ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Championing positive paths forward that nations, economies, and societies can pursue to ensure new technologies and data empower people, prosperity, and peace. #GoodTechChoices

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

ACGC

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

atlantic-council-geotech-center

Employees number:

15

Number of followers:

1,099

NAICS:

54172

Industry Type:

Think Tanks

Homepage:

atlanticcouncil.org

IP Addresses:

18

Company ID:

ATL_6958781

Scan Status:

Completed

AI scoreACGC Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlantic-council-geotech-center.jpeg
ACGC Think Tanks
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreACGC Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlantic-council-geotech-center.jpeg
ACGC Think Tanks
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

ACGC Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Intellexa ConsortiumCyber Attack10059/2024
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Intellexa Consortium, notorious for its Predator spyware, faced US sanctions for targeting Americans, including government officials, journalists, and policy experts. With robust data-stealing and surveillance capabilities, Predator can compromise devices through sophisticated zero-click attacks. Despite sanctions causing operational decline, Recorded Future reports a resurgence leveraging new infrastructure, making tracking challenging. Increase in stealth and complexity signifies a continued threat to high-profile individuals globally, raising privacy, security, and ethical concerns. The renewed use of Predator could lead to significant repercussions for victims, compromising personal, financial, and strategic information.

Intellexa Consortium
Cyber Attack
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 9/2024
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: The Intellexa Consortium, notorious for its Predator spyware, faced US sanctions for targeting Americans, including government officials, journalists, and policy experts. With robust data-stealing and surveillance capabilities, Predator can compromise devices through sophisticated zero-click attacks. Despite sanctions causing operational decline, Recorded Future reports a resurgence leveraging new infrastructure, making tracking challenging. Increase in stealth and complexity signifies a continued threat to high-profile individuals globally, raising privacy, security, and ethical concerns. The renewed use of Predator could lead to significant repercussions for victims, compromising personal, financial, and strategic information.

Ailogo

ACGC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for ACGC

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Council GeoTech Center in 2025.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Council GeoTech Center in 2025.

Incident Types ACGC vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Council GeoTech Center in 2025.

Incident History — ACGC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACGC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

ACGC Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Championing positive paths forward that nations, economies, and societies can pursue to ensure new technologies and data empower people, prosperity, and peace. #GoodTechChoices

Loading...
similarCompanies

ACGC Similar Companies

thinkspace

thinkspace is a community of passionate entrepreneurs, tech startups, and small businesses with a natural affinity for inspiration and innovation. thinkspace provides: • private offices in both Seattle and Redmond • shared coworking space in Seattle • virtual office service in Seattle and Redm

The Opportunity Institute

The Opportunity Institute is a nonprofit organization that promotes social mobility and equity by improving outcomes from early childhood through early career. We focus on education, which plays a critical role in opening opportunities, and the related social policies that make true opportunity poss

Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)

The Center for the Study of Global Economic Futures (CSGEF) was established in Dubai, UAE in 2021, is a multidisciplinary policy research organization to scrutinize the socioeconomic and systemic forces that bear upon the future of the worldwide financial system. The aim is to offer an extraordinary

WIRED Live

WIRED Live brings to life the compelling stories of innovation changing the way we live, as covered in WIRED magazine. The one-day conference is designed for curious minds looking to discover the future and to meet those who are driving change and layers compelling storytelling with visual stimulati

The Paul Douglas Institute

The Paul Douglas Institute is a nonpartisan student-run public policy think tank. Founded and based at the University of Chicago, we empower students to independently influence public policy. We produce evidence-driven social science research that is rigorous, practical, and innovative. To ensure o

Mission Energy Foundation

'You're building the future. Please build the one you want to live in." – A CLEAN WORLD with CLEAN ENERGY... Throughout the last 14 years Mission Energy Foundation have delivered successful platforms of knowledge dissemination on various subjects like Gasification, Waste-to-Energy, Fly Ash Utilizat

newsone

ACGC CyberSecurity News

December 15, 2025 02:23 PM
From simulation to strategy: How Cyber 9/12 prepares students for real-world cyber crises

On October 10-11, 2025, the Cyber Statecraft Initiative and Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs and Digital and...

December 08, 2025 03:37 PM
Ukraine’s wartime experience provides blueprint for infrastructure protection

When cyberattacks and missile strikes converge on the same targets, infrastructure resilience becomes more than a technical mandate;...

November 06, 2025 08:00 AM
Learning the lessons from Ukraine’s fight against Russian cyber warfare

The ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine is among the most technologically advanced wars the world has ever seen.

October 31, 2025 04:24 PM
Success after service: Careers in tech and cybersecurity for veterans

Experts explore the different pathways from the armed services to a career in tech and cybersecurity.

October 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyber policy in action: A glimpse into the 2025 DC Cyber 9/12 Strategy Challenge

On March 13–14, 2025, the Atlantic Council's Cyber Statecraft Initiative hosted its flagship Cyber 9/12 Strategy Challenge in Washington,...

September 30, 2025 07:00 AM
404 Accountability not found: Spyware accountability through software liability

This report proposes a legislative safe harbor framework that would incentivize technology companies to engage in spyware accountability.

September 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Global perspectives on AI and digital trust ahead of the Swiss e-ID referendum

On September 28, Switzerland will vote in a national referendum on the introduction of a state-recognized electronic proof of identification...

September 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Securing data in the AI supply chain

Underpinning AI technologies is a complex supply chain—organizations, people, activities, information, and resources that enable AI research...

August 15, 2025 09:24 PM
Building cybersecurity capacity in Sub-Saharan Africa

On Tuesday, September 9, at 8:30 a.m. ET, the Atlantic Council's Cyber Statecraft Initiative and the University of Cape Town Cybersecurity Capacity Center...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

ACGC CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

The official website of Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/programs/geotech-center/.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 739, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Atlantic Council GeoTech Center have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center operates primarily in the Think Tanks industry.

Number of Employees at Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center employs approximately 15 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s LinkedIn Followers

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,099 followers.

NAICS Classification of Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center is classified under the NAICS code 54172, which corresponds to Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlantic-council-geotech-center.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Atlantic Council GeoTech Center

As of December 18, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Atlantic Council GeoTech Center has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Atlantic Council GeoTech Center has an estimated 867 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Atlantic Council GeoTech Center ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Spyware

Title: Intellexa Consortium Predator Spyware Incident

Description: The Intellexa Consortium faced US sanctions for targeting Americans, including government officials, journalists, and policy experts, with their Predator spyware. Predator spyware has robust data-stealing and surveillance capabilities, compromising devices through sophisticated zero-click attacks. Despite operational decline due to sanctions, there has been a resurgence leveraging new infrastructure, making tracking challenging. The increase in stealth and complexity signifies a continued threat to high-profile individuals globally, raising privacy, security, and ethical concerns. The renewed use of Predator could lead to significant repercussions for victims, compromising personal, financial, and strategic information.

Type: Spyware

Attack Vector: Zero-click attacks

Threat Actor: Intellexa Consortium

Motivation: SurveillanceData-stealing

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information, Strategic information

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Financial Information, Strategic Information and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

Entity Name: Intellexa Consortium

Entity Type: Organization

Industry: Cybersecurity

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Financial information, Strategic information

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

Regulations Violated: US sanctions,

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

Source: Recorded Future

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Recorded Future.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Spyware ATL000091024

High Value Targets: Government Officials, Journalists, Policy Experts,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Government Officials, Journalists, Policy Experts,

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Intellexa Consortium.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal information, Financial information, Strategic information and .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal information, Financial information and Strategic information.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Recorded Future.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=atlantic-council-geotech-center' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge