Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Capcom » PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-101
Company Score Before Incident766 / 1000
Company Score After Incident665 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORphishing, exposed Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) ports, unpatched VPN vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSEDpersonal data, financial records, intellectual...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Capcom's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Capcom Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Capcom breach identified under incident ID PINCOICONARACAPLINTHETHE1781023070.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Capcom's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/capcom, the number of followers: 120008, the industry type: Computer Games and the number of employees: 1210 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 665 with a difference of -101 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Capcom and their customers.

Fresno recently reported "Ransomware Data Breaches Surge: A Systemic Crisis Targeting U.S. Governments and Enterprises (2024–2026)", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Ransomware attacks have evolved into a dual threat: not only do they encrypt critical systems, but they also exfiltrate sensitive data, turning operational disruptions into full-scale data breaches.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting critical systems, file transfer software (Cleo) and VPN, and exposing personal data, financial records and intellectual property.

In response, while recovery efforts such as offline, immutable backups and forensic investigations continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The ransomware crisis is a systemic, nationwide threat requiring proactive monitoring, resilient backups, and incident response planning. Exfiltration is now the default tactic, making every ransomware attack a potential data breach with legal and reputational consequences, and recommending next steps like Implement dark web monitoring to detect stolen data early, Adopt the 3-2-1-1-0 backup rule for recovery resilience and Practice incident response planning with log retention (30–90 days pre-incident).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers gain entry via phishing...accounting for over 70% of intrusions, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) ports, or unpatched VPN vulnerabilities, and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched VPN vulnerabilities tactics that account for over 70% of intrusions. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating phishing...accounting for over 70% of intrusions (implies malicious file execution). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed RDP ports...longer dwell times, slower detection. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating escalating privileges...systematically copying high-value data and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched software...flat network architectures. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating threat actors lurk inside networks for days or weeks...escalating privileges and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups like LockBit, BlackCat/ALPHV (implies obfuscation). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating escalating privileges...systematically copying high-value data and Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating phishing...exposed RDP ports (implies credential interception). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating conducting reconnaissance...systematically copying high-value data and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating high-value data...personal data, financial records, intellectual property. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate sensitive data...personal data, financial records, intellectual property and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating flat network architectures...high-value data copied. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating raaS model...longer dwell times, slower detection and Proxy (T1090) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating raaS affiliates...exploiting predictable architectures. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate sensitive data...before encrypting files and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting millions...public leaks. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating systems are locked...double-extortion model, Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating public leaks...brand reputation impact, and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating encryption itself is often a distraction (implies potential destruction). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
External Remote Services (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Persistence
External Remote Services (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Adversary-in-the-Middle (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (80%)
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Proxy (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement (60%)
Data Destruction (50%)