Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » CEVA Logistics » CEVPOK1787070452

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CEVPOK1787070452)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-35
Company Score Before Incident698 / 1000
Company Score After Incident663 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCEVPOK1787070452
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-Party Supply Chain Attack
DATA EXPOSEDCustomer order details (names, email...
INCIDENT DATE29/07/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of CEVA Logistics's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts CEVA Logistics Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the CEVA Logistics breach identified under incident ID CEVPOK1787070452.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of CEVA Logistics's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ceva-logistics, the number of followers: 2076851, the industry type: Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage and the number of employees: 69342 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 698 and after the incident was 663 with a difference of -35 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on CEVA Logistics and their customers.

On 30 July 2024, Pokémon Center disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Pokémon Center Customer Data Exposed in Third-Party Breach via CEVA Logistics".

The Pokémon Center, the official retailer for Pokémon merchandise, confirmed a data breach stemming from a cyberattack on its logistics partner, CEVA Logistics.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting CEVA Logistics systems (third-party logistics partner), and exposing Customer order details (names, email addresses, phone numbers, physical addresses).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores the growing risk of third-party supply chain attacks, where vulnerabilities in partner networks can expose sensitive customer data.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data breach stemming from a cyberattack on its logistics partner, CEVA Logistics and Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party supply chain attacks, where vulnerabilities in partner networks can expose sensitive customer data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no direct evidence, but third-party compromise may involve stolen credentials or tokens. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed customer order details including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach...exposed customer order details for orders shipped to the United Kingdom and Germany. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach disrupted operations, leading to delivery delays and cancellations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (60%)

Sources & References