Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » D-Link » DLI1790073409

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DLI1790073409)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-5
Company Score Before Incident681 / 1000
Company Score After Incident676 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDLI1790073409
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORNetwork
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE17/09/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of D-Link's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts D-Link Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the D-Link breach identified under incident ID DLI1790073409.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of D-Link's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dlink-corp, the number of followers: 13057, the industry type: Information Technology & Services and the number of employees: 521 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 681 and after the incident was 676 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on D-Link and their customers.

On 18 September 2024, D-Link disclosed Vulnerability Disclosure and Memory Corruption issues under the banner "Critical D-Link DIR-822A Router Vulnerabilities Expose Devices to Remote Exploitation".

D-Link has disclosed two critical vulnerabilities in its non-US DIR-822A router, including a stack-based buffer overflow flaw (CVE-2026-86296) with a maximum CVSS score of 10.0 and a public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting D-Link DIR-822A routers (non-US models).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Reducing internet exposure, Disabling remote management and Restricting administrative access to trusted systems, and began remediation that includes Firmware updates (pending investigation), and stakeholders are being briefed through Advisory SAP10516 published and updated.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Risks posed by memory-safety flaws in edge devices, particularly routers with exposed management interfaces, and recommending next steps like Monitor D-Link’s regional support portals for updates, Verify exact model and version before applying updates and Reduce internet exposure of affected devices, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advisory SAP10516 published and updated with mitigation recommendations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including stack-based buffer overflow flaw (CVE-2026-86296) with CVSS 10.0, and remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit available, and memory corruption via `strcpy` in `udhcpcd/serverpacket.c`. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating out-of-bounds write flaw (CVE-2026-86510) requires low-level privileges. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromising the router’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating memory corruption via unsafe `strcpy` function. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal from Tools (T1066) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating public PoC exploit available; attackers may remove traces. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (90%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal from Tools (50%)

Sources & References