Cox Communications
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
cox-communications
Website:
Employees number:
16,385
Number of followers:
160,469
NAICS:
517
Industry Type:
Homepage:
cox.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
COX_4584382
Scan Status:
In-progress
Cox Communications Company CyberSecurity Posture
cox.com
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. Our world-class broadband applications and services are helping create smart homes and smart cities that will bring more comfort, convenience, security, entertainment and connectivity to the lives of the people we serve. Our company is full of dreamers and doers; people who make plans and who make things happen. And, of course, people who have fun doing it. In short, people like you. Join the Cox team and make your mark!
Cox Communications A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Cox Communications Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Cox Communications
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Cox Communications Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Cox Communications
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Cox Communications Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
4
Autotrader US
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: In January 2023, 1.4M records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20k unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Cox Communications
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Cox Communications, a large cable company recently suffered a data breach incident in December 2021. The attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and managed to access the company's customer data. The compromised data includes address, telephone number, Cox account number, usernames, and other personal information of the customers. The company with the help of cyber security experts investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks and notified the affected customers of the breach.
Cox Communications
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage that affected the Tucson region. no customer information was compromised in the attack. however, the Cox says their efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Cox Enterprises
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S.-based conglomerate with operations in telecommunications, media, and automotive services (e.g., Cox Communications, Autotrader), suffered a **sophisticated data breach** via a **zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882)** in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. Hackers, linked to the **Cl0p ransomware group**, infiltrated the network between **August 9–14, 2025**, exfiltrating **1.6TB of data**—including **sensitive personal information of 9,479 individuals** (names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and internal documents). The breach was detected in **late September 2025**, with Cl0p leaking the data on the dark web. The attack exploited an **unpatched critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8)** allowing unauthorized database access, heightening risks of **identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**. Oracle released an emergency patch post-breach, but the delay enabled widespread exploitation across other high-profile targets (e.g., The Washington Post, Harvard University). Cox offered affected parties **credit monitoring**, though long-term risks persist. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in **ERP systems**, **supply chain security gaps**, and the escalating threat of **ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)** campaigns targeting enterprise software.
Cox Enterprises
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Cox Enterprises disclosed a data breach stemming from a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, discovered in late September 2024 after hackers breached its network in August. The Cl0p ransomware group claimed responsibility, exploiting the vulnerability before Oracle released a patch on October 5. While the company confirmed exposure of personal data, the specific types of compromised information (e.g., financial, employee, or customer records) were not disclosed. The delayed detection suggests prolonged unauthorized access, though the full scope of the leak—including whether sensitive data like SSNs, financial details, or proprietary business information was exfiltrated—remains unclear. The incident underscores the risks of third-party software vulnerabilities and the operational gaps in timely threat detection.
Cox Communications Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Cox Communications
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2025.
Incident Types Cox Communications vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2025.
Incident History — Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Cox Communications Company Subsidiaries
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. Our world-class broadband applications and services are helping create smart homes and smart cities that will bring more comfort, convenience, security, entertainment and connectivity to the lives of the people we serve. Our company is full of dreamers and doers; people who make plans and who make things happen. And, of course, people who have fun doing it. In short, people like you. Join the Cox team and make your mark!
Loading...
Cox Communications Similar Companies
ACN
ACN is the leading direct selling telecommunications and essential services provider. ACN Inc. was founded in 1993 by four entrepreneurs and is now operating in North America. ACN offers essential products and services that people use every day, while also offering a powerful business ownership oppo
Telenor
EMPOWERING SOCIETIES. CONNECTING YOU TO WHAT MATTERS MOST. Telenor Group is a leading telecommunications company across the Nordics and Asia with 158 million subscribers and annual sales of around NOK 99 billions (2022). We are committed to responsible business conduct and driven by the ambition
T-Mobile
T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is America’s supercharged Un-carrier, delivering an advanced 4G LTE and transformative nationwide 5G network that will offer reliable connectivity for all. T-Mobile’s customers benefit from its unmatched combination of value and quality, unwavering obsession with off
Ooredoo Group
We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via our advanced, data-centric mob
Idea Cellular Ltd
Idea Cellular is an Aditya Birla Group Company, India's first truly multinational corporation. Idea is a pan-India integrated GSM operator offering 2G and 3G services, and has its own NLD and ILD operations, and ISP license. With revenue in excess of $4 billion; revenue market share of 18%; and subs
Telmex
TELMEX, la empresa líder de telecomunicaciones y servicios TI en México, ha realizado importantes inversiones para desarrollar la plataforma tecnológica más robusta y vanguardista del país, que le permite ofrecer la más amplia gama de soluciones, con los mayores estándares de calidad, seguridad, con
Jazz
Pakistan’s number one digital operator and the largest internet and broadband service provider with over 70 million subscribers nationwide. With a legacy of more than 27 years, Jazz maintains market leadership through cutting-edge, integrated technology, the strongest brands and the largest portfoli
Vodafone Idea Limited
Vodafone Idea Limited is an Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group partnership. It is India’s leading telecom service provider. The Company provides pan India Voice and Data services across 2G, 3G and 4G platform. With the large spectrum portfolio to support the growing demand for data and voice, the
EE
EE, part of BT Group, is the largest and most advanced mobile communications company in the UK, delivering mobile and fixed communications services to consumers. We run the UK's biggest and fastest mobile network, having pioneered the UK's first superfast 4G mobile service in October 2012 and was
.png)
Cox Communications CyberSecurity News
November 24, 2025 04:58 PM
Cox Enterprises Data Breach: Cl0p Exploits Oracle Zero-Day Flaw
The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises' Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits. In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity...
November 13, 2025 12:19 PM
Cox Foundation unveils $10M grant to American Rivers for nationwide river restoration at Milton event
American Rivers receives the largest donation in the organization's history from James M. Cox Foundation to fund dam removal and floodplain...
October 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Why cybersecurity matters more than ever
In today's digital world, cybersecurity is no longer a niche concern. It's a shared responsibility that affects us all.
October 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Vegas Inc and Cox Business present the 2025 Top Tech Awards
Vegas Inc, in partnership with Cox Business, presents the 2025 Top Tech Awards. Technology drives progress across every sector—powering...
October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
Cox Communications offers 10 tips for online safety during cybersecurity month
Cox Gulf Coast Market Vice President emphasizes importance of online safety as cyberattacks, remote work and AI-driven threats continue to...
September 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Cox Enterprises Careers, Perks + Culture
Learn more about Cox Enterprises. Find jobs, explore benefits, and research company culture at Built In.
June 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Why Palo Alto Networks is focusing on just a few big gen AI bets
To help figure out how AI will make its workers more productive, cybersecurity provider Palo Alto Networks polled every one of its departments for its best...
June 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Cox Gulf Coast executive highlights digital safety during Internet Safety Month
Cox Communications Gulf Coast is urging local families to strengthen their digital security practices amid concerning trends in online child safety.
June 13, 2025 07:00 AM
The Week’s Biggest Funding Rounds: Scale AI Tops Busy Week For AI Investment
Want to keep track of the largest startup funding deals in 2025 with our curated list of $100 million-plus venture deals to U.S.-based...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Cox Communications CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Cox Communications
The official website of Cox Communications is http://www.cox.com.
Cox Communications’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 751, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Cox Communications’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Cox Communications have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Cox Communications have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Cox Communications comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Cox Communications have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Cox Communications comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Cox Communications have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Cox Communications is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Cox Communications
Cox Communications operates primarily in the Telecommunications industry.
Number of Employees at Cox Communications
Cox Communications employs approximately 16,385 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Cox Communications
Cox Communications presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Cox Communications’s LinkedIn Followers
Cox Communications’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 160,469 followers.
NAICS Classification of Cox Communications
Cox Communications is classified under the NAICS code 517, which corresponds to Telecommunications.
Cox Communications’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Cox Communications has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cox-communications.
Cox Communications’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Cox Communications maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cox-communications.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Cox Communications
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Cox Communications has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Cox Communications has an estimated 9,533 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Cox Communications ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Breach, Data Leak and Cyber Attack.
How does Cox Communications detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cyber security experts, and recovery measures with investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks, and communication strategy with notified the affected customers of the breach, and containment measures with efforts to stop the attack, and and communication strategy with public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, and and third party assistance with potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), and containment measures with patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), containment measures with network segmentation (assumed), and remediation measures with free credit monitoring for affected individuals, remediation measures with ongoing forensic investigation, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected parties, communication strategy with public disclosure via maine attorney general’s office filing, and network segmentation with recommended (not explicitly confirmed), and enhanced monitoring with recommended (not explicitly confirmed)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cox Communications Data Breach
Description: Cox Communications suffered a data breach incident in December 2021 where attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and accessed customer data.
Date Detected: December 2021
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability through impersonation
Title: Cyber Attack on Cox Communications
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage affecting the Tucson region. No customer information was compromised in the attack. The efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Type: Cyber Attack
Title: Autotrader Data Breach
Description: In January 2023, 1.4 million records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20,000 unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Date Detected: 2023-01-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Available Data
Title: CrowdStrike Insider Threat Incident
Description: CrowdStrike confirmed that an insider shared screenshots taken on internal systems. The company emphasized that its systems were not breached, and customers’ data was not compromised. The threat group responsible was not specified.
Type: Insider Threat
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Title: The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises’ Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S. conglomerate in telecommunications, media, and automotive services, suffered a data breach due to a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. The breach, attributed to the Cl0p ransomware group, exposed sensitive personal data of 9,479 individuals, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and other identifiers. The incident occurred between August 9–14, 2025, but was detected in late September. Cl0p leaked 1.6 TB of stolen data on the dark web, and Cox offered affected parties free credit monitoring. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in ERP systems and the risks of delayed patching, with broader implications for supply chain security and regulatory compliance.
Date Detected: 2025-09-01T00:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882)Unauthenticated AccessMulti-Stage Java ImplantsData Exfiltration
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882 (Critical Authentication Bypass in Oracle E-Business Suite)
Threat Actor: Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged)
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Systems Affected: Internet Services
Downtime: Internet Outage
Operational Impact: Internet Services Disrupted
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Data Compromised: Internal screenshots (no customer data)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk due to insider incident
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Personal identifiers, Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to HR, financial, and supply chain operations
Brand Reputation Impact: High (potential erosion of customer trust, regulatory scrutiny)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits (e.g., Bloomberg Law report on Oracle’s liability)Regulatory fines under GDPR/CCPA
Identity Theft Risk: High (9,479 individuals affected)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Address, Telephone Number, Cox Account Number, Usernames, Other Personal Information, , Email Addresses, Physical Addresses, Phone Numbers, Vehicle Details Including Vin Numbers, , Internal screenshots, Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Telecommunications
Size: Large
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications
Location: Tucson Region
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Entity Name: Autotrader
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Online Vehicle Marketplace
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Entity Name: CrowdStrike
Entity Type: Cybersecurity Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global (HQ: USA)
Customers Affected: None (no customer data compromised)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entity Name: Cox Enterprises
Entity Type: Conglomerate
Industry: Telecommunications, Media, Automotive Services
Location: United States
Size: 55,000+ employees, $23B+ annual revenue
Customers Affected: 9,479 individuals
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cyber security experts
Recovery Measures: Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks
Communication Strategy: Notified the affected customers of the breach
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Containment Measures: Efforts to stop the attack
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation).
Containment Measures: Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed)
Remediation Measures: Free credit monitoring for affected individualsOngoing forensic investigation
Communication Strategy: Notification letters to affected partiesPublic disclosure via Maine Attorney General’s Office filing
Network Segmentation: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cyber security experts, Potential involvement of Mandiant (forensic investigation), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Type of Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 1,400,000
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Type of Data Compromised: Internal screenshots
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (internal systems)
File Types Exposed: Screenshots
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Number of Records Exposed: 9,479 individuals
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, dates of birth, addresses)
Data Exfiltration: 1.6 TB of data leaked on the dark web
File Types Exposed: DatabasesDocumentsHR/Employee Records
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Free credit monitoring for affected individuals, Ongoing forensic investigation, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by efforts to stop the attack, patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), network segmentation (assumed) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), State breach notification laws (e.g., Maine),
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching),
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General’s Office filingCISA alerts for related vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61757)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Lessons Learned: Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations., Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact., Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management., Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks., Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Recommendations: Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations.,Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact.,Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management.,Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks.,Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882). and Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: SecurityWeekUrl: https://www.securityweek.com, and Source: The Hacker NewsUrl: https://thehackernews.com, and Source: TechRadarUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: Bloomberg LawUrl: https://news.bloomberglaw.com, and Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), and Source: CISA AlertsUrl: https://www.cisa.gov, and Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Investigation Status: Confirmed (insider incident)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (forensic investigation, potential third-party involvement)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notified the affected customers of the breach, Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, Notification Letters To Affected Parties and Public Disclosure Via Maine Attorney General’S Office Filing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Customer Advisories: No customer data compromised
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Stakeholder Advisories: Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings.
Customer Advisories: Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were No customer data compromised, Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entry Point: Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite
Reconnaissance Period: Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign)
Backdoors Established: ['Multi-stage Java implants']
High Value Targets: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Root Causes: Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability (Cve-2025-61882) In Oracle E-Business Suite., Delayed Detection (Weeks Between Intrusion And Discovery)., Lack Of Proactive Threat Hunting For Erp-Specific Attacks., Potential Gaps In Network Segmentation Or Access Controls.,
Corrective Actions: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cyber security experts, Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation), , Recommended (not explicitly confirmed).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on December 2021.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information, , Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, , Internal screenshots (no customer data), Names, Addresses, Dates of Birth, Social Security Numbers, Personal Identifiers, Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cyber security experts, potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Efforts to stop the attack and Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal Identifiers, Email addresses, Names, Other personal information, Dates of Birth, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, Telephone number, Social Security Numbers, Customer Details, Usernames, Cox account number, Addresses, Address, Physical addresses, Internal Documents, Employee Records, Internal screenshots (no customer data) and Phone numbers.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.4M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882). and Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are BleepingComputer, Bloomberg Law, TechRadar, The Hacker News, Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), CISA Alerts, SecurityWeek and IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://www.securityweek.com, https://thehackernews.com, https://www.techradar.com, https://news.bloomberglaw.com, https://www.cisa.gov, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Confirmed (insider incident).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Notification letters to affected individuals, Public statements via regulatory filings, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an No customer data compromised and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing), Unpatched zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.Delayed detection (weeks between intrusion and discovery).Lack of proactive threat hunting for ERP-specific attacks.Potential gaps in network segmentation or access controls..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Applied Oracle’s emergency patch (2025-10-04).Enhanced monitoring for ERP systems.Review of third-party software patching policies.Potential restructuring of incident response protocols to reduce detection lag..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=cox-communications' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
