ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

Facebook A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Facebook

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

facebook

Employees number:

24,205

Number of followers:

404,186

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

meta.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

FAC_5156420

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreFacebook Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 650 and 699

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/facebook.jpeg
Facebook Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreFacebook Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/facebook.jpeg
Facebook Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Facebook Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
7
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
FacebookBreach50202/2020
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law. The Tagansky District Court in Moscow fined Facebook for its refusal to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

FacebookBreach60205/2020
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook “made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger” and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

FacebookBreach10066/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Meta has been fined €265 million ($275.5 million) by the Irish data protection commission (DPC) for the data leak suffered by Facebook. It exposed the data belonging to millions of Facebook users. The Data Protection Commission is also imposing a range of corrective measures on Meta. On April 3rd, 2021, a user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online. Leaked data included users’ phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, and for some accounts the associated email addresses.

Facebook (Meta)Cyber Attack6027/2023
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The **FileFix attack** impersonated a **Facebook security alert**, tricking users into executing malicious commands disguised as a PDF file appeal process. Victims unknowingly ran a **multi-stage payload** that dropped the **StealC infostealer**, a malware capable of harvesting credentials from **browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, etc.)**, **cryptocurrency wallets (20+ types)**, **messaging apps (Telegram, Discord, Thunderbird)**, **VPNs (OpenVPN, Proton VPN)**, **cloud services (AWS, Azure)**, and **gaming platforms (Ubisoft, Battle.net)**. The attack leveraged **AI-generated decoy images** (e.g., houses, doors) embedded with **PowerShell scripts** and encrypted executables, evading detection by mimicking benign user actions (downloading a JPG). The malware also checked for **virtual machines (VMs)** to avoid sandbox analysis. While the article does not confirm **direct financial losses or data breaches** at Facebook, the campaign’s **global reach** (US, Germany, China, etc.) and **sophisticated evasion techniques** suggest **high-risk exposure** for users’ **personal, financial, and corporate credentials**. The attack’s **rapid evolution** (from a July 2023 PoC to a **517% surge in 6 months**) highlights its effectiveness in bypassing traditional phishing defenses, posing **reputational harm** to Facebook’s platform security and **potential downstream fraud** for affected users.

FacebookCyber Attack80408/2015
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King had faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He used to trick people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also used to target the users with bogus "friend requests" for distributing spam.

FacebookData Leak85305/2018
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used a popular personality app was left exposed online for anyone to access. Academics at the University of Cambridge distributed the data from the personality quiz app myPersonality to hundreds of researchers via a website with insufficient security provisions. It led to it being left vulnerable to access for four years & gaining access illicitly was relatively easy. The data was highly sensitive, revealing personal details of Facebook users, such as the results of psychological tests. Facebook suspended myPersonality from its platform saying the app may have violated its policies due to the language used in the app and on its website to describe how data is shared. More than 6 million people completed the tests on the myPersonality app and nearly half agreed to share data from their Facebook profiles with the project. All of this data was then scooped up and the names removed before it was put on a website to share with other researchers.

FacebookData Leak85404/2021
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 02/2020
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law. The Tagansky District Court in Moscow fined Facebook for its refusal to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 05/2020
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook “made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger” and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 6/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Meta has been fined €265 million ($275.5 million) by the Irish data protection commission (DPC) for the data leak suffered by Facebook. It exposed the data belonging to millions of Facebook users. The Data Protection Commission is also imposing a range of corrective measures on Meta. On April 3rd, 2021, a user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online. Leaked data included users’ phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, and for some accounts the associated email addresses.

Facebook (Meta)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 7/2023
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The **FileFix attack** impersonated a **Facebook security alert**, tricking users into executing malicious commands disguised as a PDF file appeal process. Victims unknowingly ran a **multi-stage payload** that dropped the **StealC infostealer**, a malware capable of harvesting credentials from **browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, etc.)**, **cryptocurrency wallets (20+ types)**, **messaging apps (Telegram, Discord, Thunderbird)**, **VPNs (OpenVPN, Proton VPN)**, **cloud services (AWS, Azure)**, and **gaming platforms (Ubisoft, Battle.net)**. The attack leveraged **AI-generated decoy images** (e.g., houses, doors) embedded with **PowerShell scripts** and encrypted executables, evading detection by mimicking benign user actions (downloading a JPG). The malware also checked for **virtual machines (VMs)** to avoid sandbox analysis. While the article does not confirm **direct financial losses or data breaches** at Facebook, the campaign’s **global reach** (US, Germany, China, etc.) and **sophisticated evasion techniques** suggest **high-risk exposure** for users’ **personal, financial, and corporate credentials**. The attack’s **rapid evolution** (from a July 2023 PoC to a **517% surge in 6 months**) highlights its effectiveness in bypassing traditional phishing defenses, posing **reputational harm** to Facebook’s platform security and **potential downstream fraud** for affected users.

Facebook
Cyber Attack
Severity: 80
Impact: 4
Seen: 08/2015
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King had faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He used to trick people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also used to target the users with bogus "friend requests" for distributing spam.

Facebook
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 05/2018
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used a popular personality app was left exposed online for anyone to access. Academics at the University of Cambridge distributed the data from the personality quiz app myPersonality to hundreds of researchers via a website with insufficient security provisions. It led to it being left vulnerable to access for four years & gaining access illicitly was relatively easy. The data was highly sensitive, revealing personal details of Facebook users, such as the results of psychological tests. Facebook suspended myPersonality from its platform saying the app may have violated its policies due to the language used in the app and on its website to describe how data is shared. More than 6 million people completed the tests on the myPersonality app and nearly half agreed to share data from their Facebook profiles with the project. All of this data was then scooped up and the names removed before it was put on a website to share with other researchers.

Facebook
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 04/2021
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

Ailogo

Facebook Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Facebook

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2025.

Incident Types Facebook vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2025.

Incident History — Facebook (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Facebook cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Facebook Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

Loading...
similarCompanies

Facebook Similar Companies

Cadence

Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential for the world’s leading semic

NetSuite

Founded in 1998, Oracle NetSuite is the world’s first cloud company. For more than 25 years, NetSuite has helped businesses gain the insight, control, and agility to build and grow a successful business. First focused on financials and ERP, we now provide an AI-powered unified business system that

Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. We are driven by the excitement of building technologies, inventing products, and providing services that change lives. We embrac

Workday

Workday is a leading provider of enterprise cloud applications for finance and human resources, helping customers adapt and thrive in a changing world. Workday applications for financial management, human resources, planning, spend management, and analytics are built with artificial intelligence and

bigbasket

Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is India’s largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of business lines - bigbasket, bb

PhonePe

PhonePe Group is India’s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as India’s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in India. In just eight years, Pho

Infor

As a global leader in business cloud software specialized by industry. Infor develops complete solutions for its focus industries, including industrial manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, food & beverage, automotive, aerospace & defense, hospitality, and high tech. Infor’s mission-critical ente

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for ev

ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) makes the world work better for everyone. Our cloud-based platform and solutions help digitize and unify organizations so that they can find smarter, faster, better ways to make work flow. So employees and customers can be more connected, more innovative, and more agile. And w

newsone

Facebook CyberSecurity News

November 12, 2025 11:01 AM
@facebookmail.com Invites Exploited to Phish Facebook Business Users

If you manage Facebook advertising for a small or medium-sized business, open your inbox with suspicion, because attackers have been sending...

October 31, 2025 07:00 AM
BT and CrowdStrike unleash SMB cybersecurity service

UK telco incumbent gets in bed with global cybersecurity pacesetter to boost its breach detection and ransomware protection offering.

October 23, 2025 04:00 PM
Meta offers its Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp users new age AI Scam Review

With over 4 billion active users engaging across various messaging platforms today, online fraud is becoming increasingly sophisticated.

October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity Awareness Month: Helping Older Adults Avoid Online Scams

We're sharing the latest trends in scams targeting older adults, new safety tools, and tips for how to spot and avoid scammers online.

October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
New Phishing Emails Pretend to Offer Jobs to Steal Facebook Logins

The search for a new job, especially with a slow labour market in the US, has become the perfect opportunity for scammers to trap...

October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
Meta Launches New Tools to Protect Messenger and WhatsApp Users from Scammers

Meta announced innovative tools on Tuesday to shield users of Messenger and WhatsApp from scammers. The updates, revealed during...

October 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Saleem Yousaf was a trusted cybersecurity manager at the Universities Superannuation Scheme, based at the Royal Liver Building

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM
💻 October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month, a reminder to stay alert and protect yourself from scams. 🚨 Scammers will pressure you to send money immediately, often through gift cards or cryptocurrency. They may claim: Your account has been hacked You

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Northland woman warns of Facebook hacking scam

A Northland woman is warning people to better secure their Facebook accounts after a hacker stole her credentials, leaving her unable to...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Facebook CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Facebook

The official website of Facebook is https://www.meta.com.

Facebook’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Facebook’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 659, reflecting their Weak security posture.

How many security badges does Facebook’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Facebook have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Facebook have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Facebook comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Facebook have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Facebook comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Facebook have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Facebook is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Facebook

Facebook operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at Facebook

Facebook employs approximately 24,205 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Facebook

Facebook presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Facebook’s LinkedIn Followers

Facebook’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 404,186 followers.

NAICS Classification of Facebook

Facebook is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Facebook’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Facebook does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Facebook’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Facebook maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/facebook.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Facebook

As of November 30, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Facebook has experienced 7 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Facebook has an estimated 26,907 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Facebook ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Data Leak and Cyber Attack.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Facebook ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $9.06 million.

How does Facebook detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with acronis threat research unit, and communication strategy with public disclosure via the register, communication strategy with research report by acronis..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution

Title: Spam King Cyber Incident

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He tricked people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also targeted the users with bogus 'friend requests' for distributing spam.

Type: Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution

Attack Vector: PhishingFriend Requests

Vulnerability Exploited: Social Engineering

Threat Actor: Spam King

Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Collection

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Data Breach of myPersonality App on Facebook

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used the myPersonality app was left exposed online for anyone to access due to insufficient security provisions.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Insufficient Security Provisions

Vulnerability Exploited: Inadequate data protection measures

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Facebook Data Leak

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

Type: Data Breach

Incident : Data Leak

Title: Facebook Data Leak

Description: A user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online.

Date Detected: 2021-04-03

Type: Data Leak

Attack Vector: Hacking Forum

Threat Actor: Unknown

Incident : Data Law Breach

Title: Russian Court Fines Facebook for Data Law Breach

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law by refusing to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

Type: Data Law Breach

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Facebook Fined for Privacy Violations in Canada

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Improper Access Control

Vulnerability Exploited: Privacy Controls

Threat Actor: Third-party Developers

Motivation: Data Access

Incident : Malware

Title: FileFix Attack Dropping StealC Infostealer via Fake Facebook Security Alerts

Description: An attack called FileFix masquerades as a Facebook security alert, tricking victims into executing malicious commands that ultimately drop the StealC infostealer and malware downloader. The attack is a variation of ClickFix, a social-engineering technique that surged by 517% in the past six months. Victims are deceived into copying and pasting a command into a file upload window or File Explorer, which executes the payload. The attack uses AI-generated images (e.g., a bucolic house, intricate doors) embedded with PowerShell scripts and encrypted executables to evade detection. The final payload includes a Go-written loader that checks for VM environments before deploying StealC v2, which targets browsers, cryptocurrency wallets, messaging apps, VPNs, and cloud service credentials (Azure, AWS). The campaign has global reach, with submissions from multiple countries, and leverages BitBucket for hosting malicious images to avoid domain-based detection.

Date Detected: 2024-08-late

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-08-late

Type: Malware

Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security AlertUser-Executed Command via File ExplorerAI-Generated Image PayloadsPowerShell Script Embedding

Vulnerability Exploited: Human Trust (Social Engineering)

Motivation: Data TheftCredential HarvestingFinancial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing, Friend Requests and Fake Facebook Security Alert PDFUser-Executed Command in File Explorer.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Data Compromised: Personal Data, Login Details

Systems Affected: Facebook Accounts

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Data Compromised: Personal details, Psychological test results

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Data Compromised: Facebook id numbers, Profile names, Email addresses, Location information, Gender details, Job data, Phone numbers

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Data Compromised: Phone numbers, Facebook ids, Full names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email addresses

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Financial Loss: $63,000

Legal Liabilities: Fine

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Financial Loss: CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million)

Data Compromised: Personal Information

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Data Compromised: Browser credentials, Cryptocurrency wallet data, Messaging app data (telegram, discord, etc.), Vpn credentials, Cloud service keys (azure, aws), Game launcher credentials

Systems Affected: Windows (User Devices)Potential Enterprise Systems via Stolen Credentials

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Reputation Damage for Facebook (Abused Brand Trust)

Identity Theft Risk: High (Stolen PII, Credentials, Financial Data)

Payment Information Risk: High (Cryptocurrency Wallets, Payment App Data)

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $1.29 million.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Data, Login Details, Personal Details, Psychological Test Results, , Personal Information, , Phone Numbers, Facebook Ids, Full Names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email Addresses, , Personal Information, Credentials, Session Cookies, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Messaging App Data, Vpn Configurations, Cloud Service Keys, Pii (Potential) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: 500,000

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Customers Affected: 6000000

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Social Media

Customers Affected: 533 million

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Entity Name: Meta

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Customers Affected: 533 million

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Company

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Network

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entity Name: Facebook (Brand Abused)

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Customers Affected: Users Worldwide (US, Bangladesh, Philippines, Tunisia, Nepal, Dominican Republic, Serbia, Peru, China, Germany, etc.)

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entity Name: Individual Victims

Entity Type: End Users

Location: Global (Multi-Country)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Third Party Assistance: Acronis Threat Research Unit.

Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure via The RegisterResearch Report by Acronis

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Acronis Threat Research Unit, .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Type of Data Compromised: Personal Data, Login Details

Number of Records Exposed: 500,000

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Type of Data Compromised: Personal details, Psychological test results

Number of Records Exposed: 6000000

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information

Number of Records Exposed: 533 million

Personally Identifiable Information: Facebook ID numbersprofile namesemail addresseslocation informationgender detailsjob dataphone numbers

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Type of Data Compromised: Phone numbers, Facebook ids, Full names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email addresses

Number of Records Exposed: 533 million

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Type of Data Compromised: Personal Information

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Type of Data Compromised: Credentials, Session cookies, Cryptocurrency wallet data, Messaging app data, Vpn configurations, Cloud service keys, Pii (potential)

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Likely (StealC Capabilities)

Data Encryption: Partial (Payload Encrypted in Images)

File Types Exposed: JPG (Malicious Images)PowerShell ScriptsExecutables

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (Browser Autofill, Saved Logins)

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Legal Actions: Federal Fraud Charges

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Fines Imposed: €265 million ($275.5 million)

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Regulations Violated: Russian Data Law,

Fines Imposed: $63,000

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Fines Imposed: CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Federal Fraud Charges.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Lessons Learned: Evolution of social engineering tactics beyond traditional phishing (e.g., user-executed commands via fake file prompts)., Effectiveness of AI-generated imagery in evading detection and luring victims., Rapid weaponization of proof-of-concept (PoC) attacks (75 days from PoC to global campaign)., Need for updated anti-phishing training to address 'Fix'-type attacks (ClickFix/FileFix)., Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Recommendations: Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Evolution of social engineering tactics beyond traditional phishing (e.g., user-executed commands via fake file prompts).,Effectiveness of AI-generated imagery in evading detection and luring victims.,Rapid weaponization of proof-of-concept (PoC) attacks (75 days from PoC to global campaign).,Need for updated anti-phishing training to address 'Fix'-type attacks (ClickFix/FileFix).,Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: The Register

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: Acronis Threat Research Report

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data)

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: VirusTotal Submissions

URL: https://www.virustotal.com

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Register, and Source: Acronis Threat Research Report, and Source: ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data), and Source: VirusTotal SubmissionsUrl: https://www.virustotal.com.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Active Campaign)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure Via The Register and Research Report By Acronis.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Customer Advisories: Acronis Blog/Report (Expected)Potential Facebook Security Notices

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Acronis Blog/Report (Expected), Potential Facebook Security Notices and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Entry Point: Phishing, Friend Requests

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entry Point: Fake Facebook Security Alert Pdf, User-Executed Command In File Explorer,

Backdoors Established: Potential (StealC's Secondary Payload Capabilities)

High Value Targets: Cryptocurrency Wallets, Cloud Service Credentials, Enterprise Vpn Access,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Cryptocurrency Wallets, Cloud Service Credentials, Enterprise Vpn Access,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Root Causes: Social Engineering

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Root Causes: Lack Of User Awareness About 'Fix'-Type Social Engineering., Over-Reliance On Domain Reputation For Detection (Attackers Used Bitbucket)., Effective Evasion Via Image Steganography And Ai-Generated Lures., Rapid Iteration Of Attack Infrastructure (New Variants Deployed Frequently).,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Acronis Threat Research Unit, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Spam King, Unknown and Third-party Developers.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2021-04-03.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-08-late.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $63,000.

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Data, Login Details, Personal details, Psychological test results, , Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, job data, phone numbers, , phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, email addresses, , Personal Information, Browser Credentials, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Messaging App Data (Telegram, Discord, etc.), VPN Credentials, Cloud Service Keys (Azure, AWS), Game Launcher Credentials and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Windows (User Devices)Potential Enterprise Systems via Stolen Credentials.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was acronis threat research unit, .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were phone numbers, Psychological test results, Facebook IDs, Messaging App Data (Telegram, Discord, etc.), Personal details, Cloud Service Keys (Azure, AWS), VPN Credentials, profile names, location information, email addresses, job data, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Game Launcher Credentials, bios, Facebook ID numbers, Personal Information, Personal Data, Login Details, birthdates, gender details, full names, locations and Browser Credentials.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.1B.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was €265 million ($275.5 million), $63,000, CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million).

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Federal Fraud Charges.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration). and Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Acronis Threat Research Report, VirusTotal Submissions, ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data) and The Register.

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.virustotal.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Active Campaign).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Acronis Blog/Report (Expected)Potential Facebook Security Notices.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Phishing and Friend Requests.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Social Engineering, Lack of user awareness about 'Fix'-type social engineering.Over-reliance on domain reputation for detection (attackers used BitBucket).Effective evasion via image steganography and AI-generated lures.Rapid iteration of attack infrastructure (new variants deployed frequently)..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=facebook' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge