Conti Communications A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Conti Communications
Company Information
Website:https://www.conti-communications.com
Employees number:18
Number of followers:1,183
NAICS:54182
Industry Type:Public Relations and Communications Services
Homepage:conti-communications.com
Conti Communications Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
Conti CommunicationsPublic Relations and Communications Services
Updated:
15/05/2026
15/05/2026
574/1000
Very Poor
Ca
Conti Communications Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
Conti CommunicationsPublic Relations and Communications Services
Score locked

Conti CommunicationsVery Poor
Current Score
574Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
2 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
586
JULY 2026
585
JUNE 2026
580
MAY 2026
574
APRIL 2026
572
MARCH 2026
567
FEBRUARY 2026
562
JANUARY 2026
558
DECEMBER 2025
552
NOVEMBER 2025
547
OCTOBER 2025
542
SEPTEMBER 2025
536
APRIL 2025
658
Ransomware
01 Apr 2025 • Conti Communications
Gunra and Conti: Gunra Ransomware Expands RaaS After Conti Locker Shift
Gunra Ransomware Evolves into a Major RaaS Threat with Global Impact
499
CRITICAL-159
S2WCON1778855087
Gunra Ransomware Evolves into a Major RaaS Threat with Global Impact
Since its emergence in April 2025, Gunra ransomware has rapidly transformed from a minor Conti-based operation into a sophisticated Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) threat, expanding its reach across industries. Initially targeting five South Korean companies, the group has since developed its own ransomware payload, distancing itself from its Conti origins.
By March 2026, Gunra had compromised at least 32 organizations, with a notable resurgence in attacks following its shift to a RaaS model. This transition has enabled broader affiliate recruitment, fueling a rise in incidents. While early activity suggested a possible Asian origin given consistent attack windows between 08:00 and 10:00 local time attribution remains inconclusive due to limited data.
Gunra operates discreetly within dark web forums such as RAMP, Rehub, Tierone, and Darkforums, where it recruits affiliates, sells stolen data, and promotes its RaaS program. Unlike many RaaS groups, Gunra affiliates do not publicly disclose their involvement, though shared victim data confirms collaboration. The group’s affiliate panel offers advanced features, including negotiation tools, payload deployment, and brand customization, allowing affiliates to rebrand attacks under different names complicating detection and attribution.
The ransomware supports both Windows and Linux environments, with the Linux variant exhibiting notable modifications in execution, logging, and encryption. Researchers have identified cryptographic weaknesses in the Linux implementation, which could aid defensive efforts. Notably, Gunra imposes no industry or geographic restrictions, increasing the risk of indiscriminate attacks, including those on critical sectors like healthcare.
With its flexible affiliate structure and lack of targeting constraints, Gunra represents a growing threat, capable of launching widespread campaigns under multiple identities. Organizations face heightened risks as the group continues to refine its operations and expand its influence in the cybercrime ecosystem.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
MAY 2024
749
Ransomware
01 May 2024 • Conti Communications
Conti: The economics of ransomware 3.0
Ransomware 3.0: Evolution of High-Stakes Extortion
636
CRITICAL-113
CON1778840684
Ransomware 3.0: How Cybercriminals Turned Extortion into a High-Stakes Business
Ransomware has evolved from indiscriminate, low-value attacks into a sophisticated, profit-driven enterprise. Early campaigns relied on mass phishing and opportunistic encryption, with demands rarely exceeding a few hundred dollars. However, groups like REvil and Conti shifted tactics, targeting high-value enterprises with precision escalating ransom demands from thousands to tens of millions.
Today’s ransomware, dubbed Ransomware 3.0, goes beyond encryption. The real leverage lies in multi-layered extortion: disrupting operations, exfiltrating sensitive data, and threatening regulatory exposure or customer fallout. According to Verizon’s 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report, ransomware or extortion played a role in 32% of all breaches, with organized criminal groups driving the majority of incidents.
The latest tactic triple extortion amplifies pressure by combining system encryption, data theft, and additional threats, such as DDoS attacks or public leaks. This approach leaves organizations facing not just downtime but reputational and legal risks, forcing them to weigh recovery against prolonged exposure. The shift marks a fundamental change: ransomware is no longer just a technical disruption but a calculated business model.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Conti Communications ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Conti Communications's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Conti Communications ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Conti Communications's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?