Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LEDGITMICAUDTRE1784125944)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Ledger's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Ledger Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ledger breach identified under incident ID LEDGITMICAUDTRE1784125944.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ledger's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ledgerhq, the number of followers: 91625, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 824 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 587 and after the incident was 567 with a difference of -20 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ledger and their customers.
A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "New OkoBot Malware Framework Targets Cryptocurrency Users with Advanced Theft Tactics", has drawn attention.
A sophisticated malware framework, OkoBot, has emerged as a major threat to cryptocurrency users, employing a multi-stage attack chain to steal recovery phrases, credentials, and wallet data.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cryptocurrency wallet applications (Ledger Live, Ledger Wallet, Trezor Suite) and Password managers, and exposing Recovery phrases, Credentials and Wallet data.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including clickFix social-engineering attacks, and initial infections occur through ClickFix and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including trojanized applications hosted on GitHub, and fake Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) repository. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including malicious Audacity installer, and trojanized applications and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including tookPS downloader installs SSH service, and modular platform with 202,020 payloads. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating modular platform allows remote deployment of capabilities, Create Account: Local Account (T1136.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating creating backdoor user accounts, and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating installs an SSH service. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating hDUtil bypasses User Account Control (UAC) using Windows RPC and msconfig.exe and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating patching termsrv.dll to allow concurrent RDP sessions. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including identifying security software, and modifying firewall rules, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including fake Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) repository, and malicious Audacity installer, and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rC4-encrypted file for storing seed phrases locally. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (T1555.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating harvesting browser data, Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including mC Keylogger logs keystrokes, and okoSpyware records keystrokes, Steal Web Session Cookie (T1539) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating harvesting browser data, and Data from Configuration Repository: SNMP (MIB Dump) (T1602.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating system reconnaissance. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating system reconnaissance identifying security software, Query Registry (T1012) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating system reconnaissance, and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating seedHunter targets Ledger Live, Ledger Wallet, and Trezor Suite. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Screen Capture (T1113) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including mC Keylogger logs screenshots, and okoSpyware records video streams, Clipboard Data (T1115) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating mC Keylogger logs clipboard data, Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating okoSpyware records keystrokes, and Data from Information Repositories: Confluence (T1213.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating harvesting browser data (potential stored credentials). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating establishes tunnel to attacker-controlled servers via SSH, Proxy: Internal Proxy (T1090.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sSH tunnel to attacker-controlled servers, and Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography (T1573.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sSH infrastructure for remote deployment. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating seed phrases exfiltrated to moonsand.store and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration to moonsand.store. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating rC4-encrypted file for storing seed phrases locally and Account Access Removal (T1531) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating steal recovery phrases (potential account lockout/loss). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Ledger Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ledgerhq/incident/LEDGITMICAUDTRE1784125944
- Ledger CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ledgerhq
- Ledger Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ledgitmicaudtre1784125944-microsoft-trezor-audacity-github-ledger-cyber-attack-january-2026/
- Ledger CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ledgerhq/history
- Ledger CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://gbhackers.com/okobot-malware-uses-clickfix/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf