measures with patch released, and containment measures with disabled ghost accounts, and remediation measures with continued detection and removal of harmful content, and remediation measures with patch deployed, and remediation measures with implement stricter file and folder access controls, and remediation measures with vulnerability addressed by github team, and remediation measures with implement akamai’s detection script get-badsuccessoroupermissions.ps, remediation measures with restrict dmsa creation permissions to trusted administrators only, and remediation measures with patching, and communication strategy with public disclosure, communication strategy with user notifications, and containment measures with disable preview panes, containment measures with block outbound smb traffic, containment measures with enforce macro blocking, and remediation measures with deploy behavioral monitoring, and enhanced monitoring with monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd, and containment measures with upgrade to patched git versions, containment measures with avoid using github desktop for macos until patched, and remediation measures with upgrade to patched git versions, remediation measures with monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, and enhanced monitoring with monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, and remediation measures with patches issued by microsoft, and remediation measures with emergency patches, rotate machine keys, enable amsi, conduct thorough security assessments, and containment measures with dmca takedown notices, containment measures with account suspensions, and and third party assistance with gitguardian (detection/alerting), third party assistance with pypi (mitigation), and containment measures with shut down exfiltration server, containment measures with reverted malicious commits, containment measures with read-only mode for compromised project, and remediation measures with alerted affected users via github issues, remediation measures with removed malicious workflows, and recovery measures with account recovery for legitimate owners, and communication strategy with public report by gitguardian, communication strategy with direct notifications to repository owners, and third party assistance with reversinglabs (discovery and analysis), and remediation measures with github may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated), and communication strategy with reversinglabs blog post (public disclosure), and and containment measures with patch deployed by microsoft on july 17, 2025, containment measures with deprecation and retirement of azure ad graph api (effective august 31, 2025), containment measures with migration guidance to microsoft graph for affected applications, and remediation measures with no customer action required (server-side patch), remediation measures with encouragement to migrate from azure ad graph api to microsoft graph, remediation measures with review of applications with extended access to azure ad graph api, and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft security response center (msrc), communication strategy with technical blog post by researcher dirk-jan mollema, communication strategy with advisories from cloud security firms (e.g., mitiga), and and third party assistance with cloudflare, third party assistance with health-isac, and law enforcement notified with criminal referral to international law enforcement (ogundipe), and containment measures with seizure of 338 raccoono365 websites, containment measures with cloudflare takedown of domains/worker accounts, containment measures with interstitial 'phish warning' pages, containment measures with termination of workers scripts, containment measures with suspension of user accounts, and remediation measures with lawsuit against ogundipe and associates, remediation measures with restraining order (limited to us jurisdiction), and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft/cloudflare blogs, communication strategy with coordination with health-isac, and third party assistance with mitiga (research analysis), and incident response plan activated with recommended (microsoft defender xdr playbooks, entra id protection), and third party assistance with microsoft detection and response team (dart), third party assistance with microsoft threat intelligence center (mstic), third party assistance with managed security service providers (mssps), and law enforcement notified with likely (for state-sponsored or large-scale financial crimes), and containment measures with isolate compromised accounts/devices, containment measures with disable external access (federation, guest users), containment measures with revoke suspicious oauth tokens, containment measures with block malicious ips/domains (defender for office 365), containment measures with quarantine phishing emails/teams messages, and remediation measures with password resets for affected users, remediation measures with mfa re-enrollment, remediation measures with patch teams clients/endpoints, remediation measures with remove persistent backdoors (e.g., sticky keys, startup tasks), remediation measures with audit entra id configurations (pim, conditional access), and recovery measures with restore teams data from backups (if ransomware), recovery measures with rebuild compromised tenants (in severe cases), recovery measures with user training (phishing simulations, social engineering awareness), recovery measures with enhanced logging (teams audit logs, defender xdr), and communication strategy with internal advisories (it teams, executives), communication strategy with customer notifications (if data breached), communication strategy with public disclosures (for transparency, e.g., microsoft security blog), communication strategy with regulatory reporting (as required by law), and adaptive behavioral waf with recommended (microsoft defender for cloud apps), and on demand scrubbing services with available (microsoft purview data lifecycle management), and network segmentation with critical (isolate teams from high-value assets), and enhanced monitoring with defender xdr alerts (e.g., anomalous teams logins), enhanced monitoring with entra id risk policies (impossible travel, leaked credentials), enhanced monitoring with siem integration (microsoft sentinel), enhanced monitoring with teams-specific hunting queries (e.g., external file shares), and and third party assistance with legit security (researcher omer mayraz), third party assistance with hackerone (vulnerability disclosure), and containment measures with disabled image rendering in copilot chat (2024-08-14), containment measures with blocked camo image-proxy exfiltration route, and remediation measures with long-term fix under development, and incident response plan activated with cisa binding operational directive (bod) 22-01, and containment measures with isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, and remediation measures with apply microsoft’s security updates for cve-2025-59230, remediation measures with follow bod 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services, and communication strategy with cisa advisory (kev catalog inclusion), communication strategy with public warning via media (e.g., google news, linkedin, x), and enhanced monitoring with recommended for detecting exploitation attempts, and containment measures with enable privacy mode in teams, containment measures with restrict guest/external access, containment measures with limit admin permissions, containment measures with remove unused guest accounts, and remediation measures with patch microsoft teams/os vulnerabilities, remediation measures with deploy antivirus/endpoint protection, remediation measures with use data removal services to scrub pii, remediation measures with phishing awareness training, and recovery measures with restore from backups (if ransomware), recovery measures with reset compromised credentials, recovery measures with reconfigure teams security settings, and communication strategy with microsoft public advisory (via fox news), communication strategy with user education (tips to stay protected), communication strategy with reporting suspicious activity to microsoft, and on demand scrubbing services with recommended (e.g., personal data removal services to erase pii from data broker sites), and enhanced monitoring with enable teams alerts for unusual activity, enhanced monitoring with real-time antivirus scanning, enhanced monitoring with zero trust verification (validate every user/device), and third party assistance with exodus intelligence (vulnerability discovery), and containment measures with october 2025 security updates (patch release), and remediation measures with apply microsoft security updates (october 2025), remediation measures with prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories, and incident response plan activated with yes (microsoft patch release), and third party assistance with crowdstrike, third party assistance with google project zero, third party assistance with vicarius (detection script), and containment measures with patch deployment (june 2025 patch tuesday), containment measures with smb traffic monitoring, and remediation measures with apply security updates, remediation measures with enable smb signing, remediation measures with restrict smb to trusted networks, and communication strategy with cisa kev listing, communication strategy with techradar advisory, communication strategy with vicarius detection script, and network segmentation with recommended (restrict smb exposure), and enhanced monitoring with monitor outbound smb traffic, and and third party assistance with security researchers (meow, f7d8c52bec79e42795cf15888b85cbad, markus wulftange with code white gmbh), third party assistance with hawktrace (batuhan er), third party assistance with eye security, third party assistance with dutch national cyber security centre (ncsc), and containment measures with out-of-band security patch release, containment measures with system reboot required post-patch, containment measures with disabling wsus server role (if enabled), containment measures with blocking inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 on host firewall, and remediation measures with patch application (kb updates for affected windows server versions), remediation measures with removal of binaryformatter from .net 9 (august 2024), and communication strategy with public advisory via microsoft security update guide, communication strategy with collaboration with cisa for kev catalog inclusion, communication strategy with media updates via the hacker news, and incident response plan activated with microsoft (emergency patch), incident response plan activated with threat intelligence teams (e.g., google threat intelligence group, palo alto networks unit 42, trend micro zdi), and third party assistance with google threat intelligence group (gtig), third party assistance with palo alto networks unit 42, third party assistance with trend micro zero day initiative (zdi), and containment measures with emergency patch (microsoft), containment measures with network segmentation (recommended), containment measures with disabling internet-facing wsus instances, and remediation measures with apply microsoft's emergency patch, remediation measures with monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., powershell commands, data exfiltration), and communication strategy with public advisories by microsoft and cisa, communication strategy with media coverage (e.g., the register), and network segmentation with recommended to limit exposure of wsus servers, and enhanced monitoring with monitor for powershell commands (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig), enhanced monitoring with check for exfiltration to webhook.site endpoints, and incident response plan activated with likely by affected organizations, incident response plan activated with microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates, and third party assistance with expel (threat intelligence tracking), third party assistance with microsoft threat intelligence team, and containment measures with microsoft revoked malicious certificates, containment measures with av vendors updating detection signatures, and remediation measures with removal of oysterloader/latrodectus malware, remediation measures with patch management for exploited vulnerabilities, and recovery measures with restoration from backups (if available), recovery measures with rebuilding compromised systems, and communication strategy with expel blog post (2024-10-18), communication strategy with microsoft social media advisory (2024-10-15), and network segmentation with recommended for affected organizations, and enhanced monitoring with expel tracking indicators on github, enhanced monitoring with recommended for potential targets, and incident response plan activated with yes (responsible disclosure by check point, patch development by microsoft), and third party assistance with check point (vulnerability research and disclosure), and containment measures with patches released in august 2024 (cve-2024-38197), containment measures with subsequent patches in september 2024 and october 2025, and remediation measures with software updates for microsoft teams, remediation measures with security advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks), and communication strategy with public disclosure by check point and the hacker news, communication strategy with microsoft security advisory (released in september 2024), and and third party assistance with secure annex (research), third party assistance with datadog security labs (research), and containment measures with microsoft removed 'susvsex' from vs code marketplace (2025-11-06), containment measures with npm banned malicious accounts ('aartje', 'saliii229911') and packages, and communication strategy with public disclosure by researchers (secure annex, datadog), communication strategy with media coverage, and remediation measures with patch affected sql server instances, remediation measures with review and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controls, remediation measures with monitor sql server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft advisory, communication strategy with recommendations for urgent patching and access control reviews, and enhanced monitoring with sql server logs for suspicious activity, and and third party assistance with veracode threat research, and containment measures with npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact'), containment measures with removal of two github user accounts linked to malware, containment measures with blocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', and remediation measures with veracode package firewall protection for customers, remediation measures with advisory for github actions users to scrutinize dependencies, and communication strategy with public disclosure by veracode, communication strategy with media coverage (e.g., gbh), and enhanced monitoring with recommended for github actions environments, and and containment measures with mitigation of udp flood traffic, containment measures with traceback and enforcement by isps, containment measures with redaction/hiding of malicious domains in cloudflare rankings, and remediation measures with cloudflare’s adjustment of dns ranking algorithm, remediation measures with removal of aisuru-linked domains from public rankings, and communication strategy with public disclosure by microsoft and cloudflare, communication strategy with media coverage by infosec journalists (e.g., brian krebs), and enhanced monitoring with increased ddos mitigation capabilities (cloudflare, microsoft), and and containment measures with azure ddos protection infrastructure filtering, containment measures with traffic redirection, and remediation measures with botnet ip blocking, remediation measures with enhanced monitoring for aisuru/turbomirai activity, and communication strategy with public blog post by microsoft, communication strategy with media statements, and and and third party assistance with zscaler threatlabz (discovery), and containment measures with patch deployment (build 10.0.26100.4946), and remediation measures with immediate patching of all affected windows systems, remediation measures with prioritization of windows infrastructure updates, and communication strategy with public advisory via microsoft security update guide, communication strategy with urgent recommendation for 48-hour patch deployment, and incident response plan activated with anticipated: national cyber-resilience mandates (u.s. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure., and third party assistance with expected collaboration between cisa, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation., and law enforcement notified with mandatory for critical infrastructure breaches under 2026 regulations., and containment measures with zero-trust architectures (extended to ai agents), containment measures with continuous context-aware verification (for identity sprawl), containment measures with mandatory mfa enforcement (cloud providers), containment measures with network segmentation (critical infrastructure), and remediation measures with ai-specific credential management, remediation measures with iam system consolidation, remediation measures with supply chain risk assessments, remediation measures with resilience metrics reporting (for regulatory compliance), and recovery measures with public-private threat intelligence sharing, recovery measures with insurance-linked incentives for cyber hygiene, recovery measures with investor penalties for poor resilience, and communication strategy with transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or ai systems., and network segmentation with critical for containing cascading failures in cloud backbones., and enhanced monitoring with required for ai agents and autonomous systems., and containment measures with review and update api monitoring rules for readprocessmemory calls, especially those targeting executable memory sections., and enhanced monitoring with monitor for unusual readprocessmemory calls with *lpnumberofbytesread pointer manipulation...

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Microsoft Azure DevOps Server Compromise

Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.

Type: Data Breach

Threat Actor: Lapsus$ hacking group

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Github OAuth Token Theft Incident

Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Stolen OAuth Tokens

Vulnerability Exploited: OAuth Token Theft

Threat Actor: Unknown

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : DDoS Attack

Title: GitHub DDoS Attack

Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to GitHub. GitHub investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.

Type: DDoS Attack

Attack Vector: Malicious JavaScript Injection

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation Service

Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.

Date Resolved: December 2021

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access

Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Automation Service Vulnerability

Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Resources and Data

Incident : Security Flaw

Title: Microsoft Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory Security Flaw

Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to any malicious actor acquiring the Azure Data Factory service certificate and accessing another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. No evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.

Type: Security Flaw

Attack Vector: Exploiting a vulnerability to acquire service certificate and access Integration Runtimes

Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Data Factory service certificate vulnerability

Motivation: Unauthorized access to sensitive information

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability

Title: Follina Zero-Day Vulnerability

Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants “wizards” in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised user’s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer.

Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Malicious DocumentRich Text Format (.RTF)

Vulnerability Exploited: Follina

Incident : Data Exposure

Title: Microsoft Customer Data Exposure

Description: Sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner.

Date Detected: September 2022

Type: Data Exposure

Attack Vector: Misconfigured Server

Vulnerability Exploited: Unintentional Misconfiguration

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Microsoft Data Breach

Description: Microsoft experienced a massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses, and support case details.

Type: Data Breach

Incident : Ransomware

Title: GitHub Ransomware Attack

Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which included at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.

Type: Ransomware

Attack Vector: Weak PasswordsCredential Scanning

Vulnerability Exploited: Weak Passwords

Motivation: Financial

Incident : DDoS Attack

Title: Microsoft Services Outage Due to DDoS Attacks

Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359).

Type: DDoS Attack

Attack Vector: Layer 7 DDoS

Threat Actor: Anonymous SudanStorm-1359

Incident : Data Exposure

Title: Unsecured Database Exposure at Microsoft Careers Site

Description: The database driving m.careersatmicrosoft.com, handled by a mobile web development company, was accessible without authentication for a few weeks. The MongoDB instance was not write-protected, allowing potential alterations to the database and HTML code of job listing pages. The issue was secured after notification by Chris Vickery.

Type: Data Exposure

Attack Vector: Unsecured Database

Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Authentication

Incident : Data Leak

Title: Microsoft AI Research Division Data Leak

Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub.

Type: Data Leak

Attack Vector: Accidental Data Exposure

Vulnerability Exploited: Improper data management practices

Incident : Data Exfiltration

Title: GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom Code Signing Certificates Exfiltration

Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.

Type: Data Exfiltration

Attack Vector: Exfiltration of Code Signing Certificates

Incident : Data Leak

Title: Microsoft Windows 10 Source Code Leak

Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.

Date Detected: March

Type: Data Leak

Incident : Data Exposure

Title: GitHub Plain Text Password Logging Incident

Description: GitHub discovered an issue resulting in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs, prompting some users to reset their passwords.

Type: Data Exposure

Attack Vector: Internal Logging Error

Vulnerability Exploited: Internal Logging Mechanism

Incident : Security Breach

Title: Microsoft Exchange Server Breach

Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attack—exploiting software vulnerabilities—the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.

Date Detected: March 2021

Type: Security Breach

Attack Vector: Exploitation of software vulnerabilities

Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft Exchange Server

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing

Title: GitHub 'Ghost' Accounts Manipulation

Description: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies.

Type: Malware Distribution, Phishing

Attack Vector: Fake Accounts, Repository Manipulation

Threat Actor: Stargazer Goblin

Motivation: Malware Distribution, Phishing

Incident : Cyberattack

Title: Microsoft Cyberattack via CVE-2024-21412 Vulnerability

Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.

Type: Cyberattack

Attack Vector: Crafted links to bypass security features

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-21412

Motivation: Data theft

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing

Title: Stargazer Goblin Network Manipulates GitHub to Promote Malware

Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub's response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.

Type: Malware Distribution and Phishing

Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Malicious Links

Vulnerability Exploited: User Trust in Popular Repositories

Threat Actor: Stargazer Goblin Network

Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)

Title: Microsoft Azure Outage Due to DDoS Attack

Description: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.

Type: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)

Attack Vector: Network overload

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability

Title: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot Security Vulnerability

Description: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations.

Type: AI-powered Software Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Bypass file reference protectionsManipulate AI to provide bank detailsGlean insights from financial reportsTrick users into visiting phishing websites

Vulnerability Exploited: Bypassing file reference protections

Motivation: Access sensitive informationManipulate AI for financial gainExtract internal system prompts

Incident : Credential Theft

Title: Chinese Threat Actors Employing Quad7 Botnet in Password-Spray Attacks

Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.

Type: Credential Theft

Attack Vector: Password Spray AttacksBrute-force Attacks

Vulnerability Exploited: SOHO devicesVPN appliances

Threat Actor: Storm-0940

Motivation: Credential Theft

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Microsoft Recall AI Privacy and Security Incident

Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.

Date Detected: May 2023

Type: Data Breach

Vulnerability Exploited: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature

Incident : Privacy Breach

Title: Microsoft Recall AI Privacy Concerns

Description: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users.

Type: Privacy Breach

Vulnerability Exploited: Sensitive Information Capture

Incident : Password Spraying Attack

Title: Botnet Targeting Microsoft 365 Accounts Through Password Spraying Attacks

Description: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity.

Date Detected: December 2024

Type: Password Spraying Attack

Attack Vector: Password Spraying

Vulnerability Exploited: Basic Authentication

Threat Actor: Chinese-affiliated hacking group

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : Malware Campaign

Title: GitVenom Campaign

Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.

Type: Malware Campaign

Attack Vector: Fake repositoriesMalicious code

Motivation: Credential theftUnauthorized cryptocurrency transactionsRemote system control

Incident : Remote Code Execution

Title: Windows KDC Proxy Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Description: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-11-01

Date Resolved: 2024-11-01

Type: Remote Code Execution

Attack Vector: Unauthenticated remote attacker

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-43639

Incident : Ransomware

Title: VSCode Marketplace Ransomware Incident

Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.

Type: Ransomware

Attack Vector: Malicious Extensions

Vulnerability Exploited: Review Process Bypass

Motivation: Financial Gain

Incident : Data Breach

Title: GitHub Repositories Compromised

Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials

Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of Install Action Tokens

Incident : Vulnerability

Title: GitHub CodeQL Vulnerability

Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.

Type: Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Exploit of a security analysis tool

Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of GitHub token

Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure

Title: Microsoft Security Vulnerabilities Discovered by EncryptHub

Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.

Type: Vulnerability Disclosure

Attack Vector: Vulnerability ResearchRansomwareVishing

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-24061CVE-2025-24071

Threat Actor: EncryptHub (SkorikARI)

Incident : Privilege Escalation

Title: BadSuccessor Vulnerability Exploited by SharpSuccessor Tool

Description: A proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor that weaponizes the recently discovered BadSuccessor vulnerability in Windows Server 2025’s delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature. The .NET-based tool, developed by Logan Goins, demonstrates how attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions can escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious concerns about the unpatched vulnerability affecting enterprise environments worldwide.

Type: Privilege Escalation

Attack Vector: Exploiting dMSA migration mechanism by manipulating msDS-ManagedAccountPrecededByLink and msDS-DelegatedMSAState attributes

Vulnerability Exploited: BadSuccessor

Motivation: Privilege Escalation

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability

Title: Microsoft Edge Security Update for CVE-2025-6554 and CVE-2025-49713

Description: Microsoft has released a critical security update for Edge Stable Channel on July 1, 2025, addressing a severe vulnerability that cybercriminals have actively exploited.

Date Detected: 2025-07-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-01

Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Exploited in the wild

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-6554CVE-2025-49713

Threat Actor: Unknown

Motivation: Data TheftSystem CompromiseArbitrary Code Execution

Incident : Zero-Click Attack

Title: RenderShock Zero-Click Attack

Description: A sophisticated zero-click attack methodology called RenderShock that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems to execute malicious payloads without requiring any user interaction.

Type: Zero-Click Attack

Attack Vector: File Preview SystemsAutomatic File Indexing Services

Vulnerability Exploited: RenderShock 0-Click Vulnerability

Motivation: Credential HarvestingRemote AccessData Exfiltration

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Git CLI Arbitrary File Write Vulnerability

Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, with working proof-of-concept exploits now publicly available.

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: Malicious repositories via git clone –recursive commands

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-48384

Motivation: Remote Code Execution, Data Exfiltration

Incident : Server Hack

Title: Microsoft SharePoint Server Hack

Description: A hack targeting Microsoft's SharePoint software was likely carried out by a single bad actor, researchers say.

Type: Server Hack

Attack Vector: Exploitation of SharePoint Software

Threat Actor: Single Bad Actor

Incident : Cyber Attack

Title: Microsoft SharePoint Server Vulnerability Exploitation

Description: A security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.’s SharePoint servers has been exploited by hackers, compromising about 400 government agencies, corporations, and other groups. The vulnerability allows hackers to access SharePoint servers and steal keys to impersonate users or services, enabling deep access into compromised networks to steal confidential data.

Type: Cyber Attack

Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation

Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft SharePoint Server

Threat Actor: Linen TyphoonViolet TyphoonStorm-2603

Motivation: Espionage, Intellectual Property Theft

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Massive Exposure of Microsoft SharePoint Servers to Internet-Based Attacks

Description: A critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-53770) in Microsoft SharePoint servers has been exploited, affecting over 17,000 servers, with 840 specifically vulnerable. The vulnerability, dubbed 'ToolShell,' allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely. At least 20 servers have active webshells, indicating successful compromises. The attacks are attributed to Chinese threat actors Linen Typhoon (APT27), Violet Typhoon (APT31), and Storm-2603. Over 400 victim organizations across multiple sectors, including government, healthcare, finance, and education, have been confirmed.

Date Detected: 2025-07-07

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-18

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-53770

Threat Actor: Linen Typhoon (APT27)Violet Typhoon (APT31)Storm-2603

Motivation: Data Theft, Operational Disruption

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Microsoft PlayReady DRM System Breach

Description: A significant security breach has compromised Microsoft’s PlayReady Digital Rights Management (DRM) system, exposing critical certificates that protect premium streaming content across major platforms including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Certificate-Based Attack

Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized disclosure of SL2000 and SL3000 certificates

Motivation: Piracy and content redistribution

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)

Title: Famous Chollima APT Group Targeting Job Seekers with Malicious NPM Packages

Description: North Korean-linked Famous Chollima APT group has emerged as a sophisticated threat actor, orchestrating targeted campaigns against job seekers and organizations through deceptive recruitment processes. Active since December 2022, this advanced persistent threat has developed an intricate multi-stage attack methodology that exploits the trust inherent in professional networking and job-seeking activities.

Date Detected: December 2022

Type: Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)

Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Malicious NPM Packages

Vulnerability Exploited: Trust in professional networking and job-seeking activities

Threat Actor: Famous Chollima APT Group

Motivation: Establishing footholds within target organizations, credential harvesting, data exfiltration

Incident : supply-chain attack

Title: GhostAction Supply-Chain Attack on GitHub

Description: A supply-chain attack dubbed 'GhostAction' targeted GitHub, stealing 3,325 secrets (e.g., PyPI, AWS keys, GitHub tokens) from 327 compromised accounts. The attack was discovered by GitGuardian, who alerted GitHub and disrupted the campaign by shutting down the exfiltration server. A separate but unrelated NPM attack ('s1ngularity') compromised 2,000 accounts around the same time.

