Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Conduent » CONDAVORASANASA1770645741

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CONDAVORASANASA1770645741)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCONDAVORASANASA1770645741
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED59.2 million records (confirmed), 31.2...
INCIDENT DATE14/01/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Conduent's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Conduent Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Conduent breach identified under incident ID CONDAVORASANASA1770645741.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Conduent's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/conduent, the number of followers: 536543, the industry type: Business Consulting and Services and the number of employees: 37668 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Conduent and their customers.

Conduent recently reported "Global Ransomware Attacks Surge 32% in 2025, With Manufacturing and U.S. Organizations Hit Hardest", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In 2025, global ransomware attacks reached 7,419 incidents, marking a 32% increase from 2024.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 59.2 million records (confirmed), 31.2 petabytes (Qilin), with nearly ['59.2 million (confirmed)', '15.9 million (Conduent)', '5.4 million (Episource)', '3.49 million (University of Phoenix)', '2.69 million (DaVita)', '2 million (Sanrio)', '1.9 million (Asahi Group)'] records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of ['£206 million ($276 million) in lost revenue (Co-operative Group)', '$276 million (Co-operative Group)'].

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating oracle zero-day vulnerability exploited in Clop attack on University of Phoenix, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating manufacturing sector surge suggests exploitation of remote access services, and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups like Qilin and Akira commonly use phishing for initial access. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (Qilin, Akira) typically require user execution of malicious payloads and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating common ransomware tactic for post-exploitation execution. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups maintain persistence via compromised credentials and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often installs services for persistence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating zero-day exploits (Oracle) suggest privilege escalation attempts and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised accounts used for lateral movement and privilege escalation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware payloads are typically obfuscated to evade detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often disables security tools to evade detection. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups dump credentials for lateral movement and privilege escalation and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating common tactic in ransomware attacks to access stored credentials. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups enumerate accounts for lateral movement and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware scans for high-value data prior to exfiltration. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups use RDP for lateral movement and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised credentials used for lateral movement across networks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 59.2M records compromised, 31.2 petabytes exfiltrated by Qilin and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups target shared drives for data collection. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups use HTTP/HTTPS for C2 communications and Ingress Tool Transfer (T1105) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware payloads and tools downloaded via C2 channels. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 31.2 petabytes exfiltrated by Qilin, 8.5TB by SafePay (Conduent) and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups may use cloud storage for data exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks encrypt data for financial gain, Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential data destruction if ransom demands are not met, and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often deletes backups to prevent recovery. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
External Remote Services (70%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (80%)
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (80%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (80%)
Ingress Tool Transfer (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Data Destruction (50%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)