Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Conduent » PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-273
Company Score Before Incident697 / 1000
Company Score After Incident424 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORphishing, exposed Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) ports, unpatched VPN vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSEDpersonal data, financial records, intellectual...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Conduent's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Conduent Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Conduent breach identified under incident ID PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Conduent's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/conduent, the number of followers: 536543, the industry type: Business Consulting and Services and the number of employees: 37668 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 697 and after the incident was 424 with a difference of -273 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Conduent and their customers.

Fresno recently reported "Ransomware Data Breaches Surge: A Systemic Crisis Targeting U.S. Governments and Enterprises (2024–2026)", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Ransomware attacks have evolved into a dual threat: not only do they encrypt critical systems, but they also exfiltrate sensitive data, turning operational disruptions into full-scale data breaches.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting critical systems, file transfer software (Cleo) and VPN, and exposing personal data, financial records and intellectual property.

In response, while recovery efforts such as offline, immutable backups and forensic investigations continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The ransomware crisis is a systemic, nationwide threat requiring proactive monitoring, resilient backups, and incident response planning. Exfiltration is now the default tactic, making every ransomware attack a potential data breach with legal and reputational consequences, and recommending next steps like Implement dark web monitoring to detect stolen data early, Adopt the 3-2-1-1-0 backup rule for recovery resilience and Practice incident response planning with log retention (30–90 days pre-incident).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers gain entry via phishing...accounting for over 70% of intrusions, External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) ports...accounting for over 70% of intrusions, and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched VPN vulnerabilities...accounting for over 70% of intrusions. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks...encrypt critical systems. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers lurk inside networks for days or weeks, escalating privileges. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating escalating privileges...systematically copying high-value data. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat actors lurk inside networks for days or weeks and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating underfunded IT security...lacking dedicated security teams. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating escalating privileges...systematically copying high-value data. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating conducting reconnaissance...copying high-value data and Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating threat actors lurk inside networks for days or weeks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating before encrypting files, attackers steal sensitive information and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating systematically copying high-value data...personal data, financial records. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model...exploiting predictable architectures. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating before encrypting files, attackers steal sensitive information and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...stolen data on leak sites, criminal forums. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating systems are locked...demands for payment to restore access, Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational disruptions...systems locked, and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating the encryption itself is often a distraction. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
External Remote Services (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (80%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Account Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (70%)
Data Destruction (60%)