Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
InfraShield

InfraShield Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

infrashield.com

InfraShield is a U.S.-based cyber-physical security company specializing in the protection of critical infrastructure systems across OT and IT environments. We design and implement tailored solutions, technologies, and strategies to defend high-value assets—such as those in energy, transportation, mining and metals, water, and government sectors—against evolving cyber threats. Built by former regulators, industry practitioners, and subject matter experts, InfraShield bridges the gap between policy and operational resilience. Our approach integrates compliance, defense-in-depth engineering, and incident response to help organizations safeguard mission-critical operations from nation-state actors, ransomware groups, and supply chain


InfraShield A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

InfraShield
Company Information
Website:https://infrashield.com/
Employees number:21
Number of followers:223
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:infrashield.com
InfraShield Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
logo
InfraShieldComputer and Network Security
Updated:
08/04/2026
617/1000
Poor
Caa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
InfraShield Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
InfraShieldComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

InfraShield
InfraShieldPoor
Current Score
617Caa (POOR)
01000
3 incidents
-115 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
644Before Incident
MAY 2026
641Before Incident
APRIL 2026
637Before Incident
MARCH 2026
635Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
635Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
631Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
630Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
627Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
624Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
734Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Sep 2025InfraShield
Unnamed Victims: Yurei Ransomware Uses Common Tools, Adds Stranger Things References

New Yurei Ransomware Campaign Leverages Stranger Things-Themed Tools in Aggressive Extortion Attacks

619After Incident
CRITICAL-115
INF1775140237
New Yurei Ransomware Campaign Leverages *Stranger Things*-Themed Tools in Aggressive Extortion Attacks Researchers at Team Cymru have uncovered a sophisticated extortion campaign tied to the Yurei ransomware toolkit, operated by a threat group first observed in September 2025. The attackers stand out for their use of pop-culture references, naming malicious tools after characters and themes from Stranger Things including a PowerShell script dubbed Vecna.ps1 and the ransomware payload StrangerThings.exe. Unlike traditional ransomware groups that develop custom malware, the Yurei operators assemble modular toolkits from readily available resources, lowering the barrier to entry for cybercrime. Their attack chain begins with stolen credentials purchased from criminal marketplaces, followed by network reconnaissance using tools like SoftPerfect NetScan and NetExec. To escalate privileges, they deploy Rubeus, a tool that exploits Windows authentication systems to gain administrator-level access. Once inside, the group maintains persistence by installing AnyDesk, a legitimate remote-desktop application often overlooked by security software. The Vecna.ps1 script then lies dormant, waiting for a user login to trigger the execution of StrangerThings.exe, the ransomware payload. Notably, Yurei is not an original creation but a repurposed version of Prince Ransomware, an open-source strain written in Go, allowing the attackers to operate without advanced development skills. Before encrypting files, the group disables security defenses using FixingIssues2.ps1, which neutralizes Windows Defender and other protections. They also employ SDelete to permanently erase evidence and delete shadow copies, eliminating recovery options for victims. Between December 2025 and January 2026, Team Cymru tracked the group’s activity via NetFlow analysis, observing their lateral movement through networks using tools like PsExec. While their public leak site currently lists only three confirmed victims, the ease of deploying these attacks has raised concerns among experts about the growing accessibility of ransomware operations. The campaign highlights how low-skill threat actors can now launch high-impact attacks with minimal effort.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Extortion
DATA BREACH
Data Encryption: Yes
AUGUST 2025
734Before Incident
JULY 2025
750Before Incident
JUNE 2025
750Before Incident
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2025InfraShield
Unnamed IT Sector Organizations and React Server Components: Attackers Exploiting React2Shell Vulnerability to Attack IT Sectors

React2Shell Exploits Target Insurance, E-Commerce, and IT Sectors

733After Incident
CRITICAL-17
INFREA1769533068
React2Shell Exploits Target Insurance, E-Commerce, and IT Sectors in Rapid Cyberattacks Threat actors are actively exploiting CVE-2025-55182 (React2Shell), a critical vulnerability in React Server Components, to compromise organizations in the insurance, e-commerce, and IT sectors. The flaw stems from insecure deserialization in the Flight protocol, enabling attackers to execute unauthorized code on vulnerable servers. Exploitation campaigns have moved swiftly, with adversaries weaponizing the vulnerability within hours of disclosure. While many critical flaws never see real-world use, React2Shell has become a prime target, delivering XMRig cryptocurrency miners, botnets, and remote access tools. ### Attack Scope and Malware Payloads - Russian entities faced attacks deploying RustoBot and Kaiji botnets, which conduct DDoS attacks and establish persistence via systemd services, crontab tasks, and modified system utilities. - Global campaigns distributed a broader range of malware, including: - CrossC2 implants (Cobalt Strike payloads with AES-128-CBC encryption) - Tactical RMM (remote management tool abuse) - VShell backdoors - EtherRAT (JavaScript-based malware retrieving C2 addresses from Ethereum smart contracts) ### Affected Systems and Patches React2Shell impacts multiple React Server Component packages, including: - react-server-dom-webpack - react-server-dom-parcel - react-server-dom-turbopack (versions 19.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, 19.2.0) Patches are available in versions 19.0.1, 19.1.2, and 19.2.1, but security experts warn that patching alone is insufficient. Organizations must also scan for post-exploitation activity, as attackers often deploy multiple malicious tools in a single breach. ### Infection Mechanism 1. Initial Access: Attackers exploit React2Shell to execute commands in compromised containers. 2. Malware Deployment: Bash scripts (e.g., wocaosinm.sh, setup2.sh) download architecture-specific payloads, including: - Kaiji botnet (DDoS attacks, persistence via systemd/crontab) - XMRig miner (version 6.24.0, with CPU throttling to evade detection) 3. Data Exfiltration: Attackers use DNS tunneling (nslookup) to encode and transmit stolen data via subdomain queries. 4. Persistence Techniques: - CrossC2 payloads disguise themselves as "Rsyslo AV Agent Service" via systemd. - EtherRAT employs five persistence methods, including XDG Autostart, .bashrc, and .profile modifications. ### Mitigation Recommendations Beyond patching, organizations should: - Verify Next.js versions and dependencies - Rebuild projects after updates - Check lock files to ensure vulnerable packages are removed - Restrict experimental React Server Components in production unless fully patched The attacks highlight the speed and sophistication of modern cyber threats, with adversaries rapidly adapting to newly disclosed vulnerabilities.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (cryptocurrency mining)Botnet deploymentRemote access
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Potential data exfiltration via DNS tunnelingSystems Affected: Servers running vulnerable React Server Components (react-server-dom-webpack, react-server-dom-parcel, react-server-dom-turbopack)Operational Impact: DDoS attacks, unauthorized remote access, system resource consumption (cryptocurrency mining)
DATA BREACH
Data Exfiltration: Possible via DNS tunneling (nslookup)
JUNE 2016
751Before Incident
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2016InfraShield
Venezuela's Power Grid: New Reports Reinforce Cyberattack’s Role in Maduro Capture Blackout

US Cyberattacks in Operation to Extract Venezuelan President Maduro

734After Incident
CRITICAL-17
INF1768877763
US Leveraged Cyberattacks in Operation to Extract Venezuelan President Maduro In January, the US reportedly used cyberattacks as part of a covert operation to extract Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, according to The New York Times. Officials briefed on the mission, dubbed Operation Absolute Resolve, confirmed that US hackers disabled power grids and air defense radars in Caracas. President Donald Trump later hinted at the involvement of US cyber capabilities, stating that "the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have." While Trump did not explicitly confirm a cyberattack, experts like Robert Lee, CEO of industrial cybersecurity firm Dragos, suggested that such an operation was technically feasible, citing past incidents like the 2016–2017 Ukraine power grid attacks. Initial reports speculated that a "blackout bomb" (a graphite bomb causing short circuits) or physical sabotage may have caused the outages, as Venezuela’s Energy Minister shared footage of damaged power infrastructure. However, The New York Times later reported that cyber weapons were indeed used, allowing US operatives to cut power in targeted areas including near the military base where Maduro was captured and restore it within minutes. Some neighborhoods experienced outages lasting up to 36 hours. The operation also involved cyberattacks to disrupt Venezuela’s air defense radar systems. A recent analysis by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) suggested that the mission relied on a "layered effects" strategy, combining cyber tools with kinetic attacks like jamming and graphite bombs. Venezuela’s deteriorating power grid, weakened by years of neglect, was identified as a key vulnerability. While cyberattacks played a role, RUSI concluded that the operation’s success depended on a multi-domain approach, with kinetic methods providing more reliable results than hacking alone.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
CyberattackState-Sponsored Operation
MOTIVATION
Regime change / Extraction of Venezuelan President
IMPACT
Power gridsAir defense radar systemsDowntime: Up to 36 hours in some neighborhoodsOperational Impact: Disruption of military and civilian infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for InfraShield ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on InfraShield's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with InfraShield ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view InfraShield's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?