Comparison Overview

RBC Capital Markets

VS

Everbright Securities

RBC Capital Markets

Royal Bank Plaza, 200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2W7
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RBC Capital Markets is recognized by the most significant corporations, institutional investors, asset managers, private equity firms, and governments around the globe as an innovative, trusted partner with an in-depth expertise in capital markets, banking, and finance. We are well-established in the largest, most mature capital markets across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, which collectively encompass more than 75% of global investment banking activity each year. We are part of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a leading, diversified provider of financial services and one of the strongest banks globally. Founded in 1864, RBC is the 10th largest bank worldwide and the 5th in North America, as measured by market capitalization. RBC is among a small group of highly rated global banks and is recognized time and time again for its financial strength, market leadership and philanthropic work. For information on our legal terms of use visit https://www.rbccm.com/en/policies-disclaimers.page http://www.rbc.com/legal/

NAICS: 52311
NAICS Definition: Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
Employees: 10,537
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Everbright Securities

Jing'an International Plaza, No.1508 Xinzha Road, Shanghai, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Everbright Securities Company Limited (SSE: 601788) is one of the largest securities brokerage by assets in China, controlled by state-owned financial conglomerate, China Everbright Group. It was founded in 1996 and is based in Shanghai. It was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2009 with capital raising of $10.96 billion yuan. It was the second IPO by a Chinese brokerage, following CITIC Securities in 2002. On 2 February 2015, Everbright Securities Co Ltd announced its agreement to buy Hong Kong conglomerate Sun Hung Kai & Co Ltd's 70 percent stake in its brokerage and wealth management service unit for HK$4.1 billion ($529 million). As of their June 2015 quarterly filing, Everbright ranks no. 2 of all Chinese companies for net increase from borrowings, net change in cash, and net cash and cash equivalents ending balance. Net cash and cash equivalents ending balance represented over 131% of Everbright's total market cap at the time.

NAICS: 52311
NAICS Definition: Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RBC Capital Markets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/everbright-securities.jpeg
Everbright Securities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RBC Capital Markets
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Everbright Securities
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC Capital Markets in 2025.

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Everbright Securities in 2025.

Incident History — RBC Capital Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBC Capital Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Everbright Securities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Everbright Securities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RBC Capital Markets
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Legitimate Credential Abuse, Social Engineering (Recruitment via Telegram), Insider Access Misuse
Motivation: Financial Fraud, Data Theft for Resale, Potential Espionage (National Security Risk)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/everbright-securities.jpeg
Everbright Securities
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Everbright Securities company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RBC Capital Markets company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RBC Capital Markets company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Everbright Securities company has not reported any.

In the current year, RBC Capital Markets company has reported more cyber incidents than Everbright Securities company.

Neither Everbright Securities company nor RBC Capital Markets company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RBC Capital Markets company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Everbright Securities company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Everbright Securities company nor RBC Capital Markets company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RBC Capital Markets company nor Everbright Securities company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RBC Capital Markets company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Everbright Securities company.

RBC Capital Markets company employs more people globally than Everbright Securities company, reflecting its scale as a Investment Banking.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RBC Capital Markets nor Everbright Securities holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H