Conti LLC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Conti LLC
Company Information
Website:http://www.conticorporation.com
Employees number:4
Number of followers:79
NAICS:23
Industry Type:Construction
Homepage:conticorporation.com
Conti LLC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
Conti LLCConstruction
Updated:
21/08/2026
21/08/2026
122/1000
Critical
C
Conti LLC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
Conti LLCConstruction
Score locked

Conti LLCCritical
Current Score
122C (CRITICAL)
01000
6 incidents
-306 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
SEPTEMBER 2026
128
AUGUST 2026
111
JULY 2026
103
JUNE 2026
100
MAY 2026
100
APRIL 2026
100
MARCH 2026
100
FEBRUARY 2026
100
JANUARY 2026
100
DECEMBER 2025
100
NOVEMBER 2025
100
OCTOBER 2025
406
Ransomware
01 Oct 2025 • Conti LLC
Conti: Extradited Ukrainian Man Admits Role in Conti Ransomware Attacks
Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Affiliate Pleads Guilty in U.S. After Extradition
100
CRITICAL-306
CON1781367832
Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Affiliate Pleads Guilty in U.S. After Extradition
A 44-year-old Ukrainian national, Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko, has pleaded guilty in the U.S. for his role in the Conti ransomware operation, one of the most prolific cybercrime groups active during the pandemic. Extradited from Ireland in October 2025, Lytvynenko admitted to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, acknowledging his involvement in attacks that targeted over 1,000 computers and networks globally between 2020 and 2022.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Conti’s ransomware campaigns affected victims across 47 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and 31 foreign countries, including businesses and organizations of varying sizes. The FBI estimates that victims paid at least $150 million in ransoms by early 2022, with the group employing a standard extortion model encrypting files, stealing data, and threatening to leak sensitive information if demands were not met.
Lytvynenko, who joined the conspiracy in September 2021, admitted to handling stolen data from eight U.S. victims and four international targets. Court documents reveal he worked under a Conti member’s direction to develop a "loader," a tool used to deploy additional malicious software during attacks.
His sentencing is scheduled for September 10, 2026, where he faces a maximum of 20 years in prison, though the final penalty will be determined by a federal judge.
The case is part of Operation Riptide, an FBI initiative targeting cybercrime infrastructure and financial networks behind ransomware and online fraud. The operation follows a broader U.S. crackdown on ransomware gangs, including recent guilty pleas from two Americans linked to the ALPHV (BlackCat) group and another Ukrainian national involved in the Nefilim ransomware scheme.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
SEPTEMBER 2022
100
Ransomware
01 Sep 2022 • Conti LLC
Conti: Extorting the Extorters? Moscow man accused of posing as FSB officer to extort Conti ransomware gang
Moscow Man Accused of Extorting Conti Ransomware Group by Posing as FSB Officer
100
HIGH0
CON1772124224
Moscow Man Accused of Extorting Conti Ransomware Group by Posing as FSB Officer
A Moscow resident, Ruslan Satuchin, has been accused of attempting to extort the notorious Conti ransomware gang by impersonating an officer of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB). According to local media reports, the scheme began in September 2022 when Satuchin contacted a Conti member, falsely claiming to have influence over law enforcement actions targeting the group.
Satuchin allegedly demanded a substantial payment in exchange for shielding Conti from criminal prosecution. The case highlights an unusual twist in cybercrime dynamics, where a fraudster sought to exploit the very criminals known for extorting victims. Authorities have not disclosed whether the extortion attempt succeeded or if Conti members reported the incident.
The incident underscores the complex and often unpredictable nature of cybercriminal ecosystems, where even high-profile ransomware groups can become targets of deception. No further details on the investigation’s status or potential legal consequences for Satuchin have been released.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
REFERENCES
SEPTEMBER 2021
348
Ransomware
01 Sep 2021 • Conti LLC
Conti ransomware operation: Ukrainian national pleads guilty to role in Conti ransomware operation
Ukrainian National Pleads Guilty in Conti Ransomware Conspiracy
100
CRITICAL-248
CON1781288641
Ukrainian National Pleads Guilty in Conti Ransomware Conspiracy
A 44-year-old Ukrainian national, Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko, has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud for his role in the Conti ransomware operation. Extradited from Ireland to the U.S. in 2023, Lytvynenko admitted to participating in attacks between 2021 and 2022, where he and co-conspirators deployed Conti ransomware against U.S. and international victims, encrypting systems and extorting Bitcoin payments.
