Burger King
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
burger-king
Website:
Employees number:
108,914
Number of followers:
693,711
NAICS:
7225
Industry Type:
Homepage:
bk.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
BUR_1233888
Scan Status:
In-progress
Burger King Company CyberSecurity Posture
bk.com
The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its franchisees collectively operate more than 17,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories, serving over 11 million guests per day and they’re still coming back for that flame-grilled flavor. The Burger King® brand is owned by Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”), which owns three of the world’s iconic quick service restaurant brands – Burger King®, Tim Hortons®, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen®. But we still have room to grow – and that’s where you come in. We need strong operations, bold marketing, and the best people around to make these brands great. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here. For more information and exciting career opportunities, please RBI’s website at www.rbicareers.com. For more information about Burger King Corporation, please visit the company’s website at www.bk.com or follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Burger King is a registered trademark of Burger King Corporation. All rights reserved. Please visit www.bk.com for more information on Burger King Corporation trademarks. * Dave Egerton and Jim McLamore, original founders of the Burger King® brand.
Burger King A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Burger King Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Burger King
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Burger King Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Burger King
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Burger King Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data. Burger King in France exposed private information to the public as a result of a website configuration error, the Cybernews investigation team found. People who applied for jobs at Burger King in France may have been impacted because the impacted website processed job applications. It's not the first time Burger King has exposed sensitive information; supposedly, the France branch exposed personally identifying information (PII) of children who purchased Burger King menus due to a similar misconfiguration.
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.100
Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Ethical hackers **BobDaHacker** and **BobTheShoplifter** exposed severe security vulnerabilities within **Restaurant Brands International (RBI)**, the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. The flaws included **hard-coded passwords** (e.g., 'admin') in HTML and drive-through systems, **plain-text passwords sent via email**, and an **unrestricted API** allowing unauthorized admin access. The hackers gained entry to **employee accounts, internal configurations, raw audio recordings of drive-through conversations** (containing customer personal data processed by AI), and even **restaurant bathroom rating systems**. The breaches revealed **catastrophic oversight** in cybersecurity fundamentals, with no basic safeguards like antivirus checks or system audits. While the ethical hackers responsibly disclosed the issues and confirmed **no customer data was retained**, the exposure demonstrated how easily malicious actors could have exploited these gaps. RBI reportedly fixed the vulnerabilities post-disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the researchers, raising concerns about long-term security improvements. The incident underscores systemic negligence in protecting **30,000+ global outlets** from potential data leaks, financial fraud, or operational disruptions.
Burger King Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Burger King
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2025.
Incident Types Burger King vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2025.
Incident History — Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Burger King Company Subsidiaries
The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its franchisees collectively operate more than 17,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories, serving over 11 million guests per day and they’re still coming back for that flame-grilled flavor. The Burger King® brand is owned by Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”), which owns three of the world’s iconic quick service restaurant brands – Burger King®, Tim Hortons®, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen®. But we still have room to grow – and that’s where you come in. We need strong operations, bold marketing, and the best people around to make these brands great. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here. For more information and exciting career opportunities, please RBI’s website at www.rbicareers.com. For more information about Burger King Corporation, please visit the company’s website at www.bk.com or follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Burger King is a registered trademark of Burger King Corporation. All rights reserved. Please visit www.bk.com for more information on Burger King Corporation trademarks. * Dave Egerton and Jim McLamore, original founders of the Burger King® brand.
Loading...
Burger King Similar Companies
Olive Garden
Founded in 1982, Olive Garden is owned by Darden Restaurants, Inc. (NYSE:DRI), the world's largest company-owned and operated full-service restaurant company. With more than 800 restaurants, more than 92,000 employees and more than $3.5 billion in annual sales, Olive Garden is the leading restaurant
We're known for our huge restaurants and generous portions but we're so much more than that! Here, you'll have big opportunities to learn and grow your career, you can take pride in the work you do, be able to balance your life with the hours and schedule you need, and be part of a team committed to
Dallas-based Brinker International, Inc. is one of the world’s leading casual dining restaurant companies. Founded in 1975, Brinker owns, operates or franchises more than 1,600 restaurants across 31 countries and two territories under the names Chili’s® Grill & Bar and Maggiano’s Little Italy®. O
Outback Steakhouse
Made with an Australian flair, born under the Tampa sun. Outback Steakhouse is an Australian-inspired restaurant providing high quality delicious food with Aussie hospitality since 1988. Our success is based on our belief that if we take care of Our People, the institution of Outback will take care
Papa Johns
Papa Johns seeks people who have an entrepreneurial spirit and share our philosophy for success. Hands-on training, a clean and safe work environment, quality business practices, advancement opportunities and meaningful work combine to produce not only the best pizza, but also the best team members!
