Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)
VS
Burger KingBurger King
KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

Frenchs Forest, Sydney, NSW, AU, 2086

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Take one man with a big idea and an obsession with chicken perfection. Add 11 herbs and spices, grit, ambition and buckets of heart – you’ve got KFC. Since 1952, we’ve been bringing finger lickin’ good chicken to the world. But without our people, The Originals, none of...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:658
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burger King

Burger King

5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bk.com
750/1000Fair

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its f...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:127,892
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burger King

Burger King

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burger King

Burger King

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MCD344071125
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUR1790000683
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BUR22818923

FAQ

Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) company and Burger King company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) or Burger King ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) or Burger King ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) and Burger King, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KFC South Pacific (Yum! Brands Subsidiary) and Burger King, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108680
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send template notifications by calling POST /sys/api/sendTemplateAnnouncement. Low-privileged attackers can supply forged sender, recipients, title, and template parameters to deliver messages appearing to come from admin or system accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108679
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the sendBusAnnouncement handler of SystemApiController that allows any authenticated user to send announcements without the required permissions. Low-privileged attackers can POST crafted bodies to /sys/api/sendBusAnnouncement with forged sender, recipients, title and content to deliver spoofed admin or system messages for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108678
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryUserRoles handler of SystemApiController that lets authenticated users read any user's role codes. Low-privileged attackers can send GET requests to /sys/api/queryUserRoles with an arbitrary username to enumerate role assignments and identify administrator accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108677
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /sys/api/getUserByName that allows low-privileged authenticated users to retrieve any user's stored password value. Attackers can decrypt the AES-CBC protected response using the hard-coded key exposed by /sys/getEncryptedString to obtain administrators' password ciphertexts for offline guessing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108676
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysAnnouncementController downLoadFiles handler that allows low-privileged authenticated users to download announcement attachments. Attackers can supply a known announcement id to retrieve a ZIP of attachments from unreleased announcements or those addressed only to other users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8