What is the official website of DC Advisory ?

The official website of DC Advisory is http://www.dcadvisory.com.

What is DC Advisory's cybersecurity risk score?

DC Advisory has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 752 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has DC Advisory experienced?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has DC Advisory been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does DC Advisory have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does DC Advisory have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does DC Advisory comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does DC Advisory have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does DC Advisory comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, DC Advisory is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does DC Advisory have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,DC Advisory is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does DC Advisory operate in ?

DC Advisory operates primarily in the Investment Banking industry.

How many employees does DC Advisory have ?

DC Advisory employs approximately 836 people worldwide.

Does DC Advisory own any subsidiaries ?

DC Advisory presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does DC Advisory have ?

DC Advisory's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 60,126 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for DC Advisory ?

DC Advisory is classified under the NAICS code 52311, which corresponds to Investment Banking and Securities Dealing.

Does DC Advisory have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, DC Advisory does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does DC Advisory have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, DC Advisory maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dcadvisory.

How many cybersecurity incidents has DC Advisory experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that DC Advisory has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does DC Advisory have ?

DC Advisory has an estimated 1,430 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DC Advisory

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

752

/1000

Fair

777

/1000

Fair

DC Advisory Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

dcadvisory.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

DC Advisory is a leading corporate finance advisor with specific expertise in cross-border transactions. As part of an established global business we offer access to over 750 professionals throughout Asia, Europe and the US. DC Advisory provides tailored, independent advice on M&A, debt raisings and restructurings, private capital, secondary advisory and access to unrivalled Asia investment knowledge. For more information, visit www.dcadvisory.com

DC Advisory A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

DC Advisory

DC Advisory CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

DC Advisory Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DC Advisory

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC Advisory in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC Advisory in 2026.

Incident Types DC Advisory vs Investment Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC Advisory in 2026.

Incident History - DC Advisory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

DC Advisory Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DC Advisory

Investment Banking

Website: http://www.dcadvisory.com

Company Size: 836

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

DC Advisory Similar Companies

RBC Capital Markets

rbccm.com

RBC Capital Markets is recognized by the most significant corporations, institutional investors, asset managers, private equity firms, and governments around the globe as an innovative, trusted partner with an in-depth expertise in capital markets, banking, and finance. We are well-established in the largest, most mature capital markets across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, which collectively encompass more than 75% of global investment banking activity each year. We are part of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a leading, diversified provider of financial services and one of the strongest banks globally. Founded in 1864, RBC is the 10th largest bank worldwide and the 5th in North America, as measured by market capitalization. RBC is among a small group of highly rated global banks and is recognized time and time again for its financial strength, market leadership and philanthropic work. For information on our legal terms of use visit https://www.rbccm.com/en/policies-disclaimers.page http://www.rbc.com/legal/

Loading…

NEWS

DC Advisory CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

EY US - Home | Building a better working world

Our commitment to audit quality. At EY US, we are bringing our bold vision for the future of audit to life with quality at the center,...

Read Article

November 18, 2025 12:33 PM

DC Advisory acts as exclusive financial advisor to BGF on its £30m investment in TMT ID

Founded in 2016, TMT ID is a mobile data and data intelligence business helping global firms combat cybercrime, prevent fraud and build...

Read Article

August 27, 2025 07:00 AM

International Partners Issue PRC-related Cybersecurity Advisory

CISA has issued a joint cybersecurity advisory with international partners, warning of PRC threats. Credit: DC Studio-stock.adobe.com.

Read Article

July 21, 2025 07:00 AM

List of Women Owned Cybersecurity Companies In The U.S. And Internationally

Steve Morgan, Editor-in-Chief. Sausalito, Calif. – Mar. 6, 2025. Cybercrime Magazine is excited to bring our readers a list of women-owned...

Read Article

July 15, 2025 07:00 AM

Nautic Partners Completes Acquisition of AccessIT Group in Partnership with Management

Nautic Partners, LLC (“Nautic”) is pleased to announce that, in partnership with management, it has closed the acquisition of AccessIT Group...

Read Article

July 10, 2025 01:26 PM

Evan D. Wolff, Partner, Cyber Security, Privacy & Data Protection

Evan D. Wolff is co-chair of Akin's cybersecurity, privacy and data protection practice and a member of the firm's government contracts and national...

Read Article

July 01, 2025 07:00 AM

DC Advisory establishes presence in Munich to broaden European footprint and adds to Tech & Software expertise with appointment of Emanuel Bischofberger as Managing Director in Germany

DC Advisory, an international investment bank committed to making a difference, today announces further investment into its European footprint with the...

Read Article

June 19, 2025 09:17 AM

Cyber

Deloitte's cybersecurity solutions help you operate securely and grow successfully. Designed to meet organizations at any point in their journey.

Read Article

May 22, 2025 07:00 AM

H.I.G. Capital Announces Strategic Growth Investment in AgileBlue to Accelerate AI-Powered Cybersecurity for the Mid-Market

The strategic investment from HIG Growth will support AgileBlue's growth, product innovation, and operational scale as increasing cyber threats heighten risks.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…