Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency » CIS1769475575

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CIS1769475575)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident577 / 1000
Company Score After Incident573 / 1000
Company LinkView Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCIS1769475575
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORCross-Site Scripting (XSS)
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/08/2023
STATUSResolved

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency breach identified under incident ID CIS1769475575.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cisagov, the number of followers: 598835, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 1729 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 577 and after the incident was 573 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and their customers.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently reported "CISA’s Secure Software Tool Found Vulnerable to XSS Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A tool designed by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to help government agencies procure secure software was itself found to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Software Acquisition Guide: Supplier Response Web Tool.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Vulnerability patched, and began remediation that includes Fix implemented (estimated minutes to resolve), and stakeholders are being briefed through Acknowledged researcher’s report, documented as CVE, cited process improvements.

The case underscores how Resolved, teams are taking away lessons such as Even cybersecurity authorities are vulnerable to basic flaws; importance of thorough vulnerability assessments and timely patching, and recommending next steps like Improve vulnerability handling processes, ensure timely fixes for reported issues, and maintain consistency in secure software development practices.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating xSS in *Software Acquisition Guide such as Supplier Response Web Tool*. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating inject malicious JavaScript into the...Web Tool, potentially enabling...attacks on other users. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malicious JavaScript...potentially enabling defacement of the site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potentially enabling defacement of the site and Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacks on other users. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impact
Defacement (80%)
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (50%)

Sources & References