Lytvynenko joined the Conti conspiracy in September 2021, possessing stolen data from eight U.S. and four overseas victims. He also contributed to developing a "loader" malware, a tool used to facilitate attacks. The Conti group, one of the most prolific ransomware operations at the time, targeted hospitals, businesses, schools, and government agencies, amassing over $150 million from more than 1,000 victims worldwide.
Originally linked to the Ryuk cybercrime group and the TrickBot malware syndicate, Conti gained notoriety for high-profile attacks before disbanding in 2022 amid internal leaks and law enforcement pressure. Former members are believed to have regrouped under other ransomware operations, including BlackCat, Black Basta, and Hive.
Lytvynenko faces up to 20 years in prison. In September 2023, the U.S. and U.K. sanctioned nine Russian nationals tied to TrickBot and Conti for attacks affecting over 900 victims globally.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
MAY 2020
472
Ransomware
01 May 2020 • Conti LLC
Conti: What to expect when you’ve been hit with Conti ransomware
Conti Ransomware Attack
126
CRITICAL-346
CON1787323501
Conti Ransomware: A High-Speed, Double-Extortion Threat
Since its emergence in May 2020, Conti ransomware has established itself as one of the most aggressive and sophisticated human-operated ransomware strains. Unlike automated variants, Conti is deployed by attackers who meticulously prepare for maximum disruption, often spending days or weeks inside a network before launching the encryption phase.
### How Conti Operates
Conti employs a double-extortion model, stealing sensitive data before encrypting files and threatening to leak it if the ransom isn’t paid. As of now, the group’s leak site has exposed data from at least 180 victims. Attackers leverage legitimate tools to evade detection, including:
- Network scanners (Advanced Port Scanner, Angry IP Scanner) to map infrastructure.
- PsExec and Cobalt Strike for lateral movement and remote command execution.
- Mimikatz to harvest credentials from memory, bypassing password complexity.
- RClone and MEGA for automated data exfiltration.
- AnyDesk and RDP for persistent access.
### Attack Progression
1. Initial Access: Attackers gain entry via exposed RDP, phishing, or vulnerable firewalls.
2. Reconnaissance: They scan the network, identify critical systems (e.g., domain controllers, backup servers), and escalate privileges using stolen credentials.
3. Data Theft: Tools like "Everything" enable rapid searches for sensitive files (e.g., "confidential," "SSN"), which are then exfiltrated to cloud storage.
4. Encryption: Conti deploys ransomware during off-hours (weekends, holidays) to maximize impact. Encrypted files receive a new extension (e.g., `.encrypted`), and ransom notes appear on affected systems.
5. Extortion: If victims don’t engage, stolen data is published on the group’s leak site, often within days to weeks.
### Tactics to Maintain Persistence
- Backdoors: Attackers install remote access tools (e.g., AnyDesk) or modify Group Policy Objects (GPOs) to relaunch the attack on reboot.
- Security Bypass: They disable defenses by targeting security management consoles or exploiting admin privileges to turn off protections like Windows Defender.
- Eavesdropping: Attackers monitor communications (e.g., emails) to counter recovery efforts, such as identifying unencrypted backups.
### Impact and Aftermath
- Encryption Speed: Conti encrypts hundreds of thousands of files per endpoint, with large servers facing millions of encrypted files.
- Backup Sabotage: Online backups are often deleted or encrypted, leaving victims reliant on offline copies.
- Secondary Attacks: Some attackers wait until recovery begins before launching a second wave to pressure victims into paying.
Conti’s operators prioritize high-value targets, tailoring attacks to inflict maximum financial and operational damage. Their use of dual extortion and legitimate tools makes them a persistent and evolving threat in the ransomware landscape.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2020
751
Ransomware
01 Jan 2020 • Conti LLC
Conti ransomware operation: Conti Ransomware Conspirator Pleads Guilty in $150M Scheme
Ukrainian National Pleads Guilty in Conti Ransomware Conspiracy
450
CRITICAL-301
CON1781519095
Ukrainian National Pleads Guilty in Conti Ransomware Conspiracy, Linked to $150M in Global Damages
A 44-year-old Ukrainian national, Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko, has pleaded guilty to his role in the Conti ransomware operation, one of the most destructive cybercrime campaigns in recent history. Extradited from Ireland to the U.S., Lytvynenko admitted to participating in a wire fraud conspiracy that targeted over 1,000 victims worldwide, extorting at least $150 million in ransom payments between 2020 and 2022.
The Conti group compromised networks across 47 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and 31 other countries, encrypting critical data and threatening to leak stolen information if victims refused to pay. The FBI estimates the operation caused at least $150 million in financial losses, ranking it among the most financially damaging ransomware schemes investigated by U.S. authorities.
Court documents reveal Lytvynenko joined the conspiracy in September 2021, possessing stolen data from eight U.S. and four international victims. He also assisted in developing a malware "loader," a tool used to deploy additional malicious software on compromised systems. His guilty plea provides further insight into Conti’s technical infrastructure and the roles of individual conspirators.
The case underscores growing international cooperation in cybercrime enforcement, with U.S. authorities collaborating with Irish agencies including the Garda National Cyber Crime Bureau to secure Lytvynenko’s arrest and extradition. The prosecution is part of Operation Riptide, an FBI-led initiative targeting cybercriminal networks responsible for billions in global losses. Americans reported over $20 billion in cybercrime-related damages in 2023 alone, a 26% increase from the previous year.
Lytvynenko faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison, with sentencing scheduled for September 10, 2026. The investigation, led by the FBI’s San Diego, Nashville, and El Paso field offices alongside the U.S. Secret Service, remains ongoing as authorities pursue additional suspects linked to the Conti conspiracy.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2018
751
Ransomware
01 Jan 2018 • Conti LLC
Ryuk, Rhysida, Conti and Play: SystemBC Malware Turns Windows Machines Into SOCKS5 Proxies for Ransomware Attacks
SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks
644
CRITICAL-107
BLUCONPLARYU1782822739
SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks
SystemBC, also known as Coroxy, is a long-standing Windows malware family first detected in exploit kits around 2018–2019. Initially a secondary payload, it has since evolved into a widely used commodity tool, frequently deployed alongside loaders like Buer, QBot, and Emotet. Its lightweight, modular design and dual functionality as both a SOCKS5 proxy and remote-access trojan (RAT) make it a favored component in ransomware operations, including those linked to Ryuk, Conti, Egregor, BlackBasta, Play, and Rhysida.
The malware follows a predictable infection lifecycle: after initial access, it copies itself into a randomly named file under `%ProgramData%`, establishes persistence via a registry Run key and scheduled task, and employs anti-detection measures such as skipping installation if security software like Emsisoft’s a2guard.exe is detected. Some variants use in-memory droppers to unpack secondary binaries, either injecting them into processes or executing them from disk.
SystemBC’s defining feature is its SOCKS5 proxy capability, which allows attackers to route command-and-control (C2) and exfiltration traffic through compromised hosts. Newer versions increasingly use Tor for anonymity, blending malicious traffic with legitimate enterprise flows to evade detection. Operators manage live SOCKS sessions via a control panel that supports auto-updates, authentication, and tens of thousands of simultaneous connections.
Early versions relied on encrypted beacons (RC4-encrypted host/user data) for C2 communication, while newer builds shift traffic to Tor using embedded directory-authority IPs. The malware supports a range of payloads EXE, DLL, shellcode, VBS, BAT, CMD, and PowerShell many executed in memory to avoid disk writes.
For threat actors, SystemBC is rarely the end goal but a force multiplier, enabling stealthy lateral movement and tool reuse across access-as-a-service chains. Its presence often signals broader compromise, including credential theft and further malware deployment. Defenders are advised to monitor unusual outbound SOCKS/Tor connections, suspicious scheduled tasks, and in-memory execution techniques, while network segmentation and egress filtering can limit its impact.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Conti LLC ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Conti LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Conti LLC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Conti LLC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?