Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » A.P. Moller - Maersk » MAE1781271625

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MAE1781271625)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-69
Company Score Before Incident788 / 1000
Company Score After Incident719 / 1000
Company LinkView A.P. Moller - Maersk Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMAE1781271625
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE26/06/2017
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of A.P. Moller - Maersk's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts A.P. Moller - Maersk Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the A.P. Moller - Maersk breach identified under incident ID MAE1781271625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of A.P. Moller - Maersk's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/maersk-group, the number of followers: 2390055, the industry type: Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage and the number of employees: 82857 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 788 and after the incident was 719 with a difference of -69 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on A.P. Moller - Maersk and their customers.

Port of San Diego recently reported "Ransomware Attack on Port of San Diego", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The Port of San Diego fell victim to a ransomware attack that disrupted key administrative systems, including the issuance of parking permits, public records requests, and general business operations.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Administrative systems (parking permits, public records requests, general business operations).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores the growing vulnerability of critical infrastructure to cyber threats, particularly ransomware attacks targeting the shipping and logistics sectors.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating malware infiltrated the port’s computer network and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disrupted key administrative systems. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disrupted key administrative systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data encryption such as Yes, and ransomware strain not disclosed but demanded payment. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating hackers demanded payment in Bitcoin (implies potential exfiltration). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strain was not disclosed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (50%)

Sources & References