Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Conti Communications » S2WCON1778855087

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (S2WCON1778855087)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-159
Company Score Before Incident658 / 1000
Company Score After Incident499 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERS2WCON1778855087
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORRansomware-as-a-Service (RaaS)
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Conti Communications's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Conti Communications Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Conti Communications breach identified under incident ID S2WCON1778855087.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Conti Communications's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/conti-communications, the number of followers: 1183, the industry type: Public Relations and Communications Services and the number of employees: 18 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 658 and after the incident was 499 with a difference of -159 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Conti Communications and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Gunra Ransomware Evolves into a Major RaaS Threat with Global Impact", has drawn attention.

Since its emergence in April 2025, Gunra ransomware has rapidly transformed from a minor Conti-based operation into a sophisticated Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) threat, expanding its reach across industries.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows and Linux, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating raaS model enables broader affiliate recruitment and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no industry or geographic restrictions, indiscriminate attacks. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating gunra ransomware payload deployed on Windows and Linux and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating linux variant exhibits modifications in execution. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create Account (T1136) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating raaS affiliate recruitment via dark web forums. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating affiliates rebrand attacks under different names and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cryptographic weaknesses in Linux implementation. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating affiliate panel includes negotiation tools. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating supports both Windows and Linux environments. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised at least 32 organizations globally. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in ransomware operations. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operates discreetly within dark web forums. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed, sells stolen data on forums. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (100%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encrypts data on Windows and Linux systems and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware payload deployment implies recovery disruption. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (50%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (60%)
Persistence
Create Account (70%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (90%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (50%)
Discovery
System Information Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (100%)
Inhibit System Recovery (60%)

Sources & References