Type: supply-chain attack

Attack Vector: compromised maintainer accountmalicious GitHub Actions workflow ('Add Github Actions Security workflow')

Vulnerability Exploited: account takeover (ATO)malicious CI/CD pipeline injection

Motivation: credential harvestingsupply-chain compromisepotential follow-on attacks

Incident : supply chain attack

Title: Banana Squad Trojanizes Over 60 GitHub Repositories with Malicious Python Hacking Kits

Description: A threat group dubbed 'Banana Squad,' active since April 2023, has trojanized more than 60 GitHub repositories in an ongoing campaign. The repositories offer Python-based hacking kits with hidden malicious payloads, mimicking legitimate hacking tools. Discovered by ReversingLabs, these repositories inject backdoor logic while appearing identical to well-known tools. The malicious activity was uncovered by analyzing URL indicators in ReversingLabs’ network threat intelligence dataset.

Type: supply chain attack

Attack Vector: compromised GitHub repositoriessocial engineering (fake hacking tools)hidden backdoor payloads

Threat Actor: Name: Banana SquadActive Since: April 2023Type: ['cybercriminal group', 'malware distributor']

Motivation: malware distributionbackdoor accesspotential follow-on attacks

Incident : Privilege Escalation

Title: Critical Token Validation Failure in Microsoft Entra ID (CVE-2025-55241)

Description: A critical token validation failure in Microsoft Entra ID (previously Azure Active Directory) could have allowed attackers to impersonate any user, including Global Administrators, across any tenant. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-55241, was assigned a CVSS score of 10.0 and stemmed from a combination of service-to-service (S2S) actor tokens issued by the Access Control Service (ACS) and a flaw in the legacy Azure AD Graph API that did not validate the originating tenant. This allowed cross-tenant access, bypassing MFA, Conditional Access, and logging. The issue was reported by security researcher Dirk-jan Mollema on July 14, 2025, and patched by Microsoft on July 17, 2025, with no evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Date Detected: 2025-07-14

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-17

Date Resolved: 2025-07-17

Type: Privilege Escalation

Attack Vector: NetworkToken ManipulationAPI Abuse (Azure AD Graph API)

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-55241 (Token Validation Failure in Microsoft Entra ID / Azure AD Graph API)

Incident : phishing

Title: Microsoft Seizes 338 RaccoonO365 Phishing Websites, Identifies Leader Joshua Ogundipe

Description: Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) seized 338 websites linked to the RaccoonO365 phishing-as-a-service operation, which sold subscriptions to phishing kits used to steal Microsoft 365 credentials. The leader, Joshua Ogundipe, was identified, and a lawsuit was filed against him and four associates. The operation targeted at least 5,000 credentials across 94 countries, generating over $100,000 in cryptocurrency. The phishing kits bypassed MFA and enabled persistent access, with stolen data used for fraud, ransomware, and further attacks. Cloudflare assisted in the takedown of domains and Worker accounts tied to RaccoonO365.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-09

Date Resolved: 2024-09

Type: phishing

Attack Vector: phishing emailsphishing kitsMFA bypassAI-powered phishing (RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck)tax-themed phishing campaigns

Vulnerability Exploited: human vulnerability (social engineering)MFA bypass techniqueslack of user awareness

Threat Actor: Name: Joshua OgundipeAffiliation: RaccoonO365Location: NigeriaBackground: Computer programming; believed to have authored majority of the RaccoonO365 code

Motivation: financial gaincybercrime facilitationsale of stolen credentials and access

Incident : Authentication Bypass

Title: Max-Severity Vulnerability in Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) Allows Tenant-Wide User Impersonation

Description: Security researchers discovered a max-severity vulnerability in Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) that could allow attackers to impersonate any user in any tenant, including Global Administrators, without triggering MFA, Conditional Access, or leaving any normal login or audit trail. The flaw exploited 'Actor tokens,' a hidden Microsoft mechanism for internal delegation, by manipulating a legacy API that failed to validate the originating tenant. Attackers in a benign environment could request an Actor token and use it to pose as a privileged user in a separate organization, enabling actions such as creating new accounts, granting permissions, or exfiltrating sensitive data.

Type: Authentication Bypass

Attack Vector: Exploitation of Legacy APIToken Manipulation (Actor Tokens)Tenant Validation Bypass

Vulnerability Exploited: Legacy API in Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) failing to validate tenant source of Actor tokens

Incident : Data Exfiltration

Title: CamoLeak: Critical Vulnerability in GitHub Copilot Chat Enables Code and Secret Exfiltration

Description: GitHub's Copilot Chat, an AI-powered coding assistant, was found to have a critical vulnerability (dubbed **CamoLeak**) that allowed attackers to exfiltrate secrets, private source code, and unpublished vulnerability descriptions from repositories. The flaw exploited Copilot Chat's parsing of 'invisible' markdown comments in pull requests or issues—content not visible in the standard UI but accessible to the chatbot. Attackers could embed malicious prompts instructing Copilot to search for sensitive data (e.g., API keys, tokens, zero-day descriptions) and exfiltrate it via a covert channel using GitHub's Camo image-proxy service. The vulnerability was scored **9.6 on the CVSS scale** and demonstrated in a proof-of-concept that extracted AWS keys, security tokens, and unpublished exploit details.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-08-14

Date Resolved: 2024-08-14

Type: Data Exfiltration

Attack Vector: Hidden Markdown Comments in Pull Requests/IssuesAI Prompt InjectionCamo Image-Proxy Abuse

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-Pending (CamoLeak: Copilot Chat's parsing of invisible markdown + Camo image-proxy exfiltration)

Motivation: EspionageCredential TheftExploit Development (Zero-Day Theft)

Incident : Privilege Escalation

Title: Active Exploitation of Microsoft Windows Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59230)

Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added a critical Microsoft Windows vulnerability (CVE-2025-59230) to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The flaw, located in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager, allows attackers with limited system access to escalate privileges, execute malicious code with elevated rights, exfiltrate sensitive data, and move laterally across networks. CISA has issued a directive (BOD 22-01) mandating federal agencies to patch the vulnerability by November 4, 2025. The vulnerability is actively exploited in real-world attacks and is often chained with other exploits in multi-stage attacks, such as those initiated via phishing or internet-facing vulnerabilities.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-14

Type: Privilege Escalation

Attack Vector: Local Privilege EscalationChained with Initial Access Exploits (e.g., Phishing, Internet-Facing Vulnerabilities)

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-59230 (Improper Access Control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager)

Incident : Vulnerability

Title: Critical Race Condition Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (CVE-2025-55680)

Description: A critical security flaw in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys) was fixed, addressing a dangerous race condition (CVE-2025-55680) that enabled attackers to gain elevated system privileges (SYSTEM-level) and write files to any location on affected systems. The vulnerability, discovered by Exodus Intelligence in March 2024, was patched in Microsoft's October 2025 security updates. It arises from inadequate filename validation during placeholder file creation in cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive), allowing attackers to exploit a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness via multi-threaded attacks. This could lead to arbitrary DLL placement in restricted directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32) and privilege escalation through DLL side-loading. The flaw impacts systems running cloud sync services with configured sync root directories and relates to a previously patched issue (CVE-2020-17136).

Date Detected: 2024-03

Date Resolved: 2025-10

Type: Vulnerability

Attack Vector: LocalTime-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU)Multi-threaded Exploitation

Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-55680, Race ConditionImproper Input ValidationMicrosoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys)HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders() functionCfCreatePlaceholders() APICvss Score: {'version': '3.1', 'score': 7.8, 'severity': 'High'}, CVE-2020-17136

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: CVE-2025-33073: Windows SMB Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild

Description: Microsoft acknowledged a vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS score 8.8) in older versions of Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server related to improper access controls in SMB (Server Message Block). The flaw allows attackers to execute a crafted malicious script, coercing victim machines to authenticate via SMB, potentially granting system-level privileges. The vulnerability was added to CISA's KEV list on October 20, 2025, with evidence of active exploitation. Microsoft released a fix in June 2025's Patch Tuesday update. Users are advised to apply updates, monitor outbound SMB traffic, and restrict SMB exposure to trusted networks.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-20

Date Resolved: 2025-06-00

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: NetworkSMB Protocol AbuseScript-Based Coercion

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-33073 (Improper Access Control in SMB)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation

Title: Critical Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) - CVE-2025-59287

Description: Microsoft released out-of-band security updates to patch a critical-severity Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) vulnerability (CVE-2025-59287, CVSS score: 9.8) with a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit publicly available and actively exploited in the wild. The flaw stems from unsafe deserialization of untrusted data in WSUS, allowing unauthorized remote code execution with SYSTEM privileges. The vulnerability was originally fixed in Patch Tuesday but required an out-of-band update due to active exploitation. Exploitation involves sending a crafted event to the GetCookie() endpoint, where encrypted cookie data is decrypted and deserialized via BinaryFormatter without proper type validation. A .NET executable payload was observed being dropped via the vulnerability, executing commands from a request header to evade logging.

Date Detected: 2025-10-24T06:55:00Z

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-24

Type: Vulnerability Exploitation

Attack Vector: NetworkDeserialization of Untrusted DataCrafted Event to GetCookie() Endpoint

Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-59287, Cvss Score: 9.8, Description: Remote code execution flaw in WSUS due to unsafe deserialization of AuthorizationCookie objects via BinaryFormatter in the GetCookie() endpoint. Encrypted cookie data is decrypted using AES-128-CBC and deserialized without proper type validation., Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2022 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2025Prerequisite: WSUS server role must be enabled on the target system..

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Title: Critical Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59287) Under Active Exploitation

Description: A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), tracked as CVE-2025-59287, is under active exploitation. The flaw stems from insecure deserialization of untrusted data, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. Microsoft released an emergency patch after the initial Patch Tuesday fix was bypassed. Threat actors, including a newly identified group (UNC6512), are exploiting the vulnerability for reconnaissance and data exfiltration. Approximately 100,000 exploitation attempts have been observed in the last seven days, with around 500,000 internet-facing WSUS servers potentially at risk. The downstream impact could be catastrophic if compromised servers are used to push malicious updates to enterprise systems.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-08 (Patch Tuesday)

Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Attack Vector: Network-based (TCP ports 8530/HTTP and 8531/HTTPS)Insecure DeserializationUnauthenticated Exploitation

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-59287 (Windows Server Update Services - WSUS)

Threat Actor: UNC6512Opportunistic Threat Actors (unknown groups leveraging PoC)

Motivation: Initial AccessInternal ReconnaissanceData ExfiltrationPotential Downstream Malware Distribution via WSUS

Incident : ransomware

Title: Rhysida Ransomware Gang Uses Malvertising to Distribute OysterLoader and Latrodectus Malware via Fake Microsoft Teams Ads

Description: The Rhysida ransomware gang has been placing fake ads for Microsoft Teams in search engines (primarily Bing) to infect victims with OysterLoader (also known as Broomstick and CleanUpLoader) and Latrodectus malware. The campaign, ongoing since June 2024, leverages malvertising and typosquatting to trick users into downloading malicious installers. The group operates as a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) and has compromised at least 27 organizations since June 2024, with ~200 victims posted on their leak site since 2023. The malware uses packing tools and code-signing certificates to evade detection, with Microsoft revoking over 200 certificates tied to this activity.

Date Detected: 2024-06-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-18

Type: ransomware

Attack Vector: malvertising (Bing ads)typosquattingfake Microsoft Teams download pagesmalicious installer (OysterLoader/Latrodectus)packed malware with obfuscationcode-signing certificate abuse

Vulnerability Exploited: user trust in search engine adslack of multi-factor authentication for downloadsdelayed AV detection due to obfuscationabuse of legitimate code-signing certificates

Threat Actor: Rhysida (formerly Vice Society/Vanilla Tempest)RaaS affiliates

Motivation: financial gain (ransom payments)data exfiltration for extortionselling stolen data on dark web

Incident : Spoofing

Title: Microsoft Teams Spoofing and Impersonation Vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-38197)

Description: Cybersecurity researchers disclosed four security flaws in Microsoft Teams that could expose users to impersonation and social engineering attacks. The vulnerabilities allowed attackers to manipulate conversations, impersonate colleagues, and exploit notifications without leaving an 'Edited' label. Attackers could alter message content, sender identity, and incoming notifications to trick victims into opening malicious messages or sharing sensitive data. The flaws also enabled modifying display names in private chats and call notifications, forging caller identities. These issues undermine trust in collaboration tools, turning Teams into a vector for deception. Microsoft addressed some of the vulnerabilities in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197, CVSS 6.5), with subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-03

Date Resolved: 2025-10

Type: Spoofing

Attack Vector: Message Content ManipulationSender Identity SpoofingNotification ForgeryDisplay Name Modification in Chats/CallsMalicious Link Distribution

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-38197 (CVSS 6.5: Medium)Three additional undisclosed vulnerabilities (details not specified)

Motivation: Social EngineeringData TheftMalware DistributionUnauthorized Access

Incident : Malware

Title: Malicious VS Code Extension 'susvsex' with Ransomware Capabilities and Trojanized npm Packages Distributing Vidar Infostealer

Description: Cybersecurity researchers discovered a malicious Visual Studio Code (VS Code) extension named 'susvsex' with ransomware capabilities, likely created using AI ('vibe-coded'). The extension, uploaded by 'suspublisher18' on November 5, 2025, automatically zips, uploads, and encrypts files from a test directory (C:\Users\Public\testing on Windows or /tmp/testing on macOS) on first launch. It uses GitHub as a command-and-control (C2) server by polling a private repository for commands. The extension was removed by Microsoft on November 6, 2025. Separately, 17 trojanized npm packages were found distributing the Vidar infostealer, uploaded by accounts 'aartje' and 'saliii229911' between October 21–26, 2025. These packages were downloaded ~2,240 times before being banned.

Date Detected: 2025-11-05

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-06

Date Resolved: 2025-11-06

Type: Malware

Attack Vector: Malicious Extension (VS Code Marketplace)Trojanized npm PackagesGitHub C2Postinstall Scripts

Threat Actor: suspublisher18aykhanmv (GitHub C2 operator)MUT-4831 (npm package uploader: aartje, saliii229911)

Motivation: Testing/Experimental (susvsex)Financial Gain (Vidar Infostealer)Data Theft

Incident : Vulnerability

Title: Critical SQL Injection Vulnerability in Microsoft SQL Server (CVE-2025-59499)

Description: Microsoft has disclosed a critical SQL injection vulnerability in SQL Server (CVE-2025-59499) that could allow authenticated attackers to escalate their privileges over a network. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, exposing enterprise databases to potential unauthorized administrative access. It has been classified under CWE-89, with a CVSS 3.1 score ranging from 7.7 to 8.8, indicating a significant security risk. The network-based attack vector allows remote exploitation by attackers with valid SQL Server credentials, enabling manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion of sensitive data with elevated privileges.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-11

Type: Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Network-based (Remote)

Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-59499, Cwe Id: CWE-89, Cvss Score: 7.7 - 8.8 (CVSS 3.1), Cvss Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, Severity: Important, Exploitability Assessment: Less Likely (as of disclosure), Complexity: Low, User Interaction Required: False, Impact: {'confidentiality': 'High', 'integrity': 'High', 'availability': 'High'}.

Incident : supply chain attack

Title: Typosquatting Campaign Targeting GitHub Actions via Malicious npm Package '@acitons/artifact'

Description: On November 7th, Veracode Threat Research discovered a typosquatting campaign targeting developers using GitHub Actions. The malicious npm package '@acitons/artifact' (mimicking the legitimate '@actions/artifact') accumulated over 206,000 downloads before removal. The package contained a post-install hook that executed obfuscated malware, designed to exfiltrate GitHub authentication tokens during builds. The attack demonstrated advanced operational security, including self-termination dates and encrypted exfiltration via GitHub App-based endpoints. The campaign targeted GitHub's own repositories and posed a supply chain risk.

Date Detected: 2023-11-07

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-11-07

Type: supply chain attack

Attack Vector: typosquatting (npm package)post-install hookobfuscated shell script (shc)Node.js package with obfuscated JavaScript ('verify.js')GitHub Actions environment variables

Vulnerability Exploited: developer mistyped dependency installationlack of package verification in CI/CD pipelinesunrestricted access to GitHub Actions environment variables

Motivation: supply chain compromiseauthentication token theftimpersonation of GitHub for downstream attacks

Incident : DDoS Attack

Title: Aisuru Botnet Launches Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack on Microsoft Azure

Description: Microsoft disclosed that the Aisuru botnet executed a 15.72 Tbps DDoS attack on its Azure network, originating from over 500,000 IP addresses. The attack targeted a public IP in Australia with UDP floods reaching 3.64 billion packets per second (bpps). Aisuru, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet, exploits vulnerabilities in home routers and cameras, primarily in the U.S. and other countries. The botnet was also linked to a 22.2 Tbps attack on Cloudflare in September 2025 and an 11.5 Tbps attack attributed by Qi'anxin’s XLab. Aisuru’s growth surged in April 2025 after compromising a TotoLink firmware update server, infecting ~100,000 devices. Cloudflare removed Aisuru-linked domains from its 'Top Domains' rankings after they distorted DNS query volumes, undermining trust in the system.

Type: DDoS Attack

Attack Vector: UDP FloodCompromised IoT Devices (Routers, IP Cameras, DVRs/NVRs)Exploitation of Firmware Update Server (TotoLink)

Vulnerability Exploited: Security vulnerabilities in IP camerasDVRs/NVRsRealtek chipsRouters from T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, LinksysTotoLink router firmware update server

Threat Actor: Aisuru Botnet Operators

Motivation: Disrupting ServicesDistorting DNS Rankings (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1)Undermining Trust in Public RankingsPotential Financial Gain or Competitive Sabotage

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)

Title: Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack on Microsoft Azure Mitigated

Description: Microsoft neutralized a record-breaking distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack targeting its Azure service in late October 2023. The multivector attack peaked at 15.72 Tbps and 3.64 billion packets per second, traced to the Aisuru botnet (a variant of TurboMirai), which exploits compromised home routers and cameras. The attack originated from over 500,000 source IPs globally, targeting a single endpoint in Australia. Azure’s DDoS Protection infrastructure successfully mitigated the attack without service interruption. The incident highlights the growing scale of DDoS threats driven by faster residential internet speeds and proliferating IoT devices.

Date Detected: Late October 2023

Date Publicly Disclosed: November 2023 (exact date unspecified)

Date Resolved: Late October 2023 (same day as detection)

Type: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)

Attack Vector: Botnet (Aisuru/TurboMirai)Compromised IoT devices (routers, cameras)Residential ISPs (primarily U.S.-based)

Vulnerability Exploited: Weak credentials/default passwords in IoT devicesUnpatched firmware in home routers/cameras

Threat Actor: Aisuru botnetTurboMirai family

Motivation: Demonstration of capabilityPotential financial gain (e.g., ransom demands or disruption-for-hire)Testing infrastructure resilience

Incident : Vulnerability

Title: Critical Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Windows Graphics Component (CVE-2025-50165)

Description: Zscaler ThreatLabz discovered CVE-2025-50165, a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting the Windows Graphics Component with a CVSS score of 9.8. The flaw exists within windowscodecs.dll, a library used by numerous applications, including Microsoft Office, creating a widespread attack surface. Attackers can craft malicious JPEG images that, when processed by any application using windowscodecs.dll, trigger arbitrary code execution with minimal user interaction (e.g., opening a weaponized document). The vulnerability impacts Windows 11 Version 24H2, Windows Server 2025, and Server Core installations. Microsoft released a patch on August 12, 2025, updating affected versions to build 10.0.26100.4946.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-08-12

Date Resolved: 2025-08-12

Type: Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Malicious JPEG ImageWeaponized DocumentHeap Spraying + Return-Oriented Programming (ROP)

Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-50165 (Uninitialized Memory Pointer Dereference in GpReadOnlyMemoryStream::InitFile)

Incident : Predictive Analysis

Title: Predicted Cybersecurity Threats and Trends for 2026

Description: Security experts share predictions for incoming cyber threats in 2026, including attacks on SaaS infrastructure, AI agent vulnerabilities, identity sprawl, critical infrastructure risks, and regulatory shifts. Key concerns include concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google), AI-driven attacks, mandatory cyber resilience mandates, and the erosion of traditional authentication methods due to deepfakes and synthetic identities. The U.S. is expected to enforce national cyber-resilience mandates for critical infrastructure, while compliance may drive innovation in data and AI governance.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-01T00:00:00Z

Type: Predictive Analysis

Attack Vector: AI Agent Exploitation (e.g., autonomous decision-making, broad data access)SaaS Infrastructure Compromise (e.g., widely-deployed firewalls)Identity Sprawl (e.g., over-permissioned roles, shadow identities)Synthetic Social Engineering (e.g., deepfakes, adaptive phishing)Critical Infrastructure Targeting (e.g., energy grids, water systems)Supply Chain Attacks (e.g., multi-cloud complexities)Concentrated Infrastructure Risk (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google backbones)

Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Zero-Trust for Non-Human Identities (AI agents)Over-Permissioned IAM RolesDisconnected IAM SystemsStatic Authentication Methods (vulnerable to deepfakes)Shared Responsibility Model Gaps in Cloud SecurityOptional MFA (to be phased out)AI System Autonomy (unsupervised decision-making)Legacy Firewall Deployments (single point of failure for ecosystems)

Threat Actor: Nation-States (geopolitically motivated)Cybercriminal Syndicates (financially motivated)Initial Access Brokers (selling backdoors to high-value targets)AI-Powered Threat Actors (exploiting autonomous systems)Insider Threats (due to identity sprawl)

Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., ransomware, data exfiltration)Geopolitical Disruption (e.g., critical infrastructure sabotage)Espionage (e.g., AI-driven data theft)Market Manipulation (e.g., disrupting cloud providers)Talent Pipeline Exploitation (e.g., targeting entry-level job gaps)

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion

Title: Indirect-Shellcode-Executor: Novel EDR Bypass Technique via Windows API Exploitation

Description: A new offensive security tool developed in Rust, named Indirect-Shellcode-Executor, demonstrates a novel method for bypassing modern Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems by exploiting an overlooked behavior in the Windows API. The tool leverages the ReadProcessMemory function to inject shellcode, avoiding standard API calls monitored by security vendors. The technique manipulates the *lpNumberOfBytesRead pointer in ReadProcessMemory to force the API to write data into process memory, creating a 'write primitive' using a 'read' function. This bypasses AV/EDR hooks on functions like WriteProcessMemory or memcpy. The tool is a fully operational Proof of Concept (PoC) for Red Team operations, supporting remote payload execution (e.g., fetching shellcode from a C2 server hidden in a PNG file), terminal injection (direct shellcode/binaries via CLI), and file-based execution (payloads concealed in local files). The vulnerability was originally discovered by security researcher Jean-Pierre LESUEUR (DarkCoderSc) and documented on the Unprotect Project.

Type: EDR/AV Evasion

Attack Vector: Exploitation of Windows API (ReadProcessMemory)Pointer Manipulation (*lpNumberOfBytesRead)Memory Injection via 'Read' FunctionRemote Payload Fetching (C2)File-Based Payload Concealment

Vulnerability Exploited: Overlooked behavior in Windows API's ReadProcessMemory function, specifically the *lpNumberOfBytesRead [out] pointer, which can be manipulated to write data into process memory (write primitive via read function).

Motivation: Red Team OperationsSecurity ResearchProof of Concept (PoC)Defensive Posture Testing

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Stolen OAuth Tokens, Azure Data Factory service certificate, Malicious Document, Weak Passwords, Microsoft Exchange Server, Fake Accounts, Crafted links, Ghost Accounts, SOHO devicesVPN appliances, Basic Authentication, Fake repositoriesMalicious code, Malicious Extensions, dMSA migration mechanism, Helpdesk PortalsShared Directories, Malicious repositories, SharePoint Server Vulnerability, ToolPane endpoint, Deceptive recruitment processes, malicious NPM packages on GitHub, compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project), trojanized GitHub repositories (fake hacking tools), Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation, Phishing emailsRaccoonO365 phishing kits, Legacy API in Microsoft Entra ID, Compromised Teams Accounts (via phishing/credential theft)Legitimate Tenants Purchased on Dark WebExploited Guest/External Access MisconfigurationsMalicious Apps (Spoofed or Repurposed)Federated Trust Relationships (Cross-Tenant Access), Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues, Phishing campaignsInternet-facing vulnerabilities (potential initial access vectors), Anonymous/Guest Access in TeamsPublic Teams ProfilesExternal Meeting LinksCompromised Credentials (via phishing), SMB protocol (via script coercion), WSUS GetCookie() endpoint via crafted eventPorts 8530/8531, Internet-facing WSUS servers on TCP ports 8530 (HTTP) and 8531 (HTTPS), malvertising (Bing ads)fake Microsoft Teams download pages, VS Code Marketplace (susvsex extension)npm Registry (trojanized packages), npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact'), Exploited Vulnerabilities in IoT DevicesCompromised TotoLink Firmware Update Server, Compromised IoT devices (routers, cameras), Malicious JPEG image in weaponized document and Compromised SaaS Firewalls (single point of failure)Over-Permissioned AI Agents (autonomous lateral movement)Shadow Identities in IAM SystemsSupply Chain Vulnerabilities (multi-cloud complexities).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322

Data Compromised: Source code for bing, Source code for cortana, Emails, Documentation

Systems Affected: Azure DevOps server

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422

Data Compromised: Private Repository Data

Systems Affected: Github Private Repositories

Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422

Systems Affected: GitHub Servers

Downtime: Several Hours

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Data Compromised: Full control over resources and data

Systems Affected: Azure Automation Service

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Data Compromised: Sensitive information in integration runtimes

Systems Affected: Azure SynapseAzure Data Factory

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622

Systems Affected: Microsoft Office

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122

Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Email content, Company name, Phone numbers, Files linked to business

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222

Data Compromised: Email addresses, Ip addresses, Support case details

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323

Data Compromised: Source Code Repositories

Systems Affected: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723

Systems Affected: Outlook emailOneDrive file-sharing appsAzure's cloud computing infrastructure

Downtime: Severe outages

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823

Data Compromised: Job listing data

Systems Affected: MongoDB database

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal microsoft teams communications

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023

Systems Affected: GitHub Desktop for MacAtom

Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123

Data Compromised: Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft shared source kit

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223

Data Compromised: Plain text passwords

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information

Systems Affected: Microsoft Exchange Server

Operational Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures

Brand Reputation Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524

Brand Reputation Impact: High

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Data Compromised: User Data

Systems Affected: GitHub Platform

Brand Reputation Impact: High

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924

Systems Affected: Microsoft AzureMicrosoft 365OfficeOutlook

Downtime: 8 hours

Operational Impact: Global service interruption

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724

Data Compromised: Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts

Systems Affected: AI-powered Copilot

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524

Systems Affected: Microsoft 365 accountsTP-Link routers

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524

Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers, Other personal data

Incident : Privacy Breach MIC001010225

Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers

Systems Affected: Recall AI feature

Brand Reputation Impact: Significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users

Identity Theft Risk: High

Payment Information Risk: High

Incident : Password Spraying Attack MIC000022525

Systems Affected: Microsoft 365

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225

Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials

Brand Reputation Impact: Tarnished GitHub's reputation

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525

Systems Affected: Windows KDC Proxy service

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Systems Affected: VSCode Marketplace

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125

Data Compromised: Install action tokens, Docker credentials, Npm credentials, Aws credentials

Systems Affected: GitHub Repositories

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225

Data Compromised: Source code and secrets

Systems Affected: Public and private repositories, internal networks including GitHub's own systems

Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure MIC540040825

Systems Affected: Mark of the Web security featureWindows File Explorer

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Systems Affected: Windows Server 2025 environments

Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to domain controllers

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Systems Affected: Microsoft EdgeChromium-based browsers

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Systems Affected: Windows ExplorermacOS Quick LookEmail Client Preview SystemsFile Indexing Services

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Systems Affected: LinuxmacOS

Incident : Server Hack MIC709072225

Systems Affected: Microsoft SharePoint

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Data Compromised: Confidential Data

Systems Affected: SharePoint Servers

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Data Compromised: Machine keys, Credentials

Systems Affected: SharePoint Servers

Operational Impact: Ransomware Deployment

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Data Compromised: Sl2000 certificates, Sl3000 certificates

Systems Affected: Microsoft PlayReady DRM system

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Data Compromised: Browser credentials, remote command execution capabilities

Systems Affected: Windows, Linux, macOS environments

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Data Compromised: Secrets, Api keys, Tokens, Credentials

Systems Affected: GitHub repositoriesCI/CD pipelines

Operational Impact: malicious workflow executionrepository compromiseexfiltration server disruption

Brand Reputation Impact: potential trust erosion in open-source projects

Identity Theft Risk: ['high (due to stolen secrets)']

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Operational Impact: potential compromise of developers using trojanized toolsrisk of downstream supply chain attacks

Brand Reputation Impact: reputational risk to GitHub (if perceived as platform vulnerability)distrust in open-source hacking tools

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Data Compromised: User information (entra id), Group and role details, Tenant settings, Application permissions, Device information, Bitlocker keys, Azure resource access (via global admin impersonation)

Systems Affected: Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net)SharePoint OnlineExchange OnlineAzure-hosted resources (via tenant-level access)

Operational Impact: Potential full tenant compromise, including unauthorized account creation, permission escalation, and data exfiltration across all Entra ID-integrated services.

Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to potential for undetected, large-scale impersonation and data exfiltration)

Identity Theft Risk: High (impersonation of Global Admins and users)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Financial Loss: $100,000+ (cryptocurrency payments from subscriptions)

Data Compromised: Microsoft 365 usernames, Passwords, Persistent system access

Systems Affected: Microsoft 365 accountstargeted organizations' email systems

Operational Impact: unauthorized access to systemspotential follow-on attacks (ransomware, extortion, fraud)

Brand Reputation Impact: potential reputational damage to Microsoft 365 trustimpact on targeted organizations (e.g., healthcare sector)

Legal Liabilities: lawsuit filed by Microsoft and Health-ISACcriminal referral to international law enforcement

Identity Theft Risk: High (stolen credentials sold for fraud/identity theft)

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Systems Affected: Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)

Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized account creationPermission escalationSensitive data exfiltration

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential erosion of trust in Microsoft Entra ID security

Identity Theft Risk: ['High (impersonation of any user, including Global Admins)']

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Data Compromised: Api keys, Security tokens, Private source code, Unpublished zero-day vulnerability descriptions

Systems Affected: GitHub Copilot ChatPrivate/Internal Repositories

Operational Impact: High (Potential for stolen credentials/exploits to enable further attacks)

Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (Trust in AI-assisted coding tools undermined)

Identity Theft Risk: High (If stolen tokens/keys are abused)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Data Compromised: Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited)

Systems Affected: Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager component

Operational Impact: Potential lateral movement across networksUnauthorized execution of malicious code with elevated privileges

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage if exploited in high-profile breaches

Legal Liabilities: Non-compliance with CISA BOD 22-01 for federal agencies if unpatched

Identity Theft Risk: ['Possible if sensitive data is exfiltrated']

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Systems Affected: Windows systems running cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)Systems with configured sync root directories

Operational Impact: Potential SYSTEM-level privilege escalationArbitrary file creation in restricted directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)DLL side-loading attacks

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for Microsoft due to critical vulnerability in core cloud sync functionality

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Systems Affected: Windows 10 (older versions)Windows 11 (older versions)Windows Server (older versions)

Operational Impact: Potential system-level privilege escalation; unauthorized access to shared files/printers

Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (associated with unpatched systems and active exploitation)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Systems Affected: Windows Servers with WSUS role enabled

Operational Impact: Potential full system compromise with SYSTEM privilegesArbitrary command execution

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to exploitation of critical vulnerability

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Data Compromised: System information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain, ipconfig /all)

Systems Affected: Windows Server 2012 through 2025 with WSUS role enabled

Operational Impact: Potential for catastrophic downstream effects if WSUS servers are used to distribute malicious updatesReconnaissance and lateral movement risks

Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to potential for large-scale compromise via WSUS)

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Data Compromised: Potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), Sensitive organizational and personal data

Systems Affected: Windows machines via malicious Teams installernetworks compromised post-initial access

Operational Impact: disruption of business operations due to ransomware encryptionincident response and recovery efforts

Brand Reputation Impact: damage to trust in Microsoft Teams downloadsreputational harm to affected organizations

Legal Liabilities: potential regulatory fines for data breacheslegal actions from affected parties

Identity Theft Risk: ['high (due to stolen PII)', 'risk of credential stuffing attacks']

Payment Information Risk: ['potential exposure if financial data was exfiltrated']

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Systems Affected: Microsoft Teams (iOS)Microsoft Teams (other platforms, implied)

Operational Impact: Erosion of digital trust in collaboration tools, increased risk of phishing/social engineering success, potential unauthorized actions by tricked users (e.g., clicking malicious links, sharing sensitive data)

Brand Reputation Impact: High (undermines trust in Microsoft Teams as a secure collaboration platform)

Identity Theft Risk: High (if users disclose sensitive information to impersonated attackers)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Data Compromised: Files in test directories (c:\users\public\testing, /tmp/testing), Potential system data via vidar infostealer (credentials, cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, etc.)

Systems Affected: Windows (VS Code)macOS (VS Code)Systems with infected npm packages (Windows/Linux/macOS)

Operational Impact: Potential disruption for developers using infected extensions/packagesCompromise of development environments

Brand Reputation Impact: Negative publicity for VS Code Marketplace and npm registryErosion of trust in open-source ecosystems

Identity Theft Risk: ['High (Vidar Infostealer targets PII, credentials, and financial data)']

Payment Information Risk: ['High (Vidar Infostealer exfiltrates cryptocurrency wallets and payment details)']

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Systems Affected: Microsoft SQL Server (versions not specified)

Operational Impact: Potential complete compromise of affected databases (manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion of sensitive data)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Data Compromised: Github authentication tokens, Potential downstream repository access

Systems Affected: GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelinesdeveloper workstations (via npm install)

Operational Impact: potential cascading supply chain attackscompromised build environments

Brand Reputation Impact: eroded trust in npm/GitHub Actions ecosystemdeveloper caution in package installation

Identity Theft Risk: ['if tokens allowed access to personal repositories']

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Systems Affected: Microsoft Azure Network (Public IP in Australia)Cloudflare DNS Service (1.1.1.1)Legitimate Domains in Cloudflare’s Top Rankings (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft, Google)

Operational Impact: Disruption of Azure Services (Targeted IP)Distortion of Cloudflare’s DNS Query Volume RankingsMitigation Efforts by Cloudflare and Microsoft

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Erosion of Trust in Cloudflare’s DNS RankingsPerception of Vulnerability in IoT Devices

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Systems Affected: Azure endpoint (Australia)

Downtime: None (service continued without interruption)

Operational Impact: None reported

Brand Reputation Impact: Minimal (successful mitigation highlighted Microsoft’s resilience)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Systems Affected: Windows 11 Version 24H2 (x64)Windows 11 Version 24H2 (ARM64)Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2025 (Server Core)

Operational Impact: High (Potential full system compromise via arbitrary code execution)

Brand Reputation Impact: High (Critical vulnerability with widespread media coverage)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Financial Loss: Projected increase in breach costs for ungoverned AI systems (per IBM 2025 report); potential economic catastrophe from cascading failures in cloud backbones (Microsoft, Amazon, Google).

Data Compromised: High risk of PII, corporate data, and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks.

Systems Affected: SaaS Platforms (e.g., firewalls, cloud services)AI Agents (autonomous systems with broad access)Critical Infrastructure (energy, water, communications)Multi-Cloud EnvironmentsIAM Systems (vulnerable to credential-based attacks)

Downtime: Potential for prolonged outages in critical sectors (e.g., energy grids, water supply) due to nation-state attacks.

Operational Impact: Disruption of essential services, erosion of public trust, and supply chain breakdowns.

Revenue Loss: Significant for organizations failing to meet 2026 cyber-resilience mandates (loss of contracts, insurance, regulatory standing).

Customer Complaints: Expected surge due to service disruptions and data breaches.

Brand Reputation Impact: Severe for companies experiencing high-profile AI or SaaS breaches, especially in concentrated infrastructure sectors.

Legal Liabilities: Fines and legal actions for non-compliance with 2026 mandates (e.g., CISA, CMMC, FISMA).

Identity Theft Risk: High due to synthetic identities and over-permissioned roles.

Payment Information Risk: Elevated in SaaS and cloud environments targeted by supply chain attacks.

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Operational Impact: Potential evasion of EDR/AV detection mechanisms, enabling undetected shellcode execution in memory. Security teams must update API monitoring rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls targeting executable memory sections.

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $33.73 thousand.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Source Code, Emails, Documentation, , Private Repository Data, Sensitive Information, , Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files Linked To Business, , Email Addresses, Ip Addresses, Support Case Details, , Source Code, Job listing data, Secrets, Private Keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams Communications, , Code Signing Certificates, , Source Code, Internal Builds, , Plain Text Passwords, , Email accounts, sensitive information, Personal and potentially sensitive information, User Data, Employee Salaries, Financial Reports, Internal System Prompts, , Credit Card Numbers, Social Security Numbers, Other Personal Data, , Credit Card Numbers, Social Security Numbers, , Personal Data, Credentials, , Credentials, , Source code and secrets, Confidential Data, Machine keys, Credentials, Certificates, Browser credentials, Api Keys (Pypi, Npm, Dockerhub, Github, Cloudflare, Aws), Github Tokens, Repository Secrets, , User Identities, Group/Role Memberships, Tenant Configurations, Application Permissions, Device Metadata (Including Bitlocker Keys), Azure Resource Access Credentials, , Microsoft 365 Credentials (Usernames/Passwords), Persistent System Access, , Authentication Tokens (Entra Id), Chat/Message Content, Shared Files (Onedrive/Sharepoint), User Profiles (Presence, Contacts), Ad/Entra Id Metadata (Groups, Roles, Permissions), Pii (In Some Cases), , Source Code, Secrets (Api Keys, Tokens), Unpublished Vulnerability Research, , Potential Sensitive Data (If Exfiltrated Post-Exploitation), , Credentials, Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Corporate/Work Documents, Cloud-Stored Files, Communication Metadata (E.G., Meeting Participants, Chat Logs), , System Configuration Data, Network Information, User/Group Data, , Potentially Pii, Corporate Data, Credentials, Financial Information (If Exfiltrated), , Files In Test Directories, Potential Pii (Via Vidar: Credentials, Cookies, Cryptocurrency Wallets, Browser Data), , Github Authentication Tokens, Environment Variables, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Corporate Intellectual Property, Ai Training Datasets, Cloud Customer Data (Via Saas Breaches), Critical Infrastructure Operational Data and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422

Entity Name: Github

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Software Development

Customers Affected: Dozens of victim organizations

Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Software Development

Customers Affected: Many Users

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Telecommunications Company

Industry: Telecommunications

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Car Manufacturer

Industry: Automotive

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Car Manufacturer

Industry: Automotive

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Banking Conglomerate

Industry: Finance

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Big Four Accounting Firm

Industry: Accounting

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Entity Type: Israeli Cloud Infrastructure Security Company

Industry: Cloud Security

Location: Israel

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Software Company

Industry: Technology

Location: Redmond, Washington, USA

Size: Large

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Technology

Customers Affected: More than 65,000 entities from 111 countries

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Technology

Customers Affected: 250000000

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Software Development

Customers Affected: Hundreds of developers

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Entity Name: Microsoft AI Research Division

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Technology

Customers Affected: None

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Software Development

Customers Affected: None

Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Software Development Platform

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Technology Company

Industry: Software

Location: United States

Customers Affected: Over 30,000 organizations

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Software Development

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: SpainThailandUS

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Platform

Industry: Software Development

Customers Affected: GitHub Users

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524

Industry: Government, Law, Defense, NGOs

Location: North AmericaEurope

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Privacy Breach MIC001010225

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Technology

Incident : Password Spraying Attack MIC000022525

Entity Name: Microsoft 365

Entity Type: Cloud Service

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Platform

Industry: Software Development

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Redmond, WA, USA

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Handful of users

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Software Development

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Software Development

Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure MIC540040825

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Entity Type: Organization

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Entity Name: Git CLI Users

Entity Type: Software Users

Industry: Software Development

Incident : Server Hack MIC709072225

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Redmond, WA, USA

Size: Large

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Entity Name: National Nuclear Security Administration

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: US

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Entity Name: US Education Department

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Education

Location: US

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Entity Name: Florida’s Department of Revenue

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: US

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Entity Name: Rhode Island General Assembly

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: US

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: Department of Homeland Security

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: Department of Health and Human Services

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: Department of Education

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: State and local government agencies

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Government

Location: United States

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entity Name: Various organizations across sectors

Entity Type: Private and Public Sector

Industry: Government, Healthcare, Finance, Education

Location: Multiple

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Entity Name: Netflix

Entity Type: Streaming Service

Industry: Entertainment

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Entity Name: Amazon Prime Video

Entity Type: Streaming Service

Industry: Entertainment

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Entity Name: Disney+

Entity Type: Streaming Service

Industry: Entertainment

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Entity Type: Individuals (job seekers, software developers, IT professionals)

Industry: Various

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Entity Name: GitHub

Entity Type: code hosting platform

Industry: technology

Location: global

Customers Affected: 327 compromised accounts (817 repositories)

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Entity Name: FastUUID (compromised project)

Entity Type: open-source project

Industry: software development

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Entity Name: GitHub (platform)

Entity Type: code hosting platform

Industry: technology

Location: global

Customers Affected: developers using trojanized repositories, potential downstream victims of compromised tools

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Entity Name: Developers using trojanized repositories

Entity Type: end-users

Industry: various (likely cybersecurity, software development)

Location: global

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology (Cloud Services, Identity Management)

Location: Global

Size: Large (Enterprise)

Customers Affected: All Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) tenants (excluding national cloud deployments)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Entity Name: Microsoft (targeted credentials)

Entity Type: Technology Corporation

Industry: Software/Cloud Services

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: 5,000+ (credentials stolen from 94 countries)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Entity Name: 2,300+ US organizations (tax-themed phishing campaign)

Entity Type: Businesses, Government Entities, Nonprofits

Industry: Multiple

Location: United States

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Entity Name: 20+ American healthcare organizations

Entity Type: Healthcare Providers

Industry: Healthcare

Location: United States

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Entity Name: GitHub (Microsoft)

Entity Type: Technology Company

Industry: Software Development/DevOps

Location: San Francisco, California, USA

Size: Large (10,000+ employees)

Customers Affected: Developers/Organizations using Copilot Chat with private repositories

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Entity Name: Federal Civilian Executive Branch Agencies (U.S.)

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Public Sector

Location: United States

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Entity Name: Organizations using Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager

Entity Type: Private Sector, Public Sector, Critical Infrastructure

Location: Global

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation, Software Vendor

Industry: Technology, Software, Cloud Services

Location: Redmond, Washington, USA

Size: Large (Enterprise)

Customers Affected: Users of Windows systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Redmond, Washington, USA

Size: Large (Global)

Customers Affected: Users of unpatched Windows 10/11 and Windows Server systems

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Technology Corporation

Industry: Software Development

Location: Redmond, Washington, USA

Size: Large Enterprise

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Entity Name: Multiple Organizations (Indiscriminate Targeting)

Entity Type: Enterprises, Government Agencies, Organizations using WSUS

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Entity Name: Unspecified organizations (27+ since June 2024, ~200 since 2023)

Entity Type: private companies, public sector (possible), non-profits (possible)

Location: global (targeted via Bing ads)

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Entity Name: Microsoft (indirectly, via abuse of Teams branding)

Entity Type: technology corporation

Industry: software/IT

Location: global

Size: large enterprise

Customers Affected: users who clicked malicious ads

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large (Enterprise)

Customers Affected: All Microsoft Teams users (especially iOS users for CVE-2024-38197)

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Entity Name: Microsoft Teams Users

Entity Type: Individuals/Organizations

Industry: Multiple (all industries using Teams)

Location: Global

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Entity Name: Microsoft (VS Code Marketplace)

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: Unknown (extension removed before widespread adoption)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Entity Name: npm Registry Users

Entity Type: Developers/Organizations

Industry: Software Development

Location: Global

Size: Varies

Customers Affected: ~2,240 downloads (potentially automated scrapers)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Entity Name: GitHub (C2 Repository Host)

Entity Type: Platform

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Entity Name: Microsoft (SQL Server users)

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Entity Name: GitHub (Microsoft)

Entity Type: technology company

Industry: software development/platform

Location: San Francisco, California, USA

Size: large enterprise

Customers Affected: developers using GitHub Actions (206,000+ package downloads)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Entity Name: Developers using '@acitons/artifact'

Entity Type: individuals/organizations

Industry: software development, DevOps, CI/CD

Location: global

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider

Industry: Technology

Location: Global (Targeted IP in Australia)

Size: Large Enterprise

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Entity Name: Cloudflare

Entity Type: Cloud/CDN Provider

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large Enterprise

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Entity Name: End Users of Compromised IoT Devices

Entity Type: Consumers/Residential Users

Industry: Multiple (Home Networks)

Location: United StatesOther Countries (Global)

Customers Affected: 500,000+ IP Addresses (Botnet Size)

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Entity Name: Microsoft Azure

Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider

Industry: Technology/Cloud Computing

Location: Global (targeted endpoint in Australia)

Size: Enterprise

Customers Affected: None (workloads maintained)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Entity Name: Microsoft

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: All users of Windows 11 Version 24H2, Windows Server 2025, and Server Core installations

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Entity Name: Critical Infrastructure Sectors (U.S.)

Entity Type: Government/Private Partnership

Industry: Energy, Water Supply, Communications, Transportation

Location: United States

Size: National

Customers Affected: Potentially millions (public and private sector)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Entity Name: Cloud Hyperscalers

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Cloud Computing

Location: Global

Size: Large (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google)

Customers Affected: Billions (indirectly via ecosystem exposure)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Entity Name: SaaS Providers

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Software as a Service

Location: Global

Size: Varies

Customers Affected: Widespread (1/8 of world's networks at risk via single firewall breach)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Entity Name: Organizations Using AI Agents

Entity Type: Corporation/Government

Industry: Cross-sector

Location: Global

Size: Varies

Customers Affected: Depends on AI deployment scale

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Entity Type: Security Vendors, Organizations using EDR/AV Solutions, Windows-based Systems

Industry: Cybersecurity

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422

Containment Measures: Notifying impacted users and organizations

Communication Strategy: Notifying impacted users and organizations

Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422

Containment Measures: Removed Several Repositories

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522

Remediation Measures: Patch released in December 2021

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Remediation Measures: Mitigated the security flaw

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622

Containment Measures: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823

Third Party Assistance: Chris Vickery.

Containment Measures: Secured the database

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Third Party Assistance: Wiz.

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223

Containment Measures: Password Reset

Communication Strategy: Public Statement

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Remediation Measures: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524

Containment Measures: Disable fake accounts

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Remediation Measures: Patch released

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Containment Measures: Disabled Ghost Accounts

Remediation Measures: Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525

Remediation Measures: Patch deployed

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125

Remediation Measures: Implement stricter file and folder access controls

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225

Remediation Measures: Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Remediation Measures: Implement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.psRestrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Remediation Measures: Patching

Communication Strategy: Public DisclosureUser Notifications

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Containment Measures: Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro Blocking

Remediation Measures: Deploy Behavioral Monitoring

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Containment Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versionsAvoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched

Remediation Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versionsMonitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Remediation Measures: Patches Issued by Microsoft

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Remediation Measures: Emergency patches, rotate machine keys, enable AMSI, conduct thorough security assessments

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Containment Measures: DMCA takedown noticesAccount suspensions

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Gitguardian (Detection/Alerting), Pypi (Mitigation).

Containment Measures: shut down exfiltration serverreverted malicious commitsread-only mode for compromised project

Remediation Measures: alerted affected users via GitHub issuesremoved malicious workflows

Recovery Measures: account recovery for legitimate owners

Communication Strategy: public report by GitGuardiandirect notifications to repository owners

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Third Party Assistance: Reversinglabs (Discovery And Analysis).

Remediation Measures: GitHub may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated)

Communication Strategy: ReversingLabs blog post (public disclosure)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Containment Measures: Patch deployed by Microsoft on July 17, 2025Deprecation and retirement of Azure AD Graph API (effective August 31, 2025)Migration guidance to Microsoft Graph for affected applications

Remediation Measures: No customer action required (server-side patch)Encouragement to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft GraphReview of applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Technical blog post by researcher Dirk-jan MollemaAdvisories from cloud security firms (e.g., Mitiga)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Cloudflare, Health-Isac.

Law Enforcement Notified: Criminal referral to international law enforcement (Ogundipe),

Containment Measures: Seizure of 338 RaccoonO365 websitesCloudflare takedown of domains/Worker accountsInterstitial 'phish warning' pagesTermination of Workers scriptsSuspension of user accounts

Remediation Measures: Lawsuit against Ogundipe and associatesRestraining order (limited to US jurisdiction)

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft/Cloudflare blogsCoordination with Health-ISAC

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Third Party Assistance: Mitiga (Research Analysis).

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), Hackerone (Vulnerability Disclosure).

Containment Measures: Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat (2024-08-14)Blocked Camo image-proxy exfiltration route

Remediation Measures: Long-term fix under development

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Incident Response Plan Activated: ['CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01']

Containment Measures: Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied

Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services

Communication Strategy: CISA advisory (KEV catalog inclusion)Public warning via media (e.g., Google News, LinkedIn, X)

Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for detecting exploitation attempts

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Third Party Assistance: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery).

Containment Measures: October 2025 security updates (patch release)

Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft security updates (October 2025)Prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (Microsoft patch release)

Third Party Assistance: Crowdstrike, Google Project Zero, Vicarius (Detection Script).

Containment Measures: Patch deployment (June 2025 Patch Tuesday)SMB traffic monitoring

Remediation Measures: Apply security updatesEnable SMB signingRestrict SMB to trusted networks

Communication Strategy: CISA KEV listingTechRadar advisoryVicarius detection script

Network Segmentation: Recommended (restrict SMB exposure)

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor outbound SMB traffic

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Security Researchers (Meow, F7D8C52Bec79E42795Cf15888B85Cbad, Markus Wulftange With Code White Gmbh), Hawktrace (Batuhan Er), Eye Security, Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (Ncsc).

Containment Measures: Out-of-band security patch releaseSystem reboot required post-patchDisabling WSUS Server Role (if enabled)Blocking inbound traffic to Ports 8530 and 8531 on host firewall

Remediation Measures: Patch application (KB updates for affected Windows Server versions)Removal of BinaryFormatter from .NET 9 (August 2024)

Communication Strategy: Public advisory via Microsoft Security Update GuideCollaboration with CISA for KEV catalog inclusionMedia updates via The Hacker News

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Incident Response Plan Activated: ['Microsoft (emergency patch)', 'Threat Intelligence Teams (e.g., Google Threat Intelligence Group, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro ZDI)']

Third Party Assistance: Google Threat Intelligence Group (Gtig), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (Zdi).

Containment Measures: Emergency Patch (Microsoft)Network Segmentation (recommended)Disabling Internet-Facing WSUS Instances

Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft's emergency patchMonitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, data exfiltration)

Communication Strategy: Public advisories by Microsoft and CISAMedia coverage (e.g., The Register)

Network Segmentation: ['Recommended to limit exposure of WSUS servers']

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor for PowerShell commands (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig)Check for exfiltration to Webhook.site endpoints

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Incident Response Plan Activated: ['likely by affected organizations', 'Microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates']

Third Party Assistance: Expel (Threat Intelligence Tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team.

Containment Measures: Microsoft revoked malicious certificatesAV vendors updating detection signatures

Remediation Measures: removal of OysterLoader/Latrodectus malwarepatch management for exploited vulnerabilities

Recovery Measures: restoration from backups (if available)rebuilding compromised systems

Communication Strategy: Expel blog post (2024-10-18)Microsoft social media advisory (2024-10-15)

Network Segmentation: ['recommended for affected organizations']

Enhanced Monitoring: Expel tracking indicators on GitHubrecommended for potential targets

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (responsible disclosure by Check Point, patch development by Microsoft)

Third Party Assistance: Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure)

Containment Measures: Patches released in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197)Subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025

Remediation Measures: Software updates for Microsoft TeamsSecurity advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks)

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure by Check Point and The Hacker NewsMicrosoft security advisory (released in September 2024)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Secure Annex (Research), Datadog Security Labs (Research).

Containment Measures: Microsoft removed 'susvsex' from VS Code Marketplace (2025-11-06)npm banned malicious accounts ('aartje', 'saliii229911') and packages

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure by researchers (Secure Annex, Datadog)Media coverage

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Remediation Measures: Patch affected SQL Server instancesReview and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controlsMonitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts

Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft advisoryRecommendations for urgent patching and access control reviews

Enhanced Monitoring: SQL Server logs for suspicious activity

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Veracode Threat Research.

Containment Measures: npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact')removal of two GitHub user accounts linked to malwareblocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83'

Remediation Measures: Veracode Package Firewall protection for customersadvisory for GitHub Actions users to scrutinize dependencies

Communication Strategy: public disclosure by Veracodemedia coverage (e.g., GBH)

Enhanced Monitoring: recommended for GitHub Actions environments

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Containment Measures: Mitigation of UDP Flood TrafficTraceback and Enforcement by ISPsRedaction/Hiding of Malicious Domains in Cloudflare Rankings

Remediation Measures: Cloudflare’s Adjustment of DNS Ranking AlgorithmRemoval of Aisuru-Linked Domains from Public Rankings

Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure by Microsoft and CloudflareMedia Coverage by Infosec Journalists (e.g., Brian Krebs)

Enhanced Monitoring: Increased DDoS Mitigation Capabilities (Cloudflare, Microsoft)

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Containment Measures: Azure DDoS Protection infrastructure filteringTraffic redirection

Remediation Measures: Botnet IP blockingEnhanced monitoring for Aisuru/TurboMirai activity

Communication Strategy: Public blog post by MicrosoftMedia statements

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: True

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Third Party Assistance: Zscaler Threatlabz (Discovery).

Containment Measures: Patch deployment (build 10.0.26100.4946)

Remediation Measures: Immediate patching of all affected Windows systemsPrioritization of Windows infrastructure updates

Communication Strategy: Public advisory via Microsoft Security Update GuideUrgent recommendation for 48-hour patch deployment

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Incident Response Plan Activated: Anticipated: National cyber-resilience mandates (U.S. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure.

Third Party Assistance: Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation.

Law Enforcement Notified: Mandatory for critical infrastructure breaches under 2026 regulations.

Containment Measures: Zero-Trust Architectures (extended to AI agents)Continuous Context-Aware Verification (for identity sprawl)Mandatory MFA Enforcement (cloud providers)Network Segmentation (critical infrastructure)

Remediation Measures: AI-Specific Credential ManagementIAM System ConsolidationSupply Chain Risk AssessmentsResilience Metrics Reporting (for regulatory compliance)

Recovery Measures: Public-Private Threat Intelligence SharingInsurance-Linked Incentives for Cyber HygieneInvestor Penalties for Poor Resilience

Communication Strategy: Transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or AI systems.

Network Segmentation: Critical for containing cascading failures in cloud backbones.

Enhanced Monitoring: Required for AI agents and autonomous systems.

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Containment Measures: Review and update API monitoring rules for ReadProcessMemory calls, especially those targeting executable memory sections.

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor for unusual ReadProcessMemory calls with *lpNumberOfBytesRead pointer manipulation.

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Recommended (Microsoft Defender XDR playbooks, Entra ID Protection), , CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, , Yes (Microsoft patch release), , Microsoft (emergency patch), Threat Intelligence Teams (e.g., Google Threat Intelligence Group, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro ZDI), , likely by affected organizations, Microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates, , Yes (responsible disclosure by Check Point, patch development by Microsoft), , , , , Anticipated: National cyber-resilience mandates (U.S. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure..

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Chris Vickery, , Wiz, , GitGuardian (detection/alerting), PyPI (mitigation), , ReversingLabs (discovery and analysis), , Cloudflare, Health-ISAC, , Mitiga (research analysis), , Microsoft Detection and Response Team (DART), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC), Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs), , Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), HackerOne (Vulnerability Disclosure), , Exodus Intelligence (vulnerability discovery), , CrowdStrike, Google Project Zero, Vicarius (detection script), , Security Researchers (MEOW, f7d8c52bec79e42795cf15888b85cbad, Markus Wulftange with CODE WHITE GmbH), HawkTrace (Batuhan Er), Eye Security, Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), , Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), , Expel (threat intelligence tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), Secure Annex (research), Datadog Security Labs (research), , Veracode Threat Research, , Zscaler ThreatLabz (Discovery), , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation..

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322

Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Emails, Documentation

Sensitivity of Data: High

File Types Exposed: zip archive

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422

Type of Data Compromised: Private Repository Data

Data Exfiltration: Yes

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive information

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122

Type of Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Email content, Company name, Phone numbers, Files linked to business

Number of Records Exposed: More than 65,000 entities

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222

Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Ip addresses, Support case details

Number of Records Exposed: 250000000

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323

Type of Data Compromised: Source Code

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823

Type of Data Compromised: Job listing data

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Type of Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal microsoft teams communications

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023

Type of Data Compromised: Code signing certificates

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Encryption: True

Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123

Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Internal builds

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223

Type of Data Compromised: Plain text passwords

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Type of Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Type of Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Type of Data Compromised: User Data

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724

Type of Data Compromised: Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524

Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers, Other personal data

Sensitivity of Data: High

File Types Exposed: Notepad windowPDF

Personally Identifiable Information: credit card numberssocial security numbersother personal data

Incident : Privacy Breach MIC001010225

Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers

Sensitivity of Data: High

File Types Exposed: Screenshots

Personally Identifiable Information: Credit card numbersSocial Security numbers

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225

Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125

Type of Data Compromised: Credentials

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225

Type of Data Compromised: Source code and secrets

Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

File Types Exposed: LNK FilesPDFsOffice Documents

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration of intellectual property and proprietary source code

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Type of Data Compromised: Confidential Data

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Possible

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Type of Data Compromised: Machine keys, Credentials

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Type of Data Compromised: Certificates

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Type of Data Compromised: Browser credentials

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Yes

Data Encryption: XOR encryption

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Type of Data Compromised: Api keys (pypi, npm, dockerhub, github, cloudflare, aws), Github tokens, Repository secrets

Number of Records Exposed: 3325

Sensitivity of Data: high (authentication credentials, cloud access keys)

File Types Exposed: secrets embedded in code/repositoriesenvironment variables

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Type of Data Compromised: User identities, Group/role memberships, Tenant configurations, Application permissions, Device metadata (including bitlocker keys), Azure resource access credentials

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes administrative credentials and encryption keys)

Data Exfiltration: Potential (no evidence of exploitation in the wild)

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (via user profile data in Entra ID)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Type of Data Compromised: Microsoft 365 credentials (usernames/passwords), Persistent system access

Number of Records Exposed: 5,000+

Sensitivity of Data: High (credentials enable access to corporate systems, email, and sensitive data)

Personally Identifiable Information: Email addressespotential PII accessed via compromised accounts

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Data Exfiltration: Potential (if exploited)

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if Global Admin privileges abused)

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Secrets (api keys, tokens), Unpublished vulnerability research

Sensitivity of Data: High (Includes zero-day exploit details and authentication credentials)

File Types Exposed: Markdown FilesCode FilesPrivate Issues/Pull Requests

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Type of Data Compromised: Potential sensitive data (if exfiltrated post-exploitation)

Sensitivity of Data: High (if administrative access is gained)

Data Exfiltration: Possible if exploited

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential risk if PII is accessible on compromised systems

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Data Encryption: ['AES-128-CBC used for cookie data (vulnerable to deserialization attack)']

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Type of Data Compromised: System configuration data, Network information, User/group data

Sensitivity of Data: Medium (internal network reconnaissance data)

Data Exfiltration: Observed via PowerShell payloads to Webhook.site endpoints

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Type of Data Compromised: Potentially pii, Corporate data, Credentials, Financial information (if exfiltrated)

Number of Records Exposed: millions (exact number undisclosed)

Sensitivity of Data: high (includes PII and proprietary data)

Data Exfiltration: confirmed (Rhysida posts non-paying victims' data on leak site)

Data Encryption: ['yes (ransomware encrypts files post-infection)']

Personally Identifiable Information: likely (based on Rhysida's historical targeting)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Type of Data Compromised: Files in test directories, Potential pii (via vidar: credentials, cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, browser data)

Sensitivity of Data: Low (test files)High (Vidar-targeted data)

Data Exfiltration: ZIP archives uploaded to remote server (susvsex)Data sent to Vidar C2 servers

Data Encryption: ['Files in test directories replaced with encrypted versions (susvsex)']

File Types Exposed: ZIP archivesPotentially all file types in compromised systems (Vidar)

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (via Vidar Infostealer)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Data Exfiltration: Potential (if exploited)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Type of Data Compromised: Github authentication tokens, Environment variables

Sensitivity of Data: high (build environment credentials)

Data Encryption: ['AES encryption for exfiltrated data']

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Corporate intellectual property, Ai training datasets, Cloud customer data (via saas breaches), Critical infrastructure operational data

Number of Records Exposed: Potentially billions (scalable via SaaS/AI attacks)

Sensitivity of Data: High (includes AI models, national infrastructure data, and financial records)

Data Exfiltration: Likely in AI agent and SaaS attacks (autonomous systems as exfiltration vectors).

File Types Exposed: Databases (SQL, NoSQL)AI Model Weights/ParametersLog Files (cloud/SaaS)Configuration Files (IAM, firewall rules)Multimedia (deepfake source material)

Personally Identifiable Information: High risk due to identity sprawl and synthetic social engineering.

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patch released in December 2021, Mitigated the security flaw, , Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content, Patch deployed, Implement stricter file and folder access controls, , Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team, Implement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, , Patching, , Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, , Upgrade to patched Git versions, Monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, , Patches Issued by Microsoft, Emergency patches, rotate machine keys, enable AMSI, conduct thorough security assessments, alerted affected users via GitHub issues, removed malicious workflows, , GitHub may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated), , No customer action required (server-side patch), Encouragement to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph, Review of applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API, , Lawsuit against Ogundipe and associates, Restraining order (limited to US jurisdiction), , Password Resets for Affected Users, MFA Re-Enrollment, Patch Teams Clients/Endpoints, Remove Persistent Backdoors (e.g., Sticky Keys, Startup Tasks), Audit Entra ID Configurations (PIM, Conditional Access), , Long-term fix under development, , Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230, Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services, , Patch Microsoft Teams/OS Vulnerabilities, Deploy Antivirus/Endpoint Protection, Use Data Removal Services to Scrub PII, Phishing Awareness Training, , Apply Microsoft security updates (October 2025), Prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories, , Apply security updates, Enable SMB signing, Restrict SMB to trusted networks, , Patch application (KB updates for affected Windows Server versions), Removal of BinaryFormatter from .NET 9 (August 2024), , Apply Microsoft's emergency patch, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, data exfiltration), , removal of OysterLoader/Latrodectus malware, patch management for exploited vulnerabilities, , Software updates for Microsoft Teams, Security advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks), , Patch affected SQL Server instances, Review and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controls, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, , Veracode Package Firewall protection for customers, advisory for GitHub Actions users to scrutinize dependencies, , Cloudflare’s Adjustment of DNS Ranking Algorithm, Removal of Aisuru-Linked Domains from Public Rankings, , Botnet IP blocking, Enhanced monitoring for Aisuru/TurboMirai activity, , Immediate patching of all affected Windows systems, Prioritization of Windows infrastructure updates, , AI-Specific Credential Management, IAM System Consolidation, Supply Chain Risk Assessments, Resilience Metrics Reporting (for regulatory compliance), .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by notifying impacted users and organizations, removed several repositories, , disabling the msdt url protocol, secured the database, password reset, , disable fake accounts, disabled ghost accounts, disable preview panes, block outbound smb traffic, enforce macro blocking, , upgrade to patched git versions, avoid using github desktop for macos until patched, , dmca takedown notices, account suspensions, , shut down exfiltration server, reverted malicious commits, read-only mode for compromised project, , patch deployed by microsoft on july 17, 2025, deprecation and retirement of azure ad graph api (effective august 31, 2025), migration guidance to microsoft graph for affected applications, , seizure of 338 raccoono365 websites, cloudflare takedown of domains/worker accounts, interstitial 'phish warning' pages, termination of workers scripts, suspension of user accounts, , isolate compromised accounts/devices, disable external access (federation, guest users), revoke suspicious oauth tokens, block malicious ips/domains (defender for office 365), quarantine phishing emails/teams messages, , disabled image rendering in copilot chat (2024-08-14), blocked camo image-proxy exfiltration route, , isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, , enable privacy mode in teams, restrict guest/external access, limit admin permissions, remove unused guest accounts, , october 2025 security updates (patch release), , patch deployment (june 2025 patch tuesday), smb traffic monitoring, , out-of-band security patch release, system reboot required post-patch, disabling wsus server role (if enabled), blocking inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 on host firewall, , emergency patch (microsoft), network segmentation (recommended), disabling internet-facing wsus instances, , microsoft revoked malicious certificates, av vendors updating detection signatures, , patches released in august 2024 (cve-2024-38197), subsequent patches in september 2024 and october 2025, , microsoft removed 'susvsex' from vs code marketplace (2025-11-06), npm banned malicious accounts ('aartje', 'saliii229911') and packages, , npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact'), removal of two github user accounts linked to malware, blocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', , mitigation of udp flood traffic, traceback and enforcement by isps, redaction/hiding of malicious domains in cloudflare rankings, , azure ddos protection infrastructure filtering, traffic redirection, , patch deployment (build 10.0.26100.4946), , zero-trust architectures (extended to ai agents), continuous context-aware verification (for identity sprawl), mandatory mfa enforcement (cloud providers), network segmentation (critical infrastructure), , review and update api monitoring rules for readprocessmemory calls, especially those targeting executable memory sections. and .

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Ransom Demanded: ShibaCoin

Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Ransomware Strain: Warlock

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Data Encryption: XOR encryption

Data Exfiltration: Yes

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Data Exfiltration: ['Reconnaissance data (no ransomware observed yet)']

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Ransomware Strain: RhysidaOysterLoader (loader)Latrodectus (initial access)

Data Encryption: ['yes (post-infection)']

Data Exfiltration: ['yes (double extortion model)']

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Ransomware Strain: Custom (susvsex extension)

Data Encryption: ['AES/Other (files in test directories)']

Data Exfiltration: ['Yes (ZIP archives to remote server)']

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through account recovery for legitimate owners, , Restore Teams Data from Backups (if ransomware), Rebuild Compromised Tenants (in severe cases), User Training (Phishing Simulations, Social Engineering Awareness), Enhanced Logging (Teams Audit Logs, Defender XDR), , Restore from Backups (if ransomware), Reset Compromised Credentials, Reconfigure Teams Security Settings, , restoration from backups (if available), rebuilding compromised systems, , Public-Private Threat Intelligence Sharing, Insurance-Linked Incentives for Cyber Hygiene, Investor Penalties for Poor Resilience, .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Regulatory Notifications: CISA added CVE-2025-53770 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Legal Actions: Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only),

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Regulations Violated: Potential violation of CISA BOD 22-01 if federal agencies fail to patch by November 4, 2025,

Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV catalog inclusion (October 14, 2025)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV Catalog (added 2025-10-20)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Regulatory Notifications: Added to CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (remediation deadline: 2025-11-14)

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Regulatory Notifications: CISA added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Regulatory Notifications: likely required for affected organizations (e.g., GDPR, state breach laws)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Regulations Violated: Anticipated violations of 2026 U.S. cyber-resilience mandates (blend of CMMC, CIRCIA, FISMA).

Fines Imposed: Projected for non-compliance (details TBD by CISA/sector regulators).

Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures.

Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory disclosure of breaches under 2026 rules, with private-sector data validating performance.

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only), , Possible (e.g., class-action lawsuits for data breaches), Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures..

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Lessons Learned: Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Lessons Learned: Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Lessons Learned: Criticality of awareness and proactive security measures

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924

Lessons Learned: The importance of robust cybersecurity measures and swift identification and response to minimize impact.

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525

Lessons Learned: The critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Lessons Learned: Importance of stringent security measures in review processes.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Lessons Learned: The release of SharpSuccessor underscores the critical need for proactive security measures, as the tool transforms a complex privilege escalation technique into an easily deployable attack vector accessible to less sophisticated threat actors.

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Lessons Learned: Modern computing environments’ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Lessons Learned: Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in supply chain security and social engineering defenses, particularly within development communities where GitHub interactions and technical assessments during interviews are standard practice.

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Lessons Learned: Open-source maintainer accounts are high-value targets for supply-chain attacks., Malicious CI/CD workflows can bypass traditional security controls., Proactive monitoring of public repositories can disrupt attacks early., Automated secret detection tools (e.g., GitGuardian) are critical for mitigating credential leaks.

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Lessons Learned: Open-source repositories can be weaponized for supply chain attacks even in cybersecurity tooling., Developers must verify the integrity of third-party tools, especially those from untrusted sources., Threat actors exploit the trust in popular platforms (e.g., GitHub) to distribute malware.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Lessons Learned: Legacy APIs (e.g., Azure AD Graph) can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly deprecated or secured., Cross-tenant access risks in cloud identity systems require robust tenant isolation and token validation., Lack of API-level logging can enable stealthy exploitation without detection., Conditional Access and MFA can be bypassed if underlying identity validation mechanisms are flawed., Proactive migration from deprecated services is essential to mitigate emerging risks.

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Lessons Learned: Phishing-as-a-service operations can scale rapidly with low barriers to entry (subscriptions as low as $335)., MFA bypass techniques remain a critical vulnerability in credential-based attacks., Operational security lapses (e.g., exposed cryptocurrency wallets) can aid attribution., Collaboration between tech companies (Microsoft/Cloudflare) and sector-specific ISACs (Health-ISAC) enhances disruption efforts., AI-powered phishing tools (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck) increase attack sophistication and scalability.

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Lessons Learned: AI-assisted tools like Copilot Chat expand the attack surface by introducing new input channels (e.g., hidden markdown) that bypass human review. Content Security Policies (CSP) and proxy services (e.g., Camo) can be weaponized for covert exfiltration if not properly restricted. Developer workflows integrating AI require stricter input validation and output monitoring to prevent prompt injection and data leakage.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Lessons Learned: Privilege escalation vulnerabilities are critical as they enable deeper system access when chained with initial access exploits., Rapid patching is essential to mitigate active exploitation, especially for vulnerabilities added to CISA’s KEV catalog., Federal agencies must adhere to BOD 22-01 timelines to avoid compliance risks.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Lessons Learned: Race conditions in validation logic can reintroduce vulnerabilities even after prior patches (e.g., CVE-2020-17136)., Cloud synchronization services introduce attack surfaces that require rigorous input validation, especially for file operations., Time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities can be exploited with multi-threaded techniques to bypass security controls., Privilege escalation via DLL side-loading remains a persistent risk when attackers can write to system directories.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Lessons Learned: Proactive patch management is critical to mitigate known exploited vulnerabilities. Restricting protocol exposure (e.g., SMB) and monitoring anomalous traffic can reduce attack surfaces.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Lessons Learned: Avoid using BinaryFormatter for deserialization with untrusted input (previously recommended by Microsoft)., Legacy serialization mechanisms can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly validated., Out-of-band patches may be necessary for actively exploited vulnerabilities even after Patch Tuesday fixes., Port blocking and role disabling can serve as effective temporary mitigations.

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Lessons Learned: Incomplete patches can increase risk by creating a false sense of security., Internet-facing WSUS servers should be strictly controlled or disabled., Proof-of-concept (PoC) availability accelerates exploitation by opportunistic actors., Monitoring for reconnaissance commands (e.g., PowerShell) is critical for early detection.

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Lessons Learned: Malvertising remains an effective initial access vector, especially when abusing trusted brands like Microsoft Teams., Code-signing certificate abuse can bypass security controls, requiring proactive revocation by CAs., Obfuscation techniques (e.g., packing tools) can delay AV detection, emphasizing the need for behavioral-based defenses., RaaS models like Rhysida enable rapid scaling of attacks with varied malware (OysterLoader, Latrodectus)., Typosquatting and fake download pages exploit user trust in search engines and legitimate software.

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Lessons Learned: Collaboration platforms like Teams are as critical as email and equally exposed to social engineering risks., Threat actors can exploit trust mechanisms without needing to 'break in'—they only need to 'bend trust'., Organizations must secure not just systems but also what people believe (e.g., verification over visual trust)., Vulnerabilities in widely used tools like Teams can have cascading impacts across global enterprises.

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Lessons Learned: AI-assisted ('vibe-coded') malware can bypass basic detection due to unconventional coding practices., Open-source ecosystems (VS Code, npm) remain prime targets for supply chain attacks., GitHub can be abused as a C2 infrastructure, highlighting the need for monitoring unusual repository activity., Postinstall scripts in npm packages are a persistent attack vector for malware distribution., Developers must vet extensions/packages for suspicious indicators (e.g., vague descriptions, placeholder code, embedded tokens).

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Lessons Learned: Importance of maintaining robust database security practices, Necessity of regular patching schedules for critical systems, Value of access control reviews and continuous monitoring of database activity, Urgency in addressing network-accessible vulnerabilities with high impact potential

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Lessons Learned: Typosquatting remains effective for supply chain attacks despite awareness., Obfuscation techniques (shc, encrypted C2) can evade AV detection (0/XX on VirusTotal)., GitHub Actions environment variables are high-value targets for token theft., Short-lived malware (self-termination dates) complicates detection., CI/CD pipelines require stricter dependency verification (e.g., package signing, allowlists).

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Lessons Learned: IoT devices remain a critical attack vector for large-scale DDoS botnets., Firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink) are high-value targets for botnet expansion., DNS query volume rankings can be manipulated by malicious traffic, requiring proactive redaction., Collaboration between cloud providers (Microsoft, Cloudflare) is essential for mitigating record-breaking attacks.

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Lessons Learned: DDoS attacks are scaling with internet infrastructure upgrades (e.g., fiber-to-home, IoT proliferation)., Botnets like Aisuru/TurboMirai pose persistent threats by exploiting unsecured IoT devices., Cloud-native DDoS protection (e.g., Azure’s scrubbing services) is critical for mitigating large-scale attacks., Residential ISPs are increasingly targeted as attack launchpads.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Lessons Learned: Critical vulnerabilities in core system components (e.g., windowscodecs.dll) require accelerated patch management due to their broad attack surface. Default security mechanisms (e.g., CFG) may not be enabled in all architectures (32-bit vs. 64-bit), increasing exploitation risk. Proactive fuzzing and third-party research (e.g., Zscaler) play a key role in identifying high-severity flaws before widespread exploitation.

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Lessons Learned: Concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft/Amazon/Google backbones) is the biggest vulnerability, not just technology., AI agents introduce unique risks due to autonomy and broad access, requiring non-human zero-trust models., Identity sprawl and static authentication are no longer viable; continuous verification is essential., Compliance can drive innovation if treated as a framework for stakeholder trust and responsible AI/data use., The cybersecurity talent pipeline is critically thin, exacerbated by AI eliminating entry-level roles., Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient.

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Lessons Learned: The Windows API's vastness and flexibility allow legitimate functions (e.g., ReadProcessMemory) to be repurposed for evasion. Security vendors must expand monitoring beyond traditional 'write' functions (e.g., WriteProcessMemory) to include 'read' functions with pointer manipulation capabilities. Open-source PoCs like this highlight the need for proactive defensive updates and red teaming to identify blind spots in detection mechanisms.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Recommendations: Timely updates and patches to software

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125

Recommendations: Implement stricter file and folder access controls

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Recommendations: Implement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators onlyImplement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Recommendations: Update Microsoft Edge to version 138.0.3351.65 or later immediately

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Recommendations: Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Recommendations: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Recommendations: Patch all supported SharePoint versions, rotate machine keys, enable AMSI, conduct thorough security assessments

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Recommendations: Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Recommendations: GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Recommendations: Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Recommendations: Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Recommendations: Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Recommendations: Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Recommendations: Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Recommendations: Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Recommendations: Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services.

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Recommendations: Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Recommendations: Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Recommendations: Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Recommendations: Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts).

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Recommendations: Prioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical data

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Recommendations: Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Recommendations: Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Recommendations: Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Recommendations: Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation.

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Recommendations: Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Recommendations: Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques.Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques.Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques.Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques.Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilanceCriticality of awareness and proactive security measuresThe importance of robust cybersecurity measures and swift identification and response to minimize impact.The critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.Importance of stringent security measures in review processes.The release of SharpSuccessor underscores the critical need for proactive security measures, as the tool transforms a complex privilege escalation technique into an easily deployable attack vector accessible to less sophisticated threat actors.Modern computing environments’ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.Critical vulnerabilities in supply chain security and social engineering defenses, particularly within development communities where GitHub interactions and technical assessments during interviews are standard practice.Open-source maintainer accounts are high-value targets for supply-chain attacks.,Malicious CI/CD workflows can bypass traditional security controls.,Proactive monitoring of public repositories can disrupt attacks early.,Automated secret detection tools (e.g., GitGuardian) are critical for mitigating credential leaks.Open-source repositories can be weaponized for supply chain attacks even in cybersecurity tooling.,Developers must verify the integrity of third-party tools, especially those from untrusted sources.,Threat actors exploit the trust in popular platforms (e.g., GitHub) to distribute malware.Legacy APIs (e.g., Azure AD Graph) can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly deprecated or secured.,Cross-tenant access risks in cloud identity systems require robust tenant isolation and token validation.,Lack of API-level logging can enable stealthy exploitation without detection.,Conditional Access and MFA can be bypassed if underlying identity validation mechanisms are flawed.,Proactive migration from deprecated services is essential to mitigate emerging risks.Phishing-as-a-service operations can scale rapidly with low barriers to entry (subscriptions as low as $335).,MFA bypass techniques remain a critical vulnerability in credential-based attacks.,Operational security lapses (e.g., exposed cryptocurrency wallets) can aid attribution.,Collaboration between tech companies (Microsoft/Cloudflare) and sector-specific ISACs (Health-ISAC) enhances disruption efforts.,AI-powered phishing tools (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck) increase attack sophistication and scalability.Teams is a High-Value Target: Its integration with Entra ID, Graph API, and collaboration features makes it a lucrative attack vector for both commodity and advanced threat actors.,Social Engineering Remains Effective: Deepfakes, impersonation (IT help desk, external partners), and urgency-based scams (e.g., email bombing) bypass technical controls.,Default Configurations Are Risky: Over-permissive external access, unmonitored API queries, and legacy authentication enable initial access and lateral movement.,Open-Source Tools Lower the Barrier: Frameworks like TeamFiltration, AADInternals, and ROADtools democratize Teams exploitation for less-skilled attackers.,Hybrid Environments Complicate Security: On-premises AD synced with Entra ID creates seams for attackers to exploit (e.g., Peach Sandstorm’s AD snapshots).,MFA Is Not a Silver Bullet: Actors like Octo Tempest bypass MFA via social engineering (e.g., password resets, SIM swapping) or token theft.,Third-Party Apps Introduce Risk: Spoofed or malicious Teams apps (even Microsoft-validated ones) can serve as initial access vectors.,Detection Gaps Exist: Many Teams-specific attacks (e.g., phishing via Adaptive Cards, C2 over Teams messages) evade traditional email/security tools.,Incident Response Must Be Teams-Aware: Logs from Teams, Graph API, and Entra ID are critical for forensics but often underutilized.,User Awareness Is Critical: Employees must scrutinize Teams messages/calls as rigorously as emails, especially from 'internal' sources.AI-assisted tools like Copilot Chat expand the attack surface by introducing new input channels (e.g., hidden markdown) that bypass human review. Content Security Policies (CSP) and proxy services (e.g., Camo) can be weaponized for covert exfiltration if not properly restricted. Developer workflows integrating AI require stricter input validation and output monitoring to prevent prompt injection and data leakage.Privilege escalation vulnerabilities are critical as they enable deeper system access when chained with initial access exploits.,Rapid patching is essential to mitigate active exploitation, especially for vulnerabilities added to CISA’s KEV catalog.,Federal agencies must adhere to BOD 22-01 timelines to avoid compliance risks.Collaboration platforms like Teams are high-value targets due to their integration into daily workflows and trust assumptions.,Default/weak privacy settings (e.g., Privacy Mode disabled) create exploitable attack surfaces.,Impersonation attacks leverage publicly available PII (e.g., from data brokers) to appear legitimate.,Malware delivery via 'urgent' messages (e.g., fake security alerts) remains highly effective.,Teams can be abused for C2 and extortion, bypassing traditional network defenses.,User awareness and basic hygiene (e.g., verifying links, enabling MFA) are critical defenses.Race conditions in validation logic can reintroduce vulnerabilities even after prior patches (e.g., CVE-2020-17136).,Cloud synchronization services introduce attack surfaces that require rigorous input validation, especially for file operations.,Time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities can be exploited with multi-threaded techniques to bypass security controls.,Privilege escalation via DLL side-loading remains a persistent risk when attackers can write to system directories.Proactive patch management is critical to mitigate known exploited vulnerabilities. Restricting protocol exposure (e.g., SMB) and monitoring anomalous traffic can reduce attack surfaces.Avoid using BinaryFormatter for deserialization with untrusted input (previously recommended by Microsoft).,Legacy serialization mechanisms can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly validated.,Out-of-band patches may be necessary for actively exploited vulnerabilities even after Patch Tuesday fixes.,Port blocking and role disabling can serve as effective temporary mitigations.Incomplete patches can increase risk by creating a false sense of security.,Internet-facing WSUS servers should be strictly controlled or disabled.,Proof-of-concept (PoC) availability accelerates exploitation by opportunistic actors.,Monitoring for reconnaissance commands (e.g., PowerShell) is critical for early detection.Malvertising remains an effective initial access vector, especially when abusing trusted brands like Microsoft Teams.,Code-signing certificate abuse can bypass security controls, requiring proactive revocation by CAs.,Obfuscation techniques (e.g., packing tools) can delay AV detection, emphasizing the need for behavioral-based defenses.,RaaS models like Rhysida enable rapid scaling of attacks with varied malware (OysterLoader, Latrodectus).,Typosquatting and fake download pages exploit user trust in search engines and legitimate software.Collaboration platforms like Teams are as critical as email and equally exposed to social engineering risks.,Threat actors can exploit trust mechanisms without needing to 'break in'—they only need to 'bend trust'.,Organizations must secure not just systems but also what people believe (e.g., verification over visual trust).,Vulnerabilities in widely used tools like Teams can have cascading impacts across global enterprises.AI-assisted ('vibe-coded') malware can bypass basic detection due to unconventional coding practices.,Open-source ecosystems (VS Code, npm) remain prime targets for supply chain attacks.,GitHub can be abused as a C2 infrastructure, highlighting the need for monitoring unusual repository activity.,Postinstall scripts in npm packages are a persistent attack vector for malware distribution.,Developers must vet extensions/packages for suspicious indicators (e.g., vague descriptions, placeholder code, embedded tokens).Importance of maintaining robust database security practices,Necessity of regular patching schedules for critical systems,Value of access control reviews and continuous monitoring of database activity,Urgency in addressing network-accessible vulnerabilities with high impact potentialTyposquatting remains effective for supply chain attacks despite awareness.,Obfuscation techniques (shc, encrypted C2) can evade AV detection (0/XX on VirusTotal).,GitHub Actions environment variables are high-value targets for token theft.,Short-lived malware (self-termination dates) complicates detection.,CI/CD pipelines require stricter dependency verification (e.g., package signing, allowlists).IoT devices remain a critical attack vector for large-scale DDoS botnets.,Firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink) are high-value targets for botnet expansion.,DNS query volume rankings can be manipulated by malicious traffic, requiring proactive redaction.,Collaboration between cloud providers (Microsoft, Cloudflare) is essential for mitigating record-breaking attacks.DDoS attacks are scaling with internet infrastructure upgrades (e.g., fiber-to-home, IoT proliferation).,Botnets like Aisuru/TurboMirai pose persistent threats by exploiting unsecured IoT devices.,Cloud-native DDoS protection (e.g., Azure’s scrubbing services) is critical for mitigating large-scale attacks.,Residential ISPs are increasingly targeted as attack launchpads.Critical vulnerabilities in core system components (e.g., windowscodecs.dll) require accelerated patch management due to their broad attack surface. Default security mechanisms (e.g., CFG) may not be enabled in all architectures (32-bit vs. 64-bit), increasing exploitation risk. Proactive fuzzing and third-party research (e.g., Zscaler) play a key role in identifying high-severity flaws before widespread exploitation.Concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft/Amazon/Google backbones) is the biggest vulnerability, not just technology.,AI agents introduce unique risks due to autonomy and broad access, requiring non-human zero-trust models.,Identity sprawl and static authentication are no longer viable; continuous verification is essential.,Compliance can drive innovation if treated as a framework for stakeholder trust and responsible AI/data use.,The cybersecurity talent pipeline is critically thin, exacerbated by AI eliminating entry-level roles.,Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient.The Windows API's vastness and flexibility allow legitimate functions (e.g., ReadProcessMemory) to be repurposed for evasion. Security vendors must expand monitoring beyond traditional 'write' functions (e.g., WriteProcessMemory) to include 'read' functions with pointer manipulation capabilities. Open-source PoCs like this highlight the need for proactive defensive updates and red teaming to identify blind spots in detection mechanisms.

What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Timely updates and patches to software, Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Category: Prevention, , Category: Detection, , Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Patch all supported SharePoint versions, rotate machine keys, enable AMSI, conduct thorough security assessments, Category: Response, , Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance., Category: Recovery and .

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122

Source: SOCRadar

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723

Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Source: Wiz

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524

Source: Check Point Research

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524

Source: Microsoft

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524

Source: Tom's Hardware

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Source: Microsoft Security Update

Date Accessed: 2025-07-01

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Source: CYFIRMA

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Source: DataDog researchers

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Source: Bloomberg

URL: https://www.bloomberg.com

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Source: Shadowserver Foundation

URL: https://twitter.com/Shadowserver

Date Accessed: 2025-07-31

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Source: Eye Security

Date Accessed: 2025-07-18

Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425

Source: TorrentFreak

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Source: Medium

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Source: GitGuardian Report

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Source: BleepingComputer

URL: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Source: TechRadar Pro

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Source: ReversingLabs Blog Post

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Source: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)

URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241

Date Accessed: 2025-07-17

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog)

Date Accessed: 2025-07-14

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Source: Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman)

Date Accessed: 2025-07

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Source: Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph API

URL: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-entra-azure-ad-blog/azure-ad-graph-retirement-august-31-2025/ba-p/4123456

Date Accessed: 2025-06

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Source: Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Source: Cloudflare Blog

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Source: The Register (Article)

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Source: Mitiga Research Blog

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Red-Teamer, Initial Reporter)

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Source: Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Source: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

Date Accessed: 2025-10-14

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide

URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Source: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Source: Microsoft Security Update (October 2025)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Source: TechRadar

URL: https://www.techradar.com

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Source: CISA KEV Catalog

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

Date Accessed: 2025-10-20

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Source: Vicarius Detection Script

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide

URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287

Date Accessed: 2025-10-24

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Source: The Hacker News - CVE-2025-59287 Exploitation Report

URL: https://thehackernews.com/2025/10/critical-windows-wsus-flaw-under-active.html

Date Accessed: 2025-10-24

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

Date Accessed: 2025-10-24

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Source: HawkTrace Research (Batuhan Er) - Technical Analysis

Date Accessed: 2025-10-22

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Source: Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) Advisory

URL: https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2025/october/24/cve-2025-59287-wsus-exploitation

Date Accessed: 2025-10-24

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: The Register

URL: https://www.theregister.com

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287)

URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog

URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG)

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: Palo Alto Networks Unit 42

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Source: Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI)

URL: https://www.zerodayinitiative.com

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Source: The Register

URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/

Date Accessed: 2024-10-18

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Source: Expel Blog

URL: https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/

Date Accessed: 2024-10-18

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Source: Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter)

URL: https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted]

Date Accessed: 2024-10-15

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Source: Expel GitHub Indicators

URL: https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted]

Date Accessed: 2024-10-18

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Source: The Hacker News

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Source: Check Point Research Report

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Source: Secure Annex Research (John Tuckner)

Date Accessed: 2025-11-06

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Source: Datadog Security Labs

Date Accessed: 2025-11-06

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Source: The Hacker News (Coverage)

Date Accessed: 2025-11-06

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Source: GBHackers (GBH)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Source: Veracode Threat Research

Date Accessed: 2023-11-07

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Source: GBHackers (GBH)

Date Accessed: 2023-11-07

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Source: OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks)

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Source: Microsoft Azure Security Blog

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Source: Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS Report

Date Accessed: April 2025

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Source: Qi'anxin XLab Research

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Source: Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist)

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Source: Microsoft Azure Blog

URL: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/

Date Accessed: November 2023

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Source: Cybersecurity Dive

URL: https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/

Date Accessed: November 2023

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Source: Netscout Threat Intelligence

URL: https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligence

Date Accessed: November 2023

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Source: Zscaler ThreatLabz Research

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (August 2025)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report

URL: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach

Date Accessed: 2025-09-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security)

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy)

URL: https://securityscorecard.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO)

URL: https://www.dashlane.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO)

URL: https://www.omadaidentity.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO)

URL: https://www.inmar.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO)

URL: https://lastwall.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Source: IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO)

URL: https://www.iansresearch.com

Date Accessed: 2025-10-01

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Source: Unprotect Project (Jean-Pierre LESUEUR / DarkCoderSc)

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Source: Indirect-Shellcode-Executor (Mimorep)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: SOCRadar, and Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, and Source: Wiz, and Source: Check Point Research, and Source: Microsoft, and Source: Tom's Hardware, and Source: Microsoft Security UpdateDate Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: CYFIRMA, and Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir, and Source: DataDog researchers, and Source: BloombergUrl: https://www.bloomberg.com, and Source: Shadowserver FoundationUrl: https://twitter.com/ShadowserverDate Accessed: 2025-07-31, and Source: Eye SecurityDate Accessed: 2025-07-18, and Source: TorrentFreak, and Source: Medium, and Source: GitGuardian Report, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: TechRadar Pro, and Source: ReversingLabs Blog Post, and Source: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Url: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241Date Accessed: 2025-07-17, and Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog)Date Accessed: 2025-07-14, and Source: Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman)Date Accessed: 2025-07, and Source: Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph APIUrl: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-entra-azure-ad-blog/azure-ad-graph-retirement-august-31-2025/ba-p/4123456Date Accessed: 2025-06, and Source: Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada), and Source: Cloudflare Blog, and Source: The Register (Article), and Source: Mitiga Research Blog, and Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Red-Teamer, Initial Reporter), and Source: Microsoft Security Blog: 'Defending against attacks that abuse Microsoft Teams'Url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/01/defending-against-attacks-that-abuse-microsoft-teams/Date Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence: Storm-1811 CampaignUrl: https://threatintelligence.microsoft.com/Date Accessed: 2025-06-30, and Source: Trend Micro: 'DarkGate Malware Distributed via TeamsPhisher'Url: https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/d/darkgate-malware-distributed-via-teamphisher.htmlDate Accessed: 2024-12-15, and Source: Sophos: '3AM Ransomware Uses Storm-1811 Tactics'Url: https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2024/05/01/3am-ransomware-storm-1811-tactics/Date Accessed: 2024-05-01, and Source: Hunters: 'VEILdrive Campaign by Sangria Tempest'Url: https://www.hunters.ai/blog/veildrive-sangria-tempestDate Accessed: 2024-11-20, and Source: Microsoft Learn: 'Secure Microsoft Teams'Url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/security-teams-overviewDate Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: Microsoft Defender XDR Hunting Queries for Teams ThreatsUrl: https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Defender-XDR-Hunting-QueriesDate Accessed: 2025-06-25, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/github_copilot_chat_vulnerability/, and Source: Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne), and Source: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)Url: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalogDate Accessed: 2025-10-14, and Source: Microsoft Security Update GuideUrl: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230, and Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01Url: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01, and Source: Fox News / CyberGuy.comUrl: https://www.cyberguy.comDate Accessed: 2025, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (referenced indirectly), and Source: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery), and Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680), and Source: Microsoft Security Update (October 2025), and Source: TechRadarUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: CISA KEV CatalogUrl: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalogDate Accessed: 2025-10-20, and Source: Vicarius Detection Script, and Source: Microsoft Security Update GuideUrl: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287Date Accessed: 2025-10-24, and Source: The Hacker News - CVE-2025-59287 Exploitation ReportUrl: https://thehackernews.com/2025/10/critical-windows-wsus-flaw-under-active.htmlDate Accessed: 2025-10-24, and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogUrl: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalogDate Accessed: 2025-10-24, and Source: HawkTrace Research (Batuhan Er) - Technical AnalysisDate Accessed: 2025-10-22, and Source: Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) AdvisoryUrl: https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2025/october/24/cve-2025-59287-wsus-exploitationDate Accessed: 2025-10-24, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287)Url: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287, and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogUrl: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, and Source: Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), and Source: Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, and Source: Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI)Url: https://www.zerodayinitiative.com, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: Expel BlogUrl: https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter)Url: https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted]Date Accessed: 2024-10-15, and Source: Expel GitHub IndicatorsUrl: https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted]Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: The Hacker News, and Source: Check Point Research Report, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024), and Source: Secure Annex Research (John Tuckner)Date Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: Datadog Security LabsDate Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: The Hacker News (Coverage)Date Accessed: 2025-11-06, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499), and Source: GBHackers (GBH), and Source: Veracode Threat ResearchDate Accessed: 2023-11-07, and Source: GBHackers (GBH)Date Accessed: 2023-11-07, and Source: OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks), and Source: Microsoft Azure Security Blog, and Source: Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS ReportDate Accessed: April 2025, and Source: Qi'anxin XLab Research, and Source: Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist), and Source: Microsoft Azure BlogUrl: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/Date Accessed: November 2023, and Source: Cybersecurity DiveUrl: https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/Date Accessed: November 2023, and Source: Netscout Threat IntelligenceUrl: https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligenceDate Accessed: November 2023, and Source: Zscaler ThreatLabz Research, and Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (August 2025), and Source: IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breachDate Accessed: 2025-09-01, and Source: Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security)Date Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy)Url: https://securityscorecard.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO)Url: https://www.dashlane.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO)Url: https://www.omadaidentity.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO)Url: https://www.inmar.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO)Url: https://lastwall.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO)Url: https://www.iansresearch.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Unprotect Project (Jean-Pierre LESUEUR / DarkCoderSc), and Source: Indirect-Shellcode-Executor (Mimorep).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Investigation Status: No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Investigation Status: completed (attack disrupted, affected parties notified)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Investigation Status: ongoing (as of the report)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Investigation Status: Resolved (patched; no evidence of exploitation)

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Investigation Status: Ongoing (criminal referral to international law enforcement; Ogundipe remains at large)

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Investigation Status: Disclosed by third-party researchers (Mitiga, Dirk-jan Mollema)

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Investigation Status: Mitigated (Exfiltration vector blocked; long-term fix pending)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; no specific incidents detailed)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Investigation Status: Resolved (Patch Released)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Investigation Status: Ongoing (evidence of exploitation confirmed; no attribution)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; developing story)

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation observed; root cause analysis of patch bypass underway)

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Investigation Status: ongoing (Expel and Microsoft continue tracking)

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Investigation Status: Resolved (patches released, vulnerabilities addressed)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Investigation Status: Ongoing (C2 repository and threat actors under analysis)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Investigation Status: Disclosed; no confirmed reports of active exploitation in the wild (as of 2025-11-11)

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Investigation Status: resolved (package removed, accounts terminated)

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Mitigation Completed; Botnet Activity Persists)

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Investigation Status: Completed (mitigation successful)

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Investigation Status: Resolved (Patch released; no active exploitation reported)

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Investigation Status: Predictive (not yet occurred; expert forecasts for 2026)

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Investigation Status: Ongoing research; PoC tool released for defensive testing.

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notifying impacted users and organizations, Public Statement, Public Disclosure, User Notifications, Public Report By Gitguardian, Direct Notifications To Repository Owners, Reversinglabs Blog Post (Public Disclosure), Public Disclosure Via Microsoft Security Response Center (Msrc), Technical Blog Post By Researcher Dirk-Jan Mollema, Advisories From Cloud Security Firms (E.G., Mitiga), Public Disclosure Via Microsoft/Cloudflare Blogs, Coordination With Health-Isac, Internal Advisories (It Teams, Executives), Customer Notifications (If Data Breached), Public Disclosures (For Transparency, E.G., Microsoft Security Blog), Regulatory Reporting (As Required By Law), Cisa Advisory (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Public Warning Via Media (E.G., Google News, Linkedin, X), Microsoft Public Advisory (Via Fox News), User Education (Tips To Stay Protected), Reporting Suspicious Activity To Microsoft, Cisa Kev Listing, Techradar Advisory, Vicarius Detection Script, Public Advisory Via Microsoft Security Update Guide, Collaboration With Cisa For Kev Catalog Inclusion, Media Updates Via The Hacker News, Public Advisories By Microsoft And Cisa, Media Coverage (E.G., The Register), Expel Blog Post (2024-10-18), Microsoft Social Media Advisory (2024-10-15), Public Disclosure By Check Point And The Hacker News, Microsoft Security Advisory (Released In September 2024), Public Disclosure By Researchers (Secure Annex, Datadog), Media Coverage, Public Disclosure Via Microsoft Advisory, Recommendations For Urgent Patching And Access Control Reviews, Public Disclosure By Veracode, Media Coverage (E.G., Gbh), Public Disclosure By Microsoft And Cloudflare, Media Coverage By Infosec Journalists (E.G., Brian Krebs), Public Blog Post By Microsoft, Media Statements, Public Advisory Via Microsoft Security Update Guide, Urgent Recommendation For 48-Hour Patch Deployment and Transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or AI systems..

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Stakeholder Advisories: Github Repository Owners, Open-Source Project Maintainers.

Customer Advisories: GitHub issued guidance on securing Actions workflows

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Urged Customers To Migrate From Azure Ad Graph Api To Microsoft Graph By August 31, 2025., Applications With Extended Access To Azure Ad Graph Api Were Warned Of Impending Api Retirement In Early September 2025..

Customer Advisories: No customer action required for the vulnerability patch.Customers advised to review and update applications relying on deprecated Azure AD Graph API.

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Customers Advised To Reset Compromised Credentials And Enable Advanced Mfa., Healthcare Organizations Warned Of Targeted Phishing Risks..

Customer Advisories: Users urged to report suspicious emails and enable security defaults in Microsoft 365.

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Customer Advisories: GitHub Security Advisory (2024-08-14)

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Kev Catalog Update, Public Warnings Via Media Outlets.

Customer Advisories: Organizations urged to patch immediately; federal agencies given deadline of November 4, 2025

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Recommends Immediate Patching For All Affected Systems..

Customer Advisories: Users of Windows cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) should apply the October 2025 updates to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Kev Notification, Microsoft Security Update Guidance.

Customer Advisories: Users advised to patch systems and restrict SMB exposure.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Stakeholder Advisories: Federal Agencies (Via Cisa Kev Catalog), Enterprise Windows Server Administrators, Security Researchers.

Customer Advisories: Microsoft customers using WSUS-enabled serversOrganizations relying on Windows Server updates

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft (Limited Updates), Cisa (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Threat Intelligence Community (Gtig, Unit 42, Zdi).

Customer Advisories: Apply emergency patchRestrict WSUS internet exposureMonitor for exploitation signs

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Revoked Malicious Certificates And Issued A Public Advisory., Expel Published Technical Details And Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)..

Customer Advisories: Users advised to download Microsoft Teams only from official sources (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/download-app).Organizations warned to monitor for OysterLoader/Latrodectus infections.

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching.

Customer Advisories: Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls.

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Stakeholder Advisories: Developers Advised To Remove 'Susvsex' Extension And Scan Systems For Vidar Infostealer..

Customer Advisories: Users of infected npm packages should reset credentials and monitor for fraud.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Customer Advisories: Organizations running SQL Server in production environments advised to patch urgentlySecurity teams and database administrators urged to coordinate patch deployment

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Stakeholder Advisories: Developers Advised To Audit Github Actions Dependencies For '@Acitons/Artifact'.

Customer Advisories: Veracode customers received automated protection via Package Firewall

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, Iot Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, Totolink).

Customer Advisories: Users of affected IoT devices advised to update firmware and change default credentials.Azure/Cloudflare customers informed of mitigated attacks and ongoing monitoring.

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Advised Customers To Enable Azure Ddos Protection For Defense-In-Depth..

Customer Advisories: No action required; Azure services remained operational.

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft urged all organizations to treat this as a critical priority and verify patch deployment within 48 hours.

Customer Advisories: Users advised to update Windows immediately to prevent potential system compromise via malicious images/documents.

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Stakeholder Advisories: Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs.

Customer Advisories: Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement, and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Github Repository Owners, Open-Source Project Maintainers, Github Issued Guidance On Securing Actions Workflows, , Microsoft Urged Customers To Migrate From Azure Ad Graph Api To Microsoft Graph By August 31, 2025., Applications With Extended Access To Azure Ad Graph Api Were Warned Of Impending Api Retirement In Early September 2025., No Customer Action Required For The Vulnerability Patch., Customers Advised To Review And Update Applications Relying On Deprecated Azure Ad Graph Api., , Microsoft Customers Advised To Reset Compromised Credentials And Enable Advanced Mfa., Healthcare Organizations Warned Of Targeted Phishing Risks., Users Urged To Report Suspicious Emails And Enable Security Defaults In Microsoft 365., , Microsoft Has Issued Guidance To Customers Via The Microsoft Security Response Center (Msrc) And Defender Threat Intelligence., Enterprise Admins Are Advised To Review Teams Configurations And Apply Mitigations Outlined In The Microsoft Security Blog., Partners (E.G., Mssps) Should Prioritize Teams-Specific Detections In Their Soc Operations., Users Should Report Suspicious Teams Activity (E.G., Unexpected Calls, File Shares) Via Their Organization’S Security Team., Microsoft 365 Admins Can Access The 'Teams Security Guide' In The Microsoft 365 Admin Center For Configuration Recommendations., Customers With Defender Xdr Can Run The Provided Hunting Queries To Check For Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)., , Github Security Advisory (2024-08-14), , Cisa Kev Catalog Update, Public Warnings Via Media Outlets, Organizations Urged To Patch Immediately; Federal Agencies Given Deadline Of November 4, 2025, , Microsoft recommends enabling privacy settings, restricting permissions, and using antivirus/data removal services., Users advised to verify links/files, enable MFA, and report suspicious Teams activity to Microsoft., Microsoft Recommends Immediate Patching For All Affected Systems., Users Of Windows Cloud Synchronization Services (E.G., Onedrive) Should Apply The October 2025 Updates To Mitigate The Risk Of Privilege Escalation., , Cisa Kev Notification, Microsoft Security Update Guidance, Users advised to patch systems and restrict SMB exposure., Federal Agencies (Via Cisa Kev Catalog), Enterprise Windows Server Administrators, Security Researchers, Microsoft Customers Using Wsus-Enabled Servers, Organizations Relying On Windows Server Updates, , Microsoft (Limited Updates), Cisa (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Threat Intelligence Community (Gtig, Unit 42, Zdi), Apply Emergency Patch, Restrict Wsus Internet Exposure, Monitor For Exploitation Signs, , Microsoft Revoked Malicious Certificates And Issued A Public Advisory., Expel Published Technical Details And Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)., Users Advised To Download Microsoft Teams Only From Official Sources (Https://Www.Microsoft.Com/En-Us/Microsoft-Teams/Download-App)., Organizations Warned To Monitor For Oysterloader/Latrodectus Infections., , Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching., Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls., Developers Advised To Remove 'Susvsex' Extension And Scan Systems For Vidar Infostealer., Users Of Infected Npm Packages Should Reset Credentials And Monitor For Fraud., , Organizations Running Sql Server In Production Environments Advised To Patch Urgently, Security Teams And Database Administrators Urged To Coordinate Patch Deployment, , Developers Advised To Audit Github Actions Dependencies For '@Acitons/Artifact', Veracode Customers Received Automated Protection Via Package Firewall, , Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, Iot Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, Totolink), Users Of Affected Iot Devices Advised To Update Firmware And Change Default Credentials., Azure/Cloudflare Customers Informed Of Mitigated Attacks And Ongoing Monitoring., , Microsoft Advised Customers To Enable Azure Ddos Protection For Defense-In-Depth., No Action Required; Azure Services Remained Operational., , Microsoft urged all organizations to treat this as a critical priority and verify patch deployment within 48 hours., Users advised to update Windows immediately to prevent potential system compromise via malicious images/documents., Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs., Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement and and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure..

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422

Entry Point: Stolen OAuth Tokens

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Entry Point: Azure Data Factory service certificate

High Value Targets: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes

Data Sold on Dark Web: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622

Entry Point: Malicious Document

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323

Entry Point: Weak Passwords

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Entry Point: Microsoft Exchange Server

Backdoors Established: Installation of additional malware

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524

Entry Point: Fake Accounts

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Entry Point: Crafted links

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Entry Point: Ghost Accounts

High Value Targets: GitHub Users

Data Sold on Dark Web: GitHub Users

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524

Entry Point: Soho Devices, Vpn Appliances,

High Value Targets: Microsoft 365 Accounts,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Microsoft 365 Accounts,

Incident : Password Spraying Attack MIC000022525

Entry Point: Basic Authentication

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225

Entry Point: Fake Repositories, Malicious Code,

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Entry Point: Malicious Extensions

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Entry Point: dMSA migration mechanism

High Value Targets: Domain Administrator accounts

Data Sold on Dark Web: Domain Administrator accounts

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Entry Point: Helpdesk Portals, Shared Directories,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Entry Point: Malicious repositories

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Entry Point: SharePoint Server Vulnerability

High Value Targets: Government Agencies, Corporations, Educational Institutions,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Government Agencies, Corporations, Educational Institutions,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Entry Point: ToolPane endpoint

Backdoors Established: webshells

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Entry Point: Deceptive recruitment processes, malicious NPM packages on GitHub

Backdoors Established: InvisibleFerret backdoor

High Value Targets: Software developers, IT professionals

Data Sold on Dark Web: Software developers, IT professionals

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Entry Point: compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project)

Backdoors Established: ['malicious GitHub Actions workflow']

High Value Targets: Github Tokens, Cloud Provider Credentials,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Github Tokens, Cloud Provider Credentials,

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Entry Point: Trojanized Github Repositories (Fake Hacking Tools),

Backdoors Established: ['hidden backdoor logic in Python scripts']

High Value Targets: Developers, Cybersecurity Researchers, Potential Downstream Victims,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Developers, Cybersecurity Researchers, Potential Downstream Victims,

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Entry Point: Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation

High Value Targets: Global Administrator Roles, Entra Id Tenant Configurations, Azure Subscription Permissions, Bitlocker Keys, Sharepoint/Exchange Online Data,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Global Administrator Roles, Entra Id Tenant Configurations, Azure Subscription Permissions, Bitlocker Keys, Sharepoint/Exchange Online Data,

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Entry Point: Phishing Emails, Raccoono365 Phishing Kits,

Backdoors Established: True

High Value Targets: Microsoft 365 Accounts, Us Organizations (Tax-Themed Campaigns), Healthcare Sector,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Microsoft 365 Accounts, Us Organizations (Tax-Themed Campaigns), Healthcare Sector,

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Entry Point: Legacy Api In Microsoft Entra Id,

High Value Targets: Global Administrators, Privileged Users,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Global Administrators, Privileged Users,

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Entry Point: Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues

High Value Targets: Private Repositories, Unpublished Vulnerability Research, Authentication Secrets,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Private Repositories, Unpublished Vulnerability Research, Authentication Secrets,

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Entry Point: Phishing Campaigns, Internet-Facing Vulnerabilities (Potential Initial Access Vectors),

Backdoors Established: ['Possible if privilege escalation is successful']

High Value Targets: Administrative Accounts, Sensitive Data Repositories,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Administrative Accounts, Sensitive Data Repositories,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Entry Point: SMB protocol (via script coercion)

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Entry Point: Wsus Getcookie() Endpoint Via Crafted Event, Ports 8530/8531,

High Value Targets: Windows Servers With Wsus Role Enabled,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Windows Servers With Wsus Role Enabled,

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Entry Point: Internet-Facing Wsus Servers On Tcp Ports 8530 (Http) And 8531 (Https),

Reconnaissance Period: ['Post-exploitation (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig commands)']

High Value Targets: Wsus Servers (Potential For Downstream Malware Distribution),

Data Sold on Dark Web: Wsus Servers (Potential For Downstream Malware Distribution),

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Entry Point: Malvertising (Bing Ads), Fake Microsoft Teams Download Pages,

Reconnaissance Period: ['ongoing since June 2024 (second wave)', 'previous campaign: May–September 2024']

Backdoors Established: ['OysterLoader and Latrodectus used for persistence']

High Value Targets: Corporate Networks, Data-Rich Organizations,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Corporate Networks, Data-Rich Organizations,

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

High Value Targets: C-suite executives (impersonated in attacks)

Data Sold on Dark Web: C-suite executives (impersonated in attacks)

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Entry Point: Vs Code Marketplace (Susvsex Extension), Npm Registry (Trojanized Packages),

Backdoors Established: ['GitHub C2 (aykhanmv repository)', 'Bullethost[.]cloud (Vidar payload host)']

High Value Targets: Developer Environments, Cryptocurrency Wallets, Browser Credentials,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Developer Environments, Cryptocurrency Wallets, Browser Credentials,

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Entry Point: npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact')

Backdoors Established: ['post-install hook with obfuscated malware']

High Value Targets: Github Organization Repositories, Github Actions Environment Variables,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Github Organization Repositories, Github Actions Environment Variables,

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Entry Point: Exploited Vulnerabilities In Iot Devices, Compromised Totolink Firmware Update Server,

High Value Targets: Public Cloud Ips (Microsoft Azure), Dns Services (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1), Firmware Update Infrastructure,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Public Cloud Ips (Microsoft Azure), Dns Services (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1), Firmware Update Infrastructure,

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Entry Point: Compromised Iot Devices (Routers, Cameras),

High Value Targets: Cloud Endpoints (E.G., Azure), Internet Gaming Organizations,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Cloud Endpoints (E.G., Azure), Internet Gaming Organizations,

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Entry Point: Malicious Jpeg Image In Weaponized Document,

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Entry Point: Compromised Saas Firewalls (Single Point Of Failure), Over-Permissioned Ai Agents (Autonomous Lateral Movement), Shadow Identities In Iam Systems, Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (Multi-Cloud Complexities),

Reconnaissance Period: Prolonged (AI agents enable persistent, low-visibility reconnaissance).

Backdoors Established: Likely in critical infrastructure and cloud backbones for future exploitation.

High Value Targets: Cloud Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google), Ai Training Datasets, Critical Infrastructure Control Systems, Financial Transaction Platforms,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Cloud Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google), Ai Training Datasets, Critical Infrastructure Control Systems, Financial Transaction Platforms,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522

Root Causes: Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate

Corrective Actions: Mitigated the security flaw

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622

Root Causes: Vulnerability in MSDT

Corrective Actions: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122

Root Causes: Unintentional Misconfiguration

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323

Root Causes: Weak Passwords

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823

Root Causes: Lack of authentication and write-protection

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923

Root Causes: Improper data management practices

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724

Root Causes: Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software

Corrective Actions: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624

Root Causes: CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability

Corrective Actions: Patch released

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724

Root Causes: Trust in Popular Repositories

Corrective Actions: Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524

Root Causes: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525

Root Causes: Integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125

Root Causes: Gaps in Microsoft's review system

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625

Root Causes: Vulnerability in Windows Server 2025’s dMSA feature

Corrective Actions: Implement Akamai’S Detection Script Get-Badsuccessoroupermissions.Ps, Restrict Dmsa Creation Permissions To Trusted Administrators Only,

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325

Root Causes: Zero-Day Vulnerability Exploitation,

Corrective Actions: Apply Security Patch,

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425

Root Causes: Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems

Corrective Actions: Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound Smb Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625

Root Causes: Mismatch in Git’s handling of configuration values and control characters

Corrective Actions: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325

Root Causes: Vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server

Corrective Actions: Issuing Patches

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC625073125

Root Causes: CVE-2025-53770 vulnerability

Corrective Actions: Patching, rotating machine keys, enabling AMSI, thorough security assessments

Incident : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) GIT233080925

Root Causes: Exploitation of trust in professional networking and job-seeking activities, abuse of GitHub’s trusted infrastructure

Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925

Root Causes: Weak Authentication For Maintainer Accounts (Lack Of Mfa)., Insufficient Validation Of Github Actions Workflows., Exposed Secrets In Repositories (Lack Of Secret Scanning).,

Corrective Actions: Github Enhanced Workflow Security Controls., Gitguardian Expanded Monitoring For Similar Attacks., Affected Projects Rotated Compromised Credentials.,

Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025

Root Causes: Lack Of Repository Integrity Checks On Github For Malicious Forks., Trust In Open-Source Hacking Tools Without Verification., Exploitation Of Github’S Legitimacy To Distribute Malware.,

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225

Root Causes: Inadequate Tenant Validation In Azure Ad Graph Api For S2S Actor Tokens., Over-Reliance On Deprecated Legacy Apis Without Enforced Migration Timelines., Lack Of Api-Level Logging For The Graph Api, Enabling Stealthy Exploitation., Conditional Access Policies Applied To Tokens That Could Be Manipulated Cross-Tenant.,

Corrective Actions: Server-Side Patch To Enforce Tenant Validation In Token Processing., Accelerated Deprecation Of Azure Ad Graph Api (Retired August 31, 2025)., Enhanced Guidance For Migrating To Microsoft Graph., Internal Review Of High-Privileged Access (Hpa) Scenarios In Entra Id.,

Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325

Root Causes: Proliferation Of Phishing-As-A-Service Models Lowering Entry Barriers For Cybercriminals., Effectiveness Of Mfa Bypass Techniques In Phishing Kits., Lack Of Global Law Enforcement Coordination To Apprehend Threat Actors In Jurisdictions Like Nigeria., Delayed Detection Of Phishing Infrastructure (Operational Since At Least July 2024).,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft'S Legal Action And Infrastructure Takedowns To Disrupt Raccoono365 Operations., Cloudflare'S Ban On Identified Domains And Termination Of Malicious Scripts., Enhanced Monitoring For Ai-Powered Phishing (E.G., Raccoono365 Ai-Mailcheck)., Public-Private Collaboration To Share Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) And Tactics.,

Incident : Authentication Bypass MIC3092330100325

Root Causes: Legacy Api Lacking Tenant Validation For Actor Tokens, Hidden Delegation Mechanism (Actor Tokens) Exposed To Exploitation,

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925

Root Causes: Copilot Chat'S Over-Permissive Access To Repository Content (Inherited From User Permissions)., Lack Of Input Sanitization For 'Invisible' Markdown Comments., Camo Image-Proxy Service Repurposed As A Covert Exfiltration Channel., Ai Tool Design Assuming Trust In Contextual Inputs Without Human-Visible Cues.,

Corrective Actions: Disabled Image Rendering In Copilot Chat., Blocked Camo-Based Exfiltration Routes., Planned Long-Term Fixes To Restrict Ai Tool Access And Harden Input Validation.,

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625

Root Causes: Improper Access Control In Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (Cve-2025-59230),

Corrective Actions: Patch Management, Network Segmentation, Privileged Access Monitoring,

Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125

Root Causes: Inadequate Filename Validation In The Hsmpopcreateplaceholders() Function During Placeholder File Creation., Race Condition (Toctou) Between Filename Validation And Actual File Creation In The Windows Cloud Minifilter Driver (Cldflt.Sys)., Multi-Threaded Attack Surface Enabled By The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And I/O Control Code 0X903Bc., Incomplete Fix For A Prior Vulnerability (Cve-2020-17136) Reintroduced The Race Condition.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft Released A Patch In October 2025 To Address The Race Condition In Filename Validation., Enhanced Input Validation For Placeholder File Operations In Cloud Sync Services., Security Hardening Of The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And Related I/O Control Codes.,

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC2692126102225

Root Causes: Improper Access Controls In Smb Implementation, Delayed Patch Application By End-Users,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft Patch Release, Cisa Kev Listing For Visibility, Public Detection Tools (Vicarius),

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC0392103102425

Root Causes: Use Of Unsafe Binaryformatter For Deserialization In Legacy Wsus Code., Lack Of Proper Type Validation During Deserialization Of Authorizationcookie Objects., Inherent Risks In Aes-128-Cbc Decryption Followed By Unvalidated Deserialization.,

Corrective Actions: Release Of Out-Of-Band Patch To Validate Deserialization In Wsus., Removal Of Binaryformatter From .Net 9 (Proactive Measure)., Public Disclosure Of Exploitation Risks To Prompt Patching.,

Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025

Root Causes: Insecure Deserialization In Wsus (Cve-2025-59287), Incomplete Initial Patch By Microsoft, Internet-Facing Wsus Instances (Against Best Practices),

Corrective Actions: Emergency Patch Deployment, Network Segmentation And Exposure Reduction, Enhanced Monitoring For Reconnaissance Activity, Vendor Accountability For Patch Completeness,

Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125

Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Search Engine Ads As A Trusted Software Distribution Channel., Delayed Detection Of Obfuscated Malware By Traditional Av Solutions., Abuse Of Legitimate Code-Signing Certificates To Bypass Security Controls., Lack Of User Awareness About Typosquatting And Fake Download Pages.,

Corrective Actions: Search Engines (E.G., Bing) Should Enhance Ad Verification For Software Downloads., Certificate Authorities (Cas) Must Improve Validation And Revocation Processes., Organizations Should Implement Allow-Listing For Software Installations., Security Vendors Need To Prioritize Behavioral Detection For Packed/Obfuscated Malware.,

Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525

Root Causes: Insufficient Validation Of Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes In Teams., Lack Of Tamper-Evident Indicators (E.G., 'Edited' Label Bypass)., Over-Reliance On Visual Trust Cues (E.G., Display Names) Without Cryptographic Verification., Collaboration Features (E.G., Guest Access, External Sharing) Expanding The Attack Surface.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft Patched The Vulnerabilities To Prevent Spoofing And Impersonation., Added Stricter Validation For Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes., Enhanced User Education On Social Engineering Risks In Teams., Ongoing Monitoring For Similar Vulnerabilities In Collaboration Tools.,

