Google Cloud
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
google-cloud
Website:
Employees number:
None employees
Number of followers:
3,097,955
NAICS:
5112
Industry Type:
Homepage:
google.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
GOO_2902781
Scan Status:
In-progress
Google Cloud Company CyberSecurity Posture
google.com
Google Cloud accelerates every organization’s ability to digitally transform its business and industry. We deliver enterprise-grade solutions that leverage Google’s cutting-edge technology, and tools that help developers build more sustainably. Customers in more than 200 countries and territories turn to Google Cloud as their trusted partner to enable growth and solve their most critical business problems.
Google Cloud A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Google Cloud Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 849
Google Cloud
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Google Cloud Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Google Cloud
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Google Cloud Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
23
Attack Types
4
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Google commenced notifying its staff members of a breach of data that happened at a third-party company that provides benefits. Google Inc. began informing the concerned parties of an email gaffe that resulted in a data breach containing their private and sensitive information. The revelation followed the discovery by a vendor specialising in employee/staff benefits administration services that an email containing confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel had been accidentally forwarded to the incorrect recipient. Based on preliminary reports, no evidence of misuse, abuse, or malevolent intent was found. Additionally, according to logs from both parties, no one else has willfully seen, stored, or released this document locally, remotely, or to any other party.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Images of the upcoming Google Pixel 9a have allegedly leaked, showing the colors and design of the device, including AI features and other hardware details. The leaks, including those from tipster Evan Blass, hint at the absence of the signature Pixel camera visor, among other features. These leaks may impact the anticipation and marketing strategies for the release of the Pixel 9a. As the leaks continue, they potentially affect customer expectations and company reputation, even though the actual device specifics are yet to be confirmed.
Google Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Google Inc. on May 6, 2016. The breach occurred on March 29, 2016, when a third-party vendor mistakenly sent a document containing names and Social Security numbers of some Googlers to an unauthorized recipient. The number of affected individuals is currently unknown.
Google: Google to pay $1.375 billion to settle Texas data privacy violations
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: **Google Settles $1.375 Billion Texas Biometric Privacy Lawsuit** Google has reached a $1.375 billion settlement with Texas over allegations that it unlawfully collected and used biometric data from millions of Texans without consent. The agreement, announced by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, marks the largest recovery nationwide against Google for data-privacy violations, surpassing a $391 million multistate settlement involving 40 states. The lawsuit, filed in 2022, accused Google of violating Texas’ biometric privacy laws by harvesting facial and voice scans since at least 2015 to bolster its targeted advertising business. The state also alleged that Google tracked users’ locations and search activity—even in Chrome’s incognito mode—without proper disclosure. Paxton’s office emphasized the settlement as a landmark enforcement action, reinforcing that tech companies are not exempt from legal accountability. Google, however, stated that the agreement resolves older claims tied to policies it has since updated, framing it as a closure of past disputes rather than an admission of wrongdoing. The case follows Texas’ aggressive stance against tech giants, including a $1.4 billion settlement with Meta in 2024 over similar facial recognition violations. In January 2025, Paxton also sued Allstate and its subsidiary Arity for allegedly misusing driving data from over 45 million Americans.
Google and YouTube: Nearly 94 Billion Stolen Cookies Found on Dark Web
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: **Billions of Stolen Cookies Flood Dark Web, Exposing User Accounts and Personal Data** A recent investigation by NordVPN and threat exposure platform NordStellar has uncovered a massive trove of stolen internet cookies—approximately **93.7 billion**—available for sale on dark web marketplaces. The analysis, conducted between **April 23 and April 30, 2025**, examined data from Telegram channels, revealing that **15.6 billion** of these cookies were still active, posing an immediate security risk. The stolen cookies contained sensitive data, including **user IDs (18 billion), session tokens (1.2 billion), names, email addresses, locations, and even passwords**. Session cookies, in particular, allow attackers to hijack active user sessions, granting unauthorized access to accounts without requiring passwords. The compromised data also enables **targeted phishing attacks and identity theft**. The majority of stolen cookies originated from major platforms, with **Google services accounting for over 4.5 billion**, followed by **YouTube and Microsoft (each over 1 billion)**. The primary theft method involved **malware, particularly infostealers like Redline**, which was responsible for stealing nearly **42 billion cookies**. The findings highlight the growing threat of cookie-based attacks, where seemingly harmless browser files become tools for cybercriminals to exploit personal and corporate security.
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation:
Description: The attack involved a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting users via deceptive emails disguised as legitimate communications from Google, complete with official branding. The emails lured recipients with offers for web referencing services or product resale, ultimately directing them to contact a WhatsApp number. By shifting the interaction to WhatsApp—a private messaging platform—the attackers bypassed Google’s internal monitoring systems, enabling unrestricted fraudulent activity. Victims were likely exposed to financial scams, credential harvesting, or further social engineering exploits under the guise of business transactions. While the article does not specify data breaches or direct financial losses to Google itself, the reputational damage stems from the exploitation of its brand to facilitate fraud, eroding user trust in its email security measures. The attack leveraged psychological manipulation and platform gaps to execute the scam, highlighting vulnerabilities in user awareness and cross-platform security oversight.
Google, GSMA, Metropolitan Police and Apple: Cops want Apple, Google to kill stolen phones remotely
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: **UK Lawmakers Press Apple and Google Over Stolen Smartphone Protections** UK legislators grilled Apple and Google in a House of Commons hearing over their failure to implement measures that would allow stolen smartphones to be remotely locked, reset, or blocked from accessing cloud services—a request repeatedly made by the Metropolitan Police. During the session, MPs expressed frustration over what they perceived as resistance from the tech giants, suggesting commercial incentives may be influencing their stance. Apple and Google, however, argued that such measures could introduce new fraud risks, including account takeovers and blackmail attempts. **The Scale of the Problem** The Met Police reported a sharp rise in smartphone thefts, with 80,000 devices stolen in London in 2024—up from 64,000 in 2023. Apple devices account for roughly 80% of stolen phones, with an estimated annual replacement value of £50 million ($67 million). Most stolen devices are funneled through criminal networks and resold abroad, primarily in Algeria, China, and Hong Kong. **Current Limitations** While the GSMA industry association allows stolen phones to be blocked at a network level using their IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) numbers, this only covers about 10% of global networks. The Met Police has proposed an international cloud-level block, where reported stolen devices would be barred from accessing Apple or Google services. Security experts argue this could drastically reduce resale value and theft incentives. **Industry Responses** Apple’s Gary Davis acknowledged the risks of IMEI-based blocking, citing concerns over fraud vectors, including impersonation attacks that could lead to account deletions or blackmail. Google’s Simon Wingrove noted that Android devices can already be locked or wiped via the *Find My Device* app, but it remains unclear whether this prevents stolen phones from being reused with new accounts. **Potential Solutions** Dion Price, CEO of Trustonic—a company that provides remote locking for supply chain distributors—suggested a government-regulated system using IMEI data already collected for trade and tax purposes. Such a system could enable near-instant global locking of stolen devices, but only if phones are registered at first activation. The debate highlights the tension between security, user protection, and commercial interests as lawmakers push for stronger anti-theft measures.
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Over 32,000 users have been impacted by the Mandrake Android spyware, which was embedded in five apps on the Google Play Store. This malicious software enabled attackers to gain full control of infected devices and exfiltrate personal data. The spyware employed sophisticated evasion and obfuscation techniques, including the hiding of its malicious payload in native libraries and implementing a kill-switch to remove all traces of its presence. Despite the advanced nature of the attack, the apps remained undetected on the official marketplace for an extended period, evidencing the significant threat and potential impact on users' privacy and security.
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: A significant search engine optimization (SEO) campaign hacked over 15,000 websites. The threat actors set up the attack to divert website visitors to phoney Q&A discussion boards. The attacks were mostly discovered by Sucuri, and according to analysis, each compromised site that is utilized as a part of the plan comprises about 20,000 files used in the campaign to spam search engines, with WordPress making up the majority of the sites. The threat actors probably tried to conduct ad fraud.
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The SpyLend malware, distributed through Google Play as the app 'Finance Simplified', targeted Indian users and facilitated financial crimes. Infected over 100,000 devices, the malware offered fake loan applications that captured extensive personal data, including contacts, call logs, and photos. This accessed sensitive information was then utilized for blackmail and extortion, with some cases involving manipulated victims' photos. Despite negative reviews on Google Play, the app's rapid download growth within a week and the misuse of personal data for predatory practices highlight a significant lapse in app store security and user safety.
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Google Play was infiltrated by Mandrake Android spyware, resulting in over 32,000 downloads of compromised apps since 2022. This sophisticated malware allowed attackers complete control over infected devices, securing sensitive data exfiltration, and used a 'seppuku' feature for self-removal after its malicious deeds, thus leaving no traces. Despite the apps remaining undetected on the official platform for a significant period, most affected users are from countries like Canada, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Peru, and the UK, with one app alone achieving over 30,000 downloads. The discovery underscores the evolving tactics of attackers and the challenges faced by marketplaces in preventing sophisticated threats.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: Google has issued an urgent warning about a critical vulnerability in Google Chromium, designated as CVE-2025-6558. The vulnerability, caused by improper input validation in Chromium’s ANGLE and GPU components, allows attackers to execute sandbox escape attacks through malicious HTML. This vulnerability affects all Chromium-based browsers, including Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Opera, potentially putting millions of users at risk. The flaw enables remote code execution and bypasses browser security controls, making it a significant threat to users' data and system integrity.
Google Patches Gemini Enterprise Vulnerability Exposing Corporate Data
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: **GeminiJack: Google Patches Critical Zero-Click Exploit Targeting Enterprise Systems** A newly discovered zero-click vulnerability, dubbed **GeminiJack**, posed a severe threat to corporate data security by enabling attackers to infiltrate enterprise systems without any user interaction. The exploit leveraged flaws in how applications processed emails, calendar invites, and documents, allowing malicious actors to execute remote code or exfiltrate sensitive information. Unlike traditional attacks requiring user engagement, GeminiJack bypassed security measures entirely, making it particularly dangerous. Delivery methods included manipulated email processing, malicious calendar invitations, and embedded code in document files—all exploiting weaknesses in data-handling protocols. Google responded swiftly, deploying a **security patch** across affected enterprise applications, enhancing monitoring systems, and reinforcing data protection protocols. The company’s proactive measures aimed to neutralize the threat and prevent similar exploits. The incident underscores the growing sophistication of cyber threats, particularly zero-click exploits, which demand **rapid vulnerability identification and mitigation**. Enterprises are urged to adopt multi-layered security strategies, including regular software updates, risk assessments, and advanced intrusion detection, to defend against evolving attack vectors. The GeminiJack case serves as a critical reminder of the need for **continuous vigilance** in enterprise cybersecurity.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Security researchers have uncovered a significant vulnerability in Google Gemini for Workspace that enables threat actors to embed hidden malicious instructions within emails. The attack exploits the AI assistant’s 'Summarize this email' feature to display fabricated security warnings that appear to originate from Google itself, potentially leading to credential theft and social engineering attacks. The vulnerability affects Gmail, Docs, Slides, and Drive, potentially enabling AI worms across Google Workspace.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Security researchers identified three critical vulnerabilities in **Google’s Gemini AI assistant**, dubbed the 'Trifecta,' which could have allowed attackers to exploit hidden prompts in web requests, inject malicious commands via Chrome browsing history, and exfiltrate stored user data (including location and saved information) to external servers. The flaws affected **Gemini Cloud Assist, Search Personalization Model, and Browsing Tool**, enabling potential unauthorized control over cloud resources and AI-driven data leaks. While Google patched the issues by blocking dangerous links and reinforcing prompt injection defenses, the vulnerabilities may have been exploited before mitigation—particularly by users interacting with malicious websites or Gemini-tied cloud services. The incident underscores AI’s emerging role as both an attack vector and a target, with risks escalating as AI integrates deeper into daily-use services. Though the immediate threat is contained, the exposure highlights systemic gaps in AI security, where novel features may outpace safeguards, leaving user data and system integrity at risk.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A significant security vulnerability, known as 'ImageRunner', was identified in Google Cloud Platform affecting Google Artifact Registry and Google Container Registry. The issue allowed escalated privileges to access private container images, risking data leaks and unauthorized access. Although fixed, the vulnerability could enable attackers to exploit permissions via Cloud Run to extract sensitive information or infiltrate cloud resources. The exploit required specific Cloud Run edit permissions and could be utilized to create a malicious revision to exfiltrate data or compromise the service. Google addressed this by requiring explicit permissions for accessing container images during Cloud Run deployments.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Security researchers uncovered **Pixnapping**, a 12-year-old resurrected data-stealing attack exploiting a hardware side channel (GPU.zip) in Android devices (versions 13–16). The vulnerability (**CVE-2025-48561**) allows malicious apps to **steal sensitive data** from other apps (e.g., Google Maps, Signal, Venmo, Gmail) and websites, including **2FA codes from Google Authenticator**, by inferring pixel values via rendering time analysis. The attack leverages Android’s **Custom Tabs API**, **Intents**, and **blur API** to overlay semi-transparent windows and measure VSync callbacks, bypassing cross-origin restrictions. While Google issued partial patches in **September and December 2024 security bulletins**, researchers found a **workaround** (under embargo), and the core **GPU.zip side channel remains unpatched**. The attack’s slow leak rate (0.6–2.1 pixels/sec) is sufficient to exfiltrate critical data like authentication tokens. Google confirmed **no in-the-wild exploitation** yet, but the vulnerability exposes users to **large-scale credential theft, financial fraud, and account takeovers**. The flaw also enables attackers to **enumerate installed apps**, a privacy violation Google deemed unfixable. Mitigation efforts are ongoing, but the risk persists due to Android’s architectural limitations.
