What is the official website of GreenLake ?

The official website of GreenLake is http://hpe.com/GreenLake.

What is GreenLake's cybersecurity risk score?

GreenLake has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 749 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has GreenLake experienced?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has GreenLake been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does GreenLake have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does GreenLake have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does GreenLake comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does GreenLake have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does GreenLake comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, GreenLake is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does GreenLake have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,GreenLake is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does GreenLake operate in ?

GreenLake operates primarily in the IT Services and IT Consulting industry.

How many employees does GreenLake have ?

GreenLake employs approximately 9 people worldwide.

Does GreenLake own any subsidiaries ?

GreenLake presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does GreenLake have ?

GreenLake's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 48,514 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for GreenLake ?

GreenLake is classified under the NAICS code 5415, which corresponds to Computer Systems Design and Related Services.

Does GreenLake have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, GreenLake does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does GreenLake have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, GreenLake maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hpe-greenlake.

How many cybersecurity incidents has GreenLake experienced ?

As of October 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that GreenLake has experienced 14 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does GreenLake have ?

GreenLake has an estimated 41,946 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has GreenLake faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Vulnerability, Ransomware and Cyber Attack.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

GreenLake

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

749

/1000

Moderate

774

/1000

Fair

GreenLake Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

hpe.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

GreenLake is the cloud that delivers a unified platform experience, giving you one operating model across compute, storage, networking, and AI. Whether you manage workloads on-prem, in the public cloud, or at the edge, you get a consistent experience, shared data, and unified control.

GreenLake

GreenLake CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Cyber Attack

100

8/2026

HEW1788547244

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

6/2026

SUPHEW178524145...

HPE Aruba Networkin...

Vulnerability

4/2026

ARU1775831194

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

2/2026

HEW1772540968

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

2/2026

HEW1770906520

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

1/2026

HEW1769152921

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Ransomware

100

1/2026

HEW1788431072

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

100

12/2025

HEW1768563793

GreenLake

Vulnerability

6/2025

HEW723072225

GreenLake

Vulnerability

100

6/2024

HEW411030525

GreenLake

Breach

100

5/2023

HEW509235009212...

GreenLake

Breach

100

11/2021

ARU826111122

GreenLake

Breach

100

10/2016

HEW513092125

Hewlett Packard Ent...

Vulnerability

1/2013

SUPHEW178524875...

Loading…

A.I.

GreenLake Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for GreenLake

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenLake in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenLake in 2026.

Incident Types GreenLake vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenLake in 2026.

Incident History - GreenLake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

GreenLake Subsidiaries

GreenLake

IT Services and IT Consulting

Website: http://hpe.com/GreenLake

Company Size: 10,001+ employees

Hewlett Packard EnterpriseIT Services and IT Consulting

Axis, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023Computer and Network Security

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023Telecommunications

HPE Aruba NetworkingIT Services and IT Consulting

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017IT Services and IT Consulting

HPE Engage & GrowIT Services and IT Consulting

Hewlett Packard LabsIT Services and IT Consulting

HPE Financial ServicesFinancial Services

Loading…

GreenLake Similar Companies

Sopra Steria

soprasteria.com

Sopra Steria, a major Tech player in Europe with 51,000 employees in nearly 30 countries, is recognised for its consulting, digital services and solutions. It helps its clients drive their digital transformation and obtain tangible and sustainable benefits. The Group provides end-to-end solutions to make large companies and organisations more competitive by combining in-depth knowledge of a wide range of business sectors and innovative technologies with a collaborative approach. Sopra Steria places people at the heart of everything it does and is committed to putting digital to work for its clients in order to build a positive future for all. In 2024, the Group generated revenues of €5.8 billion. The world is how we shape it

Accenture in India

accenture.com

Accenture is a global professional services company with leading capabilities in digital, cloud and security. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries, we offer Strategy and Consulting, Interactive, Technology and Operations services — all powered by the world’s largest network of Advanced Technology and Intelligent Operations centers. Our 699,000 people deliver on the promise of technology and human ingenuity every day, serving clients in more than 120 countries. We embrace the power of change to create value and shared success for our clients, people, shareholders, partners and communities. Visit us at accenture.com.

NTT DATA North America

nttdata.com

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digital future. As a Global Top Employer, we have diverse experts in more than 50 countries and a robust partner ecosystem of established and start-up companies. Our services include business and technology consulting, data and artificial intelligence, industry solutions, as well as the development, implementation and management of applications, infrastructure, and connectivity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

cb amazon.com

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and turn capital infrastructure expenses into variable costs. Businesses no longer need to plan and procure servers and other IT resources weeks or months in advance. Using AWS, businesses can take advantage of Amazon's expertise and economies of scale to access resources when their business needs them, delivering results faster and at a lower cost. Today, Amazon Web Services provides a highly reliable, scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that powers hundreds of thousands of businesses in 190 countries around the world. With data center locations in the U.S., Europe, Singapore, and Japan, customers across all industries are taking advantage of our low cost, elastic, open and flexible, secure platform.

Asurion

cb asurion.com

As the world’s leading tech care company, Asurion eliminates the fears and frustrations associated with technology, to ensure our 300 million customers get the most out of their devices, appliances and connections. We provide insurance, repair, replacement, installation and 24/7 support for everything from cellphones to laptops and household appliances. Our experts are available online, on the phone, at one of our more than 800 stores, or can even come to you.

Infosys

infosys.com

Infosys is a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting. We enable clients in more than 50 countries to navigate their digital transformation. With over three decades of experience in managing the systems and workings of global enterprises, we expertly steer our clients through their digital journey. We do it by enabling the enterprise with an AI-powered core that helps prioritize the execution of change. We also empower the business with agile digital at scale to deliver unprecedented levels of performance and customer delight. Our always-on learning agenda drives their continuous improvement through building and transferring digital skills, expertise, and ideas from our innovation ecosystem. Visit www.infosys.com to see how Infosys (NYSE: INFY) can help your enterprise navigate your next.

Kyndryl

kyndryl.com

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on our foundation of excellence by creating systems in new ways. Bringing in the right partners, investing in our business, and working side-by-side with our customers to unlock potential. We're raising the bar. Our experience speaks for itself: We have tens of thousands of highly skilled employees around the world serving most of the Fortune 100 companies. But our purpose is what drives us: Advancing the vital systems that power human progress. Because when a digital ecosystem is healthy, it can more readily adapt and support continuous growth and that opens up a world of possibility for everyone. Together, we are the heart of progress.

Cognizant

cognizant.ai

Cognizant (Nasdaq: CTSH) is an AI Builder and technology services provider, bridging the gap between AI investment and enterprise value. We build full-stack AI solutions powered by deep industry, process and engineering expertise — embedding an organization's unique context into technology systems that amplify human potential and drive tangible outcomes. From strategy to deployment, we help global enterprises move from AI ambition to AI impact and stay ahead in a fast-changing world. See how at cognizant.ai | Follow us @cognizant

TIVIT

tivit.com

TIVIT is a Brazil-based multinational company that offers enterprise-level digital solutions, and operates in ten countries in Latin America. We help our clients develop their businesses by offering industry-leading digital solutions divided into four main categories: Digital Business, Cloud Solutions, Digital Payments, and Technology Platforms. For over 19 years, we have been developing cutting-edge technology, digital solutions and hybrid-cloud-based services to help companies overcome their most demanding challenges. With proven expertise in several areas, such as payments, financial services, utilities, retail and infrastructure, TIVIT is a technologically independent company that integrates different platforms, bringing forth innovative solutions that improve our clients’ competitiveness. Eight out of Brazil’s ten biggest companies, and 100 out of the biggest 500 in Latin America rely on TIVIT’s technological expertise to bring efficiency and innovation to their businesses.

Loading…

NEWS

GreenLake CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-77684

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile HF role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c does not release the AT command buffers that are still queued on hf->tx_pending when the RFCOMM DLC goes down. hfp_hf_disconnected() only cancelled the work items and cleared hf->acl, and no other code path ever dequeues those buffers, so each one is permanently lost from the fixed hf_pool (CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN + 1 buffers, i.e. two in the default configuration). The same function also left BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_CONNECTED set, and hfp_hf_create() wiped the object with memset() as soon as hf->acl was NULL, without checking whether hf->work, hf->slc_work or hf->deferred_work was still pending or running. The remote Audio Gateway peer controls the trigger end to end and needs no application involvement: an unsolicited +BCS: 1 response makes bcs_handle() call bt_hfp_hf_select_codec() and queue an AT+BCS buffer, which cannot be transmitted while BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_RX_ONGOING is set, and an immediately following RFCOMM DISC strands that buffer. Repeating the connect / +BCS / disconnect cycle a couple of times empties hf_pool for good. With the pool exhausted, HFP command sending fails permanently, and because hfp_hf_send_cmd() allocates with K_FOREVER (bt_rfcomm_create_pdu() → bt_conn_create_pdu()) from the Bluetooth RX context — where that timeout is not downgraded to K_NO_WAIT — one further +BCS from the peer parks the Bluetooth RX thread inside net_buf_alloc() with no possible waker, halting all HCI event processing until the device is rebooted. Separately, reusing the HF slot while a work handler was still queued or running allowed memset() to wipe live k_work items out from under the system workqueue, corrupting shared kernel workqueue state. Exploitation requires an established HFP session (for SSP devices L2CAP enforces authentication before the RFCOMM channel is reachable) and a build with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19595

SUMMARY

The user-mode syscall verifier z_vrfy_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() in subsys/rtio/rtio_syscalls.c validated its two output parameters, buff and buff_len, with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() rather than K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(). Both are pure out-parameters: z_impl_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() stores the mempool buffer address and its length through them. The distinction is enforced by every architecture validator — arch_buffer_validate() on RISC-V PMP explicitly accepts the global __rom_region/__rodata_region for reads only, and the ARM MPU validators accept P_RO_U_RO and P_RW_U_RO regions for reads only — so a read-validated pointer is not necessarily writable by the calling thread. An unprivileged user-mode thread that has been granted access to an RTIO context (rtio_access_grant()) can invoke the rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() syscall with buff/buff_len pointing at memory it may read but not write, and with a completion-queue entry whose flags field it fully controls (only RTIO_CQE_FLAG_MEMPOOL_BUFFER in flags[7:0] is required; flags[19:8] and flags[31:20] supply the block index and count). The kernel then performs a pointer-sized and a 4-byte store through those addresses while running in supervisor mode. Reaching the store requires CONFIG_USERSPACE together with CONFIG_RTIO_SYS_MEM_BLOCKS, the configuration behind RTIO_DEFINE_WITH_MEMPOOL; without the latter the implementation returns -ENOTSUP and writes nothing. Two outcomes follow. If the target lies in a memory-domain partition declared K_MEM_PARTITION_P_RW_U_RO (privileged read-write, user read-only), the kernel-mode store succeeds and deposits partly attacker-chosen values into memory the memory domain had marked read-only for that thread, bypassing the partition's write protection. If the target lies in globally readable but unwritable memory such as .text/.rodata in flash, the store faults in kernel mode; the fault is delivered to z_fatal_error() and the default k_sys_fatal_error_handler() halts or reboots the device, giving an unprivileged thread a reliable full denial of service. The read-permission check does bound the damage: the address must still be readable by the calling thread, so kernel-private memory cannot be targeted and no confidential data is disclosed. The fix replaces both checks with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(), so a thread lacking write permission is terminated by K_OOPS before the implementation runs; the cqe argument correctly remains read-validated.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19178

SUMMARY

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative privileges due to a race condition.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292610

CVE-2026-112991

SUMMARY

The html_to_markdown expansion module in MISP Modules contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its is_safe_url() URL validation function. The BLOCKED_RANGES list used to reject unsafe destination addresses was incomplete, omitting several critical IP address ranges. Specifically, the following ranges were not blocked: 0.0.0.0/8 (unspecified, which routes to loopback on Linux), 100.64.0.0/10 (carrier-grade NAT per RFC 6598), ::/128 (IPv6 unspecified), fc00::/7 (IPv6 Unique Local Addresses), and fe80::/10 (IPv6 link-local). The existing list only covered IPv4 loopback (127.0.0.0/8), RFC 1918 private ranges, IPv4 link-local (169.254.0.0/16), and IPv6 loopback (::1/128). An authenticated user with the ability to create or modify MISP attributes that trigger the html_to_markdown expansion module could supply URLs pointing to these unblocked internal address ranges. Because the module fetches the URL server-side to convert HTML content to Markdown, the request is made from the MISP server's network context. This allows an attacker to probe and read responses from internal services, carrier-grade NAT infrastructure, or link-local endpoints that would otherwise be unreachable from external networks. IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms (e.g., [::ffff:0.0.0.0]) also bypassed the existing checks. The security impact is primarily confidentiality: an attacker can read data served by internal services reachable from the MISP server. The MISP instance itself is not compromised, but it is abused as a proxy to access otherwise restricted network resources.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/98a1c2c2f297665dd8d4609e9cd644007a57516b

CVE-2026-112372

SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in H3C Magic NX15 V100R017. This affects the function importprofile of the file /api/upload. This manipulation of the argument fileName causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.7

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

GreenLake Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

GreenLake A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

GreenLake CyberSecurity News & History

GreenLake Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for GreenLake

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types GreenLake vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - GreenLake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenLake Subsidiaries

GreenLake

GreenLake Similar Companies

Sopra Steria

Accenture in India

NTT DATA North America

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Asurion

Infosys

Kyndryl

Cognizant

TIVIT

GreenLake CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

GreenLake CyberSecurity News & History

GreenLake Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for GreenLake

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types GreenLake vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - GreenLake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenLake Subsidiaries

GreenLake

GreenLake Similar Companies

Sopra Steria

Accenture in India

NTT DATA North America

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Asurion

Infosys

Kyndryl

Cognizant

TIVIT

GreenLake CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo