Comparison Overview

Burger King

VS

Chipotle Mexican Grill

Burger King

5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its franchisees collectively operate more than 17,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories, serving over 11 million guests per day and they’re still coming back for that flame-grilled flavor. The Burger King® brand is owned by Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”), which owns three of the world’s iconic quick service restaurant brands – Burger King®, Tim Hortons®, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen®. But we still have room to grow – and that’s where you come in. We need strong operations, bold marketing, and the best people around to make these brands great. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here. For more information and exciting career opportunities, please RBI’s website at www.rbicareers.com. For more information about Burger King Corporation, please visit the company’s website at www.bk.com or follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Burger King is a registered trademark of Burger King Corporation. All rights reserved. Please visit www.bk.com for more information on Burger King Corporation trademarks. * Dave Egerton and Jim McLamore, original founders of the Burger King® brand.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 108,914
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Chipotle Mexican Grill

610 Newport Center Dr, None, Newport Beach, California, US, 92660
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 600 and 649

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG) is cultivating a better world by serving responsibly sourced, classically-cooked, real food with wholesome ingredients without artificial colors, flavors or preservatives. Chipotle has over 3,250 restaurants in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Germany and is the only restaurant company of its size that owns and operates all its restaurants in North America and Europe. Chipotle is ranked on the Fortune 500 and is recognized on the 2023 list for Fortune's Most Admired Companies and Time Magazine's Most Influential Companies. With over 110,000 employees passionate about providing a great guest experience, Chipotle is a longtime leader and innovator in the food industry. Chipotle is committed to making its food more accessible to everyone while continuing to be a brand with a demonstrated purpose as it leads the way in digital, technology and sustainable business practices. For more information or to place an order online, visit www.chipotle.com.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 44,325
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burger-king.jpeg
Burger King
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chipotle-mexican-grill.jpeg
Chipotle Mexican Grill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burger King
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chipotle Mexican Grill
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chipotle Mexican Grill in 2025.

Incident History — Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chipotle Mexican Grill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chipotle Mexican Grill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burger-king.jpeg
Burger King
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hard-coded Credentials, Plain-text Passwords in Emails, Unrestricted API Access, Default/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')
Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chipotle-mexican-grill.jpeg
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale (PoS) Systems
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale Terminals
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Burger King company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Burger King company.

In the current year, Burger King company has reported more cyber incidents than Chipotle Mexican Grill company.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Burger King company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Chipotle Mexican Grill company and Burger King company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Chipotle Mexican Grill company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Burger King company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Burger King company nor Chipotle Mexican Grill company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burger King company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill company.

Burger King company employs more people globally than Chipotle Mexican Grill company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burger King nor Chipotle Mexican Grill holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H