ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

RBC Capital Markets is recognized by the most significant corporations, institutional investors, asset managers, private equity firms, and governments around the globe as an innovative, trusted partner with an in-depth expertise in capital markets, banking, and finance. We are well-established in the largest, most mature capital markets across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, which collectively encompass more than 75% of global investment banking activity each year. We are part of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a leading, diversified provider of financial services and one of the strongest banks globally. Founded in 1864, RBC is the 10th largest bank worldwide and the 5th in North America, as measured by market capitalization. RBC is among a small group of highly rated global banks and is recognized time and time again for its financial strength, market leadership and philanthropic work. For information on our legal terms of use visit https://www.rbccm.com/en/policies-disclaimers.page http://www.rbc.com/legal/

RBC Capital Markets A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

RCM

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

rbc-capital-markets

Employees number:

10,537

Number of followers:

272,559

NAICS:

52311

Industry Type:

Investment Banking

Homepage:

rbccm.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

RBC_1006019

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreRCM Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RCM Investment Banking
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreRCM Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RCM Investment Banking
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

RCM Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)Breach100510/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: A junior RBC employee, Ibrahim El-Hakim, exploited his legitimate access to breach client records, including those of then-Prime Minister Mark Carney. Recruited via Telegram by a contact linked to organized crime ('AI WORLD'), El-Hakim allegedly opened fraudulent accounts, trafficked client identification numbers, and participated in a $68,500 credit line fraud scheme. While RBC detected the breach and terminated the employee, the incident escalated into a national security concern due to the high-profile target. Surveillance logs captured El-Hakim’s actions—accessing accounts, creating credit lines, and viewing sensitive data—but RBC’s *partial monitoring* failed to prevent or immediately flag the misuse. The case highlights systemic gaps in *least-privilege access controls* and real-time oversight, compounded by the overlap between organized crime and potential state-sponsored threats. Charges include fraud, unauthorized computer use, and trafficking personal data for fraudulent purposes. The RCMP’s national security unit took over due to the prime minister’s involvement, though no direct physical threat was confirmed.

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 10/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: A junior RBC employee, Ibrahim El-Hakim, exploited his legitimate access to breach client records, including those of then-Prime Minister Mark Carney. Recruited via Telegram by a contact linked to organized crime ('AI WORLD'), El-Hakim allegedly opened fraudulent accounts, trafficked client identification numbers, and participated in a $68,500 credit line fraud scheme. While RBC detected the breach and terminated the employee, the incident escalated into a national security concern due to the high-profile target. Surveillance logs captured El-Hakim’s actions—accessing accounts, creating credit lines, and viewing sensitive data—but RBC’s *partial monitoring* failed to prevent or immediately flag the misuse. The case highlights systemic gaps in *least-privilege access controls* and real-time oversight, compounded by the overlap between organized crime and potential state-sponsored threats. Charges include fraud, unauthorized computer use, and trafficking personal data for fraudulent purposes. The RCMP’s national security unit took over due to the prime minister’s involvement, though no direct physical threat was confirmed.

Ailogo

RCM Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for RCM

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC Capital Markets in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC Capital Markets in 2025.

Incident Types RCM vs Investment Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC Capital Markets in 2025.

Incident History — RCM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RCM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

RCM Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

RBC Capital Markets is recognized by the most significant corporations, institutional investors, asset managers, private equity firms, and governments around the globe as an innovative, trusted partner with an in-depth expertise in capital markets, banking, and finance. We are well-established in the largest, most mature capital markets across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, which collectively encompass more than 75% of global investment banking activity each year. We are part of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a leading, diversified provider of financial services and one of the strongest banks globally. Founded in 1864, RBC is the 10th largest bank worldwide and the 5th in North America, as measured by market capitalization. RBC is among a small group of highly rated global banks and is recognized time and time again for its financial strength, market leadership and philanthropic work. For information on our legal terms of use visit https://www.rbccm.com/en/policies-disclaimers.page http://www.rbc.com/legal/

Loading...
similarCompanies

RCM Similar Companies

Everbright Securities

Everbright Securities Company Limited (SSE: 601788) is one of the largest securities brokerage by assets in China, controlled by state-owned financial conglomerate, China Everbright Group. It was founded in 1996 and is based in Shanghai. It was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2009 with c

Al Baraka Group (ABG)

Al Baraka Group B.S.C. (c) is licensed as an Investment Business Firm – Category 1 (Islamic Principles) by the Central Bank of Bahrain. It is a leading international Islamic financial group providing financial services through its banking subsidiaries in 13 countries offering retail, corporate, trea

newsone

RCM CyberSecurity News

November 17, 2025 10:12 PM
RBC Capital Markets Advances Research and Banking Capabilities With Agentic AI

RBC is building agentic AI with NVIDIA AI Enterprise, enabling the firm to scale and enhance its Aiden AI platform across capital markets.

November 17, 2025 07:22 PM
Rapid7’s SWOT analysis: cybersecurity firm faces headwinds as stock navigates mixed segment performance

Rapid7, Inc. (NASDAQ:RPD) finds itself at a critical juncture as the cybersecurity solutions provider contends with divergent performance...

November 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Check Point’s SWOT analysis: cybersecurity stock navigates refresh cycles amid market shifts

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:CHKP) continues to navigate the evolving cybersecurity landscape with a mix of established...

November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
The software companies most likely to be acquired as AI eats the world

Software M&A deals could accelerate as AI disruption depresses valuations, according to RBC Capital.

November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
BlackBerry launches women’s cybersecurity leadership program in Malaysia

CYBERJAYA, Malaysia - BlackBerry Limited (NYSE:BB)(TSX:BB), Global Affairs Canada and Rogers Cybersecure Catalyst announced on Tuesday a new...

October 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Deere rated Outperform in new coverage by RBC Capital Markets (DE:NYSE)

RBC Capital Markets late Tuesday initiated coverage on Deere (NYSE:DE) with an Outperform rating, citing the machinery maker's leadership in...

October 16, 2025 07:00 AM
What T-Mobile US (TMUS)'s Cybersecurity Investments and Analyst Upgrade Mean For Shareholders

In recent days, T-Mobile US unveiled its new Cyber Defense Center and Executive Briefing Center, aimed at strengthening real-time...

October 07, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyber Security Threat Roundup: What to Watch For

Scams and cyber attacks are rapidly evolving, and 2025 proved it. Consumers around the world lost billions of dollars to online crime this...

October 02, 2025 03:37 PM
Zscaler Gets A Bullish Nod As Cloud Security Demand Rises

RBC Capital Markets lifted its price target for Zscaler, pointing to strong demand, AI opportunities, and a cloud security market that's bigger than many...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

RCM CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of RBC Capital Markets

The official website of RBC Capital Markets is http://www.rbccm.com.

RBC Capital Markets’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 773, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does RBC Capital Markets’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does RBC Capital Markets have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does RBC Capital Markets have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does RBC Capital Markets comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does RBC Capital Markets have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does RBC Capital Markets comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, RBC Capital Markets is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does RBC Capital Markets have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,RBC Capital Markets is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of RBC Capital Markets

RBC Capital Markets operates primarily in the Investment Banking industry.

Number of Employees at RBC Capital Markets

RBC Capital Markets employs approximately 10,537 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by RBC Capital Markets

RBC Capital Markets presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

RBC Capital Markets’s LinkedIn Followers

RBC Capital Markets’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 272,559 followers.

NAICS Classification of RBC Capital Markets

RBC Capital Markets is classified under the NAICS code 52311, which corresponds to Investment Banking and Securities Dealing.

RBC Capital Markets’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, RBC Capital Markets does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

RBC Capital Markets’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, RBC Capital Markets maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/rbc-capital-markets.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving RBC Capital Markets

As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that RBC Capital Markets has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

RBC Capital Markets has an estimated 1,322 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at RBC Capital Markets ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on RBC Capital Markets ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.

How does RBC Capital Markets detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with law enforcement (rcmp integrated national security enforcement team), and and containment measures with employee termination, containment measures with account access revocation, and communication strategy with limited public disclosure, communication strategy with media statements, and enhanced monitoring with review of access controls (planned)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat

Title: Insider Threat at Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Involving Prime Minister's Data

Description: Ibrahim El-Hakim, a 23-year-old junior employee at the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) in Ottawa, allegedly used his legitimate work credentials to access client records, including those of then-Prime Minister Mark Carney. He was recruited via Telegram by a contact named 'AI WORLD,' suspected of ties to organized crime, and instructed to open fraudulent accounts and exfiltrate sensitive information. The breach escalated into a national security concern due to the involvement of high-profile data. RBC detected the breach, terminated El-Hakim, and cooperated with law enforcement. The case highlights systemic vulnerabilities in insider threat detection, access controls, and real-time monitoring within financial institutions.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-06

Type: Insider Threat

Attack Vector: Legitimate Credential AbuseSocial Engineering (Recruitment via Telegram)Insider Access Misuse

Vulnerability Exploited: Excessive Access PrivilegesInsufficient Real-Time MonitoringPartial Logging of Data AccessLack of Behavioral Anomaly Detection

Threat Actor: Primary: {'name': 'Ibrahim El-Hakim', 'role': 'RBC Junior Employee (Insider)', 'affiliation': None, 'motivation': ['Financial Gain', 'Coercion by External Actor']}Secondary: {'alias': 'AI WORLD', 'affiliation': ['Suspected Organized Crime', 'Possible State-Actor Ties'], 'role': 'Recruiter/Handler', 'communication_channel': 'Telegram (Encrypted)'}

Motivation: Financial FraudData Theft for ResalePotential Espionage (National Security Risk)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Legitimate Employee Credentials (No Malware or Phishing).

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Systems Affected: Client Account Management SystemCredit Line Approval System

Operational Impact: Internal InvestigationEmployee TerminationLaw Enforcement CoordinationReputation Damage

Brand Reputation Impact: High (National Media Coverage)Erosion of Trust in Financial Security

Legal Liabilities: Criminal Charges Against EmployeePotential Regulatory Scrutiny

Identity Theft Risk: ['High (PII of Prime Minister and Other Clients Exposed)']

Payment Information Risk: ['High (Fraudulent Accounts Opened)']

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Client Identification Numbers, Financial Records, Credit Line Details and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Entity Name: Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Location: Canada (Headquarters: Toronto, Incident: Ottawa Branch)

Size: Large (Over 80,000 Employees)

Customers Affected: Prime Minister Mark Carney, Undisclosed Number of Clients

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Entity Name: Government of Canada

Entity Type: Government

Industry: Public Sector

Location: Canada

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Law Enforcement (Rcmp Integrated National Security Enforcement Team).

Containment Measures: Employee TerminationAccount Access Revocation

Communication Strategy: Limited Public DisclosureMedia Statements

Enhanced Monitoring: Review of Access Controls (Planned)

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Law Enforcement (RCMP Integrated National Security Enforcement Team), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Client identification numbers, Financial records, Credit line details

Sensitivity of Data: High (Includes Data of Prime Minister and Financial Records)

Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAccount NumbersIdentification NumbersAddress/Contact Details

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by employee termination, account access revocation and .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Regulations Violated: Potential Violations of Canadian Privacy Laws (PIPEDA), OSFI Cybersecurity Standards,

Legal Actions: Criminal Charges Against Ibrahim El-Hakim (Fraud, Unauthorized Computer Use, Trafficking in Identification Information),

Regulatory Notifications: Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) Likely Notified

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Criminal Charges Against Ibrahim El-Hakim (Fraud, Unauthorized Computer Use, Trafficking in Identification Information), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Lessons Learned: Insider threats are among the hardest breaches to detect and require proactive mitigation strategies., Principle of 'least privilege' must be strictly enforced, especially for roles with access to high-profile or sensitive data., Real-time monitoring and behavioral analytics are critical to detect anomalous access patterns, even with legitimate credentials., Logging systems must capture not just access metadata (e.g., timestamps) but also the specific data viewed or modified., Third-party communication platforms (e.g., Telegram) can be exploited for recruiting insiders and must be monitored where feasible., National security risks can emerge from consumer-facing institutions, necessitating cross-sector collaboration between private entities and law enforcement.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Recommendations: Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g., via encrypted apps)., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Insider threats are among the hardest breaches to detect and require proactive mitigation strategies.,Principle of 'least privilege' must be strictly enforced, especially for roles with access to high-profile or sensitive data.,Real-time monitoring and behavioral analytics are critical to detect anomalous access patterns, even with legitimate credentials.,Logging systems must capture not just access metadata (e.g., timestamps) but also the specific data viewed or modified.,Third-party communication platforms (e.g., Telegram) can be exploited for recruiting insiders and must be monitored where feasible.,National security risks can emerge from consumer-facing institutions, necessitating cross-sector collaboration between private entities and law enforcement.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Source: National Post

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Source: RCMP Affidavit (Montreal Courthouse, June 2024)

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Source: Interviews with Benjamin Fung (McGill University), Paige Backman (Privacy Lawyer), Neil Desai (CIGI)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: National Post, and Source: RCMP Affidavit (Montreal Courthouse, June 2024), and Source: Interviews with Benjamin Fung (McGill University), Paige Backman (Privacy Lawyer), Neil Desai (CIGI).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Next court date: 2024-11-05)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Limited Public Disclosure and Media Statements.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Stakeholder Advisories: Limited Disclosure To Affected High-Profile Individuals (E.G., Prime Minister'S Office).

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Limited Disclosure To Affected High-Profile Individuals (E.G. and Prime Minister'S Office).

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Entry Point: Legitimate Employee Credentials (No Malware or Phishing)

High Value Targets: Prime Minister Mark Carney'S Account, Other High-Net-Worth Clients,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Prime Minister Mark Carney'S Account, Other High-Net-Worth Clients,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Insider Threat RBC3032130100425

Root Causes: Overprivileged Access For Junior Employee With No Business Need To Access High-Profile Accounts., Inadequate Real-Time Monitoring To Detect Anomalous Behavior (E.G., Creating Fraudulent Accounts)., Partial Logging That Failed To Capture The Specific Data Accessed Or Exfiltrated., Lack Of Behavioral Safeguards To Prevent Insider Recruitment Via Encrypted Channels., Cultural Or Procedural Gaps In Enforcing The Principle Of Least Privilege.,

Corrective Actions: Rbc Likely Reviewing Access Controls And Monitoring Systems (Details Undisclosed)., Potential Regulatory Recommendations From Osfi Pending Investigation Outcomes., Broader Industry Discussions On Insider Threat Mitigation In Financial Sectors.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Law Enforcement (Rcmp Integrated National Security Enforcement Team), , Review Of Access Controls (Planned), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Rbc Likely Reviewing Access Controls And Monitoring Systems (Details Undisclosed)., Potential Regulatory Recommendations From Osfi Pending Investigation Outcomes., Broader Industry Discussions On Insider Threat Mitigation In Financial Sectors., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Primary: {'name': 'Ibrahim El-Hakim', 'role': 'RBC Junior Employee (Insider)', 'affiliation': None, 'motivation': ['Financial Gain', 'Coercion by External Actor']}Secondary: {'alias': 'AI WORLD', 'affiliation': ['Suspected Organized Crime', 'Possible State-Actor Ties'], 'role': 'Recruiter/Handler' and 'communication_channel': 'Telegram (Encrypted)'}.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-06.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {'fraudulent_credit_line': 'CAD 68,500', 'total_estimated': None}.

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Client Account Management SystemCredit Line Approval System.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was law enforcement (rcmp integrated national security enforcement team), .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Employee TerminationAccount Access Revocation.

Data Breach Information

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Criminal Charges Against Ibrahim El-Hakim (Fraud, Unauthorized Computer Use, Trafficking in Identification Information), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was National security risks can emerge from consumer-facing institutions, necessitating cross-sector collaboration between private entities and law enforcement.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance **real-time monitoring** with behavioral analytics to flag unusual activities (e.g., accessing unrelated client accounts, creating fraudulent credit lines)., Implement **strict access controls** based on job roles and the principle of least privilege, with additional safeguards for high-profile accounts (e.g., multi-person approval for sensitive data access)., Conduct **regular audits** of access logs and privileges, particularly for employees in sensitive roles., Assess **third-party application risks**, including unauthorized use of encrypted messaging platforms for work-related communications., Foster a **culture of accountability** where employees are encouraged to report suspicious behavior without fear of retaliation., Expand **logging capabilities** to record the actual data viewed or modified during access sessions, not just metadata., Collaborate with **regulators and law enforcement** to share threat intelligence on emerging insider threat tactics, especially those blending organized crime and state-sponsored activities., Strengthen **insider threat programs** with training to recognize coercion or recruitment attempts (e.g. and via encrypted apps)..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Interviews with Benjamin Fung (McGill University), Paige Backman (Privacy Lawyer), Neil Desai (CIGI), National Post, RCMP Affidavit (Montreal Courthouse and June 2024).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Next court date: 2024-11-05).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Limited disclosure to affected high-profile individuals (e.g., Prime Minister's office), .

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Legitimate Employee Credentials (No Malware or Phishing).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=rbc-capital-markets' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge