Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » InfraShield » INF1789052031

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INF1789052031)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-78
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident673 / 1000
Company LinkView InfraShield Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERINF1789052031
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal identification information (photographs, birth...
INCIDENT DATE10/09/2001
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of InfraShield's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts InfraShield Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the InfraShield breach identified under incident ID INF1789052031.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of InfraShield's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/infrashield-com, the number of followers: 391, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 31 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 673 with a difference of -78 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on InfraShield and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Thousands Receive Misprinted IDs in Massive Data Breach Incident", has drawn attention.

A widespread data breach has left thousands of individuals across an unspecified U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal identification information (photographs, birth dates), with nearly Thousands records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating misprinted identification cards featuring another person’s photograph and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating administrative errors in handling personal data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating incorrect birth dates and photographs on IDs. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal identification information (photographs, birth dates) compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating thousands of individuals affected by misprinted IDs. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating misprinted identification cards featuring another person’s photograph and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating administrative errors in handling personal data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (60%)
Supply Chain Compromise (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (90%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References