Cicada Partners
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
cicada-partners
Website:
Employees number:
4
Number of followers:
714
NAICS:
52
Industry Type:
Homepage:
cicada.partners
IP Addresses:
2
Company ID:
CIC_4374166
Scan Status:
Completed
Cicada Partners Company CyberSecurity Posture
cicada.partners
The team provides industry-leading third-party underwriting and pool management on DeFi Protocols, risk structuring, and institutional risk advisory services.
Cicada Partners A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Cicada Partners Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 650 and 699
Cicada Partners
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Cicada Partners Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Cicada Partners
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Cicada Partners Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Cicada3301
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Cicada3301 has emerged as a new RaaS operation targeting multiple companies, with a particular focus on VMware ESXi systems. By leveraging a variant of ransomware written in Rust, similar to the defunct BlackCat/ALPHV group's tools, Cicada3301 causes significant disruption to the targeted organizations. The breach involves encrypted files, primarily documents and pictures, leading to potential loss of sensitive and proprietary data. The ransomware also targets Linux systems and exhibits flexibility in operation through various configurable parameters. The impact includes potential operational downtime, financial losses due to ransom demands, and reputational damage resulting from the compromise and publication of victim data on Cicada3301's extortion portal.
Cicada Partners Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Cicada Partners
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cicada Partners in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cicada Partners in 2025.
Incident Types Cicada Partners vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cicada Partners in 2025.
Incident History — Cicada Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cicada Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Cicada Partners Company Subsidiaries
The team provides industry-leading third-party underwriting and pool management on DeFi Protocols, risk structuring, and institutional risk advisory services.
Loading...
Cicada Partners Similar Companies
Navy Federal Credit Union
Navy Federal is the world’s largest credit union, with more than 14 million members, $180 billion+ in assets and 24,000+ employees. Throughout campuses in Vienna, VA Pensacola, FL and Winchester, VA, as well as more than 360 branches, we serve the Armed Forces, Department of Defense, Veterans and th
Barclays
Barclays is a British universal bank. Our vision is to be the UK-centred leader in global finance. We are a diversified bank with comprehensive UK consumer, corporate and wealth and private banking franchises, a leading investment bank and a strong, specialist US consumer bank. Through these five di
TMF Group
We provide employee, financial and legal administration so that firms can invest and operate safely around the world. TMF Group is a single global team with over 11,000 colleagues in more than 125 offices across 87 jurisdictions, covering 92% of world GDP and 95% of FDI inflow. We bring common c
Manappuram Finance Ltd. is one of India’s largest and most trusted gold loan companies, with 4,199 branches across the length and breadth of the country. It currently has nearly Rs. 157.65 billion worth assets under management (AUM), and 20,185 employees. Promoted by Shri. V.P. Nandakumar, the curr
Lars Larsen Group
Lars Larsen Group is owned by the Brunsborg family, descendants of JYSK founder Lars Larsen. The Group owns companies within a number of business areas including furniture, interior design, restaurants and hotels, and is also an active investor in equities, funds, and real estate. The Group is to t
BBVA en México
Bienvenido a la página oficial del Banco BBVA Bancomer. Institución financiera de México desde 1932. Es una empresa filial de Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA), uno de los grupos financieros líderes en Europa y considerado entre uno de los más grandes de la Zona Euro. El Grupo trabaja por un f
LOLC Holdings PLC
A formidable global conglomerate, LOLC Holdings has strategically diversified into key economic growth sectors across financial services, leisure, agriculture and plantations, construction and real estate, manufacturing and trading, technology, research and innovation and strategic investments. The
Nomura
Nomura is a global financial services group with an integrated network spanning approximately 30 countries and regions. By connecting markets East & West, Nomura services the needs of individuals, institutions, corporates and governments through its three business divisions: Wealth Management, Inves
USAA
Since the beginning, our mission has been to provide a range of financial services to the military community and their families. Along the way, we’ve also established ourselves as a destination employer for passionate people looking to serve those who are willing to give it their all. Our mission
.png)
Cicada Partners CyberSecurity News
October 17, 2024 07:00 AM
Researchers Uncover Cicada3301 Ransomware Operations and Its Affiliate Program
Cybersecurity researchers have gleaned additional insights into a nascent ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) called Cicada3301 after...
September 05, 2024 07:00 AM
Cicada Ransomware - What You Need To Know
Cicada (also known as Cicada3301) is sophisticated ransomware written in Rust that has claimed more than 20 victims since its discovery in June 2024.
July 13, 2018 07:00 AM
5 of the most challenging puzzle quests on the internet
Here are five of the most challenging puzzles that reward winners with either a once-in-a-lifetime career opportunity or a lifetime of bragging rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Cicada Partners CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Cicada Partners
The official website of Cicada Partners is https://www.cicada.partners.
Cicada Partners’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 657, reflecting their Weak security posture.
How many security badges does Cicada Partners’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Cicada Partners have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Cicada Partners have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Cicada Partners comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Cicada Partners have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Cicada Partners comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Cicada Partners is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Cicada Partners have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Cicada Partners is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Cicada Partners
Cicada Partners operates primarily in the Financial Services industry.
Number of Employees at Cicada Partners
Cicada Partners employs approximately 4 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Cicada Partners
Cicada Partners presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Cicada Partners’s LinkedIn Followers
Cicada Partners’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 714 followers.
NAICS Classification of Cicada Partners
Cicada Partners is classified under the NAICS code 52, which corresponds to Finance and Insurance.
Cicada Partners’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Cicada Partners has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cicada-9dba.
Cicada Partners’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Cicada Partners maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cicada-partners.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Cicada Partners
As of December 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Cicada Partners has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Cicada Partners has an estimated 30,702 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Cicada Partners ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Cicada Partners ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cicada3301 RaaS Operation
Description: Cicada3301 has emerged as a new RaaS operation targeting multiple companies, with a particular focus on VMware ESXi systems. By leveraging a variant of ransomware written in Rust, similar to the defunct BlackCat/ALPHV group's tools, Cicada3301 causes significant disruption to the targeted organizations. The breach involves encrypted files, primarily documents and pictures, leading to potential loss of sensitive and proprietary data. The ransomware also targets Linux systems and exhibits flexibility in operation through various configurable parameters. The impact includes potential operational downtime, financial losses due to ransom demands, and reputational damage resulting from the compromise and publication of victim data on Cicada3301's extortion portal.
Type: Ransomware as a Service (RaaS)
Attack Vector: RansomwareVMware ESXi exploitation
Threat Actor: Cicada3301
Motivation: Financial gain, Data extortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) CIC004090624
Financial Loss: Potential financial losses due to ransom demands
Data Compromised: Documents, Pictures
Systems Affected: VMware ESXi systemsLinux systems
Downtime: Potential operational downtime
Operational Impact: Significant disruption
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Documents, Pictures and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) CIC004090624
Entity Type: Multiple companies
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) CIC004090624
Type of Data Compromised: Documents, Pictures
Sensitivity of Data: Sensitive and proprietary data
Data Exfiltration: Data published on Cicada3301's extortion portal
Data Encryption: Encrypted files
File Types Exposed: DocumentsPictures
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) CIC004090624
Ransom Demanded: Financial losses due to ransom demands
Ransomware Strain: Variant of ransomware written in Rust
Data Encryption: Encrypted files
Data Exfiltration: Data published on Cicada3301's extortion portal
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was Financial losses due to ransom demands.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cicada3301.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Potential financial losses due to ransom demands.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Documents, Pictures and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was VMware ESXi systemsLinux systems.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Documents and Pictures.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was Financial losses due to ransom demands.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Description
A vulnerability has been found in jackq XCMS up to 3fab5342cc509945a7ce1b8ec39d19f701b89261. Affected is the function Upload of the file Admin/Home/Controller/ProductImageController.class.php of the component Backend. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1 when using the PDO PostgreSQL driver with PDO::ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES enabled, an invalid character sequence (such as \x99) in a prepared statement parameter may cause the quoting function PQescapeStringConn to return NULL, leading to a null pointer dereference in pdo_parse_params() function. This may lead to crashes (segmentation fault) and affect the availability of the target server.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, a heap buffer overflow occurs in array_merge() when the total element count of packed arrays exceeds 32-bit limits or HT_MAX_SIZE, due to an integer overflow in the precomputation of element counts using zend_hash_num_elements(). This may lead to memory corruption or crashes and affect the integrity and availability of the target server.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Description
In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, the getimagesize() function may leak uninitialized heap memory into the APPn segments (e.g., APP1) when reading images in multi-chunk mode (such as via php://filter). This occurs due to a bug in php_read_stream_all_chunks() that overwrites the buffer without advancing the pointer, leaving tail bytes uninitialized. This may lead to information disclosure of sensitive heap data and affect the confidentiality of the target server.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=cicada-partners' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
