Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hewlett Packard Enterprise » HEW1772540968

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HEW1772540968)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-3
Company Score Before Incident779 / 1000
Company Score After Incident776 / 1000
Company LinkView Hewlett Packard Enterprise Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHEW1772540968
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORNetwork
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE26/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hewlett Packard Enterprise Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hewlett Packard Enterprise breach identified under incident ID HEW1772540968.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hewlett-packard-enterprise, the number of followers: 3782913, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 90162 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 779 and after the incident was 776 with a difference of -3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hewlett Packard Enterprise and their customers.

On 27 February 2026, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) disclosed Authentication Bypass issues under the banner "HPE Patches Critical Authentication Bypass Flaw in AutoPass License Server".

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) has addressed a severe remote authentication-bypass vulnerability in its AutoPass License Server (APLS), tracked as CVE-2026-23600, which could allow unauthenticated attackers to bypass login controls over the network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting AutoPass License Server (APLS).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Restricting network access to license servers, isolating them behind VPNs or dedicated management networks, and began remediation that includes Upgrading to APLS 9.19 or later.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Organizations running affected versions are advised to apply the update promptly to mitigate exposure to potential unauthorized access.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating severe remote authentication-bypass vulnerability in its AutoPass License Server (APLS) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bypass login controls over the network...grant attackers access to protected functionality without valid credentials. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating authentication-bypass vulnerability...could allow unauthenticated attackers to bypass login controls. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material (T1550) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bypass login controls over the network...no required privileges, and no user interaction. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating network-based exploitation with low attack complexity...access to protected functionality. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (90%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material (80%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)

Sources & References