Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Foxit

Foxit Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

foxit.com

Founded in 2001, Foxit is a leading provider of innovative PDF and eSignature products and services, helping knowledge workers increase productivity and do more with documents. Foxit combines easy-to-use desktop software, mobile apps, and cloud services in one powerful solution: The Foxit PDF Editor Suite. This Intelligent Document Platform allows users to create, edit, fill, and sign documents through their integrated PDF Editor and eSign offerings – from anywhere and on any device. Foxit also enables software developers to incorporate innovative PDF technology into their applications via powerful, multi-platform Software Developer Kits (SDK). Winner of numerous awards, Foxit has over 700 million users and has sold to over 485,000


Foxit A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Foxit
Company Information
Website:https://www.foxit.com
Employees number:559
Number of followers:52,049
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:foxit.com
Foxit Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
logo
FoxitSoftware Development
Updated:
02/04/2026
601/1000
Poor
Caa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Foxit Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
FoxitSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Foxit
FoxitPoor
Current Score
601Caa (POOR)
01000
4 incidents
-12.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
716Before Incident
MAY 2026
715Before Incident
APRIL 2026
601Before Incident
MARCH 2026
713Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
716Before Incident
Vulnerability
03 Feb 2026Foxit
Foxit Software: Foxit PDF Editor Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Execute Arbitrary JavaScript

Foxit Patches Critical XSS Vulnerabilities in PDF Editor Cloud and eSign

711After Incident
MEDIUM-5
FOX1770167007
Foxit Patches Critical XSS Vulnerabilities in PDF Editor Cloud and eSign Foxit Software has addressed multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in its Foxit PDF Editor Cloud and Foxit eSign platforms, mitigating risks of arbitrary JavaScript execution in user browsers. The flaws, stemming from insufficient input validation and improper output encoding, could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted file attachments, layer names, or URL parameters. The primary vulnerabilities CVE-2026-1591 and CVE-2026-1592 affect Foxit PDF Editor Cloud, enabling script injection through the File Attachments list and Layers panel. Both carry a Moderate severity rating (CVSS 6.3) and require user interaction, such as opening a maliciously crafted PDF or layer configuration. Exploitation could lead to session token theft, data exfiltration, or redirection to malicious sites, posing heightened risks in enterprise environments where PDF workflows are prevalent. A separate XSS flaw, CVE-2025-66523 (CVSS 6.1), impacts Foxit eSign, arising from improper handling of URL parameters in specially crafted links. This vulnerability could facilitate privilege escalation and cross-domain data theft within eSign workflows. Foxit released patches on February 3, 2026 (PDF Editor Cloud) and January 15, 2026 (eSign), implementing stricter input validation and output encoding. Updates are deployed automatically, though organizations are advised to verify their systems are running the latest versions. The company’s security team encourages vulnerability reporting via [email protected] and provides updates through its [security advisory page](https://www.foxit.com/security-advisories).
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
IMPACT
Session token theftData exfiltrationCross-domain data theftFoxit PDF Editor CloudFoxit eSign
DATA BREACH
Session tokensCross-domain dataData Exfiltration: PossiblePDF
JANUARY 2026
716Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
715Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
733Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Nov 2025Foxit
OpenClaw, Notepad++, Hikvision, Apache Syncope, Foxit, TP-Link, Cisco, Google Chrome and Arista NG Firewall: ⚡ Weekly Recap: AI Skill Malware, 31Tbps DDoS, Notepad++ Hack, LLM Backdoors and More

Cybersecurity Roundup: Trust Abuse, AI Risks, and Supply Chain Attacks Dominate Threat Landscape

713After Incident
CRITICAL-20
TP-HIKFOXGOOREVARITHEOPECIS1770645410
Cybersecurity Roundup: Trust Abuse, AI Risks, and Supply Chain Attacks Dominate Threat Landscape This week’s cybersecurity developments highlight a growing trend: attackers are increasingly exploiting trusted systems AI platforms, software updates, messaging apps, and open-source ecosystems to bypass security controls. Below are the key incidents and trends shaping the threat landscape. ### AI and Open-Source Ecosystems Under Siege OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent framework, has partnered with Google’s VirusTotal to scan uploaded "skills" (AI extensions) for malware, following discoveries of malicious components in its ClawHub marketplace. Researchers warn that AI agents’ broad permissions, persistent memory, and user-controlled configurations create risks like prompt injection, data exfiltration, and supply chain attacks. Trend Micro reported threat actors on Exploit.in discussing OpenClaw for botnet operations, while Veracode noted a surge in typosquatted "claw" packages on npm and PyPI from zero in early 2026 to over 1,000 by February. Meanwhile, MoltBook, an AI-driven social platform built on OpenClaw, faces scrutiny after Simula Research Laboratory identified 506 prompt injection attacks, social engineering exploits, and unregulated cryptocurrency activity comprising 19.3% of its content. The platform’s autonomous AI agents, which interact without human oversight, raise concerns about data privacy and manipulation risks. Security firm Pillar Security detected active scanning of exposed OpenClaw gateways (port 18789), with attackers bypassing AI layers to target the WebSocket API directly for authentication bypasses and command execution. Censys identified 21,639 exposed OpenClaw instances as of January 2026, underscoring the framework’s outdated trust model lacking encryption-at-rest and containerization. ### Supply Chain Attacks: Trusted Updates as Malware Vectors A sophisticated supply chain attack targeted Notepad++ between June and December 2025, where threat actors redirected its WinGUp updater to malicious servers. Despite losing access to a compromised hosting provider in September, attackers reused stolen credentials to maintain control until December. The campaign, attributed to Lotus Blossom, exploited weak update verification in older Notepad++ versions, demonstrating how legitimate domains can become malware distribution hubs. Similarly, Docker’s AI assistant (Ask Gordon) was found vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via DockerDash, a flaw in its Model Context Protocol (MCP) Gateway. Attackers could embed malicious instructions in Docker image metadata, which the AI assistant executed without validation. Docker patched the issue in version 4.50.0 (November 2025). ### State-Sponsored Threats and High-Profile Targets Germany’s BfV and BSI issued a joint advisory warning of state-sponsored phishing attacks via Signal, exploiting the app’s PIN and device-linking features to hijack accounts. Targets included high-ranking officials, military personnel, diplomats, and journalists across Germany and Europe. In Ukraine, the government implemented a Starlink terminal verification system after confirming Russian forces were using the technology on attack drones. Only registered devices are now permitted to operate in the country. ### DDoS, Botnets, and Emerging Attack Techniques The AISURU/Kimwolf botnet set a record with a 31.4 Tbps DDoS attack in November 2025, lasting just 35 seconds. Cloudflare mitigated the attack, which was part of a broader campaign ("The Night Before Christmas") starting in December. Overall, DDoS attacks surged 121% in 2025, averaging 5,376 mitigated attacks per hour. Researchers also uncovered 54 malicious npm packages using EtherHiding, a technique leveraging Ethereum smart contracts to fetch C2 servers, complicating takedown efforts. The malware targets Windows systems with 5+ CPUs, employing sandbox evasion, COM hijacking, and system profiling. ### Linux Threats and Post-Exploitation Frameworks Cyble discovered ShadowHS, a fileless Linux post-exploitation framework that runs entirely in memory, prioritizing stealth and long-term control. The framework includes modules for credential access, lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration, with aggressive defensive tooling enumeration to avoid detection. ### Ransomware, Dark Markets, and Legal Actions - INC Ransomware suffered a setback after Cyber Centaurs breached its backup server, helping 12 victims recover data. The group, active since 2023, had listed over 100 victims on its leak site. - Rui-Siang Lin, administrator of the Incognito Market darknet drug marketplace, was sentenced to 30 years in prison for facilitating $105 million in narcotics sales to over 400,000 users. - Xinbi, a Telegram-based illicit marketplace, processed $17.9 billion in transactions, outlasting competitors like Haowang and Tudou Guarantee, which saw declines of 100% and 74%, respectively. ### Critical Vulnerabilities and Exploits Notable CVEs disclosed this week include: - CVE-2026-25049 (n8n) - CVE-2026-0709 (Hikvision Wireless Access Point) - CVE-2026-23795 (Apache Syncope) - CVE-2026-1591/1592 (Foxit PDF Editor Cloud) - CVE-2026-24512 (ingress-nginx) - Multiple CVEs in Django, Google Chrome, Cisco, TP-Link, F5 BIG-IP, and Arista NG Firewall Additionally, XBOW uncovered two Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) flaws in Spree (CVE-2026-22588/22589), allowing unauthorized access to user address data. ### Microsoft’s AI Backdoor Scanner Microsoft developed a scanner to detect hidden backdoors in open-weight AI models, addressing risks for enterprises relying on third-party large language models (LLMs). The tool identifies three key indicators: 1. Attention shifts when a hidden trigger is present. 2. Leakage of poisoned training data. 3. Partial triggers still activating malicious responses. The scanner extracts memorized content from models and ranks suspicious substrings as potential triggers. ### Conclusion This week’s incidents underscore a shift in attacker tactics exploiting trust in ecosystems, AI workflows, and supply chains rather than relying on traditional malware. As threats evolve, organizations must monitor integrations, verify updates, and secure AI deployments to mitigate risks from both state-sponsored actors and cybercriminals.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain AttackAI ExploitationDDoSRansomwarePhishingMalwarePost-Exploitation Framework
MOTIVATION
Financial GainEspionageData ExfiltrationBotnet OperationsRansomwareDrug TraffickingState-Sponsored Surveillance
IMPACT
AI Agent ConfigurationsUser Data on MoltBookCredentialsSystem ProfilesPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Payment InformationOpenClaw AI FrameworkNotepad++Docker AI AssistantSignal Messaging AppStarlink TerminalsLinux Systems (ShadowHS)Spree E-Commerce PlatformUnauthorized Command ExecutionData ExfiltrationBotnet OperationsAI Agent ManipulationDDoS DisruptionsMoltBook (AI-Driven Social Platform)Notepad++DockerOpenClawRegulatory Violations (GDPR, etc.)Fines for Data BreachesIdentity Theft Risk: HighPayment Information Risk: High
DATA BREACH
AI Agent ConfigurationsUser DataCredentialsPIIPayment InformationDrug Trafficking RecordsSensitivity Of Data: HighYes (OpenClaw, ShadowHS, INC Ransomware)Yes (Ransomware)No (OpenClaw, ShadowHS)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
OCTOBER 2025
733Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
733Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
732Before Incident
JULY 2025
732Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2019
716Before Incident
Breach
03 Sep 2019Foxit
Foxit Software

