Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
D-Link

D-Link Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

dlink.com

D-Link is a global leader in designing, developing and providing networking and connectivity products and total solutions for consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, enterprises, and service providers. From relatively modest beginnings in Taiwan, the company has grown since 1987 into an award-winning global brand in 57 countries. D-Link友訊科技(2332)成立於 1987年,以全球智能網通設備與全方位網通解決方案領導者之姿,於全球57 國設有120個營運與銷售據點,打造數位新絲路,引領全球智能生活;同時亦不斷創新、挑戰自我,屢獲德國紅點設計大獎、德國iF產品設計大獎、美國CES Innovation Awards、IoT Breakthrough Awards、台灣精品獎等國內/外大獎肯定。


D-Link A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

D-Link
Company Information
Website:https://www.dlink.com
Employees number:525
Number of followers:12,654
NAICS:
Industry Type:Information Technology & Services
Homepage:dlink.com
D-Link Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
D-LinkInformation Technology & Services
Updated:
04/06/2026
684/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
D-Link Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
D-LinkInformation Technology & Services
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

D-Link
D-LinkWeak
Current Score
684B (WEAK)
01000
8 incidents
-9 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
684Before Incident
MAY 2026
683Before Incident
APRIL 2026
680Before Incident
MARCH 2026
683Before Incident
Vulnerability
19 Mar 2026D-Link
D-Link: Mirai Botnet Growth Spurs Massive DDoS Attacks and Proxy Exploits

Botnet Surge in 2025: Record DDoS Attacks and Evolving Threats

679After Incident
HIGH-4
DLI1774527833
Botnet Surge in 2025: Record DDoS Attacks and Evolving Threats Botnet activity reached unprecedented levels in 2025, with security researchers documenting a sharp rise in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks and advanced evasion tactics. Spamhaus reported a 26% increase in botnet command-and-control (C2) servers in the first half of the year, followed by a 24% jump in the second half, culminating in 21,425 C2 servers detected between July and December alone. The surge is attributed to the proliferation of open-source botnet code, the expansion of poorly secured IoT devices, and the evolution of Mirai-based malware variants. First identified in 2016, Mirai remains a dominant threat, exploiting devices running ARC processors with default credentials or unpatched vulnerabilities. The public release of its source code enabled threat actors to create 116 distinct variants from over 21,000 analyzed samples, including Satori, which infected 260,000 routers in 2017 by targeting a flaw in D-Link DSL-2750B devices. The most disruptive botnet in 2025 was Aisuru-KimWolf, a Mirai descendant responsible for record-breaking DDoS attacks, including a 31.4 terabit-per-second (Tbps) assault and a 14.1 billion packet-per-second (PPS) attack. The botnet compromised 1–4 million devices globally, with its infrastructure spanning Canada and Germany. On March 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice announced coordinated disruption efforts, seizing DigitalOcean virtual servers linked to Aisuru, KimWolf, JackSkid, and Mossad botnets. Court documents revealed over 3 million infected devices and hundreds of thousands of DDoS attacks, often accompanied by extortion demands. Despite law enforcement actions, the commoditization of botnet tools, unpatched IoT devices, and persistent default credentials ensure that Mirai and its variants will remain a persistent threat.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DDoS Attack
MOTIVATION
ExtortionDisruption
IMPACT
Systems Affected: 1–4 million devices globallyOperational Impact: Hundreds of thousands of DDoS attacks
FEBRUARY 2026
682Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
683Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
677Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
677Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
675Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
677Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
671Before Incident
JULY 2025
688Before Incident
Cyber Attack
30 Jul 2025D-Link
Netgear and D-Link: Masjesu Botnet Targets Routers and Gateways For Paid DDoS Attacks

Masjesu Botnet: A Stealthy, Evolving IoT Threat for DDoS-as-a-Service

669After Incident
HIGH-19
DLINET1775644215
Masjesu Botnet: A Stealthy, Evolving IoT Threat for DDoS-as-a-Service The Masjesu botnet, first detected in early 2023 and still active through 2026, has established itself as a highly sophisticated DDoS-for-hire service targeting Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Unlike traditional botnets that rely on large-scale, noisy infections, Masjesu prioritizes stealth and long-term persistence, avoiding high-profile networks like U.S. Department of Defense systems to evade detection and legal action. ### Stealth Tactics & Operational Methods Masjesu employs advanced evasion techniques to bypass security measures, including: - XOR-based encryption to conceal command-and-control (C2) domains and payloads, decrypting them only at runtime. - Hardened persistence by binding to a hardcoded TCP port and ignoring termination signals. - Process masquerading, renaming its executable to mimic legitimate system files (e.g., a Linux dynamic linker) and using cron jobs to re-execute every 15 minutes. ### Exploitation & Propagation The botnet spreads by scanning random IP addresses for vulnerable open ports, targeting devices from manufacturers like D-Link, Netgear, Huawei, and GPON. Upon exploitation, it deploys a malicious shell script to recruit devices into its network. Once integrated, bots receive instructions to launch DDoS attacks under a unique "masjesu" user-agent. ### Defensive Measures & Impact Due to its obfuscation-heavy approach, traditional antivirus detection is often ineffective. Organizations are advised to: - Monitor outbound traffic for unusual HTTP requests or connections to known malicious domains. - Implement process and file integrity monitoring to detect spoofed system files or unauthorized cron jobs. - Enforce basic IoT security hygiene, including changing default credentials and applying firmware updates to patch known vulnerabilities. Masjesu’s commercial DDoS-for-hire model and low-profile operations make it a persistent threat, underscoring the need for behavior-based defenses in IoT security.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DDoS-for-hire
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (DDoS-as-a-service)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: IoT devices (D-Link, Netgear, Huawei, GPON)Operational Impact: Disruption of services due to DDoS attacks
DATA BREACH
Data Encryption: XOR-based encryption for C2 domains and payloads
JULY 2025
691Before Incident
Vulnerability
11 Jul 2025D-Link
D-Link

