Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
LastPass

LastPass Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

lastpass.com

LastPass is a leading identity and password manager, making it easier to log in to life and work. Trusted by 100,000 businesses and millions of users, LastPass combines advanced security with effortless access for individuals, families, small business owners, and enterprise professionals. With LastPass, important credentials are protected and private – and always within reach. Learn more via www.lastpass.com.


LastPass A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

LastPass
Company Information
Website:https://www.lastpass.com/
Employees number:782
Number of followers:40,720
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:lastpass.com
LastPass Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
LastPassComputer and Network Security
Updated:
14/04/2026
100/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
LastPass Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
LastPassComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

LastPass
LastPassCritical
Current Score
100C (CRITICAL)
01000
13 incidents
-122.2 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
100Before Incident
MAY 2026
100Before Incident
APRIL 2026
100Before Incident
Cyber Attack
14 Apr 2026LastPass
LastPass and Google: Omnistealer uses the blockchain to steal everything it can

Omnistealer: Malware Exploiting Blockchain for Undeletable Command-and-Control

100After Incident
CRITICAL0
LASGOO1776169942
Omnistealer: How Malware Exploits Blockchain for Undeletable Command-and-Control A newly identified info-stealer, Omnistealer, is leveraging public blockchains like TRON, Aptos, and Binance Smart Chain to host its malicious infrastructure making it nearly impossible to remove. Unlike traditional malware that relies on platforms like GitHub or Google Drive (which can be taken down), Omnistealer embeds encrypted commands, malware fragments, and staging code within blockchain transactions. Since blockchains are append-only and immutable, these malicious snippets remain permanently accessible, creating a censorship-resistant command-and-control (C2) network that evades takedown efforts. Once deployed, Omnistealer acts as a comprehensive data harvester, targeting: - Over 10 password managers, including LastPass and cloud-synced tools. - Major browsers (Chrome, Firefox) to extract saved logins and session data. - Cloud storage credentials, such as Google Drive. - More than 60 crypto wallets, including MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet. The attack chain typically begins with social engineering: victims receive fake job offers via LinkedIn or Upwork, luring them into downloading and executing code from a seemingly legitimate GitHub repository. This code then fetches the final payload by reading encrypted data from blockchain transactions. Researchers estimate that 300,000 credentials have already been compromised, affecting sectors ranging from financial compliance and defense suppliers to U.S. government entities. The malware’s persistence rooted in blockchain’s decentralized nature poses a significant challenge for defenders, as traditional remediation methods (e.g., domain takedowns) are ineffective against immutable ledger entries.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Info-Stealer / Malware
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Credential Theft, Crypto Wallet Exfiltration), Espionage (Potential Targeting of Government Entities)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Over 300,000 credentialsSystems Affected: Password managers (LastPass, cloud-synced tools), Browsers (Chrome, Firefox), Cloud storage (Google Drive), Crypto wallets (MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, 60+ others)Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to sensitive systems, credential misuse, crypto asset theftBrand Reputation Impact: High (Associated with credential theft and crypto wallet breaches)Legal Liabilities: Potential (Regulatory violations for data exposure, especially in financial and government sectors)Identity Theft Risk: High (Exfiltration of saved logins, session data, and PII)Payment Information Risk: High (Crypto wallet credentials compromised)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsSaved LoginsSession DataCrypto Wallet KeysPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Number Of Records Exposed: 300,000+Sensitivity Of Data: High (Passwords, Crypto Wallet Access, PII)Data Exfiltration: YesPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes (Saved logins, session data)
MARCH 2026
100Before Incident
Breach
10 Mar 2026LastPass
Salesforce, Snowflake, Okta, Sony, LastPass and AMD: Salesforce Customer Data Breach Linked to ShinyHunters

ShinyHunters Exploits Salesforce Experience Cloud Misconfigurations in Large-Scale Data Theft

