Comparison Overview

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

SONDA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dutch Laravel Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Dutch Laravel Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SONDA company has not reported any.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

In the current year, SONDA company and Dutch Laravel Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Dutch Laravel Foundation company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while SONDA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds any compliance certifications.

Q: Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

SONDA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dutch Laravel Foundation company.

Dutch Laravel Foundation

Bleiswijkseweg 55, Zoetermeer, 2712PB, NL

Last Update: 2026-01-19

View Profile

Between 700 and 749

https://www.dutchlaravelfoundation.nl

Met goedkeuring van Taylor Otwell, bedenker van het Laravel PHP Framework, heeft een zevental bedrijven het initiatief genomen om het gebruik van Laravel in Nederland verder te professionaliseren. Begin 2019 is daarom de Dutch Laravel Foundation opgericht. Het doel van de stichting is tweeledig. Enerzijds mogen opdrachtgevers, die één van onze leden inschakelen voor het bouwen van een webapplicatie, ervan uitgaan dat ze professionele Laravel developers in zee gaan. Dat is prettig werken! Anderzijds zorgt de stichting voor onderlinge kennisuitwisseling tussen de leden, om zo de kennis en kwaliteit van het Laravel framework in Nederland naar een nog hoger niveau te tillen. Als stichting zijn we in Nederland tevens actief in het promoten van Laravel onder potentiële opdrachtgevers voor nieuwe webapplicaties.

NAICS: None

NAICS Definition: Others

Employees: 9

Subsidiaries: 0

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

1

View Profile

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 2026-01-18

Between 750 and 799

http://www.sonda.com

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By understanding the region's challenges and demands, we provide a comprehensive portfolio of business solutions tailored to the primary industries, driving innovation and success in the market. We operate in 13 countries with a dedicated team of over 15,000 regional employees, earning the trust of more than 5,000 corporate clients to lead their digital transformation journeys. Our extensive presence spans Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay.

NAICS: None

NAICS Definition: Others

Employees: 14,805

Subsidiaries: 1

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Dutch Laravel Foundation

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

SONDA

—

ISO 27001

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 1

Not verified

—

SOC2 Type 2

Not verified

—

GDPR

Not verified

—

PCI DSS

Not verified

—

HIPAA

Not verified

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dutch Laravel Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incident History — Dutch Laravel Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dutch Laravel Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Dutch Laravel Foundation

Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025

Type:Vulnerability

Attack Vector: Improper file type and MIME validation in file uploads

Blog: Blog

SONDA

Incidents

No Incident

SONDA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dutch Laravel Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Dutch Laravel Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SONDA company has not reported any.

In the current year, SONDA company and Dutch Laravel Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SONDA company nor Dutch Laravel Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Dutch Laravel Foundation company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while SONDA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SONDA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dutch Laravel Foundation company.

SONDA company employs more people globally than Dutch Laravel Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dutch Laravel Foundation nor SONDA holds GDPR certification.

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss4

Base: 7.7

Severity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

References

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.1

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published

Date

2026-01-20

Updated

Date

2026-01-20

Risk Information

cvss3

Base: 8.2

Severity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Dutch Laravel Foundation

VS

SONDA

Dutch Laravel Foundation

SONDA

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Dutch Laravel Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Comparison Overview

Dutch Laravel Foundation

VS

SONDA

Dutch Laravel Foundation

SONDA

Compliance Badges Comparison

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Incident History — Dutch Laravel Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Incident History — SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Notable Incidents

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability LARDUTCLO1768827460

No Incident

FAQ

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation company and SONDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified — Dutch Laravel Foundation or SONDA ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant — Dutch Laravel Foundation or SONDA ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation and SONDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Dutch Laravel Foundation and SONDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-0933

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21990

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21989

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21988

Risk Information

CVE-2026-21987

Risk Information