Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LASAPP1782793516)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of LastPass's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts LastPass Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the LastPass breach identified under incident ID LASAPP1782793516.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of LastPass's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lastpass, the number of followers: 42443, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 713 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 600 and after the incident was 536 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on LastPass and their customers.
LastPass recently reported "LastPass Security Incident Involving Third-Party Tool", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
LastPass disclosed a security incident involving a third-party tool, resulting in the theft of customer contact information and physical addresses.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Customer contact information and physical addresses.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Risks of relying on third-party services in critical security infrastructure, and recommending next steps like Review and strengthen third-party security protocols, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public disclosure of breach.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating security incident involving a third-party tool. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party tool compromise in critical security infrastructure. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating theft of customer contact information and physical addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data_breach.data exfiltration such as Yes and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party tool compromise may involve cloud services. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating breach marks another setback for the password manager and Disk Wipe (T1561) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of disk wipe, but included due to breach impact. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party tool compromise may involve valid accounts and Use Alternate Authentication Material (T1550) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party tool may have used alternate auth material. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- LastPass Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass/incident/LASAPP1782793516
- LastPass CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass
- LastPass Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/lasapp1782793516-lastpass-apple-breach-january-2025/
- LastPass CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lastpass/history
- LastPass CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://me.pcmag.com/en/security/37573/new-ai-scams-are-targeting-you-lastpass-was-breached-again-and-an-urgent-warning-for-apple-owners
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf