Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Conti LLC » CON1781367832

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CON1781367832)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-392
Company Score Before Incident492 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCON1781367832
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORMalicious software deployment (loader tool)
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive data stolen and threatened...
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2025
STATUSClosed (guilty plea)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Conti LLC's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Conti LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Conti LLC breach identified under incident ID CON1781367832.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Conti LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/conti-llc, the number of followers: 78, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 492 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of -392 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Conti LLC and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Affiliate Pleads Guilty in U.S. After Extradition", has drawn attention.

A 44-year-old Ukrainian national, Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko, has pleaded guilty in the U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Over 1,000 computers and networks globally, and exposing Sensitive data stolen and threatened to be leaked, plus an estimated financial loss of $150 million (estimated ransom payments).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Closed (guilty plea).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating targeted over 1,000 computers and networks globally and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating conti ransomware groups standard extortion model. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating developed a loader tool to deploy additional malicious software and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loader tool used to deploy additional malicious software. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process (T1543) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating loader tool used to deploy additional malicious software. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating conti ransomware campaigns affected victims globally. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loader tool used to deploy additional malicious software and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malicious software deployment during attacks. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating handled stolen data from eight U.S. victims. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data stolen and threatened to be leaked. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating handled stolen data from eight U.S. victims and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeted over 1,000 computers and networks globally. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loader tool used to deploy additional malicious software. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes, sensitive data stolen and threatened and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to leak sensitive information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption such as Yes (ransomware encryption) and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware campaigns affected victims globally. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References