Foxit Software Data Breach

652After Incident
CRITICAL-64
FOX218080425
The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Foxit Software on September 3, 2019. Unauthorized access to user account data potentially exposed users' names, email addresses, company names, phone numbers, passwords, and IP addresses, though no credit card or payment information was compromised.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
namesemail addressescompany namesphone numberspasswordsIP addresses
DATA BREACH
namesemail addressescompany namesphone numberspasswordsIP addressesnamesemail addressesphone numbersIP addresses
DECEMBER 2017
757Before Incident
Breach
01 Dec 2017Foxit
Foxit

Man-in-the-Middle Attack on Fox-IT

695After Incident
CRITICAL-62
FOX215926223
Netherlands-based Fox-IT, one of the world's leading IT security providers was targeted by the cyber attack after an unknown attacker carried out a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack and spied on a small number of Fox-IT customers. The company's domain name was taken over by an attacker, who then used it to sign up for an SSL certificate under Fox-name. IT's . Fox-IT also moved rapidly to alert affected clients and reset passwords that had been captured but were useless due to the usage of two-factor authentication by Fox-IT. The business added that the majority of the intercepted files did not include critical information, and none of the files were tagged as secret.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack
MOTIVATION
Spying on Fox-IT customers
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Intercepted files
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Intercepted filesSensitivity Of Data: Majority of intercepted files did not include critical information, none tagged as secret

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Foxit ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Foxit's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Foxit ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Foxit's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Foxit Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo