Comparison Overview

MAG Aerospace

VS

SpaceX

MAG Aerospace

12730 Fair Lakes Circle, Fairfax, 22033, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 650 and 699

MAG is a leader in delivering Command, Control, Communication, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) services at the tactical edge with premier engineering and operational solutions around the world. We rapidly deliver defense technology solutions in multi-source, all-domain, decision superiority market. As a reliable and proven U.S. Government prime contractor, MAG brings operational excellence and technical understanding with program management and systems engineering expertise to manage large, complex DOD systems development and deployment contracts. For more information, please visit www.magaero.com

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 1,899
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SpaceX

Rocket Road, Hawthorne, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 by Elon Musk to revolutionize space transportation, with the ultimate goal of making life multiplanetary. SpaceX has gained worldwide attention for a series of historic milestones. It is the only private company ever to return a spacecraft from low-Earth orbit, which it first accomplished in December 2010. The company made history again in May 2012 when its Dragon spacecraft attached to the International Space Station, exchanged cargo payloads, and returned safely to Earth — a technically challenging feat previously accomplished only by governments. Since then Dragon has delivered cargo to and from the space station multiple times, providing regular cargo resupply missions for NASA. For more information, visit www.spacex.com.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 16,558
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magaerospace.jpeg
MAG Aerospace
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MAG Aerospace
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpaceX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

MAG Aerospace has 78.57% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

SpaceX has 78.57% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — MAG Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAG Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpaceX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpaceX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/magaerospace.jpeg
MAG Aerospace
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access / Human Error
Motivation: Potential espionage or unauthorized data collection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Attempt at humor
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SpaceX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MAG Aerospace company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SpaceX company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to MAG Aerospace company.

In the current year, SpaceX and MAG Aerospace have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither SpaceX company nor MAG Aerospace company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both SpaceX company and MAG Aerospace company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

SpaceX company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while MAG Aerospace company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MAG Aerospace company nor SpaceX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MAG Aerospace company nor SpaceX company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SpaceX company employs more people globally than MAG Aerospace company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MAG Aerospace nor SpaceX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X