Comparison Overview

Cicada Partners

VS

Navy Federal Credit Union

Cicada Partners

None
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 650 and 699

The team provides industry-leading third-party underwriting and pool management on DeFi Protocols, risk structuring, and institutional risk advisory services.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Navy Federal Credit Union

820 Follin Lane SE, None, Vienna, VA, US, 22180
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 700 and 749

Navy Federal is the world’s largest credit union, with more than 14 million members, $180 billion+ in assets and 24,000+ employees. Throughout campuses in Vienna, VA Pensacola, FL and Winchester, VA, as well as more than 360 branches, we serve the Armed Forces, Department of Defense, Veterans and their families with world-class financial products and services. Navy Federal provides much more than a job. We provide a meaningful career experience, including a culture that is energized, engaged and committed; and fierce appreciation for our teams, who are rewarded with highly competitive pay and generous benefits and perks. Our approach to careers is simple yet powerful: Make our mission your passion. Federally insured by NCUA. Equal opportunity employer. Android™ is a trademark of Google, Inc. iPhone® is a registered trademark of Apple, Inc. iPad® is a registered trademark of Apple, Inc. App Store(SM) is a service mark of Apple, Inc. Message and data rates may apply. FORTUNE and 100 Best Companies to Work For are registered trademarks of Time Inc., and are used under license. FORTUNE and Time Inc., are not affiliated with, and do not endorse products or services of, Navy Federal Credit Union. For more info, visit navyfederal.org. Images used for representational purposes only; do not imply government endorsement. Equal Housing Lender Equal Opportunity Employer, including disability/vets

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 23,853
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cicada-partners.jpeg
Cicada Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cicada Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Navy Federal Credit Union
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cicada Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Navy Federal Credit Union has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Cicada Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cicada Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Navy Federal Credit Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navy Federal Credit Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cicada-partners.jpeg
Cicada Partners
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware, VMware ESXi exploitation
Motivation: Financial gain, Data extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navy-federal-credit-union.jpeg
Navy Federal Credit Union
Incidents

FAQ

Navy Federal Credit Union company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cicada Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cicada Partners and Navy Federal Credit Union have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Navy Federal Credit Union company has reported more cyber incidents than Cicada Partners company.

Cicada Partners company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Navy Federal Credit Union company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Navy Federal Credit Union company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cicada Partners company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Navy Federal Credit Union company nor Cicada Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cicada Partners company nor Navy Federal Credit Union company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Navy Federal Credit Union company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cicada Partners company.

Navy Federal Credit Union company employs more people globally than Cicada Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cicada Partners nor Navy Federal Credit Union holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in jackq XCMS up to 3fab5342cc509945a7ce1b8ec39d19f701b89261. Affected is the function Upload of the file Admin/Home/Controller/ProductImageController.class.php of the component Backend. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1 when using the PDO PostgreSQL driver with PDO::ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES enabled, an invalid character sequence (such as \x99) in a prepared statement parameter may cause the quoting function PQescapeStringConn to return NULL, leading to a null pointer dereference in pdo_parse_params() function. This may lead to crashes (segmentation fault) and affect the availability of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, a heap buffer overflow occurs in array_merge() when the total element count of packed arrays exceeds 32-bit limits or HT_MAX_SIZE, due to an integer overflow in the precomputation of element counts using zend_hash_num_elements(). This may lead to memory corruption or crashes and affect the integrity and availability of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, the getimagesize() function may leak uninitialized heap memory into the APPn segments (e.g., APP1) when reading images in multi-chunk mode (such as via php://filter). This occurs due to a bug in php_read_stream_all_chunks() that overwrites the buffer without advancing the pointer, leaving tail bytes uninitialized. This may lead to information disclosure of sensitive heap data and affect the confidentiality of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X