Google: CVE-2025-5419 Vulnerability: New Google Chrome Zero-Day Actively Exploited in the Wild
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: **Google Patches Actively Exploited Chrome Zero-Day (CVE-2025-5419)** Google has released emergency patches for three Chrome vulnerabilities, including **CVE-2025-5419**, a critical zero-day flaw actively exploited in the wild. The vulnerability, classified as an out-of-bounds read/write issue in Chrome’s **V8 JavaScript and WebAssembly engine**, allows remote attackers to trigger heap corruption via maliciously crafted HTML pages. If exploited, the flaw could enable arbitrary code execution or sandbox escapes, posing severe risks to users. The vulnerability affects **Chrome versions prior to 137.0.7151.68** and impacts all Chromium-based browsers, including **Microsoft Edge, Opera, and others**. The **Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)** has added CVE-2025-5419 to its **Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog**, confirming active exploitation. While Google has not disclosed specific attack details, the company acknowledged the threat and urged users to update immediately. Google deployed an initial mitigation via a **configuration update on May 28, 2025**, followed by full patches in **Chrome 137.0.7151.68/.69 (Windows/Mac) and 137.0.7151.68 (Linux)**. This marks the **third actively exploited Chrome zero-day in 2025**, highlighting the escalating threat landscape for web browsers. The incident aligns with findings from **Mandiant’s M-Trends 2025 Report**, which identified vulnerability exploitation as the **top initial access vector in 2024**, underscoring the need for proactive defense strategies against zero-day threats.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: McAfee researchers uncovered 15 SpyLoan Android apps available on Google Play, cumulatively achieving over 8 million installs, mainly targeting users across South America, Southeast Asia, and Africa. These apps engaged in social engineering tactics to siphon off sensitive user data and gain excessive permissions, leading to incidents of extortion, harassment, and considerable financial loss for the users. As a result of these malicious activities, some applications were taken down by Google for breaching Google Play policies, while others underwent updates by their developers to comply with regulations. Victims of these SpyLoan apps experienced various threats, including misuse of personal data and aggressive harassment strategies such as spamming contacts and leveraging personal photos or IDs for intimidation.
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A **Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability (CVE-2019-5786)** was discovered in **Google Chrome’s FileReader API**, exposing millions of users to remote code execution (RCE) risks. The flaw arose when JavaScript triggered the destruction of `FileReader` objects while asynchronous file operations were still pending, creating a window for attackers to manipulate freed memory during callback execution. Exploiting this, adversaries could craft malicious web pages to corrupt memory, bypass Chrome’s sandbox protections, and execute arbitrary code within the browser’s renderer process.The vulnerability was particularly severe due to Chrome’s widespread use and the complexity of its JavaScript engine, which manages intricate object lifecycles. Attackers leveraged **heap spraying** and **type confusion** techniques to overwrite critical data structures, enabling full system compromise on unpatched devices. While Google patched the issue in an emergency update (Chrome 72.0.3626.121), the exploit demonstrated how UAF vulnerabilities in memory-unsafe languages (C/C++) remain a persistent threat, even in modern, sandboxed applications. The incident underscored the need for stricter memory safety mechanisms, such as **AddressSanitizer (ASan)** in development and **Control Flow Integrity (CFI)** in production.
Google Chrome
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the Google Chrome zero-day to its catalog of exploited vulnerabilities. The bug exists in a third-party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability and compromise a victim when they simply visit a website that hosts malicious HTML code.
Google Chrome
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Google Chrome encountered a critical zero-day vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-2783, being exploited through a campaign named Operation ForumTroll. Targeting various institutions, the flaw allowed attackers to escape Chrome’s sandbox, potentially enabling them to execute arbitrary code on victims' systems, with minimal interaction. Despite a prompt patch release in Chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178, the situation posed espionage risks, likely attributed to an APT group's involvement. Organizations were urged to upgrade their browsers and enhance security protocols to prevent exploitation.
Amazon Web Services, Palo Alto Networks, Google Cloud and Wakefield Research: Every organization faced at least one AI-related cyberattack within the last year, says research
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: **AI Systems Under Siege: Every Organization Targeted in Past Year, Unit 42 Finds** A new report from Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 reveals a stark reality: every organization surveyed has faced at least one attack on its AI systems in the past year. The findings, derived from a survey of over 2,800 participants across 10 countries—including the U.S., UK, Germany, Japan, and India—highlight a growing and systemic vulnerability in AI security, with cloud infrastructure at the heart of the problem. Conducted between September 29 and October 17, 2025, the research underscores that AI security cannot rely on reactive measures. Instead, organizations must adopt a proactive, scientific approach to safeguarding AI systems, given their complexity and critical applications. The report emphasizes that AI security is inherently tied to cloud infrastructure, where most AI workloads—data storage, model training, and application deployment—reside. Cloud platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, while enabling AI scalability, also present prime targets for cyberattacks. Exploitable weaknesses in cloud security can lead to unauthorized access, data theft, or operational disruptions. Traditional security measures often fall short in addressing the unique challenges of AI, such as securing data pipelines, managing identities, and protecting cloud-hosted workloads. The *State of Cloud Security Report 2025* argues that the only effective defense is a holistic approach to cloud security, treating it as foundational to AI protection. This includes enforcing strong policies, encryption standards, regular audits, and isolating AI workloads from cloud vulnerabilities. As AI integrates deeper into sectors like healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, the stakes rise—breaches could compromise sensitive data, disrupt services, or even endanger lives. Emerging threats, such as adversarial attacks designed to manipulate AI models, further complicate the landscape. The report calls for collaboration between cloud providers, AI developers, and security teams to build robust frameworks and real-time threat detection tools. The future of AI security hinges on securing the cloud infrastructure that powers it, ensuring resilience against an evolving threat landscape.
Google Cloud Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Google Cloud
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
Google Cloud has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Google Cloud has 26.58% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Google Cloud vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Google Cloud reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Google Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Google Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Google Cloud Company Subsidiaries
Google Cloud accelerates every organization’s ability to digitally transform its business and industry. We deliver enterprise-grade solutions that leverage Google’s cutting-edge technology, and tools that help developers build more sustainably. Customers in more than 200 countries and territories turn to Google Cloud as their trusted partner to enable growth and solve their most critical business problems.
Loading...
Google Cloud Similar Companies
Instacart, the leading grocery technology company in North America, works with grocers and retailers to transform how people shop. The company partners with more than 1,500 national, regional, and local retail banners to facilitate online shopping, delivery and pickup services from more than 85,000
KPIT
About KPIT KPIT is reimagining the future of mobility, forging ahead with group companies and partners to shape a world that is cleaner, smarter, and safer. With over 25 years of specialized expertise in Mobility, KPIT is accelerating the transformation towards Software and AI-Defined Vehicles thr
Airbnb
Airbnb was born in 2007 when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe. Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experiences and services that make it p
Meta
Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further e
Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and
Agoda
At Agoda, we bridge the world through travel. We aim to make it easy and rewarding for more travelers to explore and experience the amazing world we live in. We do so by enabling more people to see the world for less – with our best-value deals across our 4,700,000+ hotels and holiday properties, 13
DiDi
DiDi Global Inc. is a leading mobility technology platform. It offers a wide range of app-based services across Asia Pacific, Latin America, and other global markets, including ride hailing, taxi hailing, designated driving, hitch and other forms of shared mobility as well as certain energy and vehi
Adobe
Adobe is the global leader in digital media and digital marketing solutions. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone – from emerging artists to global brands – to bring digital creations to life and deliver immersive, compelling experiences to the right person at the right mo
[24]7.ai
[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent productivity and satisfaction; a
.png)
Google Cloud CyberSecurity News
December 20, 2025 10:44 AM
Google Cloud secures $10B deal with a cybersecurity giant
Google Cloud, a subsidiary of Alphabet, has signed an expanded partnership with cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks.
December 20, 2025 08:35 AM
Google Cloud lands a security services deal with Palo Alto Networks
Alphabet's cloud computing unit and cybersecurity company Palo Alto Networks have announced an expanded partnership, which was by far Google...
December 20, 2025 03:40 AM
Google Cloud secures Palo Alto Networks deal near $10 billion, source says
Alphabet's Google Cloud and cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks on Friday announced an expanded partnership that a source described as...
December 19, 2025 11:14 PM
Google Cloud announces deal with Palo Alto Networks approaching $10 billion
Palo Alto Networks will migrate key internal workloads to Google Cloud as part of a multibillion-dollar deal announced by the companies.
December 19, 2025 09:34 PM
Palo Alto Networks inks multibillion-dollar AI deal with Google Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Inc. will move some of its most important internal workloads to Google LLC's cloud platform as part of a partnership...
December 19, 2025 07:56 PM
Analysis: Google Cloud Inks An Interesting Deal With Palo Alto Networks
The Google Cloud-Palo Alto Networks deal announced Friday comes as Google is in the final stages of acquiring one of Palo Alto Networks'...
December 19, 2025 05:41 PM
Palo Alto strikes multibillion dollar deal with Google Cloud
Cybersecurity company Palo Alto Networks expanded its strategic partnership with Google Cloud to migrate key workloads to the cloud as part...
December 19, 2025 05:29 PM
Palo Alto Networks stock: does Google Cloud deal warrant buying it?
Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ: PANW) announced a landmark deal with Google Cloud on Dec. 19, aimed at integrating artificial intelligence (AI)...
December 19, 2025 05:22 PM
Google Cloud deepens cooperation with Palo Alto Networks, signing a nearly USD 10 billion AI security deal.
GoogleCloud has expanded its strategic partnership with cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks by signing a multi-year contract worth nearly...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Google Cloud CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Google Cloud
The official website of Google Cloud is https://cloud.google.com/.
Google Cloud’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 823, reflecting their Good security posture.
How many security badges does Google Cloud’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Google Cloud have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Google Cloud have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Google Cloud comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Google Cloud have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Google Cloud comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Google Cloud is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Google Cloud have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Google Cloud is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Google Cloud
Google Cloud operates primarily in the Software Development industry.
Number of Employees at Google Cloud
Google Cloud employs approximately None employees people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Google Cloud
Google Cloud presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Google Cloud’s LinkedIn Followers
Google Cloud’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,097,955 followers.
NAICS Classification of Google Cloud
Google Cloud is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.
Google Cloud’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Google Cloud does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Google Cloud’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Google Cloud maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/google-cloud.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Google Cloud
As of December 26, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Google Cloud has experienced 23 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Google Cloud has an estimated 27,891 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Google Cloud ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Malware, Vulnerability, Cyber Attack and Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Google Cloud ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $1.43 billion.
How does Google Cloud detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with sucuri, and remediation measures with removal of malicious extensions, and communication strategy with informing concerned parties, and containment measures with apps taken down, containment measures with updates by developers, and containment measures with patch release in chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178, and remediation measures with upgrade browsers, remediation measures with enhance security protocols, and remediation measures with requiring explicit permissions for accessing container images during cloud run deployments, and containment measures with inbound html linting, containment measures with llm firewall configurations, containment measures with post-processing filters, and remediation measures with html sanitization at ingestion, remediation measures with improved context attribution, remediation measures with enhanced explainability features, and containment measures with apply vendor-provided mitigations, containment measures with discontinue use of affected products if patches are unavailable, and remediation measures with apply patches, remediation measures with update to the latest browser versions, and third party assistance with security researchers (e.g., cve-2019-5786 disclosure), third party assistance with compiler/toolchain developers (e.g., asan, clang), and containment measures with patching vulnerable code (e.g., chrome updates), containment measures with disabling affected features (e.g., filereader api workarounds), containment measures with isolating vulnerable components (e.g., sandboxing), and remediation measures with code refactoring to eliminate uaf conditions, remediation measures with adoption of memory-safe languages (e.g., rust for new components), remediation measures with integration of static/dynamic analysis tools (asan, valgrind), remediation measures with pointer nullification post-free, remediation measures with reference counting for shared objects, and recovery measures with rollback to stable versions (if exploited in production), recovery measures with memory state validation for critical objects, and communication strategy with security advisories (e.g., chrome releases blog), communication strategy with cve publications (e.g., cve-2019-5786), communication strategy with developer guidance on secure coding practices, and enhanced monitoring with runtime uaf detection (e.g., asan in debug builds), enhanced monitoring with heap integrity checks in production, and containment measures with public awareness campaigns (e.g., google's security advisories), containment measures with email filtering updates, and remediation measures with user education on phishing tactics, remediation measures with reporting mechanisms for suspicious emails, and communication strategy with warnings via official channels, communication strategy with collaboration with whatsapp to block fraudulent accounts, and enhanced monitoring with monitoring for brand abuse, enhanced monitoring with dark web scanning for stolen data, and and third party assistance with academic researchers (uc berkeley, uw, cmu, ucsd), and containment measures with partial patch in september 2024 android security bulletin, containment measures with planned december 2024 patch, containment measures with limiting blur api calls (bypassed by attackers), and communication strategy with public disclosure via acm ccs 2024 paper, communication strategy with media statements to the register, communication strategy with google play detection mechanisms, and and containment measures with blocked gemini from rendering dangerous links, containment measures with strengthened defenses against prompt injections, and remediation measures with patching vulnerabilities in gemini cloud assist, search personalization model, and browsing tool, and communication strategy with public disclosure via security researchers; user advisories on safe ai usage, and containment measures with security patch integrated into enterprise applications, and remediation measures with enhanced monitoring and alert systems, remediation measures with comprehensive review of existing data protection protocols, and enhanced monitoring with advanced intrusion detection systems, and containment measures with product and procedure changes implemented, and remediation measures with privacy controls enhanced in services, and communication strategy with public statement acknowledging settlement and changes, and third party assistance with trustonic (provides locking technology for smartphones), and law enforcement notified with metropolitan police engaged with apple and google, and communication strategy with public statements by apple and google to uk parliament, and third party assistance with nordvpn, nordstellar, and communication strategy with public advisory on protective measures, and third party assistance with unit 42 (palo alto networks), and remediation measures with proactive cloud security policies, encryption standards, regular security audits, isolation of ai workloads, and network segmentation with recommended as part of holistic security approach, and enhanced monitoring with recommended for ai workloads and cloud environments, and containment measures with configuration update and emergency patches, and remediation measures with chrome versions 137.0.7151.68/.69 for windows and mac, 137.0.7151.68 for linux, and communication strategy with vendor advisory confirming active exploitation..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: SEO Campaign Hack
Description: A significant search engine optimization (SEO) campaign hacked over 15,000 websites. The threat actors set up the attack to divert website visitors to phoney Q&A discussion boards. The attacks were mostly discovered by Sucuri, and according to analysis, each compromised site that is utilized as a part of the plan comprises about 20,000 files used in the campaign to spam search engines, with WordPress making up the majority of the sites. The threat actors probably tried to conduct ad fraud.
Type: SEO Campaign Hack
Attack Vector: Compromised Websites
Motivation: Ad Fraud
Title: Google Chrome Zero-Day Vulnerability
Description: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the Google Chrome zero-day to its catalog of exploited vulnerabilities. The bug exists in a third-party library that other projects similarly depend on, but haven’t yet fixed. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability and compromise a victim when they simply visit a website that hosts malicious HTML code.
Type: Zero-Day Exploit
Attack Vector: Malicious Website
Vulnerability Exploited: Third-party library bug in Google Chrome
Title: Malicious Chrome Extensions Removed from Web Store
Description: Google has deleted 32 malicious extensions from the Chrome Web Store that could have changed search results and pushed spam or unwanted adverts. The extensions had legal functionality but contained dangerous behavior concealed in the payloads' obfuscated code.
Type: Malicious Software
Attack Vector: Malicious Extensions
Vulnerability Exploited: Obfuscated Code in Extensions
Motivation: SpamUnwanted Adverts
Title: Google Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor
Description: Google commenced notifying its staff members of a breach of data that happened at a third-party company that provides benefits.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Email Gaffe
Title: Google Play Infiltrated by Mandrake Android Spyware
Description: Google Play was infiltrated by Mandrake Android spyware, resulting in over 32,000 downloads of compromised apps since 2022. This sophisticated malware allowed attackers complete control over infected devices, securing sensitive data exfiltration, and used a 'seppuku' feature for self-removal after its malicious deeds, thus leaving no traces. Despite the apps remaining undetected on the official platform for a significant period, most affected users are from countries like Canada, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Peru, and the UK, with one app alone achieving over 30,000 downloads. The discovery underscores the evolving tactics of attackers and the challenges faced by marketplaces in preventing sophisticated threats.
Type: Malware
Attack Vector: Compromised Apps
Vulnerability Exploited: Download of malicious apps
Motivation: Data Exfiltration
Title: Mandrake Android Spyware
Description: Over 32,000 users have been impacted by the Mandrake Android spyware, which was embedded in five apps on the Google Play Store. This malicious software enabled attackers to gain full control of infected devices and exfiltrate personal data. The spyware employed sophisticated evasion and obfuscation techniques, including the hiding of its malicious payload in native libraries and implementing a kill-switch to remove all traces of its presence. Despite the advanced nature of the attack, the apps remained undetected on the official marketplace for an extended period, evidencing the significant threat and potential impact on users' privacy and security.
Type: Spyware
Attack Vector: Malicious Apps
Motivation: Data Exfiltration
Title: SpyLoan Android Apps Incident
Description: McAfee researchers uncovered 15 SpyLoan Android apps available on Google Play, cumulatively achieving over 8 million installs, mainly targeting users across South America, Southeast Asia, and Africa. These apps engaged in social engineering tactics to siphon off sensitive user data and gain excessive permissions, leading to incidents of extortion, harassment, and considerable financial loss for the users. As a result of these malicious activities, some applications were taken down by Google for breaching Google Play policies, while others underwent updates by their developers to comply with regulations. Victims of these SpyLoan apps experienced various threats, including misuse of personal data and aggressive harassment strategies such as spamming contacts and leveraging personal photos or IDs for intimidation.
Type: Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment
Attack Vector: Malicious Mobile Apps
Vulnerability Exploited: Social Engineering, Excessive Permissions
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Harassment
Title: SpyLend Malware Incident
Description: The SpyLend malware, distributed through Google Play as the app 'Finance Simplified', targeted Indian users and facilitated financial crimes. Infected over 100,000 devices, the malware offered fake loan applications that captured extensive personal data, including contacts, call logs, and photos. This accessed sensitive information was then utilized for blackmail and extortion, with some cases involving manipulated victims' photos. Despite negative reviews on Google Play, the app's rapid download growth within a week and the misuse of personal data for predatory practices highlight a significant lapse in app store security and user safety.
Type: Malware
Attack Vector: Mobile Application
Vulnerability Exploited: User Trust in App Store
Motivation: Financial Gain, Blackmail, Extortion
Title: Leaked Images of Google Pixel 9a
Description: Images of the upcoming Google Pixel 9a have allegedly leaked, showing the colors and design of the device, including AI features and other hardware details. The leaks, including those from tipster Evan Blass, hint at the absence of the signature Pixel camera visor, among other features. These leaks may impact the anticipation and marketing strategies for the release of the Pixel 9a. As the leaks continue, they potentially affect customer expectations and company reputation, even though the actual device specifics are yet to be confirmed.
Type: Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Disclosure
Threat Actor: Evan Blass
Motivation: Unauthorized Disclosure
Title: Operation ForumTroll: Exploitation of CVE-2025-2783 in Google Chrome
Description: Google Chrome encountered a critical zero-day vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-2783, being exploited through a campaign named Operation ForumTroll. Targeting various institutions, the flaw allowed attackers to escape Chrome’s sandbox, potentially enabling them to execute arbitrary code on victims' systems, with minimal interaction. Despite a prompt patch release in Chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178, the situation posed espionage risks, likely attributed to an APT group's involvement. Organizations were urged to upgrade their browsers and enhance security protocols to prevent exploitation.
Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Sandbox Escape
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-2783
Threat Actor: APT Group
Motivation: Espionage
Title: ImageRunner Vulnerability in Google Cloud Platform
Description: A significant security vulnerability, known as 'ImageRunner', was identified in Google Cloud Platform affecting Google Artifact Registry and Google Container Registry. The issue allowed escalated privileges to access private container images, risking data leaks and unauthorized access. Although fixed, the vulnerability could enable attackers to exploit permissions via Cloud Run to extract sensitive information or infiltrate cloud resources. The exploit required specific Cloud Run edit permissions and could be utilized to create a malicious revision to exfiltrate data or compromise the service. Google addressed this by requiring explicit permissions for accessing container images during Cloud Run deployments.
Type: Vulnerability Exploit
Attack Vector: Cloud Run Edit Permissions
Vulnerability Exploited: ImageRunner
Motivation: Data LeaksUnauthorized Access
Title: Google Gemini for Workspace Vulnerability
Description: A significant vulnerability in Google Gemini for Workspace enables threat actors to embed hidden malicious instructions within emails, leading to credential theft and social engineering attacks.
Type: Vulnerability Exploit
Attack Vector: Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code
Vulnerability Exploited: Indirect prompt injection (IPI)
Motivation: Credential theft, social engineering
Title: Critical Vulnerability in Google Chromium (CVE-2025-6558)
Description: CISA has issued an urgent warning about a critical vulnerability in Google Chromium that threat actors are actively exploiting. The vulnerability, designated as CVE-2025-6558, poses a significant security risk to millions of users across multiple web browsers that utilize the Chromium engine.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-22
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Malicious HTML pagesImproper Input Validation
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-6558
Motivation: Install malwareSteal sensitive dataEstablish persistent access
Title: Data Breach at Google Inc.
Description: A third-party vendor mistakenly sent a document containing names and Social Security numbers of some Googlers to an unauthorized recipient.
Date Detected: 2016-03-29
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2016-05-06
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor error
Vulnerability Exploited: Human error
Threat Actor: Unauthorized recipient
Title: Use-After-Free (UAF) Vulnerabilities in Memory-Unsafe Languages (C/C++)
Description: Use-after-free (UAF) vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to use a memory location after it has been freed, enabling attackers to manipulate program execution, corrupt data, or achieve arbitrary code execution. These vulnerabilities are prevalent in applications written in memory-unsafe languages like C and C++. They arise from flawed memory management practices, such as failing to nullify pointers after freeing memory or improper handling of object lifetimes. Exploitation often involves heap spraying, memory layout control, and advanced techniques like Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) to bypass mitigations like DEP and ASLR. High-profile cases include CVE-2019-5786 in Google Chrome, which allowed arbitrary code execution in the browser’s renderer process via JavaScript manipulation of FileReader objects. Mitigation requires a multi-layered approach, including static/dynamic analysis, memory-safe languages (e.g., Rust), runtime protections (e.g., ASan, CFI), and secure coding practices like pointer nullification and reference counting.
Type: Memory Corruption Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Memory Allocator ManipulationHeap SprayingDangling Pointer DereferenceFunction Pointer OverwriteVirtual Function Table CorruptionRace Conditions in Multithreaded CodeCallback-Based Object Lifetime ExploitationJavaScript Engine Manipulation (e.g., Chrome FileReader)Pointer Authentication Bypass
Vulnerability Exploited: Use-After-Free (UAF)Improper Pointer NullificationRace Conditions in Object DestructionType Confusion via Memory ReuseHeap Metadata CorruptionCVE-2019-5786 (Google Chrome FileReader)
Motivation: Arbitrary Code ExecutionPrivilege EscalationData CorruptionBypassing Security Mitigations (DEP, ASLR, CFI)Exploit Development for Malware DistributionTargeted Attacks on Browsers/OS/Critical Infrastructure
Title: Phishing Scam Impersonating Google via Email and WhatsApp
Description: Victims receive a legitimate-looking email with Google branding, offering SEO services or product resale opportunities. The email includes a WhatsApp number to contact, shifting the conversation to a private messaging platform where scammers operate freely without corporate oversight.
Type: Phishing / Social Engineering
Attack Vector: Email SpoofingMessaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human Trust in Branded Communications / Lack of Multi-Channel Verification
Threat Actor: Unidentified Scammers (Likely Organized Fraud Group)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Title: Pixnapping: Data-Stealing Attack on Android Devices via GPU Side Channel (CVE-2025-48561)
Description: Security researchers resurrected a 12-year-old data-stealing attack (dubbed 'Pixnapping') targeting Android devices. The attack exploits a hardware side channel (GPU.zip) to allow malicious apps to screenshot or leak sensitive information displayed in other apps (e.g., Google Maps, Signal, Venmo, Gmail) or websites, including 2FA codes from Google Authenticator. The vulnerability (CVE-2025-48561) affects Android versions 13–16 (up to build BP3A.250905.014) on devices like Google Pixel 6–9 and Samsung Galaxy S25. Google issued partial mitigations in September 2024 and plans further patches in December 2024, but no in-the-wild exploitation has been detected. The attack leverages Android Intents, Custom Tabs API, and VSync callbacks to measure rendering times and infer pixel values at a rate of 0.6–2.1 pixels/second.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-21
Type: Data Theft
Attack Vector: Malicious Android AppGPU Side Channel (GPU.zip)Android IntentsCustom Tabs APIWindow Blur APIVSync Callbacks
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-48561Android Activity LayeringMali GPU Data CompressionTiming Attack via Rendering Pipeline
Motivation: Research/Proof-of-ConceptPotential for Financial Gain (e.g., stealing 2FA codes, payment info)
Title: Gemini AI 'Trifecta' Vulnerabilities Discovered and Patched
Description: Security researchers discovered three vulnerabilities in Google’s Gemini AI assistant, dubbed the 'Trifecta.' The flaws were found in three components: **Gemini Cloud Assist** (tricked by hidden prompts in web requests, risking control over cloud resources), **Gemini Search Personalization Model** (injected harmful prompts via malicious websites, leaking personal data), and **Gemini Browsing Tool** (tricked into sending user data to malicious servers via web page summarization). Google patched these by blocking dangerous links and strengthening defenses against prompt injections. While the risk to users is now low, the incident highlights evolving AI security concerns as AI integrates deeper into daily services.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Hidden Prompts in Web RequestsMalicious Website InteractionAI Command Injection
Vulnerability Exploited: Gemini Cloud Assist (Log Summarization Flaw)Gemini Search Personalization Model (Prompt Injection via Browsing History)Gemini Browsing Tool (Web Page Summarization Data Exfiltration)
Title: GeminiJack Zero-Click Exploit Vulnerability
Description: A critical vulnerability, dubbed GeminiJack, was identified, posing significant risks to corporate data security. This zero-click exploit could leverage various delivery methods, particularly emails, calendar invites, and documents, to infiltrate enterprise systems without user interaction. Google’s prompt action to patch this vulnerability underscores their ongoing commitment to cybersecurity.
Type: Zero-Click Exploit
Attack Vector: Email processing systemsCalendar invitation structuresDocument files
Vulnerability Exploited: GeminiJack
Title: Google Biometric Data Privacy Violation Settlement
Description: Google agreed to a $1.375 billion settlement with the state of Texas over allegations that it collected and used biometric data of millions of Texans without proper consent. The lawsuit also accused Google of persistently tracking users' location and searches, including in Chrome's incognito mode.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2022
Date Resolved: 2025
Type: Data Privacy Violation
Motivation: Financial gain (targeted advertising)
Title: UK Legislators Question Apple and Google Over Lack of Smartphone Theft Protections
Description: UK Members of Parliament expressed concerns that Apple and Google have not implemented measures to remotely lock, reset, and block stolen smartphones from accessing cloud services, as requested by the Metropolitan Police. The tech companies cited potential fraud vectors and commercial incentives as reasons for their reluctance.
Type: Policy and Compliance Issue
Threat Actor: Criminal gangs
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Title: Widespread Data Exposure via Stolen Internet Cookies on Dark Web
Description: A recent investigation reveals approximately 93.7 billion stolen cookies available for sale in underground online marketplaces, posing severe privacy risks. The cookies contain sensitive personal data, including session IDs, names, email addresses, and passwords, which can be exploited for phishing attacks or identity theft. The majority of these cookies were stolen using malware such as infostealers, trojans, and keyloggers, with Redline being the most prolific.
Date Detected: 2025-04-23
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-04-30
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Malware (Infostealers, Trojans, Keyloggers)
Vulnerability Exploited: Stolen web cookies (session IDs, personal data)
Motivation: Financial gain, identity theft, phishing attacks
Title: Increasing Attacks on AI Systems via Cloud Infrastructure Vulnerabilities
Description: Recent findings from Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks) reveal that every organization has faced at least one attack targeting their AI systems over the past year. The research highlights that AI security is fundamentally a cloud infrastructure issue, requiring a systematic and proactive approach rather than reactive measures. The survey included over 2,800 participants from 10 countries, emphasizing the global scale of the threat.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-17
Type: AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation
Attack Vector: Cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities, unauthorized access, data pipeline exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited: Weaknesses in cloud security, insufficient encryption, inadequate identity management, lack of network segmentation
Motivation: Data theft, operational disruption, adversarial attacks on AI models
Title: CVE-2025-5419 Chrome Zero-Day Exploitation
Description: A new critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-5419) in Chrome's V8 JavaScript and WebAssembly engine allows remote attackers to trigger heap corruption via maliciously crafted HTML pages. The flaw has been actively exploited in the wild, affecting Chrome versions prior to 137.0.7151.68 and other Chromium-based browsers. Google issued emergency patches to mitigate the threat.
Date Detected: 2025-05-28
Date Resolved: 2025-05-28
Type: Zero-Day Exploitation
Attack Vector: Maliciously crafted HTML page
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-5419
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Malicious Website, Malicious Extensions, Compromised Apps, Malicious Apps, Google Play Store, Google Play Store, Sandbox Escape, Email, Malicious HTML pages, Memory Corruption via Crafted Input (e.g., Malicious File, Network Packet)Race Conditions in Object Destruction (e.g., Chrome FileReader)Heap Manipulation via Allocator Predictability, Phishing Email (Spoofed Google Branding), Malicious Android App (no special permissions required) and Malicious Websites (Prompt Injection)Web Requests with Hidden Commands.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : SEO Campaign Hack GOO12961222
Systems Affected: Over 15,000 websites
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit GOO181291222
Systems Affected: Google Chrome
Incident : Data Breach GOO1132271023
Data Compromised: Confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel
Incident : Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment GOO000120424
Data Compromised: Sensitive user data, Personal photos, Ids
Incident : Malware GOO000022825
Data Compromised: Contacts, Call logs, Photos
Incident : Data Leak GOO917030825
Data Compromised: Design details, Ai features, Hardware details
Operational Impact: Potential impact on anticipation and marketing strategies
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential impact on customer expectations and company reputation
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability GOO058032925
Systems Affected: Google Chrome
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554040225
Systems Affected: Google Artifact RegistryGoogle Container Registry
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Systems Affected: GmailDocsSlidesDrive
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Systems Affected: Google ChromeMicrosoft EdgeOperaAll Chromium-based browsers
Incident : Data Breach GOO444072625
Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Data Compromised: Potential memory leakage (sensitive data in freed blocks), Corruption of application state
Systems Affected: Web Browsers (e.g., Google Chrome)Operating Systems (Kernel/Userspace Components)Critical Infrastructure SoftwareApplications Written in C/C++JavaScript Engines (e.g., V8)DOM Manipulation Libraries
Downtime: ['Application Crashes (e.g., ASan-Triggered Termination)', 'Denial-of-Service via Memory Corruption']
Operational Impact: Unpredictable Program BehaviorExploitation for Further Attacks (e.g., ROP Chains)Bypass of Security Sandboxes (e.g., Browser Renderer Process)
Brand Reputation Impact: Erosion of Trust in Affected Software (e.g., Browsers, OS)Negative Publicity for Vulnerable Products
Identity Theft Risk: ['If Exploited to Leak PII from Memory']
Payment Information Risk: ['If Exploited to Leak Payment Data from Memory (e.g., Browser Sessions)']
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Customer Complaints: Potential (from victims of the scam)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (for Google, due to brand impersonation)
Identity Theft Risk: Possible (if victims share sensitive information)
Payment Information Risk: Possible (if victims engage in transactions)
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Data Compromised: 2fa codes (google authenticator), Sensitive app data (google maps, signal, venmo), Email content (gmail), Installed apps list
Systems Affected: Android Devices (Pixel 6–9, Samsung Galaxy S25)Apps: Google Authenticator, Google Maps, Signal, VenmoWebsites: Gmail (mail.google.com)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential erosion of trust in Android securityMedia coverage of unpatched vulnerability
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (via stolen 2FA codes, PII from apps/emails)']
Payment Information Risk: ['High (Venmo, Gmail may expose payment details)']
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Data Compromised: Personal data (saved information, location), Cloud resource access
Systems Affected: Google Gemini AI (Cloud Assist, Search Personalization, Browsing Tool)Chrome Browsing History Integration
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized control over cloud resources and data leakage
Brand Reputation Impact: Raised concerns about AI security and trust in Google's AI tools
Identity Theft Risk: High (if personal data was leaked before patching)
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Data Compromised: Sensitive corporate information
Systems Affected: Enterprise-level applications
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Financial Loss: $1.375 billion settlement
Data Compromised: Biometric data (face and voice scans), location data, search history
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative impact due to privacy violations
Legal Liabilities: Violation of Texas biometric privacy act, potential regulatory fines
Identity Theft Risk: Increased risk due to biometric data exposure
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Financial Loss: £50 million ($67 million) annual replacement value of stolen phones in London
Systems Affected: Smartphones (primarily Apple iPhones)
Operational Impact: Traumatic disconnection for users, potential data access by criminals
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Apple and Google due to perceived inaction
Identity Theft Risk: Potential risk if data is accessed by criminals
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Data Compromised: 93.7 billion cookies (15.6 billion active)
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant (major platforms like Google, YouTube, Microsoft affected)
Identity Theft Risk: High
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Data Compromised: Sensitive data, AI training datasets, personally identifiable information
Systems Affected: AI workloads, cloud environments (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud)
Operational Impact: Disruption of AI-driven services, potential compromise of critical operations
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential erosion of trust in AI-driven services
Identity Theft Risk: High (if PII is exposed)
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Systems Affected: Chrome versions prior to 137.0.7151.68, Microsoft Edge, Opera, and other Chromium-based browsers
Operational Impact: Potential arbitrary code execution or browser sandbox escape
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $59.38 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel, Sensitive Data, Personal Data, Sensitive User Data, Personal Photos, Ids, , Contacts, Call Logs, Photos, , Design Details, Ai Features, Hardware Details, , Names, Social Security Numbers, , Potential Memory Contents (Depends On Exploitation), Sensitive Data In Freed Blocks (E.G., Credentials, Tokens), , 2Fa Codes, Pii (From Apps/Emails), App Usage Data, Installed Apps List, , Personal Data (Saved Information, Location), Cloud Resource Access Credentials (Potential), , Sensitive corporate information, Biometric Data, Location Data, Search History, , Web cookies (session IDs, personal data, passwords), Sensitive Data, Ai Training Datasets, Personally Identifiable Information (Pii) and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit GOO181291222
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Malicious Software GOO142525623
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Breach GOO1132271023
Entity Name: Google Inc.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Malware GOO002080224
Entity Name: Google Play
Entity Type: Marketplace
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: Over 32,000
Incident : Spyware GOO001080524
Entity Name: Google Play Store
Entity Type: App Marketplace
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Customers Affected: 32,000
Incident : Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment GOO000120424
Entity Name: Google Play Users
Entity Type: Consumers
Location: South AmericaSoutheast AsiaAfrica
Customers Affected: Over 8 million
Incident : Malware GOO000022825
Entity Name: Google Play
Entity Type: App Store
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Customers Affected: Over 100,000 devices
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability GOO058032925
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Software
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554040225
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Tech Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Entity Name: ['Google', 'Microsoft', 'Opera']
Entity Type: Software Company
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Breach GOO444072625
Entity Name: Google Inc.
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Technology
Location: California
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Entity Name: Google Chrome (CVE-2019-5786)
Entity Type: Web Browser
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large-Scale (Millions of Users)
Customers Affected: Millions (All Chrome Users Pre-Patch)
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Entity Name: Applications Using C/C++ with Manual Memory Management
Entity Type: Software
Industry: Multiple (Tech, Critical Infrastructure, Embedded Systems)
Location: Global
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Entity Name: Google (Brand Impersonated)
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology / Internet Services
Location: Global
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Unknown (individuals targeted)
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Entity Name: Victims of the Scam
Entity Type: Individuals/Businesses
Location: Global
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Entity Name: Google (Android)
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Software/Internet
Location: Global
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Users of Android 13–16 (Pixel 6–9, Samsung Galaxy S25)
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Entity Name: Samsung
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Consumer Electronics
Location: Global
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Users of Samsung Galaxy S25 (Android 16)
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Entity Name: End Users
Entity Type: Individuals
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Entity Name: Google (Gemini AI Services)
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: AI/Cloud Services
Location: Global
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Users of Google services relying on Gemini AI (potential exposure if interacted with malicious sites or Gemini cloud features pre-patch)
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Millions of Texans
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Entity Name: Apple
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Consumer Electronics and Software
Location: Global (UK affected)
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Approximately 64,000-80,000 stolen Apple phones in London (2023-2024)
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Consumer Electronics and Software
Location: Global (UK affected)
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Unknown number of stolen Android phones in London
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Entity Name: Google
Entity Type: Technology
Industry: Internet Services
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Over 4.5 billion cookies
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Entity Name: YouTube
Entity Type: Technology
Industry: Video Sharing
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Over 1 billion cookies
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Technology
Industry: Software
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Over 1 billion cookies
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Entity Type: Organizations across industries
Industry: Healthcare, Finance, Autonomous Vehicles, General Enterprise
Location: MexicoSingaporeUKUnited StatesJapanIndiaGermanyFranceBrazilAustralia
Size: All sizes (survey included diverse organizations)
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Entity Name: Google Chrome
Entity Type: Software
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Customers Affected: Millions of users globally
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Entity Name: Microsoft Edge
Entity Type: Software
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Entity Name: Opera
Entity Type: Software
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : SEO Campaign Hack GOO12961222
Third Party Assistance: Sucuri
Incident : Malicious Software GOO142525623
Remediation Measures: Removal of Malicious Extensions
Incident : Data Breach GOO1132271023
Communication Strategy: Informing concerned parties
Incident : Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment GOO000120424
Containment Measures: Apps Taken DownUpdates by Developers
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability GOO058032925
Containment Measures: Patch release in Chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178
Remediation Measures: Upgrade browsersEnhance security protocols
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554040225
Remediation Measures: Requiring explicit permissions for accessing container images during Cloud Run deployments
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Containment Measures: Inbound HTML lintingLLM firewall configurationsPost-processing filters
Remediation Measures: HTML sanitization at ingestionImproved context attributionEnhanced explainability features
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Containment Measures: Apply vendor-provided mitigationsDiscontinue use of affected products if patches are unavailable
Remediation Measures: Apply patchesUpdate to the latest browser versions
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Third Party Assistance: Security Researchers (E.G., Cve-2019-5786 Disclosure), Compiler/Toolchain Developers (E.G., Asan, Clang).
