Comparison Overview
Barrington James Talent Acquisition

Barrington James Talent Acquisition
2nd Floor, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham RH12 1RL, Horsham, RH10 1WW, GB
Last Update: 03/04/2026
We are a highly successful, global, industry-leading provider of Life Science Recruitment services. Over the past three years, our company has more than doubled in size, reflecting our strong commitment to delivering exceptional results for our clients and candidates....

Gi Group
Piazza IV Novembre, 5, Milan, MI, IT
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Welcome to Gi Group! Your job, Our work! Gi Group is one of the world’s leading companies providing a full range of HR Services. We offer Temporary, Permanent and Professional Staffing Services, Search & Selection and Executive Search as well as Outsourcing, Training,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Barrington James Talent Acquisition







Gi Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Barrington James Talent Acquisition in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gi Group in 2026.
Incident History - Barrington James Talent Acquisition (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Barrington James Talent Acquisition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gi Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gi Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Barrington James Talent Acquisition

Gi Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.