Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Fried Frank » FRI1770200153

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FRI1770200153)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-82
Company Score Before Incident632 / 1000
Company Score After Incident550 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFRI1770200153
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE01/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Fried Frank's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Fried Frank Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fried Frank breach identified under incident ID FRI1770200153.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fried Frank's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/friedfrank, the number of followers: 36750, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 1649 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 632 and after the incident was 550 with a difference of -82 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fried Frank and their customers.

On 02 February 2026, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Fried Frank Law Firm Data Breach".

Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP disclosed a cybersecurity incident that compromised the personal information of over 46,000 individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), with nearly 46000 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the firm’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack vector; public-facing apps possible. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII compromised; likely credential harvesting and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access suggests stolen credentials. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personally identifiable information (PII) compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 46,000 individuals affected; data likely exfiltrated. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pII exposure; potential for identity theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Credentials from Password Stores (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)