Containment Measures: Patching Vulnerable Code (e.g., Chrome Updates)Disabling Affected Features (e.g., FileReader API Workarounds)Isolating Vulnerable Components (e.g., Sandboxing)
Remediation Measures: Code Refactoring to Eliminate UAF ConditionsAdoption of Memory-Safe Languages (e.g., Rust for New Components)Integration of Static/Dynamic Analysis Tools (ASan, Valgrind)Pointer Nullification Post-FreeReference Counting for Shared Objects
Recovery Measures: Rollback to Stable Versions (if Exploited in Production)Memory State Validation for Critical Objects
Communication Strategy: Security Advisories (e.g., Chrome Releases Blog)CVE Publications (e.g., CVE-2019-5786)Developer Guidance on Secure Coding Practices
Enhanced Monitoring: Runtime UAF Detection (e.g., ASan in Debug Builds)Heap Integrity Checks in Production
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Containment Measures: Public Awareness Campaigns (e.g., Google's security advisories)Email Filtering Updates
Remediation Measures: User Education on Phishing TacticsReporting Mechanisms for Suspicious Emails
Communication Strategy: Warnings via Official ChannelsCollaboration with WhatsApp to Block Fraudulent Accounts
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitoring for Brand AbuseDark Web Scanning for Stolen Data
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Academic Researchers (Uc Berkeley, Uw, Cmu, Ucsd).
Containment Measures: Partial patch in September 2024 Android security bulletinPlanned December 2024 patchLimiting blur API calls (bypassed by attackers)
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via ACM CCS 2024 paperMedia statements to The RegisterGoogle Play detection mechanisms
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Blocked Gemini from rendering dangerous linksStrengthened defenses against prompt injections
Remediation Measures: Patching vulnerabilities in Gemini Cloud Assist, Search Personalization Model, and Browsing Tool
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via security researchers; user advisories on safe AI usage
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Containment Measures: Security patch integrated into enterprise applications
Remediation Measures: Enhanced monitoring and alert systemsComprehensive review of existing data protection protocols
Enhanced Monitoring: Advanced intrusion detection systems
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Containment Measures: Product and procedure changes implemented
Remediation Measures: Privacy controls enhanced in services
Communication Strategy: Public statement acknowledging settlement and changes
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Third Party Assistance: Trustonic (provides locking technology for smartphones)
Law Enforcement Notified: Metropolitan Police engaged with Apple and Google
Communication Strategy: Public statements by Apple and Google to UK Parliament
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Third Party Assistance: NordVPN, NordStellar
Communication Strategy: Public advisory on protective measures
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Third Party Assistance: Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks)
Remediation Measures: Proactive cloud security policies, encryption standards, regular security audits, isolation of AI workloads
Network Segmentation: Recommended as part of holistic security approach
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for AI workloads and cloud environments
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Containment Measures: Configuration update and emergency patches
Remediation Measures: Chrome versions 137.0.7151.68/.69 for Windows and Mac, 137.0.7151.68 for Linux
Communication Strategy: Vendor advisory confirming active exploitation
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Sucuri, Security Researchers (e.g., CVE-2019-5786 Disclosure), Compiler/Toolchain Developers (e.g., ASan, Clang), , Academic Researchers (UC Berkeley, UW, CMU, UCSD), , Trustonic (provides locking technology for smartphones), NordVPN, NordStellar, Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks).
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : SEO Campaign Hack GOO12961222
File Types Exposed: Spam files for SEO
Incident : Data Breach GOO1132271023
Type of Data Compromised: Confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Malware GOO002080224
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive Data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Incident : Spyware GOO001080524
Type of Data Compromised: Personal Data
Number of Records Exposed: 32,000
Incident : Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment GOO000120424
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive user data, Personal photos, Ids
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Malware GOO000022825
Type of Data Compromised: Contacts, Call logs, Photos
Number of Records Exposed: Over 100,000
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: contactscall logsphotos
Incident : Data Leak GOO917030825
Type of Data Compromised: Design details, Ai features, Hardware details
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate
Incident : Data Breach GOO444072625
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Type of Data Compromised: Potential memory contents (depends on exploitation), Sensitive data in freed blocks (e.g., credentials, tokens)
Sensitivity of Data: High (If Exploited to Leak Secrets from Memory)Variable (Depends on Target Application)
Data Exfiltration: Possible via Crafted Exploits (e.g., Reading Freed Memory)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (If PII Resided in Freed Memory)
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if victims disclose PII during scam)
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Type of Data Compromised: 2fa codes, Pii (from apps/emails), App usage data, Installed apps list
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: Text (2FA codes, emails)Graphics (app UI elements)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data (saved information, location), Cloud resource access credentials (potential)
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal and location data)
Data Exfiltration: Possible (via malicious servers in Browsing Tool flaw)
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive corporate information
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Type of Data Compromised: Biometric data, Location data, Search history
Number of Records Exposed: Millions
Sensitivity of Data: High (biometric identifiers)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (biometric data, location, search history)
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Sensitivity of Data: Potential access to cloud services (e.g., Google Photos, Drive, Gmail, Apple iCloud)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential risk if cloud data is accessed
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Type of Data Compromised: Web cookies (session IDs, personal data, passwords)
Number of Records Exposed: 93.7 billion
Sensitivity of Data: High (personally identifiable information, session tokens)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (sold on dark web)
Personally Identifiable Information: Names, email addresses, countries, cities, passwords
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive data, Ai training datasets, Personally identifiable information (pii)
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Possible (if cloud infrastructure is breached)
Data Encryption: Recommended but not universally implemented
Personally Identifiable Information: Possible
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Removal of Malicious Extensions, , Upgrade browsers, Enhance security protocols, , Requiring explicit permissions for accessing container images during Cloud Run deployments, HTML sanitization at ingestion, Improved context attribution, Enhanced explainability features, , Apply patches, Update to the latest browser versions, , Code Refactoring to Eliminate UAF Conditions, Adoption of Memory-Safe Languages (e.g., Rust for New Components), Integration of Static/Dynamic Analysis Tools (ASan, Valgrind), Pointer Nullification Post-Free, Reference Counting for Shared Objects, , User Education on Phishing Tactics, Reporting Mechanisms for Suspicious Emails, , Patching vulnerabilities in Gemini Cloud Assist, Search Personalization Model, and Browsing Tool, , Enhanced monitoring and alert systems, Comprehensive review of existing data protection protocols, , Privacy controls enhanced in services, Proactive cloud security policies, encryption standards, regular security audits, isolation of AI workloads, Chrome versions 137.0.7151.68/.69 for Windows and Mac, 137.0.7151.68 for Linux.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by apps taken down, updates by developers, , patch release in chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178, , inbound html linting, llm firewall configurations, post-processing filters, , apply vendor-provided mitigations, discontinue use of affected products if patches are unavailable, , patching vulnerable code (e.g., chrome updates), disabling affected features (e.g., filereader api workarounds), isolating vulnerable components (e.g., sandboxing), , public awareness campaigns (e.g., google's security advisories), email filtering updates, , partial patch in september 2024 android security bulletin, planned december 2024 patch, limiting blur api calls (bypassed by attackers), , blocked gemini from rendering dangerous links, strengthened defenses against prompt injections, , security patch integrated into enterprise applications, product and procedure changes implemented and configuration update and emergency patches.
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Rollback to Stable Versions (if Exploited in Production), Memory State Validation for Critical Objects, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Legal Actions: Potential Legal Action Against Scammers if Identified,
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Regulations Violated: Texas Biometric Privacy Act, Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (TDPSA),
Fines Imposed: $1.375 billion settlement
Legal Actions: Lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Regulatory Notifications: Added to CISA’s Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential Legal Action Against Scammers if Identified, , Lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Malware GOO002080224
Lessons Learned: The discovery underscores the evolving tactics of attackers and the challenges faced by marketplaces in preventing sophisticated threats.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Lessons Learned: AI assistants represent a new component of the attack surface, requiring security teams to instrument, sandbox, and carefully monitor their outputs as potential threat vectors.
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Lessons Learned: Memory-unsafe languages (C/C++) remain a primary attack surface for high-severity vulnerabilities like UAF., Complex software (e.g., browsers, OS kernels) with intricate object lifecycles are particularly vulnerable to UAF due to race conditions and callback-heavy architectures., Exploitation techniques evolve rapidly, with attackers leveraging hardware features (e.g., pointer authentication) and bypassing mitigations (e.g., DEP, ASLR)., Static and dynamic analysis tools (ASan, Valgrind) are critical for detecting UAF but introduce performance overhead, limiting their use in production., Transitioning to memory-safe languages (Rust, Go) or managed runtimes (Java, C#) is the most effective long-term mitigation., Runtime protections (CFI, hardware-assisted sanitizers) provide defense-in-depth but are not foolproof against sophisticated exploits., Secure coding practices (pointer nullification, RAII, reference counting) must be enforced rigorously in legacy codebases., Heap spraying and memory layout control remain foundational to UAF exploitation, highlighting the need for allocator hardening (e.g., Scudo, PartitionAlloc)., Public disclosure of UAF vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2019-5786) drives awareness but also provides attackers with exploitation blueprints, necessitating rapid patching.
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Lessons Learned: Brand impersonation via email remains highly effective due to perceived legitimacy., Shifting communications to private platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) bypasses corporate security controls., User education is critical to mitigating social engineering risks.
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Lessons Learned: Side-channel attacks can resurface in new forms (e.g., reviving 2013 SVG filter techniques)., Android's activity layering and GPU compression can introduce exploitable timing side channels., Mitigations like API call limits may be bypassed without addressing root causes (e.g., pixel computation restrictions)., Hardware-level vulnerabilities (e.g., Mali GPU) require vendor collaboration for comprehensive fixes.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Lessons Learned: AI systems can be weaponized as attack vectors, not just targets., Prompt injection and hidden commands in web requests pose significant risks to AI integrity., Proactive patching and user education are critical as AI integrates into daily services., Security must be prioritized in AI feature development to prevent exploitation.
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Lessons Learned: The GeminiJack vulnerability highlights critical lessons for enterprise data protection strategies, including the need for rapid identification and resolution of security vulnerabilities, fostering a culture of security awareness, and continuously investing in advanced cybersecurity technologies.
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Lessons Learned: Companies must obtain explicit consent before collecting biometric data. Regulatory scrutiny on data privacy is increasing, especially for large tech firms.
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Lessons Learned: Need for collaboration between tech companies, law enforcement, and regulators to address smartphone theft and resale. Potential for IMEI-based blocking systems to reduce theft incentives.
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Lessons Learned: Web cookies, designed for convenience, can be exploited as digital keys to private information. Users must adopt proactive security measures to mitigate risks.
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Lessons Learned: AI security is fundamentally a cloud infrastructure problem. Reactive approaches are insufficient; organizations must adopt proactive, systematic, and scientific methods to secure AI systems. Cloud security must be treated as a foundational element of AI security.