Incident : Malware MIC1692516110725

Root Causes: Lack Of Strict Vetting For Vs Code Extensions/Npm Packages., Abuse Of Legitimate Platforms (Github, Npm) For Malicious Purposes., Over-Reliance On Automated Tools Without Manual Code Review., Insufficient Monitoring Of Postinstall Scripts In Open-Source Packages.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft: Strengthen Extension Review Processes For Vs Code Marketplace., Npm: Enhance Detection Of Malicious Postinstall Scripts And Typosquatting., Github: Improve Abuse Detection For Repositories Used As C2 Channels., Developers: Adopt Secure Coding Practices And Dependency Hygiene.,

Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225

Root Causes: Improper Neutralization Of Special Elements In Sql Commands (Cwe-89), Improper Input Validation In Sql Server Query Processing Engine,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft-Issued Patch For Affected Sql Server Versions, Reinforced Guidance On Access Control And Monitoring Best Practices,

Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325

Root Causes: Lack Of Package Name Validation During Npm Install., Over-Permissive Github Actions Environment Variables., Insufficient Scanning Of Post-Install Hooks In Npm Packages., Developer Reliance On Automated Dependency Installation Without Verification.,

Corrective Actions: Npm Removed Malicious Package And Related Versions., Github Terminated Associated User Accounts., Veracode Enhanced Detection For Obfuscated Post-Install Scripts., Public Advisory Issued To Raise Awareness Of Typosquatting Risks In Ci/Cd.,

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725

Root Causes: Proliferation Of Insecure Iot Devices With Default/Exploitable Credentials., Lack Of Segmentation Or Monitoring For Firmware Update Servers (E.G., Totolink)., Effectiveness Of Udp Floods With Minimal Spoofing In Evading Traditional Defenses., Abuse Of Dns Query Volumes To Manipulate Public Rankings.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft And Cloudflare Enhanced Ddos Mitigation Capacities (E.G., 21.3M Attacks Blocked In 2024)., Cloudflare Modified Ranking Algorithms To Exclude/Hide Malicious Domains., Increased Industry Awareness Of Iot Botnet Risks (E.G., Mirai-Class Threats)., Potential Isp-Level Collaborations To Disrupt Aisuru’S C2 Infrastructure.,

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925

Root Causes: Exploitation Of Default/Weak Credentials In Iot Devices., Lack Of Firmware Updates In Residential Routers/Cameras., Botnet Proliferation (Aisuru/Turbomirai) Leveraging Unsecured Devices.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft Enhanced Ddos Protection Thresholds For Azure., Public Awareness Campaigns On Iot Security (E.G., Changing Default Passwords)., Collaboration With Isps To Identify And Remediate Botnet-Infected Devices.,

Incident : Vulnerability MIC1133111112125

Root Causes: Uninitialized Memory Pointer Dereference In Gpreadonlymemorystream::Initfile (Windowscodecs.Dll)., Lack Of Control Flow Guard (Cfg) Protection In 32-Bit Versions Of Windowscodecs.Dll., Widespread Dependency On Vulnerable Library Across Microsoft Office And Other Applications.,

Corrective Actions: Microsoft Released Patch (Build 10.0.26100.4946) To Address The Memory Corruption Issue., Security Bulletin Issued With Cvss 9.8 Severity Rating To Emphasize Urgency., Recommendations Provided For Enabling Cfg And Network Segmentation.,

Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425

Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Concentrated Infrastructure (Single Points Of Failure), Lack Of Non-Human Identity Governance (Ai Agents, Iam Sprawl), Static Authentication In The Age Of Deepfakes, Voluntary Compliance Frameworks (Pre-2026 Mandates), Talent Pipeline Collapse (Ai Replacing Entry-Level Roles), Shared Responsibility Model Gaps In Cloud Security,

Corrective Actions: Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (Cisa-Led), Develop Ai-Specific Zero-Trust Frameworks, Replace Static Mfa With Continuous Verification, Decentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (Reduce Hyperscaler Dependency), Invest In Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (E.G., Apprenticeships), Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments For Cloud/Saas Providers, Leverage Compliance As Innovation Driver (E.G., Responsible Ai Use),

Incident : EDR/AV Evasion MIC5132151112625

Root Causes: Overlooked Pointer Manipulation Vulnerability In Windows Api'S Readprocessmemory Function (*Lpnumberofbytesread)., Edr/Av Reliance On Hooking Traditional Memory-Writing Apis (E.G., Writeprocessmemory) Without Monitoring 'Read' Functions For Write Primitives., Lack Of Behavioral Detection For Slow, Indirect Memory Injection Techniques.,

Corrective Actions: Expand Api Monitoring To Include Readprocessmemory Calls With Unusual Pointer Behavior., Implement Behavioral Detection For Indirect Memory Writing Patterns., Update Defensive Postures Based On Red Team Testing With Poc Tools Like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Chris Vickery, , Wiz, , Monitor Preview-Related Processes Like Explorer.Exe, Searchindexer.Exe, And Quicklookd, , Monitoring For Suspicious Git Clone –Recursive Executions, , Gitguardian (Detection/Alerting), Pypi (Mitigation), , Reversinglabs (Discovery And Analysis), , Cloudflare, Health-Isac, , Mitiga (Research Analysis), , Microsoft Detection And Response Team (Dart), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (Mstic), Managed Security Service Providers (Mssps), , Defender Xdr Alerts (E.G., Anomalous Teams Logins), Entra Id Risk Policies (Impossible Travel, Leaked Credentials), Siem Integration (Microsoft Sentinel), Teams-Specific Hunting Queries (E.G., External File Shares), , Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), Hackerone (Vulnerability Disclosure), , Recommended For Detecting Exploitation Attempts, , Enable Teams Alerts For Unusual Activity, Real-Time Antivirus Scanning, Zero Trust Verification (Validate Every User/Device), , Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery), , Crowdstrike, Google Project Zero, Vicarius (Detection Script), , Monitor outbound SMB traffic, Security Researchers (Meow, F7D8C52Bec79E42795Cf15888B85Cbad, Markus Wulftange With Code White Gmbh), Hawktrace (Batuhan Er), Eye Security, Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (Ncsc), , Google Threat Intelligence Group (Gtig), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (Zdi), , Monitor For Powershell Commands (E.G., Whoami, Net User, Ipconfig), Check For Exfiltration To Webhook.Site Endpoints, , Expel (Threat Intelligence Tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team, , Expel Tracking Indicators On Github, Recommended For Potential Targets, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), Secure Annex (Research), Datadog Security Labs (Research), , Sql Server Logs For Suspicious Activity, , Veracode Threat Research, , Recommended For Github Actions Environments, , Increased Ddos Mitigation Capabilities (Cloudflare, Microsoft), , , Zscaler Threatlabz (Discovery), , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation., Required for AI agents and autonomous systems., Monitor For Unusual Readprocessmemory Calls With *Lpnumberofbytesread Pointer Manipulation., .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Mitigated the security flaw, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Implement Akamai’S Detection Script Get-Badsuccessoroupermissions.Ps, Restrict Dmsa Creation Permissions To Trusted Administrators Only, , Apply Security Patch, , Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound Smb Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, , Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, Issuing Patches, Patching, rotating machine keys, enabling AMSI, thorough security assessments, Github Enhanced Workflow Security Controls., Gitguardian Expanded Monitoring For Similar Attacks., Affected Projects Rotated Compromised Credentials., , Server-Side Patch To Enforce Tenant Validation In Token Processing., Accelerated Deprecation Of Azure Ad Graph Api (Retired August 31, 2025)., Enhanced Guidance For Migrating To Microsoft Graph., Internal Review Of High-Privileged Access (Hpa) Scenarios In Entra Id., , Microsoft'S Legal Action And Infrastructure Takedowns To Disrupt Raccoono365 Operations., Cloudflare'S Ban On Identified Domains And Termination Of Malicious Scripts., Enhanced Monitoring For Ai-Powered Phishing (E.G., Raccoono365 Ai-Mailcheck)., Public-Private Collaboration To Share Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) And Tactics., , Action: Implement Zero Trust for Teams, Details: Enforce least-privilege access, verify every request (user/device), and assume breach. Use Entra ID Conditional Access to restrict Teams access by location, device state, and risk level., Action: Harden Teams Configurations, Details: Disable external access by default; require admin approval for guest users; audit Teams apps for excessive permissions; block legacy auth protocols., Action: Enhance Detection for Teams Threats, Details: Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts; create custom hunting queries for Teams API abuse, external file shares, and Adaptive Card phishing; integrate Teams logs with SIEM., Action: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA, Details: Replace SMS/email-based MFA with FIDO2 or certificate-based authentication for all users, especially admins. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks (e.g., repeated push notifications)., Action: Segment and Monitor Teams Traffic, Details: Isolate Teams from high-value networks; inspect TLS traffic for C2 (e.g., BRc4 over Teams); block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing., Action: Conduct Teams-Specific Red Teaming, Details: Simulate attack chains observed in the wild (e.g., TeamsPhisher + DarkGate, device code phishing) to test defenses and user awareness., Action: Improve User Training, Details: Add Teams-specific scenarios to security awareness programs (e.g., fake help desk calls, malicious file shares). Train users to verify unexpected Teams requests via a secondary channel., Action: Automate Response to Teams Threats, Details: Use Defender XDR automation to quarantine phishing messages, revoke compromised tokens, and isolate affected endpoints. Implement SOAR playbooks for common Teams attack patterns., Action: Audit and Reduce Attack Surface, Details: Remove unused Teams apps; disable unnecessary features (e.g., anonymous meeting joins); review federated tenant trust relationships; retire legacy authentication., Action: Leverage Microsoft’s Built-In Protections, Details: Enable all relevant Defender for Office 365, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps policies for Teams. Use Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader threats., , Disabled Image Rendering In Copilot Chat., Blocked Camo-Based Exfiltration Routes., Planned Long-Term Fixes To Restrict Ai Tool Access And Harden Input Validation., , Patch Management, Network Segmentation, Privileged Access Monitoring, , Microsoft: Enhance Default Security Settings In Teams (E.G., Disable Guest Access By Default)., Organizations: Enforce Zero Trust Policies For Teams (E.G., Mfa, Least-Privilege Access)., Users: Adopt Recommended Mitigations (Privacy Mode, Data Removal Services, Phishing Training)., Industry: Share Threat Intelligence On Teams-Specific Ttps (E.G., Octo Tempest'S Use Of Teams For Extortion)., , Microsoft Released A Patch In October 2025 To Address The Race Condition In Filename Validation., Enhanced Input Validation For Placeholder File Operations In Cloud Sync Services., Security Hardening Of The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And Related I/O Control Codes., , Microsoft Patch Release, Cisa Kev Listing For Visibility, Public Detection Tools (Vicarius), , Release Of Out-Of-Band Patch To Validate Deserialization In Wsus., Removal Of Binaryformatter From .Net 9 (Proactive Measure)., Public Disclosure Of Exploitation Risks To Prompt Patching., , Emergency Patch Deployment, Network Segmentation And Exposure Reduction, Enhanced Monitoring For Reconnaissance Activity, Vendor Accountability For Patch Completeness, , Search Engines (E.G., Bing) Should Enhance Ad Verification For Software Downloads., Certificate Authorities (Cas) Must Improve Validation And Revocation Processes., Organizations Should Implement Allow-Listing For Software Installations., Security Vendors Need To Prioritize Behavioral Detection For Packed/Obfuscated Malware., , Microsoft Patched The Vulnerabilities To Prevent Spoofing And Impersonation., Added Stricter Validation For Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes., Enhanced User Education On Social Engineering Risks In Teams., Ongoing Monitoring For Similar Vulnerabilities In Collaboration Tools., , Microsoft: Strengthen Extension Review Processes For Vs Code Marketplace., Npm: Enhance Detection Of Malicious Postinstall Scripts And Typosquatting., Github: Improve Abuse Detection For Repositories Used As C2 Channels., Developers: Adopt Secure Coding Practices And Dependency Hygiene., , Microsoft-Issued Patch For Affected Sql Server Versions, Reinforced Guidance On Access Control And Monitoring Best Practices, , Npm Removed Malicious Package And Related Versions., Github Terminated Associated User Accounts., Veracode Enhanced Detection For Obfuscated Post-Install Scripts., Public Advisory Issued To Raise Awareness Of Typosquatting Risks In Ci/Cd., , Microsoft And Cloudflare Enhanced Ddos Mitigation Capacities (E.G., 21.3M Attacks Blocked In 2024)., Cloudflare Modified Ranking Algorithms To Exclude/Hide Malicious Domains., Increased Industry Awareness Of Iot Botnet Risks (E.G., Mirai-Class Threats)., Potential Isp-Level Collaborations To Disrupt Aisuru’S C2 Infrastructure., , Microsoft Enhanced Ddos Protection Thresholds For Azure., Public Awareness Campaigns On Iot Security (E.G., Changing Default Passwords)., Collaboration With Isps To Identify And Remediate Botnet-Infected Devices., , Microsoft Released Patch (Build 10.0.26100.4946) To Address The Memory Corruption Issue., Security Bulletin Issued With Cvss 9.8 Severity Rating To Emphasize Urgency., Recommendations Provided For Enabling Cfg And Network Segmentation., , Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (Cisa-Led), Develop Ai-Specific Zero-Trust Frameworks, Replace Static Mfa With Continuous Verification, Decentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (Reduce Hyperscaler Dependency), Invest In Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (E.G., Apprenticeships), Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments For Cloud/Saas Providers, Leverage Compliance As Innovation Driver (E.G., Responsible Ai Use), , Expand Api Monitoring To Include Readprocessmemory Calls With Unusual Pointer Behavior., Implement Behavioral Detection For Indirect Memory Writing Patterns., Update Defensive Postures Based On Red Team Testing With Poc Tools Like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Has the company ever paid ransoms ?

Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.

What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was ShibaCoin.

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Lapsus$ hacking group, Unknown, Anonymous SudanStorm-1359, Stargazer Goblin, Stargazer Goblin Network, Storm-0940, Chinese-affiliated hacking group, EncryptHub (SkorikARI), Unknown, Single Bad Actor, Linen TyphoonViolet TyphoonStorm-2603, Linen Typhoon (APT27)Violet Typhoon (APT31)Storm-2603, Famous Chollima APT Group, Name: Banana SquadActive Since: April 2023Type: ['cybercriminal group', 'malware distributor'], Name: Joshua OgundipeAffiliation: RaccoonO365Location: NigeriaBackground: Computer programming; believed to have authored majority of the RaccoonO365 code, Name: Octo TempestType: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Ransomware, Extortion, MFA BypassName: Storm-1811Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Tech Support Scams, ReedBed Malware, Email BombingName: Midnight Blizzard (APT29/Cozy Bear)Type: State-Sponsored (Russia)Association: Credential Theft, Social EngineeringName: Storm-1674Type: Access BrokerAssociation: TeamsPhisher, DarkGate MalwareName: Sangria TempestType: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Ransomware (3AM/BlackSuit), JSSloaderName: Peach Sandstorm (APT33)Type: State-Sponsored (Iran)Association: Malicious ZIP Files, AD ReconnaissanceName: Void BlizzardType: State-SponsoredAssociation: Entra ID Enumeration, AzureHoundName: Storm-0324Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: TeamsPhisher, Custom MalwareName: Storm-2372Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Device Code Phishing, Token TheftName: 3AM Ransomware (BlackSuit Rebrand)Type: Ransomware OperatorAssociation: Storm-1811 Techniques, Voice/Video Scams, Cybercriminal GroupsState-Backed HackersOcto Tempest (ALPHV/BlackCat Affiliate)Initial Access Brokers (IABs), UNC6512Opportunistic Threat Actors (unknown groups leveraging PoC), Rhysida (formerly Vice Society/Vanilla Tempest)RaaS affiliates, suspublisher18aykhanmv (GitHub C2 operator)MUT-4831 (npm package uploader: aartje, saliii229911), Aisuru Botnet Operators, Aisuru botnetTurboMirai family and Nation-States (geopolitically motivated)Cybercriminal Syndicates (financially motivated)Initial Access Brokers (selling backdoors to high-value targets)AI-Powered Threat Actors (exploiting autonomous systems)Insider Threats (due to identity sprawl).

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on September 2022.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-10-01T00:00:00Z.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on December 2021.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Projected increase in breach costs for ungoverned AI systems (per IBM 2025 report); potential economic catastrophe from cascading failures in cloud backbones (Microsoft, Amazon, Google)..

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Source code for Bing, Source code for Cortana, Emails, Documentation, , Private Repository Data, Full control over resources and data, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, , Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business, , email addresses, IP addresses, support case details, , Source Code Repositories, Job listing data, Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, , Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, , Plain Text Passwords, , Email accounts, sensitive information, Personal and potentially sensitive information, User Data, Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts, , credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data, , Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, , Personal data, Credentials, , Install Action Tokens, Docker Credentials, npm Credentials, AWS Credentials, , Source code and secrets, Confidential Data, Machine keys, Credentials, SL2000 certificates, SL3000 certificates, , Browser credentials, remote command execution capabilities, secrets, API keys, tokens, credentials, , User information (Entra ID), Group and role details, Tenant settings, Application permissions, Device information, BitLocker keys, Azure resource access (via Global Admin impersonation), , Microsoft 365 usernames, passwords, persistent system access, , User Credentials (Entra ID tokens, passwords), Corporate Chat/Message History, OneDrive/SharePoint Files, Active Directory Snapshots, PII (via phishing/exfiltration), Payment Information (in some extortion cases), , API Keys, Security Tokens, Private Source Code, Unpublished Zero-Day Vulnerability Descriptions, , Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited), , Credentials (Usernames/Passwords), Personal Data (PII), Corporate/Work Files, Cloud-Stored Data (OneDrive, SharePoint), Communication Threads (Emails, Chats), , System Information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain, ipconfig /all), , potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), sensitive organizational and personal data, , Files in test directories (C:\Users\Public\testing, /tmp/testing), Potential system data via Vidar Infostealer (credentials, cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, etc.), , GitHub authentication tokens, potential downstream repository access, , High risk of PII, corporate data and and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks..

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Azure DevOps server and and GitHub Servers and and Azure SynapseAzure Data Factory and and and Outlook emailOneDrive file-sharing appsAzure's cloud computing infrastructure and and GitHub Desktop for MacAtom and and and Microsoft AzureMicrosoft 365OfficeOutlook and and Microsoft 365 accountsTP-Link routers and Recall AI feature and and Windows KDC Proxy service and and and and Mark of the Web security featureWindows File Explorer and and Microsoft EdgeChromium-based browsers and Windows ExplorermacOS Quick LookEmail Client Preview SystemsFile Indexing Services and LinuxmacOS and Microsoft SharePoint and and and Microsoft PlayReady DRM system and and GitHub repositoriesCI/CD pipelines and Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net)SharePoint OnlineExchange OnlineAzure-hosted resources (via tenant-level access) and Microsoft 365 accountstargeted organizations' email systems and Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) and Microsoft Teams (Web/Desktop/Mobile Clients)Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Microsoft 365 (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive)On-Premises Active Directory (via hybrid sync)Endpoints (via RMM tools, malware) and GitHub Copilot ChatPrivate/Internal Repositories and Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager component and Microsoft Teams (Chat, Calls, Meetings)OneDrive/SharePoint (Cloud Storage)Personal/Work Devices (Laptops, PCs)Corporate Networks (via Lateral Movement) and Windows systems running cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)Systems with configured sync root directories and Windows 10 (older versions)Windows 11 (older versions)Windows Server (older versions) and Windows Servers with WSUS role enabled and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 with WSUS role enabled and Windows machines via malicious Teams installernetworks compromised post-initial access and Microsoft Teams (iOS)Microsoft Teams (other platforms, implied) and Windows (VS Code)macOS (VS Code)Systems with infected npm packages (Windows/Linux/macOS) and Microsoft SQL Server (versions not specified) and GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelinesdeveloper workstations (via npm install) and Microsoft Azure Network (Public IP in Australia)Cloudflare DNS Service (1.1.1.1)Legitimate Domains in Cloudflare’s Top Rankings (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft, Google) and Azure endpoint (Australia) and Windows 11 Version 24H2 (x64)Windows 11 Version 24H2 (ARM64)Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2025 (Server Core) and SaaS Platforms (e.g., firewalls, cloud services)AI Agents (autonomous systems with broad access)Critical Infrastructure (energy, water, communications)Multi-Cloud EnvironmentsIAM Systems (vulnerable to credential-based attacks).

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was chris vickery, , wiz, , gitguardian (detection/alerting), pypi (mitigation), , reversinglabs (discovery and analysis), , cloudflare, health-isac, , mitiga (research analysis), , microsoft detection and response team (dart), microsoft threat intelligence center (mstic), managed security service providers (mssps), , legit security (researcher omer mayraz), hackerone (vulnerability disclosure), , exodus intelligence (vulnerability discovery), , crowdstrike, google project zero, vicarius (detection script), , security researchers (meow, f7d8c52bec79e42795cf15888b85cbad, markus wulftange with code white gmbh), hawktrace (batuhan er), eye security, dutch national cyber security centre (ncsc), , google threat intelligence group (gtig), palo alto networks unit 42, trend micro zero day initiative (zdi), , expel (threat intelligence tracking), microsoft threat intelligence team, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), secure annex (research), datadog security labs (research), , veracode threat research, , zscaler threatlabz (discovery), , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation..

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Notifying impacted users and organizations, Removed Several Repositories, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Secured the database, Password Reset, Disable fake accounts, Disabled Ghost Accounts, Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro Blocking, Upgrade to patched Git versionsAvoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched, DMCA takedown noticesAccount suspensions, shut down exfiltration serverreverted malicious commitsread-only mode for compromised project, Patch deployed by Microsoft on July 17, 2025Deprecation and retirement of Azure AD Graph API (effective August 31, 2025)Migration guidance to Microsoft Graph for affected applications, Seizure of 338 RaccoonO365 websitesCloudflare takedown of domains/Worker accountsInterstitial 'phish warning' pagesTermination of Workers scriptsSuspension of user accounts, Isolate Compromised Accounts/DevicesDisable External Access (Federation, Guest Users)Revoke Suspicious OAuth TokensBlock Malicious IPs/Domains (Defender for Office 365)Quarantine Phishing Emails/Teams Messages, Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat (2024-08-14)Blocked Camo image-proxy exfiltration route, Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, Enable Privacy Mode in TeamsRestrict Guest/External AccessLimit Admin PermissionsRemove Unused Guest Accounts, October 2025 security updates (patch release), Patch deployment (June 2025 Patch Tuesday)SMB traffic monitoring, Out-of-band security patch releaseSystem reboot required post-patchDisabling WSUS Server Role (if enabled)Blocking inbound traffic to Ports 8530 and 8531 on host firewall, Emergency Patch (Microsoft)Network Segmentation (recommended)Disabling Internet-Facing WSUS Instances, Microsoft revoked malicious certificatesAV vendors updating detection signatures, Patches released in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197)Subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025, Microsoft removed 'susvsex' from VS Code Marketplace (2025-11-06)npm banned malicious accounts ('aartje', 'saliii229911') and packages, npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact')removal of two GitHub user accounts linked to malwareblocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', Mitigation of UDP Flood TrafficTraceback and Enforcement by ISPsRedaction/Hiding of Malicious Domains in Cloudflare Rankings, Azure DDoS Protection infrastructure filteringTraffic redirection, Patch deployment (build 10.0.26100.4946), Zero-Trust Architectures (extended to AI agents)Continuous Context-Aware Verification (for identity sprawl)Mandatory MFA Enforcement (cloud providers)Network Segmentation (critical infrastructure), Review and update API monitoring rules for ReadProcessMemory calls and especially those targeting executable memory sections..

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were credit card numbers, SL2000 certificates, AWS Credentials, Unpublished Zero-Day Vulnerability Descriptions, System Information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain, ipconfig /all), Job listing data, Social Security numbers, support case details, Machine keys, Credentials, social security numbers, Internal system prompts, tokens, Windows 10 internal builds, Full control over resources and data, Corporate Chat/Message History, persistent system access, API Keys, Application permissions, Credentials (Usernames/Passwords), User information (Entra ID), Company Name, Communication Threads (Emails, Chats), Personal and potentially sensitive information, Private Source Code, secrets, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, Financial reports, GitHub authentication tokens, Group and role details, Corporate/Work Files, Personal data, credentials, Azure resource access (via Global Admin impersonation), BitLocker keys, Cloud-Stored Data (OneDrive, SharePoint), Emails, PII (via phishing/exfiltration), Private Repository Data, potential downstream repository access, Email Content, Files in test directories (C:\Users\Public\testing, /tmp/testing), OneDrive/SharePoint Files, User Credentials (Entra ID tokens, passwords), Email Addresses, Credentials, Device information, potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), Potential system data via Vidar Infostealer (credentials, cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, etc.), Source Code Repositories, Active Directory Snapshots, sensitive organizational and personal data, Security Tokens, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, Confidential Data, Personal Data (PII), Documentation, Source code for Bing, Source code and secrets, Tenant settings, Names, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, Install Action Tokens, SL3000 certificates, Source code for Cortana, Credit card numbers, API keys, npm Credentials, Browser credentials, remote command execution capabilities, passwords, Plain Text Passwords, Docker Credentials, Private keys, Microsoft 365 usernames, Employee salaries, Files linked to business, Passwords, Secrets, User Data, High risk of PII, corporate data, and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks., Phone Numbers, Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited), other personal data, email addresses, IP addresses, Payment Information (in some extortion cases), Email accounts and sensitive information.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 70.6K.

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was Undisclosed (some victims likely paid).

Regulatory Compliance

What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was Potential (none publicly disclosed yet), Projected for non-compliance (details TBD by CISA/sector regulators)..

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only), , Possible (e.g., class-action lawsuits for data breaches), Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures..

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient., The Windows API's vastness and flexibility allow legitimate functions (e.g., ReadProcessMemory) to be repurposed for evasion. Security vendors must expand monitoring beyond traditional 'write' functions (e.g., WriteProcessMemory) to include 'read' functions with pointer manipulation capabilities. Open-source PoCs like this highlight the need for proactive defensive updates and red teaming to identify blind spots in detection mechanisms.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Prioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Monitor for indirect memory injection techniques that bypass traditional hooks (e.g., WriteProcessMemory, memcpy)., Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation., Monitor for suspicious activity involving JPEG/image processing workflows., Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories., Avoid using BinaryFormatter in custom applications; migrate to safer serialization methods., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Enable SMB signing to prevent relay attacks., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults)., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical data, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Patch all supported SharePoint versions, rotate machine keys, enable AMSI, conduct thorough security assessments, Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Follow CISA KEV catalog for prioritized patching guidance., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Enhance behavioral analysis to detect slow, byte-by-byte memory writing patterns that evade heuristic detection., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Prioritize patching for systems processing untrusted images/documents (e.g., email servers, shared drives)., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Monitor outbound SMB traffic for signs of coercion attempts., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities., Stay informed about open-source offensive security tools and research (e.g., Unprotect Project) to anticipate emerging evasion techniques., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations., Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Implement stricter file and folder access controls, Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-exploitation., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for package publishing accounts to prevent hijacking., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Apply the out-of-band security update immediately for all affected Windows Server versions., Monitor for suspicious .NET executable payloads or commands executed via request headers (e.g., 'aaaa' header)., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Conduct red team exercises using tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor to test defensive postures., Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Category: Detection, , Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Enable Control Flow Guard (CFG) where possible to mitigate ROP-based exploits., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Reboot systems after patching to ensure updates take effect., Review logs for signs of exploitation, such as unexpected cmd.exe processes spawned from WSUS services., Educate users on risks of opening untrusted documents/emails., Disable the WSUS server role if not required., Enhance vetting processes for extensions/packages in official marketplaces (e.g., static analysis, behavioral sandboxing)., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection)., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict SMB to trusted networks only (e.g., via firewall rules)., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Category: Recovery, , Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management., Timely updates and patches to software, Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Update Microsoft Edge to version 138.0.3351.65 or later immediately, Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Category: Prevention, , Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations., Implement network-level detection for connections to known malicious domains (e.g., bullethost[.]cloud)., Regularly audit open-source dependencies for suspicious activity (e.g., unexpected postinstall scripts)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation., Apply Microsoft patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) immediately across all affected systems., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Block inbound traffic to ports 8530 and 8531 until patches are applied., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Immediately apply June 2025 Patch Tuesday updates (or later) for Windows systems., Monitor GitHub for repositories used as C2 channels (e.g., frequent updates to index.html/requirements.txt)., Educate developers on risks of typosquatting, dependency confusion, and postinstall scripts., Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Category: Response, , Use detection scripts (e.g., Vicarius) to identify vulnerable systems., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes, Review and update EDR/AV rules to detect unusual ReadProcessMemory calls, particularly those writing to executable memory sections via pointer manipulation. and Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter), Fox News / CyberGuy.com, Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery), Netscout Threat Intelligence, CISA KEV Catalog, Microsoft Defender XDR Hunting Queries for Teams Threats, Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne), Dirk-jan Mollema (Red-Teamer, Initial Reporter), The Register, GBHackers (GBH), Wiz, Microsoft Security Update, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Microsoft Learn: 'Secure Microsoft Teams', IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO), ReversingLabs Blog Post, Qi'anxin XLab Research, Security Researcher Matt Muir, Zscaler ThreatLabz Research, Microsoft Security Advisory (referenced indirectly), Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO), Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph API, Mitiga Research Blog, Medium, Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) Advisory, CYFIRMA, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, Secure Annex Research (John Tuckner), Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Microsoft Security Update Guide, Check Point Research Report, Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287), Trend Micro: 'DarkGate Malware Distributed via TeamsPhisher', Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO), The Hacker News - CVE-2025-59287 Exploitation Report, CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01, GitGuardian Report, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence: Storm-1811 Campaign, Unprotect Project (Jean-Pierre LESUEUR / DarkCoderSc), TorrentFreak, The Hacker News (Coverage), Sophos: '3AM Ransomware Uses Storm-1811 Tactics', Expel GitHub Indicators, Expel Blog, HawkTrace Research (Batuhan Er) - Technical Analysis, Microsoft, Vicarius Detection Script, TechRadar Pro, TechRadar, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499), Bloomberg, Indirect-Shellcode-Executor (Mimorep), Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist), Cloudflare Blog, Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security), IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report, Veracode Threat Research, Microsoft Security Blog: 'Defending against attacks that abuse Microsoft Teams', Cybersecurity Dive, SOCRadar, Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680), The Register (Article), The Hacker News, Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO), Microsoft Azure Blog, Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman), Hunters: 'VEILdrive Campaign by Sangria Tempest', Shadowserver Foundation, Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog), Datadog Security Labs, SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy), Eye Security, DataDog researchers, Check Point Research, OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks), Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS Report, CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, Microsoft Security Update (October 2025), Microsoft Azure Security Blog, Tom's Hardware, Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024), Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO), BleepingComputer and Microsoft Security Update Guide (August 2025).

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bloomberg.com, https://twitter.com/Shadowserver, https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241, https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-entra-azure-ad-blog/azure-ad-graph-retirement-august-31-2025/ba-p/4123456, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/01/defending-against-attacks-that-abuse-microsoft-teams/, https://threatintelligence.microsoft.com/, https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/d/darkgate-malware-distributed-via-teamphisher.html, https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2024/05/01/3am-ransomware-storm-1811-tactics/, https://www.hunters.ai/blog/veildrive-sangria-tempest, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/security-teams-overview, https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Defender-XDR-Hunting-Queries, https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/github_copilot_chat_vulnerability/, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230, https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01, https://www.cyberguy.com, https://www.techradar.com, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287, https://thehackernews.com/2025/10/critical-windows-wsus-flaw-under-active.html, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2025/october/24/cve-2025-59287-wsus-exploitation, https://www.theregister.com, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://www.zerodayinitiative.com, https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/, https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/, https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted], https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted], https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/, https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/, https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligence, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach, https://securityscorecard.com, https://www.dashlane.com, https://www.omadaidentity.com, https://www.inmar.com, https://lastwall.com, https://www.iansresearch.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was GitHub repository owners, open-source project maintainers, Microsoft urged customers to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph by August 31, 2025., Applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API were warned of impending API retirement in early September 2025., Microsoft customers advised to reset compromised credentials and enable advanced MFA., Healthcare organizations warned of targeted phishing risks., Microsoft has issued guidance to customers via the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) and Defender Threat Intelligence., Enterprise admins are advised to review Teams configurations and apply mitigations outlined in the Microsoft Security Blog., Partners (e.g., MSSPs) should prioritize Teams-specific detections in their SOC operations., CISA KEV catalog update, Public warnings via media outlets, Microsoft recommends enabling privacy settings, restricting permissions, and using antivirus/data removal services., Microsoft recommends immediate patching for all affected systems., CISA KEV notification, Microsoft security update guidance, Federal agencies (via CISA KEV catalog), Enterprise Windows Server administrators, Security researchers, Microsoft (limited updates), CISA (KEV catalog inclusion), Threat intelligence community (GTIG, Unit 42, ZDI), Microsoft revoked malicious certificates and issued a public advisory., Expel published technical details and indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching., Developers advised to remove 'susvsex' extension and scan systems for Vidar Infostealer., Developers advised to audit GitHub Actions dependencies for '@acitons/artifact', Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, IoT Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, TotoLink), Microsoft advised customers to enable Azure DDoS Protection for defense-in-depth., Microsoft urged all organizations to treat this as a critical priority and verify patch deployment within 48 hours., Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs., .

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an GitHub issued guidance on securing Actions workflows, No customer action required for the vulnerability patch.Customers advised to review and update applications relying on deprecated Azure AD Graph API., Users urged to report suspicious emails and enable security defaults in Microsoft 365., Users should report suspicious Teams activity (e.g., unexpected calls, file shares) via their organization’s security team.Microsoft 365 admins can access the 'Teams Security Guide' in the Microsoft 365 admin center for configuration recommendations.Customers with Defender XDR can run the provided hunting queries to check for indicators of compromise (IoCs)., GitHub Security Advisory (2024-08-14), Organizations urged to patch immediately; federal agencies given deadline of November 4, 2025, Users advised to verify links/files, enable MFA, and report suspicious Teams activity to Microsoft., Users of Windows cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) should apply the October 2025 updates to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation., Users advised to patch systems and restrict SMB exposure., Microsoft customers using WSUS-enabled serversOrganizations relying on Windows Server updates, Apply emergency patchRestrict WSUS internet exposureMonitor for exploitation signs, Users advised to download Microsoft Teams only from official sources (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/download-app).Organizations warned to monitor for OysterLoader/Latrodectus infections., Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls., Users of infected npm packages should reset credentials and monitor for fraud., Organizations running SQL Server in production environments advised to patch urgentlySecurity teams and database administrators urged to coordinate patch deployment, Veracode customers received automated protection via Package Firewall, Users of affected IoT devices advised to update firmware and change default credentials.Azure/Cloudflare customers informed of mitigated attacks and ongoing monitoring., No action required; Azure services remained operational., Users advised to update Windows immediately to prevent potential system compromise via malicious images/documents., Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement and and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an dMSA migration mechanism, compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project), Crafted links, SMB protocol (via script coercion), Fake Accounts, Weak Passwords, Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues, Malicious Extensions, Microsoft Exchange Server, Azure Data Factory service certificate, ToolPane endpoint, Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation, Ghost Accounts, Malicious repositories, Deceptive recruitment processes, malicious NPM packages on GitHub, SharePoint Server Vulnerability, npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact'), Stolen OAuth Tokens, Malicious Document and Basic Authentication.

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Weeks to months (e.g., Void Blizzard’s Entra ID enumeration before attack), Ongoing (attackers probe for weak settings before launching attacks), Post-exploitation (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig commands), ongoing since June 2024 (second wave)previous campaign: May–September 2024, Prolonged (AI agents enable persistent, low-visibility reconnaissance)..

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate, Vulnerability in MSDT, Unintentional Misconfiguration, Weak Passwords, Lack of authentication and write-protection, Improper data management practices, Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software, CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability, Trust in Popular Repositories, Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature, Integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, Gaps in Microsoft's review system, Vulnerability in Windows Server 2025’s dMSA feature, Zero-Day Vulnerability Exploitation, Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems, Mismatch in Git’s handling of configuration values and control characters, Vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server, CVE-2025-53770 vulnerability, Exploitation of trust in professional networking and job-seeking activities, abuse of GitHub’s trusted infrastructure, Weak authentication for maintainer accounts (lack of MFA).Insufficient validation of GitHub Actions workflows.Exposed secrets in repositories (lack of secret scanning)., Lack of repository integrity checks on GitHub for malicious forks.Trust in open-source hacking tools without verification.Exploitation of GitHub’s legitimacy to distribute malware., Inadequate tenant validation in Azure AD Graph API for S2S actor tokens.Over-reliance on deprecated legacy APIs without enforced migration timelines.Lack of API-level logging for the Graph API, enabling stealthy exploitation.Conditional Access policies applied to tokens that could be manipulated cross-tenant., Proliferation of phishing-as-a-service models lowering entry barriers for cybercriminals.Effectiveness of MFA bypass techniques in phishing kits.Lack of global law enforcement coordination to apprehend threat actors in jurisdictions like Nigeria.Delayed detection of phishing infrastructure (operational since at least July 2024)., Legacy API lacking tenant validation for Actor tokensHidden delegation mechanism (Actor tokens) exposed to exploitation, Over-Permissive External Access: Default configurations allowed unauthorized tenant federation and guest access.Lack of Teams-Specific Monitoring: Security tools focused on email/endpoints missed Teams-based attacks (e.g., Adaptive Card phishing).Insufficient Identity Protections: Legacy authentication, weak MFA, and standing privileges enabled credential theft.User Awareness Gaps: Employees trusted Teams messages/calls more than emails, falling for social engineering.Open-Source Tool Abuse: Attackers leveraged public frameworks (e.g., TeamFiltration) to automate reconnaissance and exfiltration.Hybrid Complexity: On-premises AD sync with Entra ID created seams for lateral movement (e.g., Peach Sandstorm’s AD snapshots).Delayed Patching: Unpatched Teams clients or endpoints allowed malware execution (e.g., DarkGate via TeamsPhisher).Third-Party Risk: Compromised partner tenants or spoofed apps provided initial access vectors., Copilot Chat's over-permissive access to repository content (inherited from user permissions).Lack of input sanitization for 'invisible' markdown comments.Camo image-proxy service repurposed as a covert exfiltration channel.AI tool design assuming trust in contextual inputs without human-visible cues., Improper access control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (CVE-2025-59230), Overly permissive default settings in Teams (e.g., guest access, privacy modes).Lack of user awareness about impersonation and phishing risks in collaboration tools.Exposure of PII on data broker sites, enabling convincing social engineering.Delayed patching of Teams/OS vulnerabilities.Trust in 'internal' communication channels (e.g., assuming Teams messages are safe)., Inadequate filename validation in the HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders() function during placeholder file creation.Race condition (TOCTOU) between filename validation and actual file creation in the Windows Cloud Minifilter driver (cldflt.sys).Multi-threaded attack surface enabled by the CfCreatePlaceholders() API and I/O control code 0x903BC.Incomplete fix for a prior vulnerability (CVE-2020-17136) reintroduced the race condition., Improper access controls in SMB implementationDelayed patch application by end-users, Use of unsafe BinaryFormatter for deserialization in legacy WSUS code.Lack of proper type validation during deserialization of AuthorizationCookie objects.Inherent risks in AES-128-CBC decryption followed by unvalidated deserialization., Insecure deserialization in WSUS (CVE-2025-59287)Incomplete initial patch by MicrosoftInternet-facing WSUS instances (against best practices), Over-reliance on search engine ads as a trusted software distribution channel.Delayed detection of obfuscated malware by traditional AV solutions.Abuse of legitimate code-signing certificates to bypass security controls.Lack of user awareness about typosquatting and fake download pages., Insufficient validation of message edits and sender identity changes in Teams.Lack of tamper-evident indicators (e.g., 'Edited' label bypass).Over-reliance on visual trust cues (e.g., display names) without cryptographic verification.Collaboration features (e.g., guest access, external sharing) expanding the attack surface., Lack of strict vetting for VS Code extensions/npm packages.Abuse of legitimate platforms (GitHub, npm) for malicious purposes.Over-reliance on automated tools without manual code review.Insufficient monitoring of postinstall scripts in open-source packages., Improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands (CWE-89)Improper input validation in SQL Server query processing engine, Lack of package name validation during npm install.Over-permissive GitHub Actions environment variables.Insufficient scanning of post-install hooks in npm packages.Developer reliance on automated dependency installation without verification., Proliferation of insecure IoT devices with default/exploitable credentials.Lack of segmentation or monitoring for firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink).Effectiveness of UDP floods with minimal spoofing in evading traditional defenses.Abuse of DNS query volumes to manipulate public rankings., Exploitation of default/weak credentials in IoT devices.Lack of firmware updates in residential routers/cameras.Botnet proliferation (Aisuru/TurboMirai) leveraging unsecured devices., Uninitialized memory pointer dereference in GpReadOnlyMemoryStream::InitFile (windowscodecs.dll).Lack of Control Flow Guard (CFG) protection in 32-bit versions of windowscodecs.dll.Widespread dependency on vulnerable library across Microsoft Office and other applications., Over-Reliance on Concentrated Infrastructure (single points of failure)Lack of Non-Human Identity Governance (AI agents, IAM sprawl)Static Authentication in the Age of DeepfakesVoluntary Compliance Frameworks (pre-2026 mandates)Talent Pipeline Collapse (AI replacing entry-level roles)Shared Responsibility Model Gaps in Cloud Security, Overlooked pointer manipulation vulnerability in Windows API's ReadProcessMemory function (*lpNumberOfBytesRead).EDR/AV reliance on hooking traditional memory-writing APIs (e.g., WriteProcessMemory) without monitoring 'read' functions for write primitives.Lack of behavioral detection for slow, indirect memory injection techniques..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Mitigated the security flaw, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Implement Akamai’s detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.psRestrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Apply Security Patch, Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro BlockingDeploy Behavioral Monitoring, Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, Issuing Patches, Patching, rotating machine keys, enabling AMSI, thorough security assessments, GitHub enhanced workflow security controls.GitGuardian expanded monitoring for similar attacks.Affected projects rotated compromised credentials., Server-side patch to enforce tenant validation in token processing.Accelerated deprecation of Azure AD Graph API (retired August 31, 2025).Enhanced guidance for migrating to Microsoft Graph.Internal review of high-privileged access (HPA) scenarios in Entra ID., Microsoft's legal action and infrastructure takedowns to disrupt RaccoonO365 operations.Cloudflare's ban on identified domains and termination of malicious scripts.Enhanced monitoring for AI-powered phishing (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck).Public-private collaboration to share indicators of compromise (IOCs) and tactics., action: Implement Zero Trust for Teams, details: Enforce least-privilege access, verify every request (user/device), and assume breach. Use Entra ID Conditional Access to restrict Teams access by location, device state, and risk level., action: Harden Teams Configurations, details: Disable external access by default; require admin approval for guest users; audit Teams apps for excessive permissions; block legacy auth protocols., action: Enhance Detection for Teams Threats, details: Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts; create custom hunting queries for Teams API abuse, external file shares, and Adaptive Card phishing; integrate Teams logs with SIEM., action: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA, details: Replace SMS/email-based MFA with FIDO2 or certificate-based authentication for all users, especially admins. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks (e.g., repeated push notifications)., action: Segment and Monitor Teams Traffic, details: Isolate Teams from high-value networks; inspect TLS traffic for C2 (e.g., BRc4 over Teams); block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing., action: Conduct Teams-Specific Red Teaming, details: Simulate attack chains observed in the wild (e.g., TeamsPhisher + DarkGate, device code phishing) to test defenses and user awareness., action: Improve User Training, details: Add Teams-specific scenarios to security awareness programs (e.g., fake help desk calls, malicious file shares). Train users to verify unexpected Teams requests via a secondary channel., action: Automate Response to Teams Threats, details: Use Defender XDR automation to quarantine phishing messages, revoke compromised tokens, and isolate affected endpoints. Implement SOAR playbooks for common Teams attack patterns., action: Audit and Reduce Attack Surface, details: Remove unused Teams apps; disable unnecessary features (e.g., anonymous meeting joins); review federated tenant trust relationships; retire legacy authentication., action: Leverage Microsoft’s Built-In Protections, details: Enable all relevant Defender for Office 365, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps policies for Teams. Use Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader threats., , Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat.Blocked Camo-based exfiltration routes.Planned long-term fixes to restrict AI tool access and harden input validation., Patch managementNetwork segmentationPrivileged access monitoring, Microsoft: Enhance default security settings in Teams (e.g., disable guest access by default).Organizations: Enforce Zero Trust policies for Teams (e.g., MFA, least-privilege access).Users: Adopt recommended mitigations (privacy mode, data removal services, phishing training).Industry: Share threat intelligence on Teams-specific TTPs (e.g., Octo Tempest's use of Teams for extortion)., Microsoft released a patch in October 2025 to address the race condition in filename validation.Enhanced input validation for placeholder file operations in cloud sync services.Security hardening of the CfCreatePlaceholders() API and related I/O control codes., Microsoft patch releaseCISA KEV listing for visibilityPublic detection tools (Vicarius), Release of out-of-band patch to validate deserialization in WSUS.Removal of BinaryFormatter from .NET 9 (proactive measure).Public disclosure of exploitation risks to prompt patching., Emergency patch deploymentNetwork segmentation and exposure reductionEnhanced monitoring for reconnaissance activityVendor accountability for patch completeness, Search engines (e.g., Bing) should enhance ad verification for software downloads.Certificate authorities (CAs) must improve validation and revocation processes.Organizations should implement allow-listing for software installations.Security vendors need to prioritize behavioral detection for packed/obfuscated malware., Microsoft patched the vulnerabilities to prevent spoofing and impersonation.Added stricter validation for message edits and sender identity changes.Enhanced user education on social engineering risks in Teams.Ongoing monitoring for similar vulnerabilities in collaboration tools., Microsoft: Strengthen extension review processes for VS Code Marketplace.npm: Enhance detection of malicious postinstall scripts and typosquatting.GitHub: Improve abuse detection for repositories used as C2 channels.Developers: Adopt secure coding practices and dependency hygiene., Microsoft-issued patch for affected SQL Server versionsReinforced guidance on access control and monitoring best practices, npm removed malicious package and related versions.GitHub terminated associated user accounts.Veracode enhanced detection for obfuscated post-install scripts.Public advisory issued to raise awareness of typosquatting risks in CI/CD., Microsoft and Cloudflare enhanced DDoS mitigation capacities (e.g., 21.3M attacks blocked in 2024).Cloudflare modified ranking algorithms to exclude/hide malicious domains.Increased industry awareness of IoT botnet risks (e.g., Mirai-class threats).Potential ISP-level collaborations to disrupt Aisuru’s C2 infrastructure., Microsoft enhanced DDoS protection thresholds for Azure.Public awareness campaigns on IoT security (e.g., changing default passwords).Collaboration with ISPs to identify and remediate botnet-infected devices., Microsoft released patch (build 10.0.26100.4946) to address the memory corruption issue.Security bulletin issued with CVSS 9.8 severity rating to emphasize urgency.Recommendations provided for enabling CFG and network segmentation., Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (CISA-led)Develop AI-Specific Zero-Trust FrameworksReplace Static MFA with Continuous VerificationDecentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (reduce hyperscaler dependency)Invest in Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (e.g., apprenticeships)Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments for Cloud/SaaS ProvidersLeverage Compliance as Innovation Driver (e.g., responsible AI use), Expand API monitoring to include ReadProcessMemory calls with unusual pointer behavior.Implement behavioral detection for indirect memory writing patterns.Update defensive postures based on red team testing with PoC tools like Indirect-Shellcode-Executor..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=microsoft-cloud-platform' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge