Comparison Overview

Google Cloud

VS

Meta

Google Cloud

1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, California, US, 94043
Last Update: 2025-12-26
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://cloud.google.com/

Google Cloud accelerates every organization’s ability to digitally transform its business and industry. We deliver enterprise-grade solutions that leverage Google’s cutting-edge technology, and tools that help developers build more sustainably. Customers in more than 200 countries and territories turn to Google Cloud as their trusted partner to enable growth and solve their most critical business problems.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 46
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5
View Profile

Meta

1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 700 and 749
https://www.metacareers.com/

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 140,153
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google-cloud.jpeg
Google Cloud
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Google Cloud
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google Cloud has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Meta has 1211.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Google Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google-cloud.jpeg
Google Cloud
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities, unauthorized access, data pipeline exploitation
Motivation: Data theft, operational disruption, adversarial attacks on AI models
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Email processing systems, Calendar invitation structures, Document files
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unsafe deserialization of payloads
Motivation: Exploitation for remote code execution, potential data exfiltration, and botnet integration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Contact Discovery Feature Abuse, Brute-Force Queries, Metadata Exploitation
Motivation: Data Harvesting, Targeted Phishing Preparation, Identity-Based Social Engineering, Fraud Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Emails, Fake Websites, Spoofed URLs, AI-Generated Scam Sites
Motivation: Financial Gain, Identity Theft, Data Harvesting for Dark Web Sales
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Google Cloud company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meta company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Google Cloud company.

In the current year, Google Cloud company has reported more cyber incidents than Meta company.

Google Cloud company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Meta company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Meta company and Google Cloud company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both Meta company and Google Cloud company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Both Google Cloud company and Meta company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Google Cloud company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Meta company.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Google Cloud nor Meta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. This vulnerability affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/formConfigNoticeConfig. The manipulation of the argument timestart results in buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-25
Updated
Date
2025-12-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in UTT 进取 512W up to 1.7.7-171114. This affects the function strcpy of the file /goform/APSecurity. The manipulation of the argument wepkey1 leads to buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-25
Updated
Date
2025-12-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in ketr JEPaaS up to 7.2.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function postilService.loadPostils of the file /je/postil/postil/loadPostil. Performing manipulation of the argument keyWord results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-25
Updated
Date
2025-12-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function submitOrderPayment of the file mall-oms/oms-boot/src/main/java/com/youlai/mall/oms/controller/app/OrderController.java. Such manipulation of the argument orderSn leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-25
Updated
Date
2025-12-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A weakness has been identified in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. This impacts the function getMemberByMobile of the file mall-ums/ums-boot/src/main/java/com/youlai/mall/ums/controller/app/MemberController.java. This manipulation causes improper access controls. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-25
Updated
Date
2025-12-25
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References