Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Celerium » CEL1765188344

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CEL1765188344)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-287
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident463 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCEL1765188344
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDYes
INCIDENT DATE07/12/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Celerium's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Celerium Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Celerium breach identified under incident ID CEL1765188344.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Celerium's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/celeriumdefense, the number of followers: 1444, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 39 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 463 with a difference of -287 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Celerium and their customers.

Change Healthcare recently reported "Change Healthcare Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Change Healthcare, a US-based technology company, suffered a ransomware attack that caused a data breach affecting 190 million US citizens.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Yes, with nearly 190 million records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Implement Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions for real-time discovery and classification of sensitive data, automate risk assessments, detect anomalous data movements, and enforce security policies dynamically.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating weak security policies leading to breaches and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating likely exploitation of weak security policies. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack causing operational and financial disruptions and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating not explicitly mentioned, but ransomware often includes defacement. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 190 million US citizens and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating lack of data security measures in multi-cloud environments. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating weak security policies leading to breaches and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating likely exploitation due to weak security policies. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lack of real-time discovery and classification of sensitive data and Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating anomalous data movements not detected dynamically. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.