DLF
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
dutch-laravel-foundation
Employees number:
9
Number of followers:
735
NAICS:
None
Industry Type:
Homepage:
dutchlaravelfoundation.nl
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
DUT_3008220
Scan Status:
In-progress
Dutch Laravel Foundation Company CyberSecurity Posture
dutchlaravelfoundation.nl
Met goedkeuring van Taylor Otwell, bedenker van het Laravel PHP Framework, heeft een zevental bedrijven het initiatief genomen om het gebruik van Laravel in Nederland verder te professionaliseren. Begin 2019 is daarom de Dutch Laravel Foundation opgericht. Het doel van de stichting is tweeledig. Enerzijds mogen opdrachtgevers, die één van onze leden inschakelen voor het bouwen van een webapplicatie, ervan uitgaan dat ze professionele Laravel developers in zee gaan. Dat is prettig werken! Anderzijds zorgt de stichting voor onderlinge kennisuitwisseling tussen de leden, om zo de kennis en kwaliteit van het Laravel framework in Nederland naar een nog hoger niveau te tillen. Als stichting zijn we in Nederland tevens actief in het promoten van Laravel onder potentiële opdrachtgevers voor nieuwe webapplicaties.
Dutch Laravel Foundation A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
DLF Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
DLF
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
DLF Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
DLF
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
DLF Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Laravel, Laravel Swiss and Bee Interactive: Livewire Filemanager Vulnerability Exposes Web Applications to RCE Attacks
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Critical RCE Vulnerability Discovered in Livewire Filemanager for Laravel (CVE-2025-14894) A high-severity security flaw (CVE-2025-14894, VU#650657) has been identified in Livewire Filemanager, a popular file management component used in Laravel web applications. The vulnerability, disclosed on January 16, 2026, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable servers by exploiting improper file validation. ### Root Cause & Exploitation The flaw stems from inadequate file type and MIME validation in the `LivewireFilemanagerComponent.php` component. Attackers can upload malicious PHP files via the web interface, which are then stored in the publicly accessible `/storage/` directory assuming the `php artisan storage:link` command was run during Laravel setup. Once uploaded, the files can be executed remotely, granting remote code execution (RCE) with the privileges of the web server user. ### Impact & Risks Successful exploitation enables: - Full system compromise, including unrestricted file read/write access. - Lateral movement to connected systems and infrastructure. - No authentication required attackers only need to upload a PHP webshell and access it via the storage URL. ### Affected Vendors & Response At the time of disclosure, no vendors (Bee Interactive, Laravel, Laravel Swiss) have acknowledged the vulnerability. The CERT/CC recommends immediate mitigation, including: - Removing web serving capability from the `/storage/` directory if unnecessary. - Implementing strict file upload restrictions (e.g., allowlists for safe file types, MIME validation). - Storing uploaded files outside web-accessible directories and disabling the public storage link if unused. The vulnerability highlights a critical gap in Livewire’s security model, which defers file validation to developers despite architectural risks. Organizations using the component are urged to apply protections independently.
DLF Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for DLF
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dutch Laravel Foundation in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dutch Laravel Foundation in 2026.
Incident Types DLF vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dutch Laravel Foundation in 2026.
Incident History — DLF (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DLF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
DLF Company Subsidiaries
Met goedkeuring van Taylor Otwell, bedenker van het Laravel PHP Framework, heeft een zevental bedrijven het initiatief genomen om het gebruik van Laravel in Nederland verder te professionaliseren. Begin 2019 is daarom de Dutch Laravel Foundation opgericht. Het doel van de stichting is tweeledig. Enerzijds mogen opdrachtgevers, die één van onze leden inschakelen voor het bouwen van een webapplicatie, ervan uitgaan dat ze professionele Laravel developers in zee gaan. Dat is prettig werken! Anderzijds zorgt de stichting voor onderlinge kennisuitwisseling tussen de leden, om zo de kennis en kwaliteit van het Laravel framework in Nederland naar een nog hoger niveau te tillen. Als stichting zijn we in Nederland tevens actief in het promoten van Laravel onder potentiële opdrachtgevers voor nieuwe webapplicaties.
Loading...
DLF Similar Companies
Thoughtworks
We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong technical foundations and embed
Computacenter
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technol
VINCI Energies
In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementat
SONDA
We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By understanding the region's chal
.png)
DLF CyberSecurity News
January 21, 2026 10:55 AM
GSMA warns EU Cybersecurity Act revisions could slow network upgrades
The European Commission has submitted proposed revisions to the EU Cybersecurity Act, aiming to strengthen cybersecurity capabilities,...
January 21, 2026 10:32 AM
New EU cybersecurity package strengthens resilience and ENISA powers
A revised EU Cybersecurity Act links certification reform with supply-chain derisking, simplified compliance, and stronger operational...
January 21, 2026 10:30 AM
Experts Welcome Global Cybersecurity Vulnerability Enumeration Launch
A new service, the Global Cybersecurity Vulnerability Enumeration (GCVE), offers an alternative to the US-led CVE.
January 21, 2026 10:17 AM
Foreign rail technologies cybersecurity: UNIFE urges EU action
UNIFE urges EU bodies to act on foreign rail technologies cybersecurity and use new powers to limit high-risk non-EU suppliers.
January 21, 2026 10:00 AM
Internal Audit Focal Points for 2026 as AI Impacts Conventional Cybersecurity – Tim Lietz – BSW #431
Key emerging risks include cybersecurity (41%) and Generative AI (Gen AI) (35%), both of which present challenges in skill development and...
January 21, 2026 09:57 AM
Asset discovery market transformation in 2026: why EASM and CAASM matter
Discover why the Asset Discovery market is transforming in 2026. Omdia analysts Elvia Finalle and Andrew Braunberg explore how EASM and CAASM are augmenting...
January 21, 2026 09:41 AM
Top 10: Construction Cybersecurity Solutions
Cybersecurity is a vital feature to include when it comes to building resilience for construction companies.
January 21, 2026 09:33 AM
Greece will cooperate with Israel on anti-drone systems, cybersecurity, Greek minister says
ATHENS, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Greece will cooperate with Israel on anti-drone systems and cybersecurity, Greek Defence Minister Nikos...
January 21, 2026 09:05 AM
Commission strengthens EU cybersecurity resilience and capabilities
Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, said: "Cybersecurity threats are not just technical...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
DLF CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Dutch Laravel Foundation
The official website of Dutch Laravel Foundation is https://www.dutchlaravelfoundation.nl.
Dutch Laravel Foundation’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 749, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Dutch Laravel Foundation’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Dutch Laravel Foundation been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Dutch Laravel Foundation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Dutch Laravel Foundation have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Dutch Laravel Foundation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Dutch Laravel Foundation
Dutch Laravel Foundation operates primarily in the Information Technology & Services industry.
Number of Employees at Dutch Laravel Foundation
Dutch Laravel Foundation employs approximately 9 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Dutch Laravel Foundation
Dutch Laravel Foundation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Dutch Laravel Foundation’s LinkedIn Followers
Dutch Laravel Foundation’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 735 followers.
NAICS Classification of Dutch Laravel Foundation
Dutch Laravel Foundation is classified under the NAICS code None, which corresponds to Others.
Dutch Laravel Foundation’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Dutch Laravel Foundation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Dutch Laravel Foundation’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Dutch Laravel Foundation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dutch-laravel-foundation.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Dutch Laravel Foundation
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Dutch Laravel Foundation has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Dutch Laravel Foundation has an estimated 10,439 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Dutch Laravel Foundation ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.
How does Dutch Laravel Foundation detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with removing web serving capability from the /storage/ directory if unnecessary, containment measures with implementing strict file upload restrictions (e.g., allowlists for safe file types, mime validation), containment measures with storing uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, containment measures with disabling the public storage link if unused..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Critical RCE Vulnerability Discovered in Livewire Filemanager for Laravel (CVE-2025-14894)
Description: A high-severity security flaw (CVE-2025-14894, VU#650657) has been identified in Livewire Filemanager, a popular file management component used in Laravel web applications. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable servers by exploiting improper file validation.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2026-01-16
Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Attack Vector: Improper file type and MIME validation in file uploads
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-14894
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Systems Affected: Laravel web applications using Livewire Filemanager
Operational Impact: Full system compromise, lateral movement to connected systems
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Entity Name: Livewire Filemanager (Laravel component)
Entity Type: Software/Framework
Industry: Web Development
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Containment Measures: Removing web serving capability from the /storage/ directory if unnecessaryImplementing strict file upload restrictions (e.g., allowlists for safe file types, MIME validation)Storing uploaded files outside web-accessible directoriesDisabling the public storage link if unused
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
File Types Exposed: PHP files (malicious webshells)
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by removing web serving capability from the /storage/ directory if unnecessary, implementing strict file upload restrictions (e.g., allowlists for safe file types, mime validation), storing uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, disabling the public storage link if unused and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Lessons Learned: The vulnerability highlights a critical gap in Livewire’s security model, which defers file validation to developers despite architectural risks.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Recommendations: Apply strict file upload restrictions (allowlists, MIME validation), Store uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, Disable public storage link if unused, Monitor for unauthorized file uploadsApply strict file upload restrictions (allowlists, MIME validation), Store uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, Disable public storage link if unused, Monitor for unauthorized file uploadsApply strict file upload restrictions (allowlists, MIME validation), Store uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, Disable public storage link if unused, Monitor for unauthorized file uploadsApply strict file upload restrictions (allowlists, MIME validation), Store uploaded files outside web-accessible directories, Disable public storage link if unused, Monitor for unauthorized file uploads
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The vulnerability highlights a critical gap in Livewire’s security model, which defers file validation to developers despite architectural risks.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Source: CERT/CC
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: CERT/CC.
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) LARDUTCLO1768827460
Root Causes: Inadequate file type and MIME validation in LivewireFilemanagerComponent.php
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2026-01-16.
Impact of the Incidents
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Removing web serving capability from the /storage/ directory if unnecessaryImplementing strict file upload restrictions (e.g., allowlists for safe file types and MIME validation)Storing uploaded files outside web-accessible directoriesDisabling the public storage link if unused.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The vulnerability highlights a critical gap in Livewire’s security model, which defers file validation to developers despite architectural risks.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor for unauthorized file uploads, Disable public storage link if unused, Apply strict file upload restrictions (allowlists, MIME validation) and Store uploaded files outside web-accessible directories.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is CERT/CC.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=dutch-laravel-foundation' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