100After Incident
CRITICAL0
SALLASAMDSNOSONOKT1773153462
ShinyHunters Exploits Salesforce Experience Cloud Misconfigurations in Large-Scale Data Theft The hacking group ShinyHunters has claimed responsibility for stealing data from approximately 100 major companies by exploiting misconfigurations in Salesforce’s Experience Cloud platform. According to reports, the group accessed information from around 400 websites and organizations, including high-profile targets like Snowflake, Okta, LastPass, Sony, AMD, and Salesforce itself. Salesforce confirmed that a "known threat actor group" is actively scanning public-facing Experience Cloud sites portals used for customer, partner, and employee interactions due to overly permissive guest user configurations. The company clarified that the issue stems from customer-defined guest user profiles, not a vulnerability in Salesforce’s core platform. ### How the Attack Works Experience Cloud sites can be configured to allow guest users (unauthenticated visitors) to view public pages and submit forms. However, if these guest profiles are granted excessive permissions, attackers can query and extract CRM data that was never intended to be public. ShinyHunters reportedly used a modified version of AuraInspector, an open-source tool originally designed by Mandiant to detect misconfigurations in Salesforce’s Aura endpoints. The altered tool enables mass scanning of public-facing sites, extracting data when guest permissions are too broad. ### ShinyHunters’ Track Record Active since 2019, ShinyHunters has been linked to numerous high-profile breaches, often employing "pay or leak" tactics demanding ransoms to prevent data exposure. Recent incidents include the 2024 Snowflake breach, as well as attacks on universities and consumer platforms, leveraging phishing, social engineering, and SaaS misconfigurations. ### The Broader Risk of Misconfiguration This incident highlights a persistent cybersecurity challenge: misconfiguration remains a leading attack vector. While SaaS platforms like Salesforce offer robust security controls, human error in permission settings can expose sensitive data. Experience Cloud’s flexibility designed for public-facing portals becomes a liability when guest user profiles are improperly configured, allowing unauthorized access to CRM records. ### Salesforce’s Response & Mitigation Steps Salesforce has urged customers to: - Audit guest user permissions across all Experience Cloud sites. - Set default external access to "private" to block unauthenticated queries. - Disable guest access to public APIs and remove API-enabled permissions from guest profiles. - Monitor logs for unusual activity, such as large-scale scanning attempts. The incident underscores the need for ongoing security reviews rather than one-time configurations, as cloud environments evolve and threat actors refine their tactics. With regulatory scrutiny and reputational risks escalating, enterprises must treat access control and governance as continuous priorities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Theft
MOTIVATION
Data TheftExtortion (Pay or Leak Tactics)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: CRM data from approximately 400 websites and organizationsSystems Affected: Salesforce Experience Cloud sites with misconfigured guest user permissionsBrand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: CRM dataSensitivity Of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information likely included)Data Exfiltration: YesPersonally Identifiable Information: Likely
FEBRUARY 2026
340Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
355Before Incident
Cyber Attack
19 Jan 2026LastPass
LastPass and Amazon Web Services: LastPass Warns of Fake Maintenance Message Tracking Users to Steal Master Passwords

Critical Phishing Campaign Targets LastPass Users in Sophisticated Attack

335After Incident
CRITICAL-20
LASAMA1769009064
Critical Phishing Campaign Targets LastPass Users in Sophisticated Attack A high-severity phishing campaign targeting LastPass users began on January 19, 2026, with attackers impersonating the company’s support team to steal master passwords. The fraudulent emails falsely claim an urgent need for vault backups within 24 hours, leveraging social engineering to exploit user trust. LastPass has confirmed that it never requests master passwords or demands immediate vault backups via email, emphasizing that legitimate communications avoid unsolicited urgent actions. The campaign was strategically launched over a U.S. holiday weekend, a tactic designed to capitalize on reduced security staffing and slower incident response times commonly exploited by threat actors to evade detection. The phishing infrastructure relies on two key components: an initial redirect hosted on compromised AWS S3 buckets and a spoofed domain mimicking LastPass’s legitimate services. LastPass is actively working with third-party partners to dismantle the malicious infrastructure and urges users to delete any suspicious emails and report them to [email protected] for further analysis. Organizations are advised to bolster email security controls to block messages from identified sender addresses and reinforce phishing awareness, particularly regarding urgent language and credential requests. The incident underscores the persistent risk of credential harvesting campaigns targeting password manager users.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing
MOTIVATION
Credential Harvesting
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Master passwords, Vault backupsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to phishing impersonationIdentity Theft Risk: High (master passwords compromised)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Master passwords, Vault backupsSensitivity Of Data: High (password manager credentials)Personally Identifiable Information: Potentially (if vaults contained PII)
JANUARY 2026
355Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026LastPass
LastPass, Bitwarden and Dashlane: 25 Flaws Found in Cloud Password Managers Allow Unauthorized Access and Data Manipulation

Critical Vulnerabilities Exposed in Major Cloud Password Managers

351After Incident
CRITICAL-4
DASLASBIT1771317146
Critical Vulnerabilities Exposed in Major Cloud Password Managers Researchers from ETH Zurich’s Applied Cryptography Group have uncovered 25 severe security flaws in popular cloud-based password managers, including Bitwarden, LastPass, and Dashlane, which collectively serve around 60 million users worldwide. The findings challenge the long-held assumption of "zero-knowledge encryption" a security model where data remains encrypted even if servers are compromised. Led by Professor Kenneth Paterson, the team simulated a malicious server threat model, testing how browser extensions responded when servers were compromised. The results revealed client-side vulnerabilities that could allow attackers with server access to view, modify, or delete stored passwords, logins, and sensitive data. Bitwarden was found to have 12 vulnerabilities, LastPass 7, and Dashlane 6, with some flaws enabling full organization vault compromises or unauthorized access via sync manipulation. Key issues stem from outdated cryptographic practices and user-friendly features like password recovery and sharing, which introduce complexity and expand the attack surface. Doctoral student Matteo Scarlata noted that many vendors rely on 1990s-era encryption to avoid disrupting users or causing downtime, undermining the security guarantees of zero-knowledge architectures. The vulnerabilities, assigned CVE IDs with CVSS scores ranging from 7.5 to 8.5, include: - Bitwarden: Unauthorized vault access, integrity violations in shared credentials, and full organization vault compromise. - LastPass: Password recovery bypass and credential modification attacks. - Dashlane: Legacy crypto decryption leaks. The researchers followed responsible disclosure, giving vendors 90 days to address the flaws. While patches are now being rolled out, the findings highlight a critical weakness: even encrypted data can be manipulated if servers are compromised. The incident underscores the need for regular external audits, transparent security practices, and migration to modern cryptographic standards rather than relying on incremental fixes.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach/Vulnerability Exposure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Stored passwords, logins, and sensitive dataSystems Affected: Cloud-based password managers (Bitwarden, LastPass, Dashlane)Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access and manipulation of encrypted dataBrand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Passwords, logins, sensitive dataSensitivity Of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information, credentials)Data Encryption: Compromised (zero-knowledge encryption bypass)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
DECEMBER 2025
489Before Incident
Breach
25 Dec 2025LastPass
LastPass: LastPass Settlement Reaches Up to $24 Million After Data Breach

LastPass Data Breach and Settlement

354After Incident
CRITICAL-135
LAS1766649509
LastPass Settles Lawsuit for Up to $24 Million Following Data Breach LastPass, a widely used password manager, has agreed to a settlement of up to $24 million after a lawsuit stemming from a 2022 data breach. The agreement includes $8.2 million for data-protection claims and up to $16.25 million to reimburse users for cryptocurrency losses linked to the incident. ### The Breach and Its Impact In the attack, hackers accessed sensitive user data, though stored passwords remained encrypted. However, some customers reported unauthorized access to crypto wallets connected to their LastPass accounts, leading to financial losses. The breach raised concerns about the security of password managers, which users rely on to protect digital assets and personal information. The lawsuit alleged that LastPass failed to adequately safeguard user data, exposing customers to privacy risks and financial harm. ### Settlement Details Eligible users will be notified about how to submit claims. Payouts will vary based on verified losses: - $8.2 million allocated for data-protection claims. - Up to $16.25 million for crypto loss reimbursements. ### Broader Implications The settlement underscores the real-world consequences of data breaches, even for trusted security tools. While password managers enhance convenience, this incident highlights their vulnerabilities and the need for robust security measures. For LastPass, the case has prompted security improvements, including stronger encryption, enhanced safeguards, and more transparent user updates. The company has pledged to prevent future breaches, though the incident serves as a reminder that no service is immune to cyber threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, data exploitation
IMPACT
Financial Loss: Up to $24 million (settlement)Data Compromised: Sensitive user information, encrypted passwords, crypto wallet detailsSystems Affected: LastPass user databaseOperational Impact: Loss of user trust, reputational damageCustomer Complaints: Many users felt vulnerable and concerned about securityBrand Reputation Impact: Significant damage to trust in LastPass as a secure password managerLegal Liabilities: Lawsuit settlement of $8.2 million for data-protection claims and up to $16.25 million for crypto lossesIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposure of sensitive user information)Payment Information Risk: High (unauthorized access to crypto wallets)
DATA BREACH
Sensitive user informationEncrypted passwordsCrypto wallet detailsSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, financial data)Data Exfiltration: Unauthorized access to crypto wallets reportedData Encryption: Passwords were encryptedPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
NOVEMBER 2025
484Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
629Before Incident
Breach
15 Oct 2025LastPass
LastPass UK Limited: Recent ICO Data Breach Enforcement Emphasizes the Importance of a Robust Breach Response

UK ICO Imposes £15 Million in GDPR Fines on Capita and LastPass for Cybersecurity Failures

476After Incident
CRITICAL-153
LAS1770195780
UK ICO Imposes £15 Million in GDPR Fines on Capita and LastPass for Cybersecurity Failures In late 2025, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) levied a combined £15 million in GDPR fines against Capita plc and Capita Pension Solutions Limited (fined £14 million on 15 October 2025) and LastPass UK Limited (fined £1.2 million on 20 November 2025) for data breaches resulting from cyberattacks. The ICO’s decisions highlight critical enforcement trends, including its strict expectations for proactive cybersecurity measures. In Capita’s case, the regulator determined that inadequate penetration testing, understaffed security operations, and weak administrator access controls created avoidable vulnerabilities exploited by attackers. Despite acknowledging the costs of robust security, the ICO rejected resource constraints as justification for lapses, particularly for organizations handling high-risk data. The rulings also emphasize the NCSC’s cybersecurity guidance as a benchmark for "appropriate" GDPR compliance. Internal documents such as Capita’s penetration test reports were cited as evidence of security weaknesses, underscoring the legal risks of unprotected internal assessments. Companies are advised to consider privilege protections for sensitive security findings to limit exposure. The ICO set a high bar for mitigating factors. LastPass’s cooperation, though deemed "good," was not considered exceptional, while Capita’s 14-hour GDPR notification (well ahead of the 72-hour deadline) failed to reduce its penalty. The regulator expects continuous, engaged responses rather than one-time compliance efforts. Notably, LastPass’s fine was calculated based on its holding company’s global revenue, not just its own turnover, aligning with EU precedent. This approach could significantly impact private equity and investment firms, as fines may extend to broader corporate groups. The cases signal the ICO’s uncompromising stance on data protection, with enforcement actions targeting both technical oversights and structural accountability.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Financial Loss: £15 million (combined fines)
DATA BREACH
Sensitivity Of Data: High-risk data
Cyber Attack
15 Oct 2025LastPass
LastPass

Ongoing Phishing Campaign Targeting LastPass, Bitwarden, and 1Password Users with Fake Security Alerts

476After Incident
HIGH-153
LAS3302433101625
An ongoing phishing campaign targeted LastPass users via fake emails claiming the company was hacked, urging them to download a malicious desktop version of the password manager. The attack exploited social engineering tactics, impersonating LastPass with urgency-driven messages from domains like ‘hello@lastpasspulse[.]blog’. The downloaded binary installed Syncro, a legitimate remote monitoring tool repurposed to deploy ScreenConnect, granting attackers persistent remote access. While LastPass confirmed no breach occurred, the campaign aimed to steal vault credentials by tricking users into installing malware disguised as a security update. The threat actors leveraged reduced holiday staffing (Columbus Day weekend) to delay detection. Cloudflare later blocked the phishing landing pages, but the attack demonstrated sophisticated use of legitimate tools (Syncro/ScreenConnect) to bypass defenses, disable security agents (Emsisoft, Webroot, Bitdefender), and exfiltrate sensitive data from compromised endpoints.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
PhishingSocial EngineeringMalware DistributionRemote Access Trojan (RAT)
MOTIVATION
Financial GainCredential TheftData ExfiltrationPotential Follow-on Attacks (e.g., ransomware, fraud)
IMPACT
Potential access to password vaults via saved credentialsSystem metadataUser activity monitoringEnd-user devices (Windows, possibly macOS)Password manager applications (if credentials were exposed)Potential account takeoversFollow-on attacks (e.g., lateral movement, ransomware)Increased helpdesk/support load due to user reportsCustomer Complaints: Likely (users reporting phishing attempts or compromised accounts)Moderate (due to impersonation of trusted brands)Erosion of user trust in email communications from password managersIdentity Theft Risk: High (if password vaults are accessed)Payment Information Risk: High (if payment details are stored in compromised vaults)
DATA BREACH
Potential password vault credentialsSystem access (via ScreenConnect)User activity logsSensitivity Of Data: High (passwords, potentially payment info, PII)Data Exfiltration: Likely (if threat actors accessed vaults or deployed additional malware)Personally Identifiable Information: High risk (if stored in password vaults)
OCTOBER 2025
628Before Incident
Ransomware
03 Oct 2025LastPass
Salesforce

Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters Ransomware Attack on Salesforce Customer Data via Salesloft Drift Integration

329After Incident
CRITICAL-299
SAL5592855100325
The ransomware group ShinyHunters (Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters) breached Salesforce by exploiting stolen OAuth tokens from Salesloft Drift’s AI chatbot integration, compromising 1.5 billion records across 760 companies (including Cisco, Disney, and Marriott). The leaked data includes PII (names, DOBs, passports, employment histories), shipping details, chat transcripts, flight records, and car ownership data—validated by cybersecurity researchers. Attackers first infiltrated Salesloft’s GitHub repository, extracting private source code and OAuth tokens, then laterally moved to Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and Okta platforms of victims. The group demanded separate ransoms from Salesforce and listed 39 high-profile victims on a darkweb leak site, pressuring them to pay under threat of full data exposure. The attack leveraged social engineering (vishing, phishing, IT impersonation) to trick employees into granting access, highlighting vulnerabilities in third-party supply-chain integrations and weak 2FA/OAuth security controls.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachRansomwareSupply Chain AttackSocial Engineering
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Extortion/Ransom)Data Theft for Dark Web SalesReputation Damage
IMPACT
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Shipping InformationMarketing Lead DataCustomer Support Case RecordsChat TranscriptsFlight DetailsCar Ownership RecordsEmployment HistoriesPassport NumbersFull Contact InformationSalesforce CRM InstancesSalesloft Drift AI ChatbotGoogle WorkspaceMicrosoft 365Okta PlatformsGitHub Repository (Salesloft)Potential Disruption to CRM OperationsCustomer Data Exposure RisksIncident Response ActivationHigh (Public Data Leak Site)Loss of Customer TrustMedia ScrutinyPotential GDPR/CCPA ViolationsRegulatory FinesClass-Action LawsuitsIdentity Theft Risk: High (Exposed PII Includes Passport Numbers, DOBs, Contact Details)
DATA BREACH
PIICustomer Support RecordsChat TranscriptsMarketing DataShipping InformationFlight DetailsEmployment HistoriesNumber Of Records Exposed: 1,500,000,000 (claimed)Sensitivity Of Data: High (Includes Passport Numbers, Nationalities, Contact Details)Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (Samples Validated by Researchers)Data Encryption: No (Data Stolen in Plaintext)Database DumpsCSV/Excel FilesJSON/Log FilesChat TranscriptsFull NamesDates of BirthNationalitiesPassport NumbersEmail AddressesPhone NumbersPhysical AddressesEmployment Histories
SEPTEMBER 2025
628Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
625Before Incident
JULY 2025
622Before Incident
AUGUST 2022
650Before Incident
Breach
01 Aug 2022LastPass
LastPass

LastPass Data Breach

586After Incident
CRITICAL-64
LAS25527822
An unauthorized party gained the access to a cloud-based password security site, LastPass suffered a data security breach that resulted in the theft of certain source codes and technical information. They targeted its development environment. No customer data or encrypted passwords were accessed. Amidst investigated the incident and they engaged the services of a leading cybersecurity and forensics firm and they implemented additional countermeasures.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Unknown
IMPACT
Source CodesTechnical InformationDevelopment Environment
DATA BREACH
Source CodesTechnical Information
JUNE 2022
585Before Incident
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2022LastPass
LastPass

Phishing Campaign Targeting LastPass Users via Fake Legacy Inheritance Process

524After Incident
CRITICAL-61
LAS1192211102425
LastPass is warning customers about an ongoing phishing campaign by the financially motivated threat group CryptoChameleon (UNC5356), targeting its users since mid-October. The attack involves fraudulent emails impersonating LastPass’s legacy inheritance process, claiming a family member requested access to the victim’s password vault via a fake death certificate. Users are tricked into clicking a malicious link redirecting them to a spoofed login page (lastpassrecovery[.]com), where they are prompted to enter their master password. In some cases, attackers also posed as LastPass support staff via phone calls to manipulate victims further.The campaign has evolved to include passkey-focused phishing domains (e.g., mypasskey[.]info), indicating attempts to steal modern authentication credentials. This follows LastPass’s 2022 breach, where encrypted vault backups were stolen, leading to subsequent cryptocurrency thefts totaling $4.4 million. The latest attack exploits psychological manipulation and technical deception to compromise user accounts, potentially granting attackers access to sensitive credentials stored in LastPass vaults.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
phishingsocial engineeringcredential theftpasskey theft
MOTIVATION
financial gain (cryptocurrency theft)
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $4.4 million (from 2022 breach-linked cryptocurrency losses; current campaign losses unspecified)LastPass master passwordspasskeyspotential vault contentsLastPass user accountspasskey storage systemsCustomer Complaints: likely (based on phishing volume)Brand Reputation Impact: high (repeated targeting of LastPass users, erosion of trust in security)Identity Theft Risk: high (stolen credentials could enable broader account takeovers)Payment Information Risk: high (cryptocurrency wallets targeted)
DATA BREACH
master passwordspasskeyspotential vault data (if credentials reused)Sensitivity Of Data: high (passwords, cryptographic keys, financial access)Data Exfiltration: likely (if credentials entered on phishing sites)Data Encryption: N/A (credentials voluntarily entered by users on fake sites)Personally Identifiable Information: high risk (if vaults accessed)
JANUARY 2022
701Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2022LastPass
LastPass: LastPass Gets Initial Nod for $24.5 Million Data Breach Deal

LastPass 2022 Data Breach Settlement

565After Incident
CRITICAL-136
LAS1770196017
LastPass Reaches $24.5 Million Settlement Over 2022 Data Breach LastPass, a leading password-security provider, has received preliminary approval from a U.S. federal court to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit stemming from a 2022 data breach. The breach exposed the personal information of millions of users and led to the theft of cryptocurrency from affected accounts. Under the terms of the settlement, LastPass will establish an $8.2 million fund to compensate class members for losses incurred due to the breach. An additional $16.3 million will be allocated for further victim compensation, bringing the total settlement to nearly $24.5 million. The agreement was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The breach, which occurred in 2022, compromised sensitive user data, including encrypted password vaults, and was linked to subsequent financial fraud targeting cryptocurrency holdings. The settlement aims to resolve claims from impacted individuals while avoiding prolonged litigation. The case underscores the growing financial and reputational risks companies face following major cybersecurity incidents, particularly those involving sensitive financial or personal data.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $24.5 million settlementData Compromised: Encrypted password vaults, personal informationBrand Reputation Impact: Growing financial and reputational risksLegal Liabilities: Class-action lawsuit settlementIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Encrypted password vaultsPersonal informationSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesData Encryption: Encrypted password vaultsPersonally Identifiable Information: Yes
JUNE 2020
739Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2020LastPass
LastPass

LastPass Data Security Breach

675After Incident
CRITICAL-64
LAS214211222
LastPass again suffered from a data security breach after an unauthorized party gained the access to a cloud-based password security site. Although the third-party cloud provider wasn't identified, Amazon Web Services mentioned the company's migration of a billion customer records to its cloud in a blog post from 2020. No customer data or encrypted passwords were accessed.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: No customer data or encrypted passwords were accessed.
DATA BREACH
Data Encryption: Encrypted passwords
JULY 2015
756Before Incident
Breach
01 Jul 2015LastPass
LastPass

LastPass Data Security Breach

696After Incident
CRITICAL-60
LAS1151522
A cloud-based password security site, LastPass suffered a data security breach that compromised the account email addresses, password reminders, server per user salts, and authentication hashes. LastPass recommended its users to update their weak master passwords as a preventive step. LastPass servers were even over-loaded and many people were displayed the message: "Oops! Our servers are a bit overloaded right now. Please try your password change again shortly, we will catch up soon."
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
email addressespassword remindersserver per user saltsauthentication hashesOperational Impact: Server overload
DATA BREACH
email addressespassword remindersserver per user saltsauthentication hashes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for LastPass ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on LastPass's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with LastPass ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view LastPass's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
LastPass Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo