Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LASKLU1782319113)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of LastPass's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts LastPass Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the LastPass breach identified under incident ID LASKLU1782319113.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of LastPass's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lastpass, the number of followers: 42443, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 713 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on LastPass and their customers.
On 11 June 2024, LastPass disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "LastPass Warns Users of Third-Party Breach Exposing Personal Data".
LastPass has notified customers that their personal information was compromised in a June 11 breach of Klue, a third-party market intelligence firm.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Klue (third-party market intelligence firm), and exposing Personal information (names, phone numbers, email and physical addresses, support case and sales-related records).
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Customer notifications.
The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warnings about phishing and social engineering risks.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including third-party breach of Klue, a market intelligence firm, and supply chain such as true. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor compromise may involve stolen credentials. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data includes names, phone numbers, email/physical addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and cybercrime group Icarus claimed responsibility and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating threats to leak data suggest exfiltration to external services. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating extortion threats imply potential data destruction and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact such as Yes. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Org Information (T1591) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating market intelligence firm (Klue) targeted for customer data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- LastPass Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass/incident/LASKLU1782319113
- LastPass CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass
- LastPass Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/lasklu1782319113-klue-lastpass-breach-june-2026/
- LastPass CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass/history
- LastPass CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://protos.com/lastpass-customer-info-leaked-again-after-third-party-data-breach/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf