Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ledger

Ledger Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ledger.com

At Ledger, we’re proud to be the global platform for digital assets and Web3, with over 20% of the world’s crypto assets secured through our Ledger devices. With our headquarters in Paris, and offices in Vierzon, Grenoble, Montpellier, London, Portland, Geneva, Zurich and Central Singapore, we have a team of around 600 professionals developing a variety of products and services to enable individuals and companies to securely buy, store, swap, grow and manage crypto assets – including the Ledger hardware wallets line with more than 7.5 millions units already sold in 200 countries. We’re a team of experts pushing the limits of what’s possible, united by our common goal to unlock true freedom through digital ownership, making technology


Ledger A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Ledger
Company Information
Website:https://www.ledger.com
Employees number:777
Number of followers:87,518
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:ledger.com
Ledger Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
LedgerComputer and Network Security
Updated:
08/05/2026
515/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Ledger Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
LedgerComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Ledger
LedgerCritical
Current Score
515C (CRITICAL)
01000
8 incidents
-40.4 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
521Before Incident
MAY 2026
515Before Incident
APRIL 2026
520Before Incident
Vulnerability
17 Apr 2026Ledger
Espressif Systems and Ledger: Fake Ledger Hardware Wallets on Chinese Marketplaces Steal Crypto Seeds and PINs

Sophisticated Supply Chain Attack Targets Crypto Users with Counterfeit Ledger Wallets

511After Incident
LOW-9
ESPLED1776435883
Sophisticated Supply Chain Attack Targets Crypto Users with Counterfeit Ledger Wallets A Brazilian cybersecurity researcher uncovered a large-scale supply chain scam involving counterfeit Ledger Nano S Plus hardware wallets sold on a Chinese marketplace. The fake devices, designed to drain cryptocurrency across 20 blockchains, were engineered with tampered hardware, trojanized software, and cross-platform malware creating a seamless phishing pipeline. The researcher, u/Past_Computer2901, purchased the device at the same price as the official Ledger store, with packaging that appeared authentic. Suspicion arose only after the device failed Ledger’s Genuine Check when connected to a legitimate Ledger Live installation. A physical teardown revealed the original secure element chip had been replaced with an ESP32-S3 microcontroller, a generic IoT component from Espressif Systems, with its markings scraped off to avoid detection. The counterfeit device also included a WiFi/Bluetooth antenna, absent in genuine Ledger wallets. Firmware analysis exposed the full extent of the compromise: every PIN entry and seed phrase was stored in plaintext and transmitted to attacker-controlled command-and-control (C2) servers, including the domain kkkhhhnnn[.]com. The fake firmware, labeled "Nano S+ V2.1" a version that doesn’t exist in Ledger’s official releases was designed to impersonate a legitimate update. The scam extended beyond the hardware. The counterfeit device shipped with a QR code directing users to a cloned phishing site, where they downloaded a trojanized Ledger Live app. The fake app bypassed security warnings with a hardcoded "Genuine Check" that always returned a success screen, ensuring victims remained unaware of the breach. The malware also exfiltrated wallet data upon use and was distributed across Android, Windows, macOS, and iOS, with the iOS variant spread via Apple’s TestFlight to evade App Store reviews. Infrastructure analysis linked the operation to a Shanghai-based shell company, with three C2 servers, a cloned website, and a QR code redirect chain. While Ledger’s official Genuine Check can detect the counterfeit device, the scam’s success relied on victims never using the legitimate Ledger Live app. The researcher submitted a full technical report to Ledger’s security team, with further analysis pending. The attack has already resulted in confirmed financial losses exceeding $9.5 million across more than 50 victims, marking one of the most advanced hardware wallet supply chain attacks documented to date.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain Attack
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $9.5 millionPIN entriesSeed phrasesWallet dataLedger Nano S Plus (counterfeit)Ledger Live (trojanized)Cross-platform malware (Android, Windows, macOS, iOS)Operational Impact: Cryptocurrency theft across 20 blockchainsBrand Reputation Impact: Severe (counterfeit devices, phishing pipeline)Identity Theft Risk: High (PII and wallet data exfiltration)Payment Information Risk: High (cryptocurrency theft)
DATA BREACH
PIN entriesSeed phrasesWallet dataPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Sensitivity Of Data: High (cryptocurrency wallet credentials)Data Exfiltration: Yes (to attacker-controlled C2 servers)Data Encryption: No (stored in plaintext)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (wallet data, seed phrases)
MARCH 2026
516Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
528Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Feb 2026Ledger
OpenClaw, Coinbase, MetaMask, 1Password and Ledger Live: Hackers Use Fake OpenClaw Installer to Steal Crypto Wallet and Password Manager Credentials

Hologram Infostealer Campaign Targets Crypto Wallets and Password Managers via Fake OpenClaw Installer

508After Incident
CRITICAL-20
METLED1PACOIOPE1778262200
New "Hologram" Infostealer Campaign Targets Crypto Wallets and Password Managers via Fake OpenClaw Installer A sophisticated infostealer campaign, dubbed "Hologram," has been active since at least February 2026, targeting sensitive data stored in 250+ browser extensions tied to crypto wallets and password managers. The malware spreads via a fake installer for OpenClaw, a legitimate open-source AI assistant, hosted on a convincing typosquat domain (openclaw-installer[.]com), registered on March 9, 2026. ### How the Attack Works 1. Initial Infection - Victims download OpenClaw_x64[.]7z, a 130MB Rust-based executable padded with fake documentation to evade antivirus scans and bypass sandbox upload limits. - The dropper, named "Hologram" in its manifest, performs anti-analysis checks, including: - Scanning for virtual machine BIOS strings and suspicious software libraries. - Waiting for real mouse movement (automated sandboxes don’t trigger this). - If checks pass, it disables Windows Defender, opens firewall ports, and downloads six modular components from an attacker-controlled Azure DevOps repository. 2. Credential Theft & Persistence - The malware fetches a dynamic targeting list (hosted on Azure DevOps) covering: - 201 crypto wallets (MetaMask, Phantom, Coinbase, Ledger Live, etc.). - 49 password managers/authenticators (Bitwarden, LastPass, 1Password, Google Authenticator, etc.). - The list is remotely updatable, allowing attackers to expand targets without recompiling the malware. - Persistence mechanisms include: - Registry autoruns. - Windows logon hijacking. - Scheduled tasks. - Telegram-based droppers that survive even if the main implant is removed. 3. Evasive Infrastructure - Command-and-control (C2) servers are never hardcoded instead, the malware retrieves them from Telegram channel descriptions, allowing rapid rotation if domains are blocked. - Victim data (usernames, IPs, timestamps) is routed through Hookdeck, a legitimate webhook relay service, obscuring the attacker’s backend. - Researchers observed infrastructure rotation during analysis, with domains and IPs changing before findings were published. ### Key Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) - File Hashes: Multiple Rust-based droppers (e.g., `OpenClaw_x64[.]exe`, `svc_service[.]exe`) and secondary payloads (e.g., `onedrive_sync[.]exe`, `WinHealhCare[.]exe`). - Domains: - `openclaw-installer[.]com` (delivery). - `hkdk.events` (C2 relay via Hookdeck). - `dev.azure.com/sagonbretzpr` (payload staging). - Hijacked Brazilian law firm domain (`frr.rubensbruno.adv.br`) and others. - IPs: `193.202.84.14`, `45.55.35.48`, `188.114.97.3` (C2 beacons). - Registry Keys & Paths: - `HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\Userinit` (logon hijack). - `C:\Users\Public\` (stage-2 binary drop location). - `%APPDATA%\Ledger Live` (targeted for wallet theft). ### Why This Campaign Stands Out - Advanced Evasion: Uses Rust-based malware, in-memory .NET assembly loading (via `clroxide`), and Telegram for C2 rotation. - Dynamic Targeting: The remote Git repository allows attackers to silently expand their target list without detection. - Persistence: Multiple layers of registry, scheduled tasks, and Telegram-based backdoors ensure long-term access. Researchers at Netskope Threat Labs identified this as a second, more advanced iteration of the campaign, following an earlier variant. The attack highlights the growing sophistication of infostealers, particularly in crypto and credential theft.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Infostealer
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (crypto theft, credential harvesting)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Crypto wallet credentials, password manager data, personally identifiable informationSystems Affected: Windows systems with targeted browser extensionsOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to financial and personal accountsIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High (crypto wallets)
DATA BREACH
Crypto wallet credentialsPassword manager dataPersonally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
JANUARY 2026
587Before Incident
Breach
05 Jan 2026Ledger
Ledger and Global-e: Crypto wallet firm Ledger faces new data breach through Global-e partner

Ledger Data Exposure via Third-Party Payment Processor Global-e

524After Incident
CRITICAL-63
LEDGLO1767622098
Ledger Customers Exposed in Third-Party Payment Processor Breach Hardware wallet provider Ledger is addressing a data exposure incident tied to its third-party payment processor, Global-e. The breach, first reported by blockchain investigator ZachXBT on X, involved unauthorized access to Ledger users' personal details—including names and contact information—stored in Global-e’s cloud system. Global-e detected the suspicious activity and launched an investigation, confirming that an unauthorized party accessed customer order data. While the exact number of affected users and the timeline of the breach remain undisclosed, forensic experts verified the improper access. The company stated that payment information was not compromised. Ledger clarified that the incident occurred at Global-e, not within its own systems, and emphasized that no hardware, software, or cryptocurrency-related data—such as seed phrases or wallet balances—was exposed. As the data controller, Global-e issued notifications to impacted customers. The breach also affected other brands using Global-e’s services, as the compromised cloud system contained order data from multiple retailers. This is not Ledger’s first security incident. In 2020, a breach via e-commerce partner Shopify exposed data from 270,000 customers, and in 2023, a hack resulted in nearly $500,000 in losses for decentralized finance applications. Ledger has stated it is collaborating with Global-e to provide updates to affected users.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personal details (names, contact information)Systems Affected: Global-e's cloud systemIdentity Theft Risk: PotentialPayment Information Risk: None (payment information not involved)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Personal details (names, contact information)Sensitivity Of Data: Low to moderate (no payment information or secrets)Personally Identifiable Information: Names, contact information
DECEMBER 2025
665Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
684Before Incident
Cyber Attack
19 Nov 2025Ledger
Ledger / Trezor (Cryptocurrency Wallet Providers)

Nova Stealer macOS Malware Campaign Targeting Cryptocurrency Users

664After Incident
CRITICAL-20
LED5093550111925
The Nova Stealer malware campaign targets macOS users by replacing legitimate Ledger Live and Trezor Suite cryptocurrency wallet applications with malicious counterparts. The attack begins with a dropper downloading a shell script (`mdriversinstall.sh`) from a C2 server, establishing persistence via a hidden directory (`~/.mdrivers`) and a LaunchAgent (`application.com.artificialintelligence`). The malware operates stealthily using detached `screen` sessions, ensuring survival across reboots.Key modules include:- `mdriversfiles.sh`: Exfiltrates wallet data (e.g., Trezor’s `IndexedDB`, Exodus’ `passphrase.json`, Ledger’s `app.json`).- `mdriversswaps.sh`: Replaces genuine wallet apps with unsigned FAT Mach-O executables (Swift-based) that render phishing pages (`wheelchairmoments[.]com`, `sunrisefootball[.]com`). These pages use BIP-39/SLIP-39 validation to harvest recovery phrases (12–33 words) via keystroke logging (200–400ms debounce) and real-time tracking (`/track` endpoints).- `mdriversmetrics.sh`: Conducts system reconnaissance (installed apps, processes).Victims unknowingly interact with counterfeit apps (registered in Dock via `PlistBuddy`), leading to full compromise of cryptocurrency assets. The modular design allows remote updates, extending the campaign’s lifespan while evading static detection. The attack focuses on high-value targets (crypto users), with potential for mass financial loss and irreversible asset theft due to exposed recovery phrases.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
malwarephishingdata theftcryptocurrency fraud
MOTIVATION
financial gain (theft of cryptocurrency via harvested recovery phrases)
IMPACT
cryptocurrency wallet recovery phrases (BIP-39/SLIP-39)Trezor Suite IndexedDB filesExodus wallet configuration (passphrase.json, seed.seco)Ledger Live app.jsoninstalled applications listrunning processeswallet presence indicatorsmacOS systems with Ledger Live, Trezor Suite, or Exodus wallets installedunauthorized replacement of legitimate applications with malicious counterpartspersistent background monitoring via detached screen sessionsreal-time exfiltration of keystrokes and recovery phrasespotential loss of trust in cryptocurrency wallet providers (Ledger, Trezor, Exodus) due to impersonationhigh (if recovery phrases are used to drain wallets)high (direct theft of cryptocurrency assets)
DATA BREACH
cryptocurrency wallet recovery phraseswallet configuration files (passphrase.json, seed.seco, app.json)system reconnaissance data (installed apps, processes)Sensitivity Of Data: extremely high (direct access to cryptocurrency assets)recovery phrases sent to /seed and /seed2 endpointspartial keystrokes logged with 200-400ms debounceuser activity beacons sent to /track every 10 secondsnone (data exfiltrated in plaintext via HTTP POST)JSON (passphrase.json, app.json, seed.seco), IndexedDB, SQLite (Launchpad databases)potentially linked to wallet ownership if recovery phrases are tied to identities
OCTOBER 2025
684Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
682Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
681Before Incident
Breach
18 Aug 2025Ledger
Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization: 750,000 Impacted by Data Breach at Canadian Investment Watchdog

CIRO Data Breach Exposes Personal Information of 750,000 Individuals

591After Incident
CRITICAL-90
CIR1768585990
CIRO Data Breach Exposes Personal Information of 750,000 Individuals The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) disclosed a data breach on August 18, 2025, revealing that hackers accessed the personal information of approximately 750,000 individuals in an August cyberattack. The breach stemmed from a sophisticated phishing incident, which led to temporary system shutdowns, though CIRO confirmed its critical regulatory functions remained unaffected. According to CIRO, the compromised data includes sensitive details such as annual income, dates of birth, government-issued ID numbers, phone numbers, investment account numbers, social insurance numbers, and account statements information collected during routine regulatory and compliance activities. The organization clarified that passwords, PINs, and security questions were not exposed, as CIRO does not store such data. While CIRO reported no evidence of data misuse or dark web exposure, it continues to monitor for malicious activity. Impacted individuals clients and former clients of CIRO dealer members are being notified and offered two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. An FAQ page has also been published to provide further details. CIRO, a pan-Canadian self-regulatory body overseeing investment and mutual fund dealers, stated that the incident is contained with no active threat remaining in its environment. The breach follows a series of recent cybersecurity incidents affecting financial and healthcare sectors globally.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personal information of 750,000 individualsSystems Affected: Temporary system shutdownsOperational Impact: Critical regulatory functions remained unaffectedIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Annual incomeDates of birthGovernment-issued ID numbersPhone numbersInvestment account numbersSocial insurance numbersAccount statementsNumber Of Records Exposed: 750,000Sensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: No evidence of data misuse or dark web exposurePersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
JULY 2025
679Before Incident
JANUARY 2024
663Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2024Ledger
Ledger

13% Increase in Ransomware Attacks on European Organizations (2024-2025)

638After Incident
CRITICAL-25
LED1832718110325
In January 2025, Ledger, a Paris-based crypto-wallet vendor, fell victim to a Violence-as-a-Service (VaaS) attack orchestrated by Russia-linked groups Renaissance Spider and The Com. The co-founder of Ledger was kidnapped in France as part of an extortion scheme tied to cryptocurrency theft. The attack was executed via Telegram-coordinated networks, leveraging physical violence, arson threats, and ransom demands. This incident was among 17 recorded VaaS attacks since January 2024, with 13 occurring in France alone, prompting Europol to establish a dedicated taskforce to counter the escalating threat. The attack not only endangered the executive’s life but also exposed Ledger to reputational damage, operational disruption, and potential financial losses due to ransom pressures. The incident underscores the convergence of cyber extortion and physical violence, targeting high-profile individuals in the crypto sector to exploit digital and real-world vulnerabilities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
ransomwaredata breachextortionvishingphysical threats (Violence-as-a-Service)
MOTIVATION
financial gain (ransomware payouts, avg. $3.6M)data theft for extortioncryptocurrency theft (Violence-as-a-Service)geopolitical leverage (exploiting GDPR compliance)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 2100+ victims (92% involved data theft)VMware ESXi infrastructure (Linux ransomware)unmanaged systems (used for lateral movement)backup/restore configuration databases (credential dumping)Operational Impact: disruption across manufacturing, professional services, technology, industrials/engineering, and retail sectorsBrand Reputation Impact: high (public disclosure of 1380+ victims on leak sites)Legal Liabilities: potential GDPR violations (used as leverage for ransom)Identity Theft Risk: high (PII likely exposed in 92% of cases with data theft)
DATA BREACH
corporate datapersonally identifiable information (PII)potential payment dataNumber Of Records Exposed: 2100+ victims (92% with data theft)Sensitivity Of Data: high (PII, corporate secrets, potential GDPR-regulated data)Data Exfiltration: yes (92% of ransomware cases)Data Encryption: yes (92% of cases involved file encryption)Personally Identifiable Information: likely (used for extortion leverage)
DECEMBER 2023
725Before Incident
Breach
01 Dec 2023Ledger
Ledger

Phishing Attack on Ledger Connect Kit Software

661After Incident
HIGH-64
LED743221223
The Ledger Connect Kit software of the Paris-based business was compromised by a phishing attempt targeting a former worker. During transactions using decentralised applications, or dapps, that utilised the compromised software, the hacker released malicious code that routed user funds to their own wallet.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing Attack
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Ledger Connect Kit Software
JUNE 2020
757Before Incident
Data Leak
01 Jun 2020Ledger
Ledger

Ledger Data Breach

680After Incident
CRITICAL-77
LED213813123
Major cryptocurrency hardware wallet provider Ledger experienced a data breach. The company said it was made aware of the breach on July 14 when a researcher participating in its bounty program reached out with details of a potential vulnerability on their website. While they were able to fix the breach immediately, a further investigation found that an authorized third party carried out a similar action on June 25. The individual used an API key to access the marketing and e-commerce database the company used to send promotional emails. This compromised the email addresses of almost one million people. For a subset of 9,500 customers, details such as first and last name, postal address, and phone number were also exposed.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Email addressesFirst and last namesPostal addressesPhone numbers
DATA BREACH
Email addressesFirst and last namesPostal addressesPhone numbersAlmost one million9,500 with additional detailsFirst and last namesPostal addressesPhone numbers

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Ledger ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Ledger's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Ledger ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Ledger's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?