Five Guys Enterprises
History: *1986: The first Five Guys location opens in Arlington, VA. *1986 - 2001: Five Guys opens five locations around the DC metro-area and perfected their business of making burgers… and starts to build a cult-like following. * 2002: Five Guys decides DC metro-area residents shouldn't be the
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Programs and more. Our team of mor
ZAMP
Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdad
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG) is cultivating a better world by serving responsibly sourced, classically-cooked, real food with wholesome ingredients without artificial colors, flavors or preservatives. Chipotle has over 3,250 restaurants in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, F
.png)
Burger King CyberSecurity News
November 18, 2025 10:39 PM
3rd Circ. Backs Burger King's Win In Miscarriage Bias Suit
The Third Circuit upheld an arbitrator's ruling that Burger King didn't discriminate against an ex-employee's pregnancy when her superiors...
November 17, 2025 09:19 AM
Hackers “Impressed” by Burger King’s “Commitment to Terrible Security Practices.” Here’s What We can Learn.
Earlier this week, Tom's Hardware reported that two ethical hackers, BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter, discovered “catastrophic” cybersecurity.
November 06, 2025 12:13 AM
Burger King Braces for the Demise of the Penny
Burger King is struggling with change. Specifically, pennies. On a recent call, Burger King's technology specialists quickly moved on from cybersecurity and...
October 06, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyberattacks hit 91% of universities and 43% of businesses in last 12 months in the UK — survey suggests more than 600,000 businesses, 61,000 charities affected
UK businesses, universities, and secondary schools have come under unprecedented hacking attacks over the past year, with 9/10 of polled...
September 26, 2025 07:00 AM
In Other News: LockBit 5.0, Department of War Cybersecurity Framework, OnePlus Vulnerability
Co-op lost £206 million due to cyberattack, South Korean credit card company hacked, Maryland Transit Administration ransomware attack.
September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
In Other News: 600k Hit by Healthcare Breaches, Major ShinyHunters Hacks, DeepSeek’s Coding Bias
Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: Eve Security seed funding, Claroty report, patches from WatchGuard and Nokia.
September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Burger King Uses DMCA to Remove Blog on Drive-Thru Security Flaws
Ethical hacker BobDaHacker published an in-depth report demonstrating how attackers could bypass authentication, eavesdrop on customer...
September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Burger King Uses DMCA to Remove Blog Exposing Drive-Thru System Security Flaws
Burger King has invoked the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to force the removal of a security researcher's blog post that disclosed...
September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Burger King Uses DMCA Complaint to Take Down Blog Post Detailing Security Flaws on Drive-Thru Systems
Burger King has invoked the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to force the removal of a security researcher's blog post that...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Burger King CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Burger King
The official website of Burger King is http://www.bk.com.
Burger King’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Burger King’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 774, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Burger King’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Burger King have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Burger King have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Burger King comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Burger King have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Burger King comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Burger King have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Burger King is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Burger King
Burger King operates primarily in the Restaurants industry.
Number of Employees at Burger King
Burger King employs approximately 108,914 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Burger King
Burger King presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Burger King’s LinkedIn Followers
Burger King’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 693,711 followers.
NAICS Classification of Burger King
Burger King is classified under the NAICS code 7225, which corresponds to Restaurants and Other Eating Places.
Burger King’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Burger King does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Burger King’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Burger King maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/burger-king.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Burger King
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Burger King has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Burger King has an estimated 4,808 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Burger King ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak and Breach.
How does Burger King detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes (after ethical hacker disclosure), and containment measures with patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly), and communication strategy with no public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Kool King Data Breach
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Accessible Database
Title: Burger King Data Exposure Incidents
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error
Vulnerability Exploited: Website Misconfiguration
Title: Hard-coded passwords exposed Burger King’s fragile security infrastructure worldwide
Description: Hackers accessed employee accounts and internal configurations with shocking ease due to weak security practices at Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter discovered hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin'), plain-text passwords sent via email, and unsecured APIs that allowed unrestricted access. The vulnerabilities exposed internal systems, employee accounts, drive-through audio recordings (containing customer PII), and even restaurant bathroom rating screens. The hackers described RBI’s security as 'catastrophic,' highlighting systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity fundamentals. RBI reportedly fixed the issues after disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the ethical hackers.
Type: Unauthorized Access
Attack Vector: Hard-coded CredentialsPlain-text Passwords in EmailsUnrestricted API AccessDefault/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')
Vulnerability Exploited: Hard-coded passwords in HTML/APIsLack of password encryptionMissing access controlsPoor credential management
Threat Actor: BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker)
Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Data Leak.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Hard-coded password in HTMLDefault 'admin' password in drive-through tabletsUnrestricted API signup.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Systems Affected: Database
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Children's pii
Systems Affected: Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Data Compromised: Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential pii), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens)
Systems Affected: Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens
Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized access to critical systems, customer data exposure, and operational disruption)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (public exposure of systemic security failures across global brands: Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes)
Identity Theft Risk: Moderate (drive-through audio recordings may contain customer PII)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher Codes, Links To The Externally Stored Certificates, , Pii, Children'S Pii, , Employee Credentials, Internal Configurations, Audio Recordings (Potential Pii), Operational Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Entity Name: Kool King
Entity Type: Online Shop
Industry: Retail
Location: France
Customers Affected: 37900
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Fast Food
Location: France
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Entity Type: Parent Company
Industry: Fast Food / Hospitality
Location: Global (30,000+ outlets)
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Tim Hortons
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food / Coffee
Location: Primarily Canada/US
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Popeyes
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure)
Containment Measures: Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly)
Communication Strategy: No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure).
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Type of Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Number of Records Exposed: 37900
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: emailspasswordsnamesphonesDOB
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Type of Data Compromised: Pii, Children's pii
Personally Identifiable Information: Job ApplicantsChildren's PII
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Type of Data Compromised: Employee credentials, Internal configurations, Audio recordings (potential pii), Operational data
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate to High (includes PII in audio recordings and system access credentials)
Data Exfiltration: No (ethical hackers did not retain data)
Data Encryption: No (passwords stored in plain-text)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (in drive-through audio recordings)
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly) and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Lessons Learned: Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Recommendations: Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Source: Cybernews Investigation Team
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Tom’s Hardware
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cybernews Investigation Team, and Source: Tom’s Hardware, and Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Investigation Status: Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entry Point: Hard-Coded Password In Html, Default 'Admin' Password In Drive-Through Tablets, Unrestricted Api Signup,
High Value Targets: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Root Causes: Misconfigured Database
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Root Causes: Lack Of Basic Cybersecurity Hygiene (E.G., Hard-Coded Passwords, Plain-Text Credentials), Absence Of Access Controls (E.G., Unrestricted Api Access), Inadequate System Audits And Vulnerability Assessments, Poor Credential Management Practices, Corporate Neglect Of Security Fundamentals Despite Global Scale,
Corrective Actions: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, , Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Children's PII, , Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens) and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System and Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, DOB, Children's PII, emails, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), phones, Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens), passwords, Employee account credentials and names.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 379.0.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks and Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived), Tom’s Hardware and Cybernews Investigation Team.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report).
Initial Access Broker
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Misconfigured Database, Lack of basic cybersecurity hygiene (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials)Absence of access controls (e.g., unrestricted API access)Inadequate system audits and vulnerability assessmentsPoor credential management practicesCorporate neglect of security fundamentals despite global scale.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patches applied to reported vulnerabilities (per RBI)No public confirmation of broader security overhaul or policy changes.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=burger-king' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
