ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Carbonite provides a robust Data Protection Platform for businesses, including backup, disaster recovery, high availability and workload migration technology. The Carbonite Data Protection Platform supports any size business, in locations around the world with secure and scalable global cloud infrastructure. To learn more visit www.Carbonite.com.

Carbonite A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Carbonite

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

carbonite

Employees number:

226

Number of followers:

22,077

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

carbonite.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

CAR_2769997

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreCarbonite Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carbonite.jpeg
Carbonite Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreCarbonite Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carbonite.jpeg
Carbonite Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Carbonite Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
CarboniteBreach60406/2016
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

OpenText (Indian Enterprises - Survey Context)Ransomware100511/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Over half of Indian enterprises surveyed by OpenText faced **ransomware attacks** in the past year, with **71% reporting AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts**, marking India as a highly targeted region. **70% of affected organizations paid ransoms** to regain data access—one of the highest global rates—yet only **12% fully recovered encrypted/stolen data**, exposing a critical gap between perceived resilience and actual recovery capabilities. Attacks increasingly exploited **third-party vendors or supply chains**, with **63% of organizations impacted by breaches via managed service providers**. Despite proactive measures like **cloud security (68%), network protection (60%), and backup technologies (58%)**, heavy reliance on external ecosystems amplified cascading risks. The financial and operational strain was compounded by **AI-enabled threats (deepfakes, voice/video spoofing)**, with **95% of firms allowing generative AI tools** but only **50% having formal AI governance policies**. Ransomware is now a **board-level priority (84% of execs rank it a top-3 risk)**, yet recovery tests (76% conduct multi-annual drills) and employee training (80% participation) have not prevented persistent data loss and operational disruption.

Carbonite
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 4
Seen: 06/2016
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

OpenText (Indian Enterprises - Survey Context)
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 11/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: Over half of Indian enterprises surveyed by OpenText faced **ransomware attacks** in the past year, with **71% reporting AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts**, marking India as a highly targeted region. **70% of affected organizations paid ransoms** to regain data access—one of the highest global rates—yet only **12% fully recovered encrypted/stolen data**, exposing a critical gap between perceived resilience and actual recovery capabilities. Attacks increasingly exploited **third-party vendors or supply chains**, with **63% of organizations impacted by breaches via managed service providers**. Despite proactive measures like **cloud security (68%), network protection (60%), and backup technologies (58%)**, heavy reliance on external ecosystems amplified cascading risks. The financial and operational strain was compounded by **AI-enabled threats (deepfakes, voice/video spoofing)**, with **95% of firms allowing generative AI tools** but only **50% having formal AI governance policies**. Ransomware is now a **board-level priority (84% of execs rank it a top-3 risk)**, yet recovery tests (76% conduct multi-annual drills) and employee training (80% participation) have not prevented persistent data loss and operational disruption.

Ailogo

Carbonite Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Carbonite

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carbonite in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carbonite in 2025.

Incident Types Carbonite vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carbonite in 2025.

Incident History — Carbonite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carbonite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Carbonite Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Carbonite provides a robust Data Protection Platform for businesses, including backup, disaster recovery, high availability and workload migration technology. The Carbonite Data Protection Platform supports any size business, in locations around the world with secure and scalable global cloud infrastructure. To learn more visit www.Carbonite.com.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Carbonite Similar Companies

Lazada

About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and payments networks in the regio

Synopsys Inc

Catalyzing the era of pervasive intelligence, Synopsys delivers trusted and comprehensive silicon to systems design solutions, from electronic design automation to silicon IP and system verification and validation. We partner closely with semiconductor and systems customers across a wide range of

Rakuten

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion m

VMware by Broadcom delivers software that unifies and streamlines hybrid cloud environments for the world’s most complex organizations. By combining public-cloud scale and agility with private-cloud security and performance, we empower our customers to modernize, optimize and protect their apps an

Alibaba Group

🌍Alibaba Group is on a mission to make it easy to do business anywhere! Guided by our passion and imagination, we’re leading the way in AI, cloud computing and e-commerce. We aim to build the future infrastructure of commerce, and we aspire to be a good company that lasts for 102 years.

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not h

Google

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we c

At Agoda, we bridge the world through travel. We aim to make it easy and rewarding for more travelers to explore and experience the amazing world we live in. We do so by enabling more people to see the world for less – with our best-value deals across our 4,700,000+ hotels and holiday properties, 13

About KPIT KPIT is reimagining the future of mobility, forging ahead with group companies and partners to shape a world that is cleaner, smarter, and safer. With over 25 years of specialized expertise in Mobility, KPIT is accelerating the transformation towards Software and AI-Defined Vehicles thr

newsone

Carbonite CyberSecurity News

February 27, 2025 08:00 AM
List of 60+ publicly traded cybersecurity companies we follow

Click ticker symbols for real-time stock quotes & charts, financial news, and company comparisons from Yahoo! Finance.

December 05, 2024 08:00 AM
OpenText To Add ‘Missing’ Piece To Cybersecurity Platform With MDR Debut

OpenText plans to round out its comprehensive cybersecurity platform with the Dec. 9 debut of managed detection and response (MDR), based on...

June 21, 2024 07:00 AM
Driving future expansion: Turtlemint’s strategic use of emerging technologies

Prajakt Deolasee, Chief Technology Officer, Turtlemint, highlights that embedded insurance has revolutionised his company's approach to...

June 20, 2024 07:00 AM
OpenText Cybersecurity launches Carbonite Cloud-to-Cloud Backup

OpenText Cybersecurity has introduced Carbonite Cloud-to-Cloud Backup in India. This would enable organisations to protect business-critical data stored on...

May 23, 2024 07:00 AM
Mohamad Ali promoted to SVP of IBM Consulting

IBM on Wednesday announced the appointment of Mohamad Ali as senior vice president of its consulting business, effective July 1.

April 01, 2024 09:43 PM
33 Cloud Computing Examples That Keep the World at Our Fingertips

Cloud computing refers to when computing services and storage are accessed over the internet instead of through hardware like a USB drive or disk.

March 28, 2024 12:28 PM
Carbonite promo codes for November 2025 | 10% OFF

Use one of 7 Carbonite Promo Codes to lower the price of personal and professional cloud storage plans.

March 25, 2024 09:39 AM
Carbonite to Buy Webroot, Beef Up Data Protection Chops

Carbonite, the cloud-based data protection provider, said Thursday that it plans to acquire cybersecurity provider Webroot for nearly $619 million.

August 22, 2023 07:00 AM
Connect with OpenText at Google Cloud Next 2023

Connect with OpenText at Google Cloud Next, August 29-32 in San Francisco and discover the latest OpenText and Google Cloud partner...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Carbonite CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Carbonite

The official website of Carbonite is http://www.carbonite.com.

Carbonite’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 746, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Carbonite’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Carbonite have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Carbonite have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Carbonite comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Carbonite have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Carbonite comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Carbonite is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Carbonite have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Carbonite is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Carbonite

Carbonite operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at Carbonite

Carbonite employs approximately 226 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Carbonite

Carbonite presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Carbonite’s LinkedIn Followers

Carbonite’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 22,077 followers.

NAICS Classification of Carbonite

Carbonite is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Carbonite’s Presence on Crunchbase

Yes, Carbonite has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/carbonite.

Carbonite’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Carbonite maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/carbonite.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Carbonite

As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Carbonite has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Carbonite has an estimated 26,613 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Carbonite ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.

How does Carbonite detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with forced password reset, and communication strategy with customer notification, and and third party assistance with managed service providers (83% of organizations), third party assistance with cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), and remediation measures with cloud security enhancements (68% priority), remediation measures with network protection (60% priority), remediation measures with backup technologies (58% priority), and recovery measures with ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year), recovery measures with security awareness training (80% conduct regularly)..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack

Title: Password Reuse Attack on Carbonite

Description: Carbonite, a provider of online computer and server backup services, suffered a password reuse attack in which some users’ credentials, obtained elsewhere, were used to obtain user data. The company notified its more than 1.5 million individual and small business customers and forced them to password reset. The attack was a result of a third-party attacker using compromised email addresses and passwords obtained from other companies that were previously attacked.

Type: Password Reuse Attack

Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials

Vulnerability Exploited: Password Reuse

Threat Actor: Third-party attacker

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : ransomware

Title: Ransomware and AI-Driven Cyber Threats Targeting Indian Enterprises (2023-2024)

Description: OpenText's fourth annual Global Ransomware Survey reveals that over 50% of Indian enterprises faced ransomware attacks in the past year, with 71% reporting a surge in AI-driven phishing or deepfake attempts. Nearly 70% of affected organizations paid ransoms, yet only 12% fully recovered encrypted or stolen data. The report highlights gaps in AI governance, third-party risks, and the escalating complexity of attacks, including supply chain breaches. Indian organizations are prioritizing cloud security, network protection, and backup technologies for 2026, with 84% of executive teams now treating ransomware as a top-three business risk.

Type: ransomware

Attack Vector: AI-driven phishingdeepfake (voice/video spoofing)third-party service providerssoftware supply chain

Vulnerability Exploited: insufficient AI governancethird-party ecosystem dependencieslack of formal AI-use/data privacy policies

Motivation: financial gain (ransom payments)data theftdisruption of operations

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through third-party service providerssoftware supply chainAI-driven phishing/deepfake attacks.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Data Compromised: User Data

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Downtime: True

Identity Theft Risk: True

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are User Credentials, Personally Identifiable Information (Likely), Corporate Data, Financial Data (Possible) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Entity Name: Carbonite

Entity Type: Service Provider

Industry: Technology

Size: More than 1.5 million customers

Customers Affected: 1.5 million

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Entity Name: Indian Enterprises (Survey Respondents)

Entity Type: private sector, public sector (if applicable)

Industry: technology, financial services, manufacturing, others (unspecified)

Location: India

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Containment Measures: Forced password reset

Communication Strategy: Customer notification

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Incident Response Plan Activated: True

Third Party Assistance: Managed Service Providers (83% Of Organizations), Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers (91%).

Remediation Measures: cloud security enhancements (68% priority)network protection (60% priority)backup technologies (58% priority)

Recovery Measures: ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year)security awareness training (80% conduct regularly)

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through managed service providers (83% of organizations), cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Type of Data Compromised: User Credentials

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (likely), Corporate data, Financial data (possible)

Sensitivity of Data: high (includes potential PII and corporate secrets)

Data Encryption: True

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: cloud security enhancements (68% priority), network protection (60% priority), backup technologies (58% priority), .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by forced password reset.

Ransomware Information

Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Ransom Paid: 70% of affected organizations

Data Encryption: True

Data Exfiltration: True

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through ransomware recovery plan testing (76% test multiple times/year), security awareness training (80% conduct regularly), .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Lessons Learned: AI adoption outpaces governance: 95% allow generative AI tools, but only ~50% have formal AI-use/data privacy policies., Third-party risks are critical: 66% of organizations impacted by vendor/managed services breaches in the past year., Recovery confidence is misplaced: 98.6% express confidence in recovery, but only 12% fully recover data post-attack., Board-level engagement is rising: 84% of Indian executives now rank ransomware as a top-three business risk (vs. 71% globally)., Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Recommendations: Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse)., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are AI adoption outpaces governance: 95% allow generative AI tools, but only ~50% have formal AI-use/data privacy policies.,Third-party risks are critical: 66% of organizations impacted by vendor/managed services breaches in the past year.,Recovery confidence is misplaced: 98.6% express confidence in recovery, but only 12% fully recover data post-attack.,Board-level engagement is rising: 84% of Indian executives now rank ransomware as a top-three business risk (vs. 71% globally).,Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Source: OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual)

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Source: ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual), and Source: ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Investigation Status: Survey-based findings (no specific incident investigation detailed)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Customer notification.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Stakeholder Advisories: Board-Level Engagement: 84% Of Indian Executives Treat Ransomware As A Top-Three Business Risk., Third-Party Advisories: 91% Conduct Formal Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers..

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Board-Level Engagement: 84% Of Indian Executives Treat Ransomware As A Top-Three Business Risk. and Third-Party Advisories: 91% Conduct Formal Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers..

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Entry Point: Third-Party Service Providers, Software Supply Chain, Ai-Driven Phishing/Deepfake Attacks,

High Value Targets: Corporate Data, Financial Systems, Customer Pii,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Corporate Data, Financial Systems, Customer Pii,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Password Reuse Attack CAR1914123

Root Causes: Password Reuse

Corrective Actions: Forced password reset

Incident : ransomware OPE0062100110625

Root Causes: Rapid Ai Adoption Without Commensurate Governance (E.G., Lack Of Formal Ai-Use Policies)., Over-Reliance On Third-Party Ecosystems With Inadequate Security Oversight., Insufficient Testing Of Ransomware Recovery Plans (Gap Between Confidence And Actual Recovery Rates)., Expanding Attack Surface Due To Hybrid/Ai-Powered Environments.,

Corrective Actions: Accelerate Implementation Of Ai Governance Frameworks And Data Privacy Policies., Enhance Third-Party Risk Management Programs, Including Continuous Monitoring Of Suppliers., Increase Frequency And Rigor Of Ransomware Recovery Simulations., Invest In Advanced Threat Detection For Ai-Driven Attacks (E.G., Deepfake Identification Tools)., Promote Cross-Industry Collaboration To Address Systemic Vulnerabilities In Supply Chains.,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Managed Service Providers (83% Of Organizations), Cybersecurity Assessments Of Software Suppliers (91%), .

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Forced password reset, Accelerate Implementation Of Ai Governance Frameworks And Data Privacy Policies., Enhance Third-Party Risk Management Programs, Including Continuous Monitoring Of Suppliers., Increase Frequency And Rigor Of Ransomware Recovery Simulations., Invest In Advanced Threat Detection For Ai-Driven Attacks (E.G., Deepfake Identification Tools)., Promote Cross-Industry Collaboration To Address Systemic Vulnerabilities In Supply Chains., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Has the company ever paid ransoms ?

Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Third-party attacker.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were User Data and .

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was managed service providers (83% of organizations), cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers (91%), .

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Forced password reset.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was User Data.

Ransomware Information

What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was 70% of affected organizations.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Collaboration is key: Effectiveness depends on shared responsibility across organizations, partners, and technology providers.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance ransomware recovery testing frequency and realism to close the gap between perceived and actual resilience., Strengthen third-party risk management, including rigorous cybersecurity assessments of suppliers and managed service providers., Implement formal AI governance frameworks to align productivity gains with security/privacy risks., Prioritize investments in cloud security, network protection, and immutable backup solutions., Expand security awareness training to include AI-specific threats (e.g., deepfakes, generative AI misuse). and Foster cross-ecosystem collaboration to address cascading risks in supply chains and shared infrastructure..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are OpenText Global Ransomware Survey (4th Annual) and ETCISO Article on OpenText Survey Findings.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Survey-based findings (no specific incident investigation detailed).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Board-level engagement: 84% of Indian executives treat ransomware as a top-three business risk., Third-party advisories: 91% conduct formal cybersecurity assessments of software suppliers., .

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Password Reuse, Rapid AI adoption without commensurate governance (e.g., lack of formal AI-use policies).Over-reliance on third-party ecosystems with inadequate security oversight.Insufficient testing of ransomware recovery plans (gap between confidence and actual recovery rates).Expanding attack surface due to hybrid/AI-powered environments..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Forced password reset, Accelerate implementation of AI governance frameworks and data privacy policies.Enhance third-party risk management programs, including continuous monitoring of suppliers.Increase frequency and rigor of ransomware recovery simulations.Invest in advanced threat detection for AI-driven attacks (e.g., deepfake identification tools).Promote cross-industry collaboration to address systemic vulnerabilities in supply chains..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=carbonite' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge