Comparison Overview
Cox Communications

Cox Communications
6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. ...

T-Mobile
12920 SE 38th St, Bellevue, 98006, US
Last Update: 15/09/2026
As the supercharged Un-carrier, T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is powered by an award-winning 5G network that connects more people, in more places, than ever before. With T-Mobile’s unique value proposition of best network, best value, and best experiences, the Un-car...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cox Communications







T-Mobile






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
T-Mobile has 292.16% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cox Communications

T-Mobile
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.
Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.
The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.