Critical Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in D-Link DIR-825 Rev.B 2.10 Firmware

687After Incident
LOW-4
DLI331071125
A critical stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the D-Link DIR-825 Rev.B 2.10 router firmware allows unauthenticated, zero-click remote attackers to crash the device’s HTTP server. This flaw resides in the router’s httpd binary and stems from improper handling of the language parameter in the switch_language.cgi endpoint. Exploitation requires no valid credentials or user interaction, meaning an adversary only needs network access to the target device’s management interface to trigger a denial-of-service condition. This vulnerability disrupts VPNs, guest Wi-Fi, and IoT device management, leading to potential service outages and loss of network functionality.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
MOTIVATION
Denial-of-Service (DoS)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: D-Link DIR-825 Rev.B 2.10 router firmwareOperational Impact: Disrupts VPNs, guest Wi-Fi, and IoT device management
MAY 2025
694Before Incident
Vulnerability
26 May 2025D-Link
D-Link

Hardcoded Telnet Credentials Vulnerability in D-Link Routers

689After Incident
MEDIUM-5
D-L636052625
A significant security flaw (CVE-2025-46176) has exposed thousands of D-Link routers to remote code execution attacks through hardcoded Telnet credentials embedded in firmware. The vulnerability affects DIR-605L v2.13B01 and DIR-816L v2.06B01 models, scoring 6.5 on the CVSS v3.1 scale with medium severity. Security researchers discovered the flaw through firmware analysis, revealing that both router models contain default Telnet credentials that cannot be changed by users. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands remotely.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
MOTIVATION
Unauthenticated access and arbitrary command execution
IMPACT
D-Link DIR-605L (v2.13B01)D-Link DIR-816L (v2.06B01)
MAY 2025
697Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 May 2025D-Link
Next.js, D-Link, Apache and Netgear: Cyberattack Trends & Variations: What Our Honeypots Reveal

Honeypot Data Reveals Persistent Cyber Threats: A Year in Exploit Trends (2025–2026)

693After Incident
CRITICAL-4
NETVERDLITHE1780583187
Honeypot Data Reveals Persistent Cyber Threats: A Year in Exploit Trends (2025–2026) Between May 2025 and May 2026, a global network of honeypots recorded over 9.2 million security events originating from 54,000 unique IP addresses across 163 countries, offering a snapshot of evolving cyber threats. The data, collected from strategically deployed decoy systems, highlights sustained attacker interest in vulnerable services, with SSH (75% of events) dominating activity reinforcing the risks of exposing the protocol directly to the internet. Web applications (10%) and SMTP services (10%) followed, while attacks on medical protocols remained negligible. ### Top Exploited Vulnerabilities Nine vulnerabilities stood out for their high exploitation rates, with React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) a critical flaw in Next.js servers leading the pack. Disclosed in December 2025, it triggered a surge in attacks, with six IP addresses accounting for 90% of December’s activity. Other notable targets included: - ProxyLogon/ProxyShell/ProxyNotShell (Microsoft Exchange): Persistent exploitation since 2021, leveraging unpatched servers for SYSTEM-level access. - Shellshock (CVE-2014-6271): A decade-old Bash vulnerability still actively probed for initial access. - ThinkPHP (CVE-2018-25270): Sustained attacks on the Chinese PHP framework post-2026 disclosure. - Log4Shell (CVE-2021-44228): Declining but still targeted, reflecting its historical impact. - Legacy Router Flaws: D-Link Dir-645 (CVE-2015-2051) and Netgear DGN1000/DGN2000 (CVE-2024-12847) saw renewed activity, tied to campaigns like Rondodox. - CrushFTP (CVE-2025-54309): A single, concentrated attack on October 13, 2025, exploiting a race-condition flaw. ### Key Observations - Web applications faced relentless attacks, with CVEs like React2Shell and ProxyShell driving spikes. - Routers and IoT devices remained prime targets, often via decade-old vulnerabilities. - Exploit timelines varied: Some flaws (e.g., CrushFTP) saw brief, intense campaigns, while others (e.g., Shellshock) endured as persistent threats. - Attacker behavior aligned globally, with honeypot operators reporting similar patterns. The data underscores the longevity of high-impact vulnerabilities and the risks of unpatched systems, even years after disclosure. Honeypots continue to serve as critical tools for detecting emerging threats and attacker methodologies.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Exploit TrendsVulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Decoy honeypot systems
OCTOBER 2023
755Before Incident
Breach
01 Oct 2023D-Link
D-Link

D-Link Data Breach

670After Incident
HIGH-85
DLI1117101123
Global networking equipment and technology company D-Link revealed a breach after stolen data was offered for sale on the Breach Forums platform by a threat actor. Upon learning of the purported data breach, the corporation promptly enlisted the assistance of security firm Trend Micro to investigate the purported event. The threat actor declared that it had obtained the source code for D-Link's D-View network management software as well as 3 million lines of personal data. The exposed information includes names, emails, addresses, phone numbers, firms, dates of registration, and the most recent times a user signed in among the stolen data.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain
IMPACT
Source code for D-Link's D-View network management software3 million lines of personal data
DATA BREACH
Source codePersonal data3 million lines of personal dataNamesEmailsAddressesPhone numbersFirmsDates of registrationMost recent times a user signed in
JANUARY 2022
756Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2022D-Link
CISA warns of D-Link router vulnerability exploitation

Exploitation of CVE-2022-37055 in D-Link Go-RT-AC750 Routers

752After Incident
CRITICAL-4
DLI1765260054
A pair of vulnerabilities – one old, and one new – has been added to the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog. CVE-2022-37055 is a three-year-old buffer overflow vulnerability in D-Link Go-RT-AC750 routers, which is a sticky one, as the product has reached “end of life” (EoL) and is no longer supported by D-Link. JavaScript is required for CAPTCHA verification to submit this form. By becoming a member, I agree to receive information and promotional messages from Cyber Daily. I can opt out of these communications at any time. For more information, please visit our Privacy Statement. Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more! JavaScript is required for CAPTCHA verification to submit this form. If you check the box above before you log in, you won’t have to log back into the website next time you return, even if you close your browser and come back later. If you check this box before you log in, you won’t have to log back into the website next time you return, even if you close your browser and come back later. Keep me signed in on this device. To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in. You’re out of free articles for this month The company’s own security announcement regarding the vulnerability outlined the dangers of using EoL network hardware, and with hackers now on the warpath, it makes for timely reading. “D-Link strongly recommends that this pro
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: D-Link Go-RT-AC750 routersBrand Reputation Impact: Potential negative impact due to unsupported EoL hardware
APRIL 2019
758Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Apr 2019D-Link
D-Link: D-Link Router Command Injection Vulnerability Actively Exploited in the Wild

D-Link Router Unauthenticated Command Injection and DNS Hijacking Vulnerabilities

753After Incident
CRITICAL-5
DLI1767786327
D-Link Routers Targeted in Long-Running DNS Hijacking Campaign D-Link has confirmed critical unauthenticated command injection vulnerabilities in multiple router models, enabling attackers to remotely modify DNS settings without authentication. These flaws, exploited since at least 2016, allow threat actors to redirect user traffic to malicious infrastructure, facilitating malware distribution, phishing, and traffic interception. Security researchers have tracked ongoing exploitation campaigns targeting home and enterprise networks across multiple continents. The vulnerabilities stem from improper input validation in the routers’ web interfaces, permitting attackers to alter DNS configurations persistently. A large-scale malvertising campaign first reported in December 2016 affected at least 166 router models, including D-Link devices, by redirecting users to malicious ad servers and phishing sites. By April 2019, threat intelligence teams observed sustained attacks against D-Link routers over three consecutive months. Attackers leveraged Google Cloud Platform to deploy the DNSChanger malware variant, automating exploits and increasing the vulnerability’s severity. Publicly disclosed exploits further amplified the risk. Affected Models and Regions: - DSL-2740R (Rev. A, Europe) – Firmware EU v1.15 and older (EDB-35917) - DSL-2640B (Rev. T, Malaysia) – Firmware GE v1.07 and older (EDB-42197) - DSL-2780B (Rev. A, AU/NZ/EU) – Firmware v1.01.14 and older (EDB-37237) - DSL-526B (Rev. B, Australia) – Firmware AU v2.01 and older (EDB-37241) These models are primarily deployed outside the U.S. through regional carriers with custom firmware. D-Link advises users to perform factory resets, set unique admin passwords, and manually configure DNS settings using trusted providers like Google DNS (8.8.8.8) or Cloudflare (1.1.1.1). Official firmware patches should be obtained through regional carriers.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DNS HijackingUnauthenticated Command Injection
MOTIVATION
Malware distributionTraffic interceptionPhishing
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Multiple D-Link router modelsOperational Impact: Traffic redirection to malicious infrastructureBrand Reputation Impact: Significant risk due to persistent control over compromised routersIdentity Theft Risk: High due to traffic interceptionPayment Information Risk: High due to traffic interception
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: User traffic dataSensitivity Of Data: High (traffic interception)Personally Identifiable Information: Potentially exposed due to traffic interception

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for D-Link ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on D-Link's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with D-Link ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view D-Link's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?