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Lessons Learned: The growing prevalence of zero-day vulnerabilities and their exploitation highlights the need for more proactive defense strategies and future-proof cybersecurity toolkits.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability GOO058032925
Recommendations: Upgrade browsers, Enhance security protocolsUpgrade browsers, Enhance security protocols
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Recommendations: Implement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability featuresImplement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability featuresImplement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability featuresImplement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability featuresImplement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability featuresImplement inbound HTML linting, Configure LLM firewall, Enhance user awareness training, Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Improve context attribution, Enhance explainability features
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Recommendations: Prioritize immediate updates to the latest browser versions
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Recommendations: Category: Long-Term Strategy, Measures: Invest in rewriting critical components in memory-safe languages., Fund research into automated UAF detection (e.g., ML-based static analysis)., Advocate for industry-wide adoption of memory safety (e.g., Rust in Linux kernel)., Collaborate with hardware vendors to improve exploit mitigation (e.g., ARM MTE)., Train developers on secure memory management and exploitation techniques., Category: Long-Term Strategy, Measures: Invest in rewriting critical components in memory-safe languages., Fund research into automated UAF detection (e.g., ML-based static analysis)., Advocate for industry-wide adoption of memory safety (e.g., Rust in Linux kernel)., Collaborate with hardware vendors to improve exploit mitigation (e.g., ARM MTE)., Train developers on secure memory management and exploitation techniques., Category: Long-Term Strategy, Measures: Invest in rewriting critical components in memory-safe languages., Fund research into automated UAF detection (e.g., ML-based static analysis)., Advocate for industry-wide adoption of memory safety (e.g., Rust in Linux kernel)., Collaborate with hardware vendors to improve exploit mitigation (e.g., ARM MTE)., Train developers on secure memory management and exploitation techniques., Category: Long-Term Strategy, Measures: Invest in rewriting critical components in memory-safe languages., Fund research into automated UAF detection (e.g., ML-based static analysis)., Advocate for industry-wide adoption of memory safety (e.g., Rust in Linux kernel)., Collaborate with hardware vendors to improve exploit mitigation (e.g., ARM MTE)., Train developers on secure memory management and exploitation techniques., Category: Long-Term Strategy, Measures: Invest in rewriting critical components in memory-safe languages., Fund research into automated UAF detection (e.g., ML-based static analysis)., Advocate for industry-wide adoption of memory safety (e.g., Rust in Linux kernel)., Collaborate with hardware vendors to improve exploit mitigation (e.g., ARM MTE)., Train developers on secure memory management and exploitation techniques..
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Recommendations: Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations.
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Recommendations: Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels.Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels.Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels.Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels.Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Recommendations: Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests).Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests).Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests).Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests).Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests).
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Recommendations: Regularly update software to incorporate the latest security patches, Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential weaknesses, Implement advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual activityRegularly update software to incorporate the latest security patches, Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential weaknesses, Implement advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual activityRegularly update software to incorporate the latest security patches, Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential weaknesses, Implement advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual activity
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Recommendations: Implement robust consent mechanisms for biometric data collection, enhance privacy controls, and ensure compliance with state and federal privacy laws.
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Recommendations: Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers., Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms., Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems., Improve coordination between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers to track and block stolen devices.Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers., Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms., Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems., Improve coordination between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers to track and block stolen devices.Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers., Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms., Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems., Improve coordination between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers to track and block stolen devices.Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers., Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms., Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems., Improve coordination between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers to track and block stolen devices.
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Recommendations: Reject unnecessary cookies, especially third-party trackers, Regularly clear cookies from browsers, Use anti-malware software and VPNs to block malicious websites and encrypt trafficReject unnecessary cookies, especially third-party trackers, Regularly clear cookies from browsers, Use anti-malware software and VPNs to block malicious websites and encrypt trafficReject unnecessary cookies, especially third-party trackers, Regularly clear cookies from browsers, Use anti-malware software and VPNs to block malicious websites and encrypt traffic
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Recommendations: Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems.
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Recommendations: Organizations should leverage platforms like SOC Prime for actionable threat intelligence, detection content, and proactive defense against zero-day vulnerabilities. Regularly update software and monitor for emerging threats.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The discovery underscores the evolving tactics of attackers and the challenges faced by marketplaces in preventing sophisticated threats.AI assistants represent a new component of the attack surface, requiring security teams to instrument, sandbox, and carefully monitor their outputs as potential threat vectors.Memory-unsafe languages (C/C++) remain a primary attack surface for high-severity vulnerabilities like UAF.,Complex software (e.g., browsers, OS kernels) with intricate object lifecycles are particularly vulnerable to UAF due to race conditions and callback-heavy architectures.,Exploitation techniques evolve rapidly, with attackers leveraging hardware features (e.g., pointer authentication) and bypassing mitigations (e.g., DEP, ASLR).,Static and dynamic analysis tools (ASan, Valgrind) are critical for detecting UAF but introduce performance overhead, limiting their use in production.,Transitioning to memory-safe languages (Rust, Go) or managed runtimes (Java, C#) is the most effective long-term mitigation.,Runtime protections (CFI, hardware-assisted sanitizers) provide defense-in-depth but are not foolproof against sophisticated exploits.,Secure coding practices (pointer nullification, RAII, reference counting) must be enforced rigorously in legacy codebases.,Heap spraying and memory layout control remain foundational to UAF exploitation, highlighting the need for allocator hardening (e.g., Scudo, PartitionAlloc).,Public disclosure of UAF vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2019-5786) drives awareness but also provides attackers with exploitation blueprints, necessitating rapid patching.Brand impersonation via email remains highly effective due to perceived legitimacy.,Shifting communications to private platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) bypasses corporate security controls.,User education is critical to mitigating social engineering risks.Side-channel attacks can resurface in new forms (e.g., reviving 2013 SVG filter techniques).,Android's activity layering and GPU compression can introduce exploitable timing side channels.,Mitigations like API call limits may be bypassed without addressing root causes (e.g., pixel computation restrictions).,Hardware-level vulnerabilities (e.g., Mali GPU) require vendor collaboration for comprehensive fixes.AI systems can be weaponized as attack vectors, not just targets.,Prompt injection and hidden commands in web requests pose significant risks to AI integrity.,Proactive patching and user education are critical as AI integrates into daily services.,Security must be prioritized in AI feature development to prevent exploitation.The GeminiJack vulnerability highlights critical lessons for enterprise data protection strategies, including the need for rapid identification and resolution of security vulnerabilities, fostering a culture of security awareness, and continuously investing in advanced cybersecurity technologies.Companies must obtain explicit consent before collecting biometric data. Regulatory scrutiny on data privacy is increasing, especially for large tech firms.Need for collaboration between tech companies, law enforcement, and regulators to address smartphone theft and resale. Potential for IMEI-based blocking systems to reduce theft incentives.Web cookies, designed for convenience, can be exploited as digital keys to private information. Users must adopt proactive security measures to mitigate risks.AI security is fundamentally a cloud infrastructure problem. Reactive approaches are insufficient; organizations must adopt proactive, systematic, and scientific methods to secure AI systems. Cloud security must be treated as a foundational element of AI security.The growing prevalence of zero-day vulnerabilities and their exploitation highlights the need for more proactive defense strategies and future-proof cybersecurity toolkits.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems., Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Implement advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual activity, Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Organizations should leverage platforms like SOC Prime for actionable threat intelligence, detection content, and proactive defense against zero-day vulnerabilities. Regularly update software and monitor for emerging threats., Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Implement robust consent mechanisms for biometric data collection, enhance privacy controls, and ensure compliance with state and federal privacy laws., Category: Detection, , Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential weaknesses, Regularly update software to incorporate the latest security patches, Category: Response, , Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Category: Long-Term Strategy, , Category: Prevention, , Category: Mitigation and .
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit GOO181291222
Source: CISA
Incident : Data Leak GOO917030825
Source: Evan Blass
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Source: Security researchers
Incident : Data Breach GOO444072625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2016-05-06
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: Google Chrome Security Advisory for CVE-2019-5786
URL: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: AddressSanitizer (ASan) Documentation
URL: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizer
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: Valgrind Memcheck Manual
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: Rust Programming Language (Memory Safety)
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: CERT C Coding Standard (MEM00-CPP, MEM30-C)
URL: https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/SEI+CERT+C+Coding+Standard
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: ARM Memory Tagging Extension (MTE)
URL: https://developer.arm.com/Architectures/Memory%20Tagging%20Extension
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Source: Scudo Hardened Allocator
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Source: The Register
URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/21/pixnapping_android_attack/
Date Accessed: 2024-10-21
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Source: Pixnapping Research Paper (ACM CCS 2024)
URL: https://www.example.com/pixnapping_paper.pdf
Date Accessed: 2024-10-21
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Source: GPU.zip Research (S&P 2024)
URL: https://www.example.com/gpu_zip.pdf
Date Accessed: 2024-10-21
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Source: Google Android Security Bulletin (September 2024)
URL: https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2024-09-01
Date Accessed: 2024-10-21
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Source: Malwarebytes (Security Researchers)
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Source: Texas Attorney General's Office
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Source: The Register
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Source: UK House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Source: Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks) and Wakefield Research
Date Accessed: 2025-10-17
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Source: State of Cloud Security Report 2025
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Source: Google Advisory
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Source: CISA KEV Catalog
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Source: Mandiant’s M-Trends 2025 Report
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: CISA, and Source: Evan Blass, and Source: Security researchers, and Source: CISADate Accessed: 2025-07-22, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2016-05-06, and Source: Google Chrome Security Advisory for CVE-2019-5786Url: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html, and Source: AddressSanitizer (ASan) DocumentationUrl: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizer, and Source: Valgrind Memcheck ManualUrl: https://valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html, and Source: Rust Programming Language (Memory Safety)Url: https://www.rust-lang.org/, and Source: CERT C Coding Standard (MEM00-CPP, MEM30-C)Url: https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/SEI+CERT+C+Coding+Standard, and Source: Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)Url: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/control-flow-enforcement-technology.html, and Source: ARM Memory Tagging Extension (MTE)Url: https://developer.arm.com/Architectures/Memory%20Tagging%20Extension, and Source: Scudo Hardened AllocatorUrl: https://llvm.org/docs/ScudoHardenedAllocator.html, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/21/pixnapping_android_attack/Date Accessed: 2024-10-21, and Source: Pixnapping Research Paper (ACM CCS 2024)Url: https://www.example.com/pixnapping_paper.pdfDate Accessed: 2024-10-21, and Source: GPU.zip Research (S&P 2024)Url: https://www.example.com/gpu_zip.pdfDate Accessed: 2024-10-21, and Source: Google Android Security Bulletin (September 2024)Url: https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2024-09-01Date Accessed: 2024-10-21, and Source: Malwarebytes (Security Researchers), and Source: Texas Attorney General's Office, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: The Register, and Source: UK House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, and Source: NordVPNDate Accessed: 2025-04-30, and Source: Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks) and Wakefield ResearchDate Accessed: 2025-10-17, and Source: State of Cloud Security Report 2025, and Source: Google Advisory, and Source: CISA KEV Catalog, and Source: Mandiant’s M-Trends 2025 Report.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach GOO1132271023
Investigation Status: Preliminary reports indicate no evidence of misuse, abuse, or malevolent intent
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (General Class of Vulnerability; Specific Instances May Vary)
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Investigation Status: Ongoing (likely handled by Google's security team and law enforcement)
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Google working on complete fixes; researchers disclosed workaround under embargo)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Investigation Status: Resolved (Vulnerabilities Patched)
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Investigation Status: Resolved (settlement reached)
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Investigation Status: Ongoing (policy discussion and technical evaluation)
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Investigation Status: Completed (analysis of stolen cookies)
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Investigation Status: Ongoing (research findings published)
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Investigation Status: Ongoing (specific attack details withheld until more users apply the update)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Informing concerned parties, Security Advisories (E.G., Chrome Releases Blog), Cve Publications (E.G., Cve-2019-5786), Developer Guidance On Secure Coding Practices, Warnings Via Official Channels, Collaboration With Whatsapp To Block Fraudulent Accounts, Public Disclosure Via Acm Ccs 2024 Paper, Media Statements To The Register, Google Play Detection Mechanisms, Public disclosure via security researchers; user advisories on safe AI usage, Public statement acknowledging settlement and changes, Public statements by Apple and Google to UK Parliament, Public advisory on protective measures and Vendor advisory confirming active exploitation.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Stakeholder Advisories: Developers: Adopt Memory-Safe Languages And Static Analysis Tools., Security Teams: Monitor For Uaf Exploitation Attempts (E.G., Heap Spraying)., Executives: Allocate Resources For Long-Term Migration Away From C/C++., End Users: Apply Patches Promptly (E.G., Browser Updates)..
Customer Advisories: Update software (e.g., browsers, OS) to the latest versions to mitigate known UAF vulnerabilities.Avoid untrusted websites/plugins that may trigger UAF exploits (e.g., malicious JavaScript).Enable exploit mitigations (e.g., Windows DEP/ASLR, macOS SIP).Report unexpected crashes (potential UAF triggers) to vendors.
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Stakeholder Advisories: Google May Issue Security Bulletins Warning Users About The Scam..
Customer Advisories: Users advised to report suspicious emails and avoid sharing sensitive information on unsecured channels.
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Customer Advisories: Google recommends updating devices and avoiding sideloaded apps.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Stakeholder Advisories: Users advised to update systems and exercise caution with AI interactions.
Customer Advisories: Google likely issued internal advisories; public guidance focused on safe AI usage.
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Stakeholder Advisories: UK Parliament committee urging Apple and Google to implement IMEI-based blocking for stolen devices.
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Stakeholder Advisories: Public advisory on protective measures against cookie theft
Customer Advisories: Guidance on rejecting unnecessary cookies and using security tools
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Stakeholder Advisories: Organizations are advised to adopt a proactive and scientific approach to AI security, focusing on securing cloud infrastructure as a priority.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Developers: Adopt Memory-Safe Languages And Static Analysis Tools., Security Teams: Monitor For Uaf Exploitation Attempts (E.G., Heap Spraying)., Executives: Allocate Resources For Long-Term Migration Away From C/C++., End Users: Apply Patches Promptly (E.G., Browser Updates)., Update Software (E.G., Browsers, Os) To The Latest Versions To Mitigate Known Uaf Vulnerabilities., Avoid Untrusted Websites/Plugins That May Trigger Uaf Exploits (E.G., Malicious Javascript)., Enable Exploit Mitigations (E.G., Windows Dep/Aslr, Macos Sip)., Report Unexpected Crashes (Potential Uaf Triggers) To Vendors., , Google May Issue Security Bulletins Warning Users About The Scam., Users Advised To Report Suspicious Emails And Avoid Sharing Sensitive Information On Unsecured Channels., , Google Recommends Updating Devices And Avoiding Sideloaded Apps., , Users advised to update systems and exercise caution with AI interactions., Google likely issued internal advisories; public guidance focused on safe AI usage., UK Parliament committee urging Apple and Google to implement IMEI-based blocking for stolen devices., Public advisory on protective measures against cookie theft, Guidance on rejecting unnecessary cookies and using security tools, Organizations are advised to adopt a proactive and scientific approach to AI security and focusing on securing cloud infrastructure as a priority..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit GOO181291222
Entry Point: Malicious Website
Incident : Malicious Software GOO142525623
Entry Point: Malicious Extensions
Incident : Malware GOO002080224
Entry Point: Compromised Apps
Incident : Spyware GOO001080524
Entry Point: Malicious Apps
Incident : Data Breach, Extortion, Harassment GOO000120424
Entry Point: Google Play Store
Incident : Malware GOO000022825
Entry Point: Google Play Store
High Value Targets: Indian Users,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Indian Users,
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability GOO058032925
Entry Point: Sandbox Escape
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Entry Point: Email
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Entry Point: Malicious HTML pages
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Entry Point: Memory Corruption Via Crafted Input (E.G., Malicious File, Network Packet), Race Conditions In Object Destruction (E.G., Chrome Filereader), Heap Manipulation Via Allocator Predictability,
Reconnaissance Period: ['Analysis of Target Allocator Behavior (e.g., Heap Spraying Setup)', 'Probing for UAF-Triggers (e.g., Fuzzing for Crashes)']
Backdoors Established: ['Persistent UAF Conditions in Long-Running Processes (e.g., Daemons)', 'Corrupted Function Pointers for Later Exploitation']
High Value Targets: Browser Renderer Processes (Sandbox Escape), Os Kernel Memory (Privilege Escalation), Critical Infrastructure Control Systems (Lateral Movement),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Browser Renderer Processes (Sandbox Escape), Os Kernel Memory (Privilege Escalation), Critical Infrastructure Control Systems (Lateral Movement),
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Entry Point: Phishing Email (Spoofed Google Branding)
High Value Targets: Individuals/Businesses Seeking SEO or Resale Services
Data Sold on Dark Web: Individuals/Businesses Seeking SEO or Resale Services
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Entry Point: Malicious Android App (No Special Permissions Required),
High Value Targets: 2Fa Codes (Google Authenticator), Payment Apps (Venmo), Email (Gmail), Messaging (Signal),
Data Sold on Dark Web: 2Fa Codes (Google Authenticator), Payment Apps (Venmo), Email (Gmail), Messaging (Signal),
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Entry Point: Malicious Websites (Prompt Injection), Web Requests With Hidden Commands,
High Value Targets: Cloud Resources, Personal Data (Location, Saved Information),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Cloud Resources, Personal Data (Location, Saved Information),
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
High Value Targets: AI workloads, cloud environments
Data Sold on Dark Web: AI workloads, cloud environments
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit GOO181291222
Root Causes: Third-party library bug
Incident : Malicious Software GOO142525623
Root Causes: Obfuscated Code in Extensions
Corrective Actions: Removal of Malicious Extensions
Incident : Malware GOO002080224
Root Causes: Download of malicious apps
Incident : Malware GOO000022825
Root Causes: Lapse in app store security
Incident : Vulnerability Exploit GOO554071425
Root Causes: Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code
Corrective Actions: Inbound Html Linting, Llm Firewall Configurations, Post-Processing Filters, Html Sanitization At Ingestion, Improved Context Attribution, Enhanced Explainability Features,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO354072525
Root Causes: Improper input validation within Chromium’s ANGLE and GPU components
Corrective Actions: Apply Patches, Update To The Latest Browser Versions,
Incident : Data Breach GOO444072625
Root Causes: Human error by third-party vendor
Incident : Memory Corruption Vulnerability GOO407081825
Root Causes: Lack Of Pointer Nullification After Free, Ambiguous Object Ownership In Complex Codebases, Race Conditions In Asynchronous Operations (E.G., Callbacks), Overreliance On Manual Memory Management In C/C++, Insufficient Static/Dynamic Analysis Coverage, Heap Allocator Designs Prone To Predictable Layouts, Inadequate Sandboxing For Memory-Unsafe Components,
Corrective Actions: Mandate Static Analysis (Asan, Clang) For All C/C++ Code, Refactor Critical Components To Use Smart Pointers (E.G., `Std::Shared Ptr`), Implement Custom Allocators With Uaf Detection (E.G., Guard Pages), Enforce Code Reviews Focused On Memory Safety, Deploy Runtime Mitigations (Cfi, Hardware-Based Protections), Establish A Bug Bounty Program For Uaf Reports (E.G., Chrome Vrp), Document Object Lifetime Rules For Complex Systems (E.G., Browsers), Train Developers On Uaf Exploitation Techniques To Raise Awareness,
Incident : Phishing / Social Engineering GOO846082525
Root Causes: Lack Of Robust Email Authentication (Dmarc/Dkim/Spf) Enforcement For Spoofed Domains., User Trust In Branded Communications Without Verification., Exploitation Of Private Messaging Platforms To Evade Detection.,
Corrective Actions: Strengthen Email Security Protocols To Prevent Spoofing., Deploy Ai-Driven Phishing Detection Tools., Partner With Messaging Platforms To Identify And Block Fraudulent Accounts., Launch Public Awareness Campaigns About The Scam.,
Incident : Data Theft GOO1503315101425
Root Causes: Android'S Custom Tabs Api And Activity Layering Enabling Pixel Access., Mali Gpu'S Lossless Compression Creating Data-Dependent Timing Side Channels., Lack Of Restrictions On Computing Victim Pixels Via Blur Api/Vsync Callbacks., Insufficient Isolation Between App Windows In Rendering Pipeline.,
Corrective Actions: Google'S Partial Mitigations (September/December 2024 Patches)., Planned Restrictions On Pixel Computation Capabilities (Long-Term)., Oem Collaboration To Address Gpu-Level Vulnerabilities (E.G., Mali Compression).,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GOO32101632112225
Root Causes: Insufficient Input Validation In Gemini Ai Components (Allowing Prompt Injection)., Lack Of Safeguards Against Hidden Commands In Web Requests/Browsing History., Over-Reliance On User Trust In Ai Interactions Without Robust Abuse Detection.,
Corrective Actions: Blocked Rendering Of Dangerous Links In Gemini., Enhanced Defenses Against Prompt Injection Attacks., Public Awareness Campaigns On Ai Security Risks.,
Incident : Zero-Click Exploit GOO1765461915
Root Causes: Flaws in how certain enterprise applications processed incoming data
Incident : Data Privacy Violation GOO1766053296
Root Causes: Failure to obtain proper consent for biometric data collection, persistent tracking of users without transparency
Corrective Actions: Product and procedure changes, enhanced privacy controls in services
Incident : Policy and Compliance Issue GOOGSMDC-APP1766375619
Root Causes: Lack Of Standardized Imei-Based Blocking System For Cloud Services, Potential Commercial Incentives For Tech Companies (E.G., Revenue From Cloud Services And Replacement Devices), Fraud Risks Associated With Imei Spoofing Or Misuse,
Corrective Actions: Evaluate Feasibility Of Imei-Based Cloud Blocking With Fraud Prevention Measures, Explore Regulatory Or Government-Led Solutions For Smartphone Registration And Locking, Improve Collaboration Between Tech Companies, Law Enforcement, And Telecom Providers,
Incident : Data Exposure GOOYOU1766548552
Root Causes: Malware (Redline, other infostealers) used to steal cookies containing sensitive data
Corrective Actions: Enhanced user education on cookie security, adoption of anti-malware tools, and VPNs
Incident : AI System Targeting, Cloud Infrastructure Exploitation AMAUNIGOOWAK1766721300
Root Causes: Weaknesses In Cloud Security Frameworks, Insufficient Encryption And Identity Management, Lack Of Proactive Security Measures For Ai Systems, Over-Reliance On Reactive Security Approaches,
Corrective Actions: Strengthen Cloud Security Policies, Implement Encryption And Identity Management Best Practices, Adopt Proactive Security Measures For Ai Workloads, Enhance Network Segmentation And Monitoring,
Incident : Zero-Day Exploitation GOO1766735842
Root Causes: Out-of-bounds memory access in Chrome’s V8 JavaScript and WebAssembly engine
Corrective Actions: Emergency patches and configuration updates to mitigate heap corruption
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Sucuri, Security Researchers (E.G., Cve-2019-5786 Disclosure), Compiler/Toolchain Developers (E.G., Asan, Clang), , Runtime Uaf Detection (E.G., Asan In Debug Builds), Heap Integrity Checks In Production, , Monitoring For Brand Abuse, Dark Web Scanning For Stolen Data, , Academic Researchers (Uc Berkeley, Uw, Cmu, Ucsd), , Advanced intrusion detection systems, Trustonic (provides locking technology for smartphones), NordVPN, NordStellar, Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks), Recommended for AI workloads and cloud environments.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Removal of Malicious Extensions, Inbound Html Linting, Llm Firewall Configurations, Post-Processing Filters, Html Sanitization At Ingestion, Improved Context Attribution, Enhanced Explainability Features, , Apply Patches, Update To The Latest Browser Versions, , Mandate Static Analysis (Asan, Clang) For All C/C++ Code, Refactor Critical Components To Use Smart Pointers (E.G., `Std::Shared Ptr`), Implement Custom Allocators With Uaf Detection (E.G., Guard Pages), Enforce Code Reviews Focused On Memory Safety, Deploy Runtime Mitigations (Cfi, Hardware-Based Protections), Establish A Bug Bounty Program For Uaf Reports (E.G., Chrome Vrp), Document Object Lifetime Rules For Complex Systems (E.G., Browsers), Train Developers On Uaf Exploitation Techniques To Raise Awareness, , Strengthen Email Security Protocols To Prevent Spoofing., Deploy Ai-Driven Phishing Detection Tools., Partner With Messaging Platforms To Identify And Block Fraudulent Accounts., Launch Public Awareness Campaigns About The Scam., , Google'S Partial Mitigations (September/December 2024 Patches)., Planned Restrictions On Pixel Computation Capabilities (Long-Term)., Oem Collaboration To Address Gpu-Level Vulnerabilities (E.G., Mali Compression)., , Blocked Rendering Of Dangerous Links In Gemini., Enhanced Defenses Against Prompt Injection Attacks., Public Awareness Campaigns On Ai Security Risks., , Product and procedure changes, enhanced privacy controls in services, Evaluate Feasibility Of Imei-Based Cloud Blocking With Fraud Prevention Measures, Explore Regulatory Or Government-Led Solutions For Smartphone Registration And Locking, Improve Collaboration Between Tech Companies, Law Enforcement, And Telecom Providers, , Enhanced user education on cookie security, adoption of anti-malware tools, and VPNs, Strengthen Cloud Security Policies, Implement Encryption And Identity Management Best Practices, Adopt Proactive Security Measures For Ai Workloads, Enhance Network Segmentation And Monitoring, , Emergency patches and configuration updates to mitigate heap corruption.
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Evan Blass, APT Group, Unauthorized recipient, Unidentified Scammers (Likely Organized Fraud Group) and Criminal gangs.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2016-03-29.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-10-17.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel, Sensitive Data, Personal Data, Sensitive User Data, Personal Photos, IDs, , contacts, call logs, photos, , Design details, AI features, Hardware details, , Names, Social Security numbers, , Potential Memory Leakage (Sensitive Data in Freed Blocks), Corruption of Application State, , 2FA Codes (Google Authenticator), Sensitive App Data (Google Maps, Signal, Venmo), Email Content (Gmail), Installed Apps List, , Personal Data (Saved Information, Location), Cloud Resource Access, , Sensitive corporate information, Biometric data (face and voice scans), location data, search history, 93.7 billion cookies (15.6 billion active), Sensitive data, AI training datasets and personally identifiable information.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Google Chrome and and and Google Chrome and Google Artifact RegistryGoogle Container Registry and GmailDocsSlidesDrive and Google ChromeMicrosoft EdgeOperaAll Chromium-based browsers and Web Browsers (e.g., Google Chrome)Operating Systems (Kernel/Userspace Components)Critical Infrastructure SoftwareApplications Written in C/C++JavaScript Engines (e.g., V8)DOM Manipulation Libraries and Android Devices (Pixel 6–9, Samsung Galaxy S25)Apps: Google Authenticator, Google Maps, Signal, VenmoWebsites: Gmail (mail.google.com) and Google Gemini AI (Cloud Assist, Search Personalization, Browsing Tool)Chrome Browsing History Integration and and and and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Sucuri, security researchers (e.g., cve-2019-5786 disclosure), compiler/toolchain developers (e.g., asan, clang), , academic researchers (uc berkeley, uw, cmu, ucsd), , Trustonic (provides locking technology for smartphones), NordVPN, NordStellar, Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks).
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Apps Taken DownUpdates by Developers, Patch release in Chrome version 134.0.6998.177/.178, Inbound HTML lintingLLM firewall configurationsPost-processing filters, Apply vendor-provided mitigationsDiscontinue use of affected products if patches are unavailable, Patching Vulnerable Code (e.g., Chrome Updates)Disabling Affected Features (e.g., FileReader API Workarounds)Isolating Vulnerable Components (e.g., Sandboxing), Public Awareness Campaigns (e.g., Google's security advisories)Email Filtering Updates, Partial patch in September 2024 Android security bulletinPlanned December 2024 patchLimiting blur API calls (bypassed by attackers), Blocked Gemini from rendering dangerous linksStrengthened defenses against prompt injections, Security patch integrated into enterprise applications, Product and procedure changes implemented and Configuration update and emergency patches.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Sensitive data, AI training datasets, personally identifiable information, Personal Data, photos, Confidential, sensitive data about Google personnel, Hardware details, Personal Photos, call logs, Personal Data (Saved Information, Location), 93.7 billion cookies (15.6 billion active), Design details, Corruption of Application State, Sensitive corporate information, Email Content (Gmail), Cloud Resource Access, AI features, contacts, Sensitive User Data, Social Security numbers, Potential Memory Leakage (Sensitive Data in Freed Blocks), 2FA Codes (Google Authenticator), Sensitive Data, Names, Sensitive App Data (Google Maps, Signal, Venmo), Biometric data (face and voice scans), location data, search history, Installed Apps List and IDs.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 193.7B.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was $1.375 billion settlement.
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential Legal Action Against Scammers if Identified, , Lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Security must be prioritized in AI feature development to prevent exploitation., The GeminiJack vulnerability highlights critical lessons for enterprise data protection strategies, including the need for rapid identification and resolution of security vulnerabilities, fostering a culture of security awareness, and continuously investing in advanced cybersecurity technologies., Companies must obtain explicit consent before collecting biometric data. Regulatory scrutiny on data privacy is increasing, especially for large tech firms., Need for collaboration between tech companies, law enforcement, and regulators to address smartphone theft and resale. Potential for IMEI-based blocking systems to reduce theft incentives., Web cookies, designed for convenience, can be exploited as digital keys to private information. Users must adopt proactive security measures to mitigate risks., AI security is fundamentally a cloud infrastructure problem. Reactive approaches are insufficient; organizations must adopt proactive, systematic, and scientific methods to secure AI systems. Cloud security must be treated as a foundational element of AI security., The growing prevalence of zero-day vulnerabilities and their exploitation highlights the need for more proactive defense strategies and future-proof cybersecurity toolkits.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Improve coordination between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers to track and block stolen devices., Establish a regulatory or government body to oversee smartphone registration and locking mechanisms., Adopt advanced AI-specific security tools and protocols for real-time threat detection., Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential weaknesses, Improve context attribution, Collaborate with messaging platforms (e.g., WhatsApp) to disrupt scam operations., Monitor AI tool behaviors for unusual activity (e.g., unexpected data requests)., Enhance security protocols, Implement strong cloud security policies and encryption standards., Sanitize HTML at ingestion, Researchers should explore long-term fixes for GPU.zip side channels., Use real-time anti-malware with web protection., Implement an international cloud-level blocking system for stolen smartphones using IMEI numbers., Implement inbound HTML linting, Users should update devices promptly (December 2024 patch expected)., Category: Response, , Regularly clear cookies from browsers, Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk transactions., Collaborate with cloud service providers, AI developers, and security professionals to develop robust security frameworks., Category: Long-Term Strategy, , Enhance fraud detection to prevent misuse of IMEI-based blocking systems., Google and OEMs should restrict attackers' ability to compute on victim pixels (e.g., via OS-level protections)., Monitor dark web for brand abuse and stolen credentials., Organizations should leverage platforms like SOC Prime for actionable threat intelligence, detection content, and proactive defense against zero-day vulnerabilities. Regularly update software and monitor for emerging threats., Implement robust consent mechanisms for biometric data collection, enhance privacy controls, and ensure compliance with state and federal privacy laws., Category: Detection, , Avoid visiting suspicious websites, especially those prompting AI assistant interactions., Enhance email filtering to detect spoofed domains and branded phishing attempts., Keep software, browsers, and apps updated to apply security patches., Conduct regular security audits of cloud environments hosting AI workloads., Upgrade browsers, Configure LLM firewall, Avoid sideloading apps; rely on Google Play's detection mechanisms., Limit sensitive information shared with AI tools., Reject unnecessary cookies, especially third-party trackers, Enhance network segmentation and monitoring for AI systems., Implement advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual activity, Prioritize immediate updates to the latest browser versions, Isolate AI workloads from potential vulnerabilities in the cloud., Enhance explainability features, Monitor for unusual blur API or VSync callback usage in apps., Use anti-malware software and VPNs to block malicious websites and encrypt traffic, Enhance user awareness training, Educate users on verifying sender identities and avoiding unsolicited offers., Regularly update software to incorporate the latest security patches, Category: Prevention, , Category: Mitigation and .
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Google Chrome Security Advisory for CVE-2019-5786, Security researchers, Rust Programming Language (Memory Safety), Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET), Texas Attorney General's Office, GPU.zip Research (S&P 2024), Google Advisory, BleepingComputer, NordVPN, CERT C Coding Standard (MEM00-CPP, MEM30-C), Scudo Hardened Allocator, Malwarebytes (Security Researchers), ARM Memory Tagging Extension (MTE), CISA, UK House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, CISA KEV Catalog, California Office of the Attorney General, Evan Blass, Pixnapping Research Paper (ACM CCS 2024), AddressSanitizer (ASan) Documentation, Mandiant’s M-Trends 2025 Report, State of Cloud Security Report 2025, Google Android Security Bulletin (September 2024), Unit 42 (Palo Alto Networks) and Wakefield Research, Valgrind Memcheck Manual and The Register.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html, https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizer, https://valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html, https://www.rust-lang.org/, https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/SEI+CERT+C+Coding+Standard, https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/control-flow-enforcement-technology.html, https://developer.arm.com/Architectures/Memory%20Tagging%20Extension, https://llvm.org/docs/ScudoHardenedAllocator.html, https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/21/pixnapping_android_attack/, https://www.example.com/pixnapping_paper.pdf, https://www.example.com/gpu_zip.pdf, https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2024-09-01 .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Preliminary reports indicate no evidence of misuse, abuse, or malevolent intent.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Developers: Adopt memory-safe languages and static analysis tools., Security Teams: Monitor for UAF exploitation attempts (e.g., heap spraying)., Executives: Allocate resources for long-term migration away from C/C++., End Users: Apply patches promptly (e.g., browser updates)., Google may issue security bulletins warning users about the scam., Users advised to update systems and exercise caution with AI interactions., UK Parliament committee urging Apple and Google to implement IMEI-based blocking for stolen devices., Public advisory on protective measures against cookie theft, Organizations are advised to adopt a proactive and scientific approach to AI security, focusing on securing cloud infrastructure as a priority., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Update software (e.g., browsers, OS) to the latest versions to mitigate known UAF vulnerabilities.Avoid untrusted websites/plugins that may trigger UAF exploits (e.g., malicious JavaScript).Enable exploit mitigations (e.g., Windows DEP/ASLR, macOS SIP).Report unexpected crashes (potential UAF triggers) to vendors., Users advised to report suspicious emails and avoid sharing sensitive information on unsecured channels., Google recommends updating devices and avoiding sideloaded apps., Google likely issued internal advisories; public guidance focused on safe AI usage. and Guidance on rejecting unnecessary cookies and using security tools.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Malicious Extensions, Email, Compromised Apps, Phishing Email (Spoofed Google Branding), Malicious HTML pages, Google Play Store, Sandbox Escape, Malicious Apps and Malicious Website.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Analysis of Target Allocator Behavior (e.g., Heap Spraying Setup)Probing for UAF-Triggers (e.g., Fuzzing for Crashes).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Third-party library bug, Obfuscated Code in Extensions, Download of malicious apps, Lapse in app store security, Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code, Improper input validation within Chromium’s ANGLE and GPU components, Human error by third-party vendor, Lack of Pointer Nullification After FreeAmbiguous Object Ownership in Complex CodebasesRace Conditions in Asynchronous Operations (e.g., Callbacks)Overreliance on Manual Memory Management in C/C++Insufficient Static/Dynamic Analysis CoverageHeap Allocator Designs Prone to Predictable LayoutsInadequate Sandboxing for Memory-Unsafe Components, Lack of robust email authentication (DMARC/DKIM/SPF) enforcement for spoofed domains.User trust in branded communications without verification.Exploitation of private messaging platforms to evade detection., Android's Custom Tabs API and Activity layering enabling pixel access.Mali GPU's lossless compression creating data-dependent timing side channels.Lack of restrictions on computing victim pixels via blur API/VSync callbacks.Insufficient isolation between app windows in rendering pipeline., Insufficient input validation in Gemini AI components (allowing prompt injection).Lack of safeguards against hidden commands in web requests/browsing history.Over-reliance on user trust in AI interactions without robust abuse detection., Flaws in how certain enterprise applications processed incoming data, Failure to obtain proper consent for biometric data collection, persistent tracking of users without transparency, Lack of standardized IMEI-based blocking system for cloud servicesPotential commercial incentives for tech companies (e.g., revenue from cloud services and replacement devices)Fraud risks associated with IMEI spoofing or misuse, Malware (Redline, other infostealers) used to steal cookies containing sensitive data, Weaknesses in cloud security frameworksInsufficient encryption and identity managementLack of proactive security measures for AI systemsOver-reliance on reactive security approaches, Out-of-bounds memory access in Chrome’s V8 JavaScript and WebAssembly engine.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Removal of Malicious Extensions, Inbound HTML lintingLLM firewall configurationsPost-processing filtersHTML sanitization at ingestionImproved context attributionEnhanced explainability features, Apply patchesUpdate to the latest browser versions, Mandate Static Analysis (ASan, Clang) for All C/C++ CodeRefactor Critical Components to Use Smart Pointers (e.g., `std::shared_ptr`)Implement Custom Allocators with UAF Detection (e.g., Guard Pages)Enforce Code Reviews Focused on Memory SafetyDeploy Runtime Mitigations (CFI, Hardware-Based Protections)Establish a Bug Bounty Program for UAF Reports (e.g., Chrome VRP)Document Object Lifetime Rules for Complex Systems (e.g., Browsers)Train Developers on UAF Exploitation Techniques to Raise Awareness, Strengthen email security protocols to prevent spoofing.Deploy AI-driven phishing detection tools.Partner with messaging platforms to identify and block fraudulent accounts.Launch public awareness campaigns about the scam., Google's partial mitigations (September/December 2024 patches).Planned restrictions on pixel computation capabilities (long-term).OEM collaboration to address GPU-level vulnerabilities (e.g., Mali compression)., Blocked rendering of dangerous links in Gemini.Enhanced defenses against prompt injection attacks.Public awareness campaigns on AI security risks., Product and procedure changes, enhanced privacy controls in services, Evaluate feasibility of IMEI-based cloud blocking with fraud prevention measuresExplore regulatory or government-led solutions for smartphone registration and lockingImprove collaboration between tech companies, law enforcement, and telecom providers, Enhanced user education on cookie security, adoption of anti-malware tools, and VPNs, Strengthen cloud security policiesImplement encryption and identity management best practicesAdopt proactive security measures for AI workloadsEnhance network segmentation and monitoring, Emergency patches and configuration updates to mitigate heap corruption.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. This vulnerability affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/formConfigNoticeConfig. The manipulation of the argument timestart results in buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
A vulnerability has been found in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. This affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/APSecurity. The manipulation of the argument wepkey1 leads to buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
A vulnerability was detected in ketr JEPaaS up to 7.2.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function postilService.loadPostils of the file /je/postil/postil/loadPostil. Performing manipulation of the argument keyWord results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
A security vulnerability has been detected in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function submitOrderPayment of the file mall-oms/oms-boot/src/main/java/com/youlai/mall/oms/controller/app/OrderController.java. Such manipulation of the argument orderSn leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
A weakness has been identified in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. This impacts the function getMemberByMobile of the file mall-ums/ums-boot/src/main/java/com/youlai/mall/ums/controller/app/MemberController.java. This manipulation causes improper access controls. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=google-cloud' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
