Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) » THEUSDFBI1789129739

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (THEUSDFBI1789129739)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-35
Company Score Before Incident734 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTHEUSDFBI1789129739
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORMalware loader, Exploited vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSEDStolen data from 8 U.S....
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2019
STATUSCompleted (sentencing)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) breach identified under incident ID THEUSDFBI1789129739.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fbi, the number of followers: 963487, the industry type: Law Enforcement and the number of employees: 10425 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 734 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -35 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Developer Sentenced to Four Years in U.S. Prison", has drawn attention.

A Ukrainian national, Oleksii Lytvynenko (44), has been sentenced to four years in a U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Stolen data from 8 U.S. victims and 4 international targets, plus an estimated financial loss of $150 million (estimated ransoms extorted).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Completed (sentencing).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including exploited vulnerabilities, and attack vector such as Malware loader, Exploited vulnerabilities and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malware loader used to deploy ransomware on compromised systems. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malware loader used to deploy ransomware on compromised systems and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating helped develop malicious tools, including a malware loader. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating malware loader used to deploy ransomware (implied persistence). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exploited vulnerabilities (implied privilege escalation). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware loader used to deploy ransomware (implied obfuscation) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating conti ransomware operations (implied defense evasion). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating conti targeted critical infrastructure (implied credential access). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data from 8 U.S. victims and 4 international targets. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data from 8 U.S. victims and 4 international targets. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating conti ransomware operations (implied C2 infrastructure). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and stolen data from 8 U.S. victims. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data encryption such as Yes (ransomware encryption), and conti ransomware strain and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks (implied service disruption). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (50%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (40%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (40%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Service Stop (60%)

Sources & References