Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FOX1770167007)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Foxit's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Foxit Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Foxit breach identified under incident ID FOX1770167007.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Foxit's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foxit-corporation, the number of followers: 52049, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 559 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 716 and after the incident was 711 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Foxit and their customers.
Foxit Software recently reported "Foxit Patches Critical XSS Vulnerabilities in PDF Editor Cloud and eSign", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Foxit Software has addressed multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in its Foxit PDF Editor Cloud and Foxit eSign platforms, mitigating risks of arbitrary JavaScript execution in user browsers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Foxit PDF Editor Cloud and Foxit eSign, and exposing Session token theft, Data exfiltration and Cross-domain data theft.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Stricter input validation and output encoding, and began remediation that includes Patches released for Foxit PDF Editor Cloud (February 3, 2026) and Foxit eSign (January 15, 2026), while recovery efforts such as Updates deployed automatically continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Security advisories published on Foxit's security advisory page.
The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Verify systems are running the latest versions of Foxit PDF Editor Cloud and Foxit eSign. Report vulnerabilities via [email protected].
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating inject malicious scripts via crafted file attachments, layer names, or URL parameters and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating require user interaction, such as opening a maliciously crafted PDF. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified JavaScript (T1059.007) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating arbitrary JavaScript execution in user browsers via XSS vulnerabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Web Session Cookie (T1539) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating session token theft via malicious scripts in PDF Editor Cloud. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cross-domain data theft within eSign workflows via XSS. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration via malicious JavaScript execution. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating crafted file attachments or layer names to bypass input validation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Foxit Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxit-corporation/incident/FOX1770167007
- Foxit CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxit-corporation
- Foxit Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/fox1770167007-foxit-software-vulnerability-february-2026/
- Foxit CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxit-corporation/history
- Foxit CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cyberpress.org/foxit-pdf-editor-